NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST


HUMAN RIGHTS ABUSES PERPETRATED BY THE MANAGEMENT


NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST


THESE ARE SUPPORTED BY THE LABOUR PARTY
AS THE MOST SENIOR MEMBERS OF THE LABOUR PARTY ARE
THE MANAGEMENT


NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST


THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE - THE OVER PAID MEMBER OF MANAGEMEMNT WHO DOES NOT HAVE THE DECENCY TO REPLY TO GOOD TENANTS WITH LEGITIMATE COMPLAINTS - ENOUGH IS ENOUGH

I DO NOT LIVE TO EXIST

I LIVE TO LIVE WITH THE ABILITY TO BE RESPECTED

I DO NOT LIVE TO ENDURE EVERY DAY LIVING IN FEAR SUBJECTED BY THE WHIMS OF AN ARROGANT LANDLORD REPRESENTED BY A CHIEF EXECUTIVE THAT REVELS IN ACTING WITH EXTREME HOSTILITY AND CONFRONTATION WHEN LEGITIMATE COMPLAINTS ARE SUBMITTED IN WRTING AND IGNORED AND TREATED WITH CONTEMPT AND HOSTILITY

I DO NOT EXPECT MY WINDOW TO BE BRICKED UP THANK YOU!

HUMAN RIGHTS ARE TO BE ENDORSED

NOT ABUSED

BY THE SENIOR MANAGEMENT OF

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST

Are there any complaints about Notting Hill Housing Trust? We have a complaints procedure

From the bundels of papers I have looked through it is clear from two completely separate cases that Nadine Saakwa is the corrupt employee at Notting Hill Housing Trust. I think there is enough evidence here to file criminal proceedings against her and involve the police. She has been defrauding Notting Hill Housing for years.

Notting Hill Housing Trust has a Complaints procedure. Surely there is no

COMPLAINTS? - COMPLAINTS - YES, COMPLAINTS!!! LOTS OF THEM!

Maxine Carr writes of abuse of the rights of her son. I'm not too sure what to say, as I'm not fully familiar with that situation. Yet, I intend to find out.

Jason mentions that there is a Complaints Procedure to direct complaints from respectable tenants with legitimate complaints to the management at Notting Hill Housing Trust.

Barry Lindsey speaks about Innocent until proven Guilty??? Not at Notting Hill Housing Trust.
He states that the management of Notting Hill Housing Trust have been known to mention the DATA PROTECTION ACT [1998] and to hide behind it. How surprising! The Data Protection Act was meant to PROTECT the 'Data-Subject', who is the Tenant faced with the fact that private and confidential unauthorised unlawful information is constantly being inputted on the computer system about the tenant - the Beneficiary of the Charitable Trust. This is being done UNLAWFULLY, if UNTRUE information is being placed without the CONSENT of the tenant. I notice how the management of Notting Hill Housing Trust are extremely selective as to their knowledge of the provisions of the Act - one might even use the word 'ignorant' of the Act.

The axiom 'Ignorance is no defence as to not being aware of the provisions of the law.'

This makes Notting Hill Housing liable to ANY breaches of the law. Of which there are many!

I have documemtary proof that Notting Hill Housing Trust are UNLAWFULLY in breach of the DATA PROTECTION ACT in the misuse and abuse of their computer system.

All tenants are entitled to a FULL RECORD of the information held on the COMPUTER data-base of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.

One tenant mentions his anti-social neighbour. He will know that this is no coincidence. Is it not the case that Mr Lindsey is a MEMBER of a very powerful political party that poses a DIRECT threat to the LABOUR PARTY. Is that not the real reason he has been targeted? Is it not the case that the respectable tenant, Mr Lindsey has complained in writing to Notting Hill Housing Trust about his anti-social neighbours that are harassing him, as a good friendly sociable, helpful, charitable, gentleman and unlawfully harassing his respectable wife. How dare landlords act in such a cowardly unlawful way to such law abiding people who have an automatic legal right to quiet enjoyment of their flat. Is it not the real reason why 'Tenants from Hell' have been deliberately placed next to the respectable tenant, because he asserted his legal rights and made a legitimate complaint in writing to the management. Mr Lindsey's "crime" is that he put it in writing. This is an "unforgivable sin" as understood by the twisted, perverse, management policies of Notting Hill Housing Trust.

He knows his MP - he knows the Councillors for his Ward in his Borough of HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM! Yes, HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM!
The FLAGSHIP BOROUGH in the UK

IF THIS FALLS - Notting Hill Housing Trust FALLS TOO!

All the policies of the LABOUR PARTY would then be in tatters.

The CHAIRMAN [LABOUR PARTY member] would then be obliged to resign.

The BOARD OF DIRECTORS [LABOUR PARTY members] would then be obliged to resign.

The CHIEF EXECUTIVE [LABOUR PARTY member] would then be obliged to resign.


Please note that the flagship Housing Association (HA)/Registered Social Landlord (RSL) which is Notting Hill Housing Trust has extremely good relations with the Local Authority (L/A) as long as it remains LABOUR. If it FALLS, Notting Hill Housing Trust management FALLS.

