As the predictable speeches poured out of the pa one 'Socialist Party' stand even had a stab at flogging silkscreens of Che Guevara at a fiver a pop. Knocked out no doubt in some south asian sweatshop for pennies this surely wins a coconut for global capitalism.
No matter. At 6.45 celebs led a pre-arranged token march the fifty yards to the Whitehall barricade. Constables smirked, Stop the War having briefed them of their limited intent.
Others turned out to have different ideas. As placards and sticks flew, a determined mass pushed at the centre. Police jumped to secure the barriers but to no avail. Soon they were in the air flying over the police line's heads.
Cops responded with vicious baton blows. Fingers and heads bled, stabs were made to the stomachs, people fell to the floor but the crowd pushed on. A senior officer ran the line shouting "No Arrests, No Arrests, orders from the top".
Stop the War stewards now pushed to the front to try and calm matters. Ill briefed cops, not realising they were on the same side walloped them with sticks.
As dusk fell the TSG riot cops took the front line. The crowd responded with a sit down, punctuated with the odd punch up and, relative calm having being restored, the introduction of the usual snatch squads.
Bush came, Bush went, Brown probably got bitch slapped - hell, who knows how the Queen managed at tea.
The only thing we can positively relish it that it's the farewell tour and if we're lucky enough he'll stay alive 'till the end and we won't get 'Old Dick' Cheney in charge.
Comments
Hide the following 17 comments
great headline you should work for the Son !
15.06.2008 23:09
NMLA
Heartening...
16.06.2008 08:14
A proposal:
If there is one thing amonst all the active anarchist groups in the uk that we can agree on, it is that we don't want war, and would like to see a militant movement against it. There are plenty of groups with resources, that if pooled, we could build a strong militant movement against the war. Specifically I am thinking of a militant version of STWC, without the hirachy, or underlying recruitment agenda.
off the top of my head i can think of quite a few networks, groups, and organisations who could contribute to this(I am not a member of any of these): EF!, SolFed, Anarchist Federation, IWW, and maybe even some single issue campaigns might want to get on board, like Smash EDO, and Shut Down HK. (sorry for anyone i missed, I am writing this whilst thinking it).
whatya think?
Quick point about the photos, might have been worth blurring the faces of the protesters.
*No dig at activists here, I am one, It's just often we are easily singled out as the trouble makers on demos such as this, and can be spotted easily, that doesn't seem to be the case from the photo's.
fly Posters
You really should!
16.06.2008 08:23
Third Camp
Was great
16.06.2008 10:15
Made me smile anyway.
hiho
Solidarity
16.06.2008 10:57
J
Junk reporting
16.06.2008 11:46
For one thing, you've outdone the BBC in understating the number on the demo - they said 2500 in Parliament Square ( http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7456241.stm). Conversely you have vastly inflated the ranks of the SWP - and none of them were "carrying the party's begging buckets". The only collection buckets I saw were for Stop the War Coalition.
For another there is the claim that Stop the War Coalition had "briefed [police] of their limited intent." So how do you explain Stop the War Coalition's promise on the front page of their website? "The ban against us marching from Parliament Square to Downing Street continues. We intend to defy this ban." ( http://www.stopwar.org.uk)
Can we believe anything we read on Indymedia?
anarchist
Well done!
16.06.2008 11:48
http://indymedia.org.uk/en/2008/06/401141.html
Paul
e-mail: o_hanlon@hotmail.com
?
16.06.2008 11:58
General Degenerate
Bush entered through the front entrance
16.06.2008 12:34
> George W Bush snuck into Downing Street via the St James
> Park entrance.
No he didn't, his motorcade went up the Mall, through Admiralty Arch then down Whitehall.
checker
recognize some peps
16.06.2008 12:45
benji
No violence
16.06.2008 13:21
"I object to violence because when it appears to do good, the good is only temporary; the evil it does is permanent"
Gandhi
G
USA, BUSH and the EU: same ship
16.06.2008 13:51
http://youtube.com/watch?v=x-E0EccnA2A
StopEU
Homepage: http://youtube.com/watch?v=x-E0EccnA2A
ask
16.06.2008 23:21
I suggest you should ask what I am after, instead of jumping to concusions, and insulting me by suggesting I should join the police force (did Gandhi alow insults?)
Fly Posters
Apologies
17.06.2008 08:32
NMLA
pacifism = pacified
17.06.2008 12:12
http://www.utne.com/2007-05-01/ArmsandtheMovement.aspx
slow down Gandhi, you're killing them
Violence won't win the masses, we need a programme 1st and foremost
17.06.2008 18:40
Violence should only be used selectively, if at all. Otherwise it's just a NO, it means nothing more than NO.
But if it's in support of said programme, which elsewhere is being applied in a peaceful way ie when violence is applied to get the actual message of a programme, and to illustrate the depth of feeling felt. Well that is a different matter. And also, by way of exception rather than rule - then that is a different matter because that allows for people to understand what the violence is clamouring for, rather than it just being seen as 'against' , a big against but without any positive agenda.
IMO even then it (violence) should only be applied when other routes of widespread mobilisation are not possible.
And in the EU I do not think that that will turn out to be the case, I think we are beyond that now.
No, pacifist does not mean pacified.
And violence won't win the masses, all it will do is increase the clampdown and alienate the people. Gandhi lives, and he moves slowly not fast.
Programme
What violence?
21.06.2008 17:01
normantebbit