Just thought it is items like this that possibly IMC should be discussing in Manchester as these developments have major effects on quality of life as well as environmental issues.
Skip Navigation | HOME | UK Indymedia | Editorial Guidelines | Mission Statement | About Us | Contact | Help | Support Us
Jay | 23.07.2004 14:15
Jay
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
COP15 Climate Summit 2009
G20 London Summit
Guantánamo
Indymedia Server Seizure
University Occupations for Gaza
2008 Days Of Action For Autonomous Spaces
Campaign against Carmel-Agrexco
Climate Camp 2008
G8 Japan 2008
SHAC
Smash EDO
Stop Sequani Animal Testing
Stop the BNP's Red White and Blue festival
April 2006 No Borders Days of Action
Art and Activism Caravan 2006
Climate Camp 2006
Faslane
French CPE uprising 2006
G8 Russia 2006
Lebanon War 2006
March 18 Anti War Protest
Mayday 2006
Oaxaca Uprising
Refugee Week 2006
Rossport Solidarity
SOCPA
Transnational Day of Action Against Migration Controls
WSF 2006
Bush 2003
DSEi 2003
Evian G8
May Day 2003
No War F15
Saloniki Prisoner Support
Thessaloniki EU
WSIS 2003
Networking Newsletter also have a comprehensive list of local events.
Networking Newletter
Manchester IMC keep this caledar of events
which you can add to yourself.
Manc IMC Event calendar
www.indymedia.org
Projects
print
radio
satellite tv
video
Africa
Europe
antwerpen
armenia
athens
austria
barcelona
belarus
belgium
belgrade
brussels
bulgaria
calabria
croatia
cyprus
emilia-romagna
estrecho / madiaq
galiza
germany
grenoble
hungary
ireland
istanbul
italy
la plana
liege
liguria
lille
linksunten
lombardia
madrid
malta
marseille
nantes
napoli
netherlands
northern england
nottingham imc
paris/île-de-france
patras
piemonte
poland
portugal
roma
romania
russia
sardegna
scotland
sverige
switzerland
torun
toscana
ukraine
united kingdom
valencia
Latin America
argentina
bolivia
chiapas
chile
chile sur
cmi brasil
cmi sucre
colombia
ecuador
mexico
peru
puerto rico
qollasuyu
rosario
santiago
tijuana
uruguay
valparaiso
venezuela
Oceania
aotearoa
brisbane
burma
darwin
jakarta
manila
melbourne
perth
qc
sydney
South Asia
india
United States
arizona
arkansas
asheville
atlanta
Austin
binghamton
boston
buffalo
chicago
cleveland
colorado
columbus
dc
hawaii
houston
hudson mohawk
kansas city
la
madison
maine
miami
michigan
milwaukee
minneapolis/st. paul
new hampshire
new jersey
new mexico
new orleans
north carolina
north texas
nyc
oklahoma
philadelphia
pittsburgh
portland
richmond
rochester
rogue valley
saint louis
san diego
san francisco
san francisco bay area
santa barbara
santa cruz, ca
sarasota
seattle
tampa bay
united states
urbana-champaign
vermont
western mass
worcester
West Asia
Armenia
Beirut
Israel
Palestine
Topics
biotech
Process
fbi/legal updates
mailing lists
process & imc docs
tech
Comments
Hide the following 6 comments
Not good
23.07.2004 19:16
I saw this report today and think it's really bad news for the area. Metrolink into the city would be wonderful step in the right direction, as you say getting people out of their cars. People will go to the airport whether the Metrolink is there or not. I suppose if they are going, then the Metrolink at least lessens the impact, even if only a fraction.
Particularly horrifying, to me, was the news that Tameside Metropolitan Council has already started work which has involved evicting people from their homes and demolishing them to make way for the scheme. Clearly they assumed it was in the bag, which seems to be the way that TMC likes to operate.
From the Government's side, it seems they're back on the road-building agenda. My cynical take on this is that they're saving their money for road schemes in the area instead.
Cheers,
Emma
Little Em
Not good
23.07.2004 19:16
I saw this report today and think it's really bad news for the area. Metrolink into the city would be wonderful step in the right direction, as you say getting people out of their cars. People will go to the airport whether the Metrolink is there or not. I suppose if they are going, then the Metrolink at least lessens the impact, even if only a fraction.
Particularly horrifying, to me, was the news that Tameside Metropolitan Council has already started work which has involved evicting people from their homes and demolishing them to make way for the scheme. Clearly they assumed it was in the bag, which seems to be the way that TMC likes to operate.
From the Government's side, it seems they're back on the road-building agenda. My cynical take on this is that they're saving their money for road schemes in the area instead.
Cheers,
Little Em
Little Em
Definately not good
23.07.2004 19:45
H Braviner
e-mail: massivefoot@hotmail.com
Northern trams
25.07.2004 20:11
Could someone explain how at the beginning of the last century
thousands of miles of tram track were laid in our cities and yet
today it is impossible to extend urban tramways beyond a couple of
routes? Is the economy so much poorer now? Is there so little
need for rational systems of mass transport? Or is it something to
do with the drastic curtailment of local government powers over the
last three decades, and policy choices to favour roadbuilding and
the private car?
Mark Burton
Policies
28.07.2004 08:38
Light rail schemes have been shown to be better for the environment, better for retailers, better for regeneration and better for quality of life. It is ridiculous, therefore, to consider taking away the funding and committing yourself to (a great deal more) funding of roads.
As for TMC, they would naturally have to CPO some houses in order for the tram to go in. I don't think you can criticise them for that really.
I despair of transport strategies in this country.
Jay
something bad about Metrolink
12.08.2004 15:23
Serco profits/manages/etc private prisons & hospitals, nuclear missile 'defence' systems and long-range ballistic missiles, is generally involved in the arms trade and is involved in the privatisation of council services (they run 'council' leisure centres in Manchester, wanting to Union-bust...). They are involved in many 'invisible' areas of your daily life, but maybe most noticeably in Metrolink. They are one of the few companies that have an extremely cosy ongoing relationship with the City Council (like AMEC).
Metrolink & GMPTE also ran a consultation on carrying bicycles on trams, and then when the results came in decided to discount them and claim they'd been hijacked (it might have helped them if they'd actually tried a bit to distribute the forms beyond the Piccadilly Travelshop!).
Use the tram but don't pay.
anti-corporate