« Reply #154 on: Today at 01:32am »
Published on Sefton MBC website 10th March 2004
"Sefton Council
Town and Country Planning Act 1990
Housing Topic Paper
Prepared by Sefton MBC Planning Department
Sefton Unitary Development Plan
Pubic Local Inquiry 2004
3.19 Table 9 of the New Heartlands Prospectus (CD/0085) indicates that, within the Sefton area, during the 15 year lifetime of the Pathfinder Initiative, some 1,921 dwellings will be demolished out of a total of 22,500 properties, some 8.5% of the total stock. This is made up of 886 properties which are privately owned, and 1,035 which are owned by Registered Social Landlords (RSLs) or the Council. The number of dwellings which may be cleared is likely to change as proposals for the priority neighbourhoods are still evolving, and is dependant on a continuing dialogue with the local community about clearance and refurbishment, particularly outside the two priority areas where clearance plans are most advanced.
3.20 As indicated in paragraph 3.10 above, some 7.6% of the private sector and RSL dwellings in the Pathfinder Area are vacant at the time of the private Sector House Condition Survey which was carried out in 2002. However not all of the properties which are currently vacant will be demolished. Outside the clearance areas, a small proportion will be demolished where they are in capable of being brought back into beneficial use, but most will be re-furbished, thereby reducing vacancy rates. Some will be used to re-house displaced residents, while others will be occupied by new residents moving into the area. Table 9 of the New Heartlands Prospectus confirms that there is likely to be an overall net loss of 281 dwellings, but that there will be a greater decrease in the social sector stock. This is explained partly because significantly fewer social sector dwellings will be built than are demolished, and more private sector houses will be built than are demolished. However more private sector dwellings will be built than are demolished, which will help to redress the current imbalance between privately owned and social housing.
3.21 This table also indicates that 1,640 new dwellings will be built in Sefton, 828 on cleared sites (13 hectares) and 812 on other sites (16 hectares) at an average density of 50 dwelling per hectare. Most of these dwellings will be built within the Pathfinder Area. However, because of the lack of available vacant land, and extremely high existing densities (over 100 dwellings per hectare in places) combined with low vacancy rates, especialy in the Klondyke area, it will not be possible to re-locate everyone either within the areas which will be cleared or necessarily within the Pathfinder area. Some people will also want to make their own arrangements, and may move further afield.
3.24 The situation is compounded because many of the sites which are being considered for possible redevelopment for housing are, or have in the past, been used for a variety of industrial purposes including chemical works, tanneries and lead works, or have been filled with radioactive tin slag, and are severely contaminated. The costs of remediation are extremely high, and notwithstanding the availability of grant aid, the levels of contamination may affect the suitability of some of the sites for future housing or limit the areas within some sites which can be developed.
3.25 More recent work on the first two priority neighbourhoods of Klondyke and the Bedford Rd/Queens Road areas has indicated that some 7.4 hectares containing approximately 830 dwellings are likely t be cleared in the Klondyke area in three phrases starting later this year, which will ultimately be redeveloped to accommodate a minimum of 280 dwellings. For phase 1 of the area to be cleared, three sites in the immediate vicinity in the Hawthorne Road Canal Corridor have been identified for off-site replacement. In addition, two further sites are allocated under Policy H3, (Sites H3.A (Ash Road/ Beach Road) and H3.B (Former Secrets Site and are also expected to contribute towards meeting this need (Minute 305, Cabinet, 15th January, 2004 (CD/112), and Minutes 228. Planning Committee, 11th February, 2004 (CD/113). It is calculated that these sites could meet most of the need for off-site replacement for these sites, with the remaining households decanted into vacant housing stock in the locality.
3.26 Plans for the re-structuring of the Bedford Road Queens Road area are less advanced. It is envisaged that some 195 dwellings will be cleared in phase 1, of which approximately 70 are voids. Because of lower housing densities and larger property sizes in this area, it is anticipated that 155 dwellings could be redeveloped in this area. The refurbishment of other vacant Council-owned and RSL properties outside the clearance area will be able to re-house a proportion of people from this area. However, there is still a need to identify sites which can be deevloped into which displaced residents can be transferred into before more comprehensive clearance in this area can occur."
