The Geneva Conventions and their Protocols are international treaties that contain the most important rules limiting the barbarity of war. They protect people who do not take part in the fighting (civilians, medics, aid workers) and those who can no longer fight (wounded, sick and shipwrecked troops, prisoners of war). Links to selected resources.
Current location: Ireland
Entry tags: boycott, bullies, bully, gaza, holocaust, ireland, islam, israel, jew, middle-east, palestine, peace, usa
Boycott War Criminals USA & Israel
The Geneva Conventions: the core of international humanitarian law
The Geneva Conventions and their Protocols are international treaties that contain the most important rules limiting the barbarity of war. They protect people who do not take part in the fighting (civilians, medics, aid workers) and those who can no longer fight (wounded, sick and shipwrecked troops, prisoners of war). Links to selected resources.
The Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols are part of international humanitarian law – a whole system of legal safeguards that cover the way wars may be fought and the protection of individuals.
They specifically protect people who do not take part in the fighting (civilians, medics, chaplains, aid workers) and those who can no longer fight (wounded, sick and shipwrecked troops, prisoners of war).
The Conventions and their Protocols call for measures to be taken to prevent (or put an end to) what are known as "grave breaches"; those responsible for breaches must be punished.
The Geneva Conventions have been acceded to by 194 States and enjoy universal acceptance.
http://www.icrc.org/Web/Eng/siteeng0.nsf/html/5ZMEEM
http://irishblog-irelandblog.blogspot.com/
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article18236.htm
United , Peaceful , Boycott.
Spread The Word , Pass it on !
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geneva_Conventions
Boycott the USA and Israel War Crimes Now !
Please, share with your friends !
The Nuremberg Principles were a set of what constitutes a war crime. The document was created by necessity during the Nuremberg Trials and execution of Nazi party members following World War II war crimes
Principle I
Any person who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefore and liable to punishment.
[ Principle II
The fact that internal law does not impose a penalty for an act which constitutes a crime under international law does not relieve the person who committed the act from responsibility under international law.
Principle III
The fact that a person who committed an act which constitutes a crime under international law acted as Head of State or responsible government official does not relieve him from responsibility under international law.
[ Principle IV
The fact that a person acted pursuant to order of his Government or of a superior does not relieve him from responsibility under international law, provided a moral choice was in fact possible to him.
[ Principle V
Any person charged with a crime under international law has the right to a fair trial on the facts and law.
Principle VI
The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under international law:
(a) Crimes against peace:
(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).
(b) War Crimes:
Violations of the laws or customs of war which include, but are not limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation of slave labor or for any other purpose of the civilian population of or in occupied territory; murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the Seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.
(c) Crimes against humanity:
Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime.
Principle VII
Complicity in the commission of a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity as set forth in Principle VI is a crime under international law.
The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under international law:
(a) Crimes against peace:
(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).
(b) War Crimes:
Violations of the laws or customs of war which include, but are not limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation of slave labor or for any other purpose of the civilian population of or in occupied territory; murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the Seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.
(c) Crimes against humanity:
Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime.
Principle VII
Complicity in the commission of a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity as set forth in Principle VI is a crime under international law.
Principle VI
The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under international law:
(a) Crimes against peace:
(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).
(b) War Crimes:
Violations of the laws or customs of war which include, but are not limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation of slave labor or for any other purpose of the civilian population of or in occupied territory; murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the Seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.
(c) Crimes against humanity:
Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime.
Principle VII
Complicity in the commission of a crime against peace, a war crime, or a crime against humanity as set forth in Principle VI is a crime under international law.
Geneva Conventions
Key issues
The essential rules
Humanitarian law: your questions answered
The Geneva Conventions and the emblems
Who is bound by the Geneva Conventions?
Humanitarian law and human rights
How the founding of the ICRC led to the first Geneva Convention
The Gaza Strip is an Open Air Prison, as such Israel is clearly responsible for the prisoners there. You cannot shoot kill prisoners or children from either fixed wing aircraft or helicopters, without committing war crimes. This is barbaric collective punishment.