Mr Lindsey seems to be well aware that it is common knowledge amongst tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust that as soon as a tenant is flagged up on the expensive 'tailor-made' Notting Hill Housing Trust computer system as a 'Problem Tenant' - meaning a problem to Notting Hill Housing Trust management - translated in normal understanding as a good respectable tenant who has complained in writing for legitimate and laudable reasons - invariably a person who is a good, respectable, sociable tenant - that as a knee-jerk reaction by Notting Hill Housing Trust:
ACTION 1 - Place the tenant in PURPORTED RENT ARREARS - irrespective that the Rent is paid in FULL and DIRECT by the Local Authority.
Is it possible for the Local Authority to go along with this scam by 'inhibiting' payments?

Look at the massive Conflict of Interest


CONFLICT OF INTEREST
PRIVATE INTEREST of Local Authority (L/A) [The L/A now gets its housing from the flagship HA/RSL) PUBLIC DUTY of flagship HA/RSL is to act as a reasonable landlord (L/L).

There is a crossover of staff from LA to flagship HA/RSL and from HA/RSL to L/L.

Both Protect and Support each other.

Similarly, all Housing Centres in the Borough are paid by the L/A.

All Law Centres in the Borough are paid by the L/A.

The Housing Centres and Law Centres have a policy - do NOT sue the L/A.

See the (LABOUR) Connection?


Central Government - LABOUR PARTY
Local Government - LABOUR PARTY
Flagship HA/RSL - Notting HIll Housing Trust - LABOUR PARTY


The Institutions PROTECT and SUPPORT each other.

The Institutions PROTECT and SUPPORT the LABOUR hierarchy SECRET SCHEME.


The only way to deal with Notting Hill Housing Trust is NOT through the HOUSING OMBUDSMAN (whose deliberations are in PRIVATE and not open to re-examination!) but through the following remedies:

i) POLITICAL INVOLVEMENT (DO NOT CONTACT THE LABOUR PARTY - THEY DO NOT SUPPORT TENANTS NOR THOSE WHO UNDERSTAND THE SECRET SCHEME WHICH IS TO HOUSE, IN THE BEST PROPERTIES, NON-INDIGENOUS CITIZENS WHO HAVE PRIORITY IN THE USE OF UNACCOUNTABLE TAXPAYERS FUNDING INTO HAs/RSLs)
INDIGENOUS CITIZENS ARE GRANTED INFERIOR PROPERTIES IN MASSIVE DISREPAIR
ii) MEDIA EMBARASSMENT [BE SELECTIVE AS TO WHICH NEWSPAPERS!]
iii) EFFECTIVE TENANT DEMONSTRATION IN THE MEDIA
iv) COURT INJUNCTION (AN ORDER) AGAINST NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - THIS IS EASY TO OBTAIN - CONTACT MR LINDSEY - FOR MORE ADVICE - TO BRING US ALL TOGETHER!

LET US NO LONGER SUFFER IN SILENCE - WE MUST SHOW MR BLAIR !

WHO SHOULD GET OUR PROPERTIES HELD IN TRUST - YOU OR OTHERS WHO HAVE NOT CONTRIBUTED ONE PENNY TO THE SYSTEM?


Break the mould - DO NOT VOTE LABOUR on Thursday, 4 MAY 2006


Keep the same (political party) - you remain a VICTIM - THE VICTIM!


How many other tenants are in the same situation? Every tenant who has been flagged up as 'a Problem' by the management of Notting Hill Housing Trust onto the computer system - perhaps monitoring by the local authority on the Closed Circuit TeleVision (CCTV) monitoring that goes back to Hammersmith & Fulham Town Hall based on the Ground Floor office, close to the reception desk, inside the King Street Town Hall main building (all 350 cameras monitoring - 'including targeted tenants'? - 7 days a week 24 hours a day). The system can be used to good effect to generate much needed revenue - but - can it not be abused?


Notting Hill Housing Trust tend to be silent about other legislation - an important part of European Law incorporated into UK domestic law introduced in 1998 -
THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998.
This gives Legal Rights to Beneficiaries/Tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust.

Then there is THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000.
This gives Legal Rights to Beneficiaries/Tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust to find out information from the management of the Trust - and the Chairman and Board of Directors of the Trust as Trustees of the Trust. The Chief Executive is employed by the Board of Directors of the Trust. Employed to COMMUNICATE and CONSULT not to CONFRONT and CAVIL.


Keith Henley speaks of Fraud going on within Notting HiIl Housing Trust.

Certainly, it is well known that the management of Notting HIll Housing Trust were misappropriating (read: 'stealing') some of the housing stock of 18,000+ properties that are the property of Notting HIll Housing Trust - that is held in Trust - for the benefit of the Beneficiaries of the Charitable Trust. The Chairman and the Board of Trustees, read the Board of Directors of Notting Hill Housing Trust, have a legal duty and a duty of Trust to ensure that the housing stock is not misappropriated (read: 'stolen') by any of the management of Notting Hill Housing Trust. Neither done collectively or severally (read: 'individually'). Neither done in collusion with management or done on an internally collective basis. Whether done in the form of a CONSPIRACY (a group of more than one person who agreed to act to commit an unlawful purpose) or in the form of a basic FRAUD.

