This site was set-up in the wake of the London bombings on July 7th 2005 with the aim of getting to the truth about what really happened on the day that 56 people were killed and over 700 injured on London transport.
J7truth | 19.09.2006 09:56 | Education | London
J7truth
Homepage:
http://julyseventh.co.uk/
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Mayday 2007
No Borders Days of Action 06
M18 Anti War
Mayday 2006
Refugee Week 2006
SOCPA
Day of Action Against Migration Controls
DSEi 2005
ESF 2004
Server Seizure
May Day 2004
2003 Bush Visit
DSEi 2003
May Day 2003
No War Feb 15
Spaces
rampART
Bowl Court
56a Infoshop
LARC
Pogo Cafe
Groups/Projects
Offline/InfoUsurpa
No Borders
Rising Tide
Freedom Bookshop
Advisory Service For Squatters
RoR samba band
Space Hijackers
LDMG
Campaigns
Disarm DSEi
Food Not Bombs
London No2ID
Bikes Not Bombs
Climate Camp
Regular Events
Critical Mass
Anarchist Bookfair
Anarchist Forum
Comments
Hide the following 6 comments
Caveat emptor!
19.09.2006 10:56
http://julyseventh.co.uk/july-7-hypotheses.html
Throw a dart at it and see if you can miss a loony theory.
http://julyseventh.co.uk/7-7-cctv-evidence.html
The assertions of image fakery are technically nonsense to anyone with any expertise in compositting.
http://julyseventh.co.uk/7-7-profile-mohammad-sidique-khan.html
As are the claims of the technical ease of video & audio fakery.
All-in-all, I would classify this as a classic conspiraloon site... one with ties to Ex(?)-spooks that are the Intelligence equivalent of Mr & Mrs Neil Hamilton.
This site is not looking for an inquiry, it's already prejudged any investigation.
Spook Plant
Ludicrous Diversion
19.09.2006 11:20
The police have, from the onset of their investigation, chosen to withold from the public almost every bit of evidence they claim to have and have provably lied about several aspects of the London Bombings.
The mainstream news has wilfully spread false, unsubstantiated and unverifiable information, while choosing to completely ignore the numerous inconsistencies and discrepancies in the official story.
The government has finally, after a year, presented us with their official ‘narrative’ concerning the event. Within hours it was shown to contain numerous errors, a fact since admitted by the Home Secretary John Reid. They have continuously rejected calls for a full, independent public inquiry. Tony Blair himself described such an inquiry as a ‘ludicrous diversion’. What don’t they want us to find out?"
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4943675105275097719
Bridget Dunne
e-mail: Bridget_is@Hotmail.com
Homepage: http://bridgetdunnes.blogspot.com/
spook plant plants spooks
19.09.2006 12:37
quote: "All-in-all, I would classify this as a classic conspiraloon site... one with ties to Ex(?)-spooks that are the Intelligence equivalent of Mr & Mrs Neil Hamilton".
What information is this based on? I think you mean the 9/11 Truth Campaign rather than July 7th. If you wish to attack the July 7th site for inaccuracies please at least have your own facts correct.
Bridget Dunne
e-mail: Bridget_is@Hotmail.com
Homepage: http://bridgetdunnes.blogspot.com/
Ludicrous Diversions
19.09.2006 12:46
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/09/350822.html
No need to watch it on Google Video :-)
red
spook plant plants spooks
19.09.2006 12:50
Try getting your facts straight if you wish to have any credibility in your argument.
Bridget Dunne
e-mail: Bridget_is@Hotmail.com
Homepage: http://bridgetdunnes.blogspot.com/
Oh dear, here comes the usual ad hominems and straw men...
19.09.2006 14:04
If you want it made clearer: the site makes bold assertions that are little more than hypotheses unsupported by any actual evidence. They are often based on selectively quoting minority accounts of events as though they must be some significant lead.
The site makes thoroughly ill-inforrmed boasts about the ease in which fake audio/visual evidence can be achieved.
It cites prisonplanet... a right-wing gun nut militia-mentality business concern.
Without you asking me to reinforce specifics in my observations then I can only assume that you aren't interested in debate but just here to troll. When I saw your name I got that same sinking feeling I got when famous trolls appeared in my usenet groups.
Again, any claims that this site is seeking an unbiased inquiry are plainly ludicrous. The site is a club for people who think they are so much cleverer than anyone else in the world that they have spotted some sinister conspiracy. And all that based practically, entirely on news analsys.
Having been the subject of International coverage recently, I can tell you that the amount of innaccuracy thrown up by the media was astounding. Most of it was inconsequential (wrong name, wrong age, wrong address etc.). Most of the consequential stuff was obviously due to poor journalism or even poorer editing. One very major innaccuracy actually stemmed from a member of our affinity group being a bit loopy and being convinced of something that never happened at all!
The world is not an episode of Columbo, Brigit, where Peter Falk chomps his stogey and squares every loose end away. Some things have no meaning. Some things reiterate through journalistic plaigarism. Some things just never actually happened- sometimes that is a deliberate deception, often is just plain error.
As stated, please flag up any specifics you wish me to address in my assertion that the site can in no way be resolved to the notion on unbiased, unprejudiced and informed inquiry!
It starts with conclusions and tries to reverse engineer support for them by any means necessary.
Spook Plant