International Criminal Court
At the end of the bloodiest century in human history, the international community adopted a treaty creating the world's first independent and permanent International Criminal Court. That court is now a reality. The International Criminal Court (ICC) is able to investigate and prosecute those individuals accused of genocide, crimes against humanity, and crimes of war. The ICC complements existing national judicial systems and will step in only if national courts are unwilling or unable to investigate or prosecute such crimes. The ICC will also help defend the rights of those, such as women and children, who have often had little recourse to justice.
* ICC News Releases
* Memos, policy and briefing papers
Understanding the ICC
* Basic Fact Sheet
* Questions and Answers
* Rome Statute Ratifications
Current situations
* Central African Republic
* Darfur (Sudan)
* Democratic Republic of Congo
* Uganda
BE AN ETHICAL SHOPPER, DO NOT SUPPORT WAR CRIMINALS ! SUPPORT THE BOYCOTT AND PEACE !
Bookmark
Comments
Hide the following 3 comments
And don't forget the UK
28.03.2008 15:12
You mention Darfur but none of the above is responsible for that, it's widely known that China who buys their oil has blocked sanctions against Sudan which the UK and US wanted, China that also occupies Tibet now in the face of Western criticism.
Then again we could always buy Russian.
I. Ron Ic
No Boycott
29.03.2008 17:29
Pete
Hasbara By The Numbers
31.03.2008 05:58
However, the producers found that, whereas Palestinian schools teach the reality of the conflict (what the Zionists refer to as 'spreading hate'), Israeli curriculum disseminates Revisionism to Israel's children, breeding misunderstanding and perpetuating hatred. This is designed, of course, to allow the Extremists who design this curriculum, to fool its population into allowing it to perpetuate its war to eliminate Palestine.
"Anti-Arab Racism and Incitement in Israel"
Palestine Center Information Brief No. 161 (25 March 2008)
By Ali Abunimah
Palestine Center Fellow
A prominent strategy of Israeli hasbara, or official propaganda, is to deflect criticism of its actions in the Occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip by stressing that within the country's 1948 boundaries, it is a model democracy comparable to the societies in Western Europe and North America with which it identifies and on whose diplomatic support it relies to maintain a favorable status quo. In fact, Israeli society is in the grip of a wave of unchecked racism and incitement that seriously threatens Israel's Palestinian community and the long-term prospects for regional peace. This briefing examines societal and institutional racism and incitement by public figures against Israel's Arab population and considers some policy implications.
Background and Context
When Israel was established in 1948, most of the indigenous Palestinian inhabitants were driven out or fled from the area that became Israel. Approximately 150,000 Palestinians remained behind.1 Until 1966, these Palestinians lived under martial law. Today, having increased in number to approximately 1.3 million or about one fifth of Israel's population (not including the Palestinian population of Occupied East Jerusalem), they are citizens of the State of Israel and can vote in elections for the Knesset. Despite this, most view themselves as second-class citizens. As indigenous non-Jews in a self-described Jewish state, they face a host of systematic social, legal, economic and educational barriers to equality. Israel lacks a constitution and has no other basic law guaranteeing equal rights to all citizens regardless of religion, race, ethnicity or national origin.2
One measure of the cumulative impact of these discriminatory policies is socioeconomic: while just 16 percent of Jewish citizens in Israel fall below the official poverty line, the figure for non-Jews is 50 percent.3
In October 2000, Israeli police used live ammunition against unarmed civilians demonstrating their solidarity with Palestinians in the Occupied Territories. Thirteen Palestinians, of whom twelve were Israeli citizens, were shot dead. An official commission, headed by Judge Theodor Or, was appointed to look into the events which came to mark a dramatic deterioration in Arab-Jewish relations inside the country. In 2003, the Or Commission confirmed that the police used "excessive" and unjustifiable force, reported that the police viewed the country's Arab citizens as "enemies" and documented a pattern of "prejudice and neglect" towards them by Israel's establishment.4