Comments
Hide the following 3 comments
this is indeed correct
06.04.2004 15:51
Degeneration
Regeneration of what for who? Regeneration of private landlordism!
07.04.2004 20:24
SECURE tenancies of councils (and Pre'89 HAs) can only be altered by Parliament!
There's profit to be made out of rented housing - Rachmanism rises again!
What remains are the Housing Associations renamed under Labour government as registered Social Landlords (RSLs) which are supposed to offer regulated housing for rent. However as another housing campaigner has quite correctly said on this site, the RSLs have moved far beyond their social housing remit of affordable housing for those who either choose to rent or simply could never afford to buy into property speculators. With another 21,000 remaining council houses due to be 'disposed' off soon the RSLs are empire building using our public resources.
RSLs with their totalitarian disreguard for accountability and democratic methods are growing into oppressive private sector monsters, they're responsible for demolishing a massive and ever growing list of housing estates here in Liverpool and Merseyside. RSLs are now pushing through massive demolition and building projects, over ruling local community concerns, misleading and undermining our communities, local leaders and activists. Local councils have actually surrendered their duties to defend local voters interests against these very intimidating and secretive organisations.
Why Housing Associations/RSLs are building housing for sale has got to be asked, we actually need more housing for rent. When council estates are demolished without exception more housing for sale is built than for rent, for example on the Norris Green estate where the 'Henry Boot Ltd' housing is being demolished the first housing to be build is; 90 houses for rent and 107 houses for sale. The neighbourhood being demolished was actually the largest concentration of tenanted accomodation. Another friend of mine had just this week informed me that he received a letter stating that his home is amongst others in the 'Lodge Lane' area now under threat of demolition.
It's an obvious fact that the 'free-market' is being let run riot here in Liverpool, another negative aspect of 'Capital of Culture' is that first time local buyers can't buy a home, because speculators from Ireland, Scandinavia and elsewhere are buying up housing (for speculative profit) and pushing up prices at the bottom of the price range. Thus those of us living on low incomes, either poor paid employment or benefits are being pushed to the margins, a question increasingly being asked is; where are they putting all the people they're forcing out?
Having myself spent the past two weeks trying to find an available council house in the North East of Liverpool, on five estates any spare houses are being 'trickle transferred' to housing associations ie one-by-one or simply not being re-let. Thus as council housing waiting list grows their housing stock shrinks weekly, accompanied by RSLs demolishing empty former council properties too rather upgrade and refit, thus it would suggest that those of us requiring rented property are being forced down a certain pathway, a very narrow and closed pathway at that. Aren't alarm bells ringing with local councillors?? MPs?? Press or media?? It would appear that we tenants are becoming the new refugees and the silently disappeared...
Kai Andersen
e-mail: aokai@tiscali.co.uk
Homepage: http://groups.msn.com/SocialistLabourPartyLiverpool
Deadline near for tenants - The vote for Wirral council housing privatisation!
07.04.2004 21:55
Bang go council tenants rights!
Tenants rights a past memory soon?
COUNCIL house tenants in Wirral have a week left to vote on whether to transfer their homes to a non-profit housing association.
ddi-Wirral council has been forced to allow the month-long vote after central government refused to give councils more money to carry out essential repairs.
Cllr George Davies said: "The council believes that transfer is the way forward, but it is not a foregone conclusion.
"It will be tenants who decide the future."
Cllr Davies said a "no" vote would mean a £6m deficit with no way to bridge the gap. The transfer has been backed by Wirral's four MPs.
If tenants vote "yes", the new landlord will be Wirral Partnership Homes, which says it will spend an ational £172m over the next seven years on improvements.
Critics believe it is just another form of privatisation that could be prone to the same pitfalls that have affected private finance initiative schemes.
COMMENT: Wirral council tenants need to learn the lessons from Liverpool's former council tenants who've now experienced six years of council housing transfers, we're now facing demolitions on most ex-council estates. You're being conned out of your 'SECURE' tenancy rights only alterable by Parliamentary act - VOTE NO!
Kai Andersen
e-mail: aokai@tiscali.co.uk
Homepage: http://groups.msn.com/SocialistLabourPartyLiverpool