http://rinf.com/alt-news/911-truth/brian-haw-911-was-an-inside-job/1655/
From this much longer monologue from Brian
http://rinf.com/alt-news/911-truth/brian-haw-041107/1665/
In which Brian convincingly cuts up the whole charade
Despite the traffic noise
Comments
Hide the following 6 comments
Hi Brian...
07.11.2007 04:35
..oh and by the way, don't take the 'bible' as some sort of set in stone (sick) sacred artifact - the (real christian) Nostic teachings were removed/edited/not included by the Church of Rome ritual abusers.
Othwerwise you'll just end up putting a cap on your consciousness...oh but, yes, I know, you're a famous saint of a protestor, and therefore anything I say will be ignored/dissed out. Whatever - just thought I'd let you know that the only people you are killing yourself for are the ritual child abusers, so in other words mate, start looking after yourself please.
Thanks you,
Blessings.
King Amdo
Finally!
07.11.2007 04:59
Solice
if it's wifi there
07.11.2007 14:11
well
"blessings" >>AMDO
07.11.2007 15:04
People are just getting on with their lives and doing what THEY WANT to do with them.
Why the constant obsession with other peoples lives/ campaigns etc amdo?
Do you ever get out and just get on with living and doing what you personally feel may benefit the world around you? Or are your postings on the internet the extent of this?
Try living YOUR dreams and please don't keep publicly pulling others apart for living their's.
Thanks
X-Traveller
RINF: A Disinformation Website?
12.11.2007 19:31
Just solid facts...!
"Only information that will stand up in a court of law is presented on the RINF newswire. No speculation, no rumours, no theories. Just solid facts."
However the site runs stories like:
9/11 Truth - We’ve got the BBC on the run
http://rinf.com/alt-news/911-truth/911-truth-we%e2%80%99ve-got-the-bbc-on-the-run/1706/
Which contains such gems as:
"Prof Jim Fetzer states the BBC team recorded many hours with him yet showed next to nothing of what he explained were the key science issues of the truth movement & the key evidence – why – what has the BBC got to hide – perhaps the FACTS???"
"PS: Why was Prof Judy Wood not asked to explain the 911 physics?"
If you don't know who Judy Wood is then watch this: http://video.google.com/googleplayer.swf?docId=-558096240694803017
And this is supposed to fit in with the text they have on every page which is reproduced above?!
If you want to know more on Judy Wood and Jim Fetzer, then you could start with these resources:
http://journalof911studies.com/volume/200702/Implausibility-Directed-Energy-Beam-Demolish-WTC-by-Gregory-Jenkins.pdf
http://journalof911studies.com/letters/b/scientific-critique-of-judy-woods-paper-star-wars-beam-weapons-by-james-gourley.pdf
http://journalof911studies.com/letters/Szamboti_The_Damage_to_WTC_Bldg._s_3_and_6__and_the_debate_between_the_controlled_demolition_and_beam_weapon_theories.pdf
http://journalof911studies.com/letters/b/interview-judy-wood-at-national-press-club-regarding-the-use-of-directed-energy-beam-in-the-demolition-of-the-wtc-by-dr-gregory-jenkins.pdf
http://www.911blogger.com/node/8294
http://www.911blogger.com/node/8110
http://www.911blogger.com/node/6531
Chris
Homepage: http://truthaction.org/
Saving stuff from the memory hole...
13.11.2007 11:50
911Blogger.com: 9/11 Truth - We’ve got the BBC on the run
RNIF.com: Was the WTC demolition to cover up Nuclear Reactor explosion damage
The two attached screen shots are from article that were deleted yesterday since they made RNIF look bad, one was at this address: http://www.911blogger.com/node/12482 and the other was at this address: http://rinf.com/alt-news/911-truth/was-the-wtc-demolition-to-cover-up-nuclear-reactor-explosion-damage/1479/
Chris