While the Or Commission recommended a number of measures to redress the sharp disparities between Jews and Arabs in the country, families of the victims regarded the report as a whitewash. The Commission failed to examine the forensic evidence in each of the killings, and none of the killers, nor any responsible official, were ever brought to justice.5 By 2007, according to Elie Rekhess of the Moshe Dayan Center at Tel Aviv University, there remained "yawning" gaps between Jews and Arabs in Israel and "the bottom line" is "that the conclusions and recommendations of the 2003 Or Commission remain conspicuously unimplemented."6
Amidst the increasingly precarious situation of Palestinian citizens of Israel, prominent and broadly representative leaders of that community published in 2007 a series of documents setting out visions for Israel as a state of all its citizens with equality for all.7 The response of the Israeli body politic was overwhelmingly to view these initiatives as an unwelcome threat to the "Jewish character" of the state. Israel's Shin Bet secret police, responsible among other things for many "targeted killings" in the Occupied Territories, went so far as to warn that it would "disrupt the activities of any groups that seek to change the Jewish or democratic character of Israel, even if they use democratic means."8
Unlearned Lessons: The Jabal al-Mukkabir "Pogrom"
On March 10, a week after a Palestinian opened fire in the Mercaz HaRav yeshiva in Jerusalem killing eight students, apparently in revenge for Israel's killing of dozens of civilians in Gaza, a mob of hundreds of Israeli Jews converged on the Jabal al-Mukkabir neighborhood in Occupied East Jerusalem where the gunman's family lived. In what Haaretz termed an "organized, synchronized pogrom," the mob threw stones at Palestinian homes smashing windows and destroying water tanks, damaged cars and chanted "Death to the Arabs" while police did little to stop them.9 Haaretz observed that such an attack "could never take place in a Jewish neighborhood," and noted that while "Israel and the Jewish world raise a huge cry over every suspicion of an attack on Jews because of their ethnicity, it is intolerable that residents of the capital [sic] are attacked solely because of their nationality."10
Although the mob action had been planned and advertised days in advance, the Israeli police had done nothing to prepare for it. "The district police didn't need to be surprised," said the former Jerusalem district police commander Mickey Levy. "There was no need to collect intelligence, it was right there in their hand. Appropriate preparation was called for in order to prevent the violent demonstration."11
This event indicates that Israel's official institutions have failed to learn any lessons from the Or Commission report but also serves as a warning sign of worse to come, against a backdrop of highly tolerated public incitement and widespread racist attitudes towards Arabs.
Racist Statements and Incitement by Religious and Political Leaders
One of the most blatant examples of public incitement in the days before the attack on Jabal al-Mukkabir was a circular widely distributed and posted around Jerusalem and in West Bank settlements. Signed by a long list of rabbis, it called for acts of revenge on Palestinians in retribution for the Mercaz HaRav shooting: "Each and everyone is required to imagine what the enemy is plotting to do to us and match it measure for measure."12
Among the signatories was Rabbi Ya'acov Yosef, son of Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, the former Sephardic chief rabbi of Israel and spiritual leader of Shas, a party in Prime Minister Ehud Olmert's coalition government. The younger Yosef is himself a former Knesset member representing Shas. Another signatory, Rabbi Uzi Sharbav, was one of a group of extremists who murdered three Palestinian students at a school in the occupied West Bank city of Hebron and set off bombs that maimed the mayors of Nablus and Ramallah in the early 1980s. Sharbav served a short prison sentence for the murders but was pardoned and freed along with other extremists by Israel's president in 1990.13