Based on the mass of documentary evidence gleaned to date, Notting Hill Housing Trust needs to be carefully scrutinized and scrutinized independently - this is not the case - there is no independent scrutiny of the properties of Notting Hill Housing Trust - there is no independent accountable scrutiny of the properties - there is no independent scrutiny of the unlimited taxpayers funding that is going into Notting Hill Housing Trust.

24 BILLION POUNDS [24,000,000,000 pounds] of taxpayers money has gone into HAs/RSLs
This is UNACCOUNABLE.

It is accountable to the AUDIT COMMISSION, the organ of the Executive and TONY BLAIR as head of the LABOUR PARTY - NOT the NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE (NAO) the organ of PARLIAMENT. This makes taxpayers money going into Notting Hill Housing Trust UNACCOUNTABLE.

The previous Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - GERARD LEMOS (of Indian ancestry) was appointed:
i) COMMISSIONER of the AUDIT COMMISSION - by TONY BLAIR [on the recommendation of the mentor of GERARD LEMOS and fellow LABOUR PARTY member LABOUR PARTY LORD] LORD TOM SAWYER the previous Chairman of Notting Hill Housing Trust described as "Our Champion" by Kate Davies (another member of the LABOUR PARTY who came out of the woodwork that day)! Members of the Audit Commission are Civil Servants. Members of the Audit Commission are subject to the directives of the Audit Commission Commissioners! The Audit Commission writes reports and assesspes the quality of HAs/RSLs like Notting Hill Housing Trust. Yes, that is what GERARD LEMOS was appointed to do before he was appointed by the LABOUR PARTY to the Board of Notting Hill Housing Trust - Conflict of Interst? - YOU BET!!! MASSIVE CONFLICT OF INTEREST!!!
ii) COMMISSIONER OF THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION [recommended by LORD SAWYER] controls the British Civil Service. Members of the Audit Commission are subject to the directives of the Civil Service Commission.
iii) DEPUTY CHAIRMAN to LABOUR LORD, LORD NEIL KINNOCK appointed on the BRITISH COUNCIL (noted for being full of Sleaze, Nepotism and Cronyism) meant to promote British Culture - some say a massive unaccountable waste of taxpayers money.
iv) CHAIRMAN of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST [Nominated by LABOUR PARTY LORD, LORD SAWYER the previous LABOUR PARTY Chairman]
- no prizes for identifying the massive CONFLICTS OF INTEREST!
v) GERARD LEMOS runs a business partnership LEMOS & CRANE at the top of Highgate Hill and LABOUR LORD, LORD TOM SAWYER arranged him to enjoy a lucrative business consultancy to draft policies for Notting HIl Housing Trust and to research books based in COLVILLE, a political district known as a WARD, located in the area of high property prices in Kensington & Chelsea where Notting Hill Housing promote policies to house the 'right people' at Notting Hill Housing Trust - negative discrimination policies - that would do justice to a Banana Republic with a(n elective) dictatorship in power.

The body that controls Notting Hill Housing Trust is the HOUSING CORPORATION which comes under the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) - The Executive (not Parliament) once again and makes it UNACCOUNTABLE! Notting Hill Housing Trust receives taxpayers money from this unaccountable body - just like Notting HIll Housing Trust is inspected by a body controlled by the Executive (not Parliament) - thereby making it UNACCOUNTABLE!


That being the case, the tenants are hit - attacked - and hit hard by the management of Notting Hill Housing Trust - clearly, as a way of trying to suppress the evidence if illegallity.

Yet, a breach of trust has happened and I have proof that this has taken place under the Chairmanship of LABOUR PARTY member, Gerard Lemos and with LABOUR PARTY member, Kate Davies as Chief Executive. I have the witnesses to prove it.

This is the reason why the previous Chief Executive of Notting Hill Housing Trust, PETER REDMAN, a member of the LABOUR PARTY, was obliged to resign with immediate effect. Anywhere else it would constitute Gross Misconduct. This means NO possibility of any Termination Payment. Yet, this is Notting Hill Housing Trust, with unaccountable taxpayers money, Deviously Clever (tactics can be invoked?)!

So a Secret PAY OFF was made out of Trust funds - a Breach of Trust was thereby effected. This means it is possible to initiate a Legal Action against the management of Notting Hill Housing Trust.

It was recorded in an authoritative journal of property as 'Property People' using the quaint euphemism that the LABOUR PARTY member, PETER REDMAN was obliged to 'Fall on his Sword'. Indeed, the truth is that PETER REDMAN was 'pushed' by his LABOUR PARTY more senior 'friend' in the LABOUR PARTY. He was made to be the FALL GUY! Certainly not, LABOUR LORD