So, are you a green or are you a supporter of completely free migration? Because it seems to me at least that you cannot be both. You're either in the Gatwick camp or the Heathrow camp. Make your choice.
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/brendan_oneill/2007/09/in_the_other_camp.html
You can clearly be Green and against borders, travel doesn't have to use huge amounts of oil, for example listen to last week's Low Carbon Show on low carbon footprint travel:
The Low Carbon Show: #13: Slow Travel
Cargo Ship, Train & Milkfloat
Like Slow Food, Slow Travel is about quality rather than speed. Dan Kieran talks about his journey across Britain in a milkfloat and LoCO2 founder Jamie Andrews talks about travel by cargo ship and train travel in Europe.
Programme produced by Phil England for Climate Radio. http://climateradio.co.uk
Please drop me an email to let me know if you rebroadcast this programme: phil [at] switch-online.co.uk
http://www.radio4all.net/proginfo.php?id=24724
My personal suggestion would be renewable powered airships, but first capitalism and war have to be stopped, the US military uses as much oil as Australia does in a whole year in just two days.
No Borders!
No War!
Comments
Hide the following 7 comments
No Surprises
20.09.2007 12:14
The Cur
Independent, unbiased thought
20.09.2007 14:44
Spiked lists current and former spiked partners and sponsors as follows:
"Current and former spiked partners and sponsors include: Arts Council England, Bloomberg; the British Association for the Advancement of Science; the British Council; BT; Cadbury Schweppes; Cambridge University Press; the Cheltenham Science Festival; Colubris Networks; the City of London; Clarke Mulder Purdie; Continuum International Publishing Group; the Dana Centre; the European Commission research project RightsWatch; EuroScience; Hill and Knowlton; IBM; INFORM; the Institute for the International Education of Students; the Institute of Psychiatry; International Policy Network; Luther Pendragon; the Medical Research Council; the Mobile Operators Association; the National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts; Natural Environment Research Council; Orange; O2; Pfizer; the Royal Institution of Great Britain; the Social Issues Research Centre; the Society of Chemical Industry; TechCentralStation; University of East London; the Wellcome Trust; and others."
Strange company for self-professed marxists to be keeping, I would've thought.
Spiked & screwed
Slow travel to flee poverty?
20.09.2007 22:17
If you are fleeing abject poverty, persecution,war etc is your carbon footprint going to be your priority?
I'm in the gatwick camp!
sandra d
One can support borders and be an underdog too
21.09.2007 00:42
I hope it's Indymedia's intention to be a broad church for underdogs and I will not be censored for saying that while there are many in both camps, there are also many who aren't.
jimroland
Homepage: http://www.portal.campaigncc.org/node/1116
a controlled fair immigration policy is the way forward...
21.09.2007 09:50
would also argue the deliberate opening of our borders in the last ten years and the development of what is basically a cheap labour transit camp fuelled by exploitation of migrants is also clearly a big part of the neo-liberal project.
This idea that migration is always a good thing also needs to be challenged, so migration brings no problems, so there is no organised crime gangs moving in from around the world?. It's also interesting that many of the camps supporters, obviously decent people, are sadly now in the same camp as Digby Jones, the Former CBI Boss who argues we need more migration to fuel the economy, so there we go, campers helping the neo-liberal agenda? What I and many others on the left resent is the willful refusal by many of the NB people and the un-reconstructed left to accept that such policies may have major consequences and crucially an aloofness and a total lack of understanding and concern for the impact such changes, however inevitable will have on existing communities, its impact on positive sentiment and willingness to pay for a comprehensive welfare state as indeed all that is solid melts into air. Most of all the denigration of ordinary working people who dare to challenge this rose tinted view as racist, etc. There also seems to be a hierarchy of oppression: when are we going to see camps for the homeless or disabled people facing massive assaults on their benefits and the possibility of losing homes, camps for carers, the mentally ill who face major difficulties, I'm not being facetious, i would just like some answers.
Of course, we have shafted the countries the migrants are coming from(though not in all cases) one only has to look at the dreadful floods in SEA caused by our profiligate use of resources. Further, I am sure over the very long term (100 years) the imperative of global capitalism and communications will mean that there will be free flow of labour just as there is free flow of goods and services and ultimately this is morally and politically right. But the volume of people who would want to enter the country and the disorienting speed of the changes suggest to me that at present a managed fair and proactive border controls is the best way forward.
concernedz
Thanks for the link
21.09.2007 13:00
The Brendan piece - as all Spiked-related pieces are - was very obviously a deliberate devils-advocate wind-up. Can't believe so many are falling for it.
Of course it's a false dichotomy, and there will be people at both protests. But it did raise interesting questions about the clashes between environmentalism and no-borders, even if those clashes are nowhere near as fundamental as he suggested. It's led to some rational responses both on here and CiF about how those can be reconciled.
Have one message for the original poster- would be careful calling that piece "bullshit", when yours ends with the line "My personal suggestion would be renewable powered airships"...
Norville B
England the Tardis
11.11.2007 21:22
And I haven't seen any big climate change related disasters yet in Poland. But when it really kicks off it won't matter what we do in terms of border control. Even if planes are grounded (wishing..) the affected peoples will get to safety any way the can. Millions will march here. They will fight their way in. The only answers to the crisis are tackling economic growth and population growth. Both rely on oil anyway. Falling to earth..burning...
s.smith