Other statements have been aimed at delegitimizing, intimidating and threatening with expulsion Palestinian citizens of Israel exercising their democratic rights. In early March, thousands of Palestinian citizens of Israel staged a peaceful rally attended by several Arab members of the Knesset to protest Israel's military attacks in the Gaza Strip. In the Knesset, former cabinet minister Effie Eitam accused the Arab legislators of "treason" for participating in the rally adding, "We have to drive you out, as well as everyone else who took part" in the demonstration.14 Days later, Olmert's former Deputy Prime Minister Avigdor Lieberman repeated the ethnic cleansing threat in the Knesset, telling Arab members, "You are temporary here," and "One day we will take care of you."15
Israeli extremists appear to be getting the message. Representatives of three Arab parties have reported that their Knesset members have been receiving death threats in the mail daily. A spokesman for one Knesset member said, "We have always received threats but they have recently escalated to the point where we are growing truly concerned."16
Several rabbis have used the excuse of "security" in the wake of the Mercaz HaRav shooting to issue racist halakhic (religious) rulings against Arabs. Rabbi Dov Lior, chairman of the rabbinical council for settlers in "Judea and Samaria" (the West Bank), decreed that "It is completely forbidden to employ [Arabs] and rent houses to them in Israel. Their employment is forbidden, not only at yeshivas, but at factories, hotels and everywhere."17
Rabbi Chaim Kanievsky, considered a world-wide Orthodox authority on Jewish law, held "that it is completely forbidden to hire Arabs, especially in yeshivas; there is a concern for endangering lives." Indicating that security might not be the only motivation for this ruling, Kanievsky added that Jews should refrain from hiring any non-Jews, "unless there exists a huge disparity between the costs of the labor," in which case non-Jews could be hired.18
While these are recent examples, Mossawa, an Arab civil rights advocacy group in Israel, documented dozens of instances of racist declarations by public figures and thousands of examples of incitement on the Internet in 2007 alone.19
Silence is Consent
Leaders in the Palestinian community in Israel worry that the escalating incitement will provoke further violence against them. A spokesman for Muhammad Barakeh, an Arab member of parliament, said that the recent upsurge in death threats had been reported to Knesset security, "But we have seen nothing happen. I do not feel they are taking this threat very seriously."20 Another Arab Knesset member urged Israel's two chief rabbis to condemn the rabbinical calls for revenge, fearing that these statements might incite the assassination of community leaders.21 There are no reports that the chief rabbis responded to this plea. Indeed, while a handful of Israeli Jewish voices have been raised in protest, it was most often to decry the deafening silence.
A spokesman for the Religious Action Center for Reform Judaism condemned an "ever growing phenomenon of racist incitement that distorts Judaism and is also illegal." The group called on Israel's attorney general to "shake off his apathy" and begin to enforce anti-incitement laws.22 Haaretz complained that "the continued inactivity in the face of acts of incitement and violence by the extreme right is shared by all the law-enforcement authorities-the police, Shin Bet, State Prosecutor's Office and the courts."23 A Haaretz reporter noted "the dizzying increase in incitement, curses and insults leveled" at Arab Knesset members, "a spike that has gone almost without protest or the involvement of the Knesset Ethics Committee."24 Another commentator in the same newspaper observed that "as long as no one demonstrates whenever a Knesset member curses Arabs; and as long as the number of people who rent apartments to or hire Arabs can be counted on one hand, Israeli society cannot be absolved of the sin of racism."25
A Society in Crisis
"Israeli society is reaching new heights of racism," said Sami Michael, one of the country's most celebrated equality advocates and president of the Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI).26 A growing body of research indicates that racist sentiments are not the preserve of the right-wing fringe but increasingly prevalent across Israeli Jewish society.
One particularly disturbing indicator is that the chant "Death to the Arabs" is voiced not just by mobs of right-wingers angered by this or that Palestinian attack. Rather, "in the late 1990s and onwards," writes Amir Ben-Porat, a professor in the Department of Behavioral Sciences at Ben Gurion University, "'Death to the Arabs' became a common chant in almost every football [soccer] stadium in Israel." Ben-Porat, who authored a study on the use of the chant, says that because of the importance of soccer in Israeli society and its high profile in the media, "This chant is heard far beyond the stadium."27
In its 2007 Israeli Democracy Index, the Israel Democracy Institute found that 87 percent of all Israeli citizens rated Jewish-Arab relations in the country as being "poor" or "very poor."28
In addition:
*
78 percent of Israeli Jews opposed having Arab parties or ministers join Israel's government.29
*
Just 56 percent of Israeli Jews support full equality for Palestinian citizens of Israel and an identical number agreed that "Arabs cannot attain the Jews' level of cultural development."30
*
75 percent of Israeli Jews agreed with the statement that "Arabs are inclined to violent behavior" (as compared with 54 percent of Palestinian citizens of Israel who had an equivalent view of Israeli Jews).31
*
43 percent of Israeli Jews agreed that "Arabs are not intelligent" and 55 percent agreed that "the government should encourage Arab emigration from the country."32
A recent Haifa University survey found that half of Israeli Jews object to Arabs living in their neighborhoods (56 percent of Arabs supported residential integration with Jews).33 Similarly, ACRI reported that 75 percent of Israeli Jews surveyed said they would not agree to live in the same building as Arabs. The same survey found that more than half of Israeli Jews felt that Arabs and Jews should have separate recreational facilities.34
There are two consistent trends among all these surveys: both Palestinian citizens of Israel and Israeli Jews hold some prejudices towards each other, but on almost every measure, Israeli Jewish views of Arabs are more negative and extreme than Arab views of Jews; second, the negative trends have risen markedly in recent years as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has intensified. Between 2005 and 2006, there was a 26 percent rise in racist incidents targeting Arabs, and the number of Israeli Jews reporting they felt "hatred" towards Arabs doubled to 30 percent.35
While the conflict is undoubtedly the overarching context for these sentiments, an important contributing factor may be the consistently dehumanizing and denigrating stereotypes of Arabs that have for decades been presented to Israeli Jewish schoolchildren in their textbooks and media.36
Discrimination against United States Citizens
An outgrowth of the institutional and societal racism against Arabs in Israel is mistreatment that some United States citizens have received at the hands of Israeli authorities.
The State Department recently warned travelers that "American citizens whom Israeli authorities judge (based on their name or other indicators) may be of Palestinian origin are likely to face additional, and often time consuming questioning by immigration and border authorities."37 The warning adds that the "United States Government seeks equal treatment for all American citizens regardless of national origin or ethnicity," or as State Department spokesperson Sean McCormack put it, "You have a blue American passport, you should be treated like an American citizen."38
Yet, while Arab American civil rights advocates have reported dozens of such cases of discrimination to the U.S. government,39 American citizens who are considered Jewish by Israel are accorded special treatment, including free Israeli-government sponsored "Birthright Israel" trips and enticements to emigrate to the country. This is a long-standing problem; in 1987, the State Department lodged an official protest over the mistreatment of African Americans and Palestinian Americans traveling to Israel.40
Conclusions and Implications
Anti-Arab racism and incitement are persistent and growing problems in Israel and symptoms of hyper nationalism that seeks to consolidate and justify the state's "Jewish character." For decades, the mistreatment of Palestinians in Israel has been virtually ignored by Palestinian national leaders, as well as by international policymakers and organizations under the doctrine of non-interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states.
Yet, the precarious position of Palestinian citizens of Israel is closely linked to the fate of Palestinians under military occupation in the West Bank and Gaza Strip and refugees outside the country. It stems from the same set of historical events 60 years ago. All three categories of Palestinians are targets of discriminatory or abusive Israeli policies intended to preserve Israel as a "Jewish state." In the context of a "solution" to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, some Israeli politicians increasingly speak of population or territorial "exchanges" that would strip Palestinian citizens of Israel of their citizenship and otherwise violate their fundamental human rights. Palestinian citizens of Israel have raised the alarm about this growing existential threat, but they have received little international solidarity.
Israel's official institutions have failed for decades to demonstrate any willingness or capacity to treat Palestinian citizens as equal to Israeli Jews either in law or in practice. Israeli police act, in effect, as a uniformed sectarian militia protecting Jewish privilege rather than as an impartial police service for a modern, democratic state.
Although most international actors are not yet ready to do so, it is inevitable that the situation inside Israel will eventually have to be internationalized. A good example of the successful internationalization of an "internal" situation is the role external actors played in overseeing the transformation of the Royal Ulster Constabulary from a uniformed sectarian militia into the present-day Police Service of Northern Ireland and otherwise supporting the Northern Ireland peace process. There must also be external pressure on Israel to curb and punish racist incitement and to launch broad public initiatives, particularly in schools, to combat hateful stereotypes of Arabs.
As Israeli politicians and parties increasingly propose "solutions" that treat all Palestinians, whether citizens or not, as equally inferior, Palestinians in the diaspora, the Occupied Territories and inside Israel must urgently engage with each other to formulate common strategies to protect and advance their human and political rights.
Ali Abunimah is a fellow at the Palestine Center in Washington, DC. He is an expert on Palestine, the Palestinian-Israeli conflict and is the author of One Country: A Bold Proposal to End the Israeli-Palestinian Impasse. Abunimah also co-founded The Electronic Intifada, an online publication about Palestine and the Palestine-Israeli conflict, Electronic Iraq and Electronic Lebanon.
The views expressed in this information brief are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of The Jerusalem Fund.
1See Ilan Papp, The Ethnic Cleansing of Palestine, Oneworld Publications, 2004; Benny Morris, The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem Revisited, Second Edition, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
2For an excellent overview of legal discrimination against Palestinian citizens of Israel see Jonathan Cook, Blood and Religion: The Unmasking of the Jewish and Democratic State, Pluto Press, 2006.
3Asher Arian, Nir Atmor, Yael Hadar, The 2007 Israeli Democracy Index, The Israel Democracy Institute, June 2007, p. 63 (www.idi.org.il/english/article.asp?id=31052007141057).
4James Bennet, "Police used excessive force on Israeli Arabs, panel says," The New York Times, 2 September 2003.
5See Jonathan Cook, "Still no justice for October 2000 killings," The Electronic Intifada, 26 February 2008 (electronicintifada.net/v2/article9329.shtml).
6Elie Rekhess, "Israel and its Arab Citizens - Taking Stock," 16 October 2007, Moshe Dayan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies at Tel Aviv University (tau.ac.il/dayancenter/Israel and its Arab Citizens.pdf).
7The four documents are: The Future Vision of the Palestinian Arabs in Israel published by The National Committee for the Heads of the Arab Local Authorities in Israel (www.adalah.org/newsletter/eng/dec06/tasawor-mostaqbali.pdf); The Democratic Constitution published by Adalah The Legal Center for Arab Minority Rights in Israel (www.adalah.org/eng/constitution.php); An Equal Constitution for All? On a Constitution and Collective Rights for Arab Citizens in Israel published by Mossawa Center - The Advocacy Center for Arab Citizens in Israel (www.mossawacenter.org/files/files/File/An Equal Constitution For All.pdf); and The Haifa Declaration (www.mada-research.org/archive/haifaenglish.pdf).
8Yoav Stern, "Arab leaders air public relations campaign against Shin Bet," Haaretz, 6 April 2007 (www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/846247.html).
9Nadav Shagrai, "Right-wing demonstrators try to storm home village of Mercaz Harav gunman," Haaretz, 17 March 2007 (www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/964814.html).
10"Limp police in the face of a pogrom," Haaretz editorial, 18 March 2008 (www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/965315.html).
11"Top police officer slams police response to E. Jerusalem clash," Haaretz, 17 March 2008 (www.haaretz.com/hasen/objects/pages/PrintArticleEn.jhtml?itemNo=964769).
12"Rightist rabbis urge 'measure for measure' revenge on foes," Haaretz, 12 March 2008 (www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/963518.html).
13See "Israel frees 3 Jewish radicals Killers of Arabs served less than 7 years of life sentence," Associated Press, December 27, 1990.
14Shahar Ilan, "MK Eitam to Arab MKs: One day we will expel you from Israel," Haaretz, 5 March 2008 (www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/961199.html).
15Shahar Ilan, "Lieberman to Arab MKs: One day we will 'take care of you,'" Haaretz, 10 March 2008 (www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/962767.html).
16Sheera Claire Frenkel, "Death threats to Arab MKs on the rise," The Jerusalem Post, 14 March 2008.
17Nadav Shagrai, "Top Yesha rabbi says Jewish law forbids renting houses to Arabs," Haaretz, 20 March 2008 (www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/966208.html).
18Neta Sela, "Prominent rabbi to yeshiva heads: Don't hire Arabs," Yediot Aharonot, 17 March 2008 (www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3519643,00.html).
19Press release, "Mossawa Center releases racism report detailing over 169 cases," Mossawa, 19 March 2008 (www.mossawacenter.org/default.php?lng=3&dp=2&fl=25&pg=1).
20Sheera Claire Frenkel, "Death threats to Arab MKs on the rise," The Jerusalem Post, 14 March 2008.
21Yoav Stern, "Arab MK to chief rabbis: Slam rabbinic calls to harm Arabs," Haaretz, 17 March 2008 (www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/965263.html).
22Nadav Shagrai, "Top Yesha rabbi says Jewish law forbids renting houses to Arabs," Haaretz, 20 March 2008 (www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/966208.html).
23"Limp police in the face of a pogrom," Haaretz editorial, 18 March 2008 (www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/965315.html).
24Shahar Ilan, "The vision of an Arab-free Knesset," Haaretz, 24 March 2008 (www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/967364.html).
25Avirama Golan, "Racist? Us?", Haaretz, 19 March 2008 (www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/965789.html).
26Yuval Yoaz and Jack Khoury, "Civil rights group: Israel has reached new heights of racism," Haaretz, 9 December 2007 (www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/932384.html).
27Amir Ben-Porat, "Death to the Arabs: the right-wing fan's fear," Soccer & Society, Vol. 9, No. 1, January 2008, pp. 1-13.
28Asher Arian, Nir Atmor, Yael Hadar, The 2007 Israeli Democracy Index, The Israel Democracy Institute, June 2007, p.61 (www.idi.org.il/english/article.asp?id=31052007141057).
29The 2007 Israeli Democracy Index, p.64.
30The 2007 Israeli Democracy Index, pp. 66-67.
31The 2007 Israeli Democracy Index, p. 67.
32The 2007 Israeli Democracy Index, p. 68.
33Fadi Eyadat, "Poll: Half of Jews oppose living in neighborhoods with Arabs," Haaretz, 13 March 2008 (www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/963698.html).
34Bachar Awawda and Attorney Alla Heider, "Index of Racism for 2006: Racism against Israeli Arabs - Citizens of the State of Israel," The Center Against Racism, April 2007, cited in The State of Human Rights in Israel and the Occupied Territories, 2007 Report, Association for Civil Rights in Israel (ACRI), p.14 (www.acri.org.il/pdf/State2007.pdf).
35ACRI, p.14.
36For an important and systematic study of this phenomenon, see Daniel Bar-Tal & Yona Teichman, Stereotypes and Prejudice in Conflict: Representations of Arabs in Israeli Jewish Society, Cambridge University Press, 2005. Bar-Tal is Professor of Social Psychology at the School of Education, Tel Aviv University. Teichman is Professor of Clinical Psychology in the Department of Psychology, Tel Aviv University.
37State Department, "Travel Warning: Israel, The West Bank and Gaza," 19 March 2008 (travel.state.gov/travel/cis_pa_tw/tw/tw_922.html).
38"U.S. to Israel: No bias vs. Arab-Americans," Associated Press, 20 March 2008.
39American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC), "ADC Sends First Hand Accounts of Israel's Entry Denials of U.S. Citizens to Secretary Rice," 20 March 2008 (www.adc.org/index.php?id=3290).
40Dan Fisher, "Israel will review its border control practices," The Los Angeles Times, 18 July 19
ZIonist Extremism Key Impediment to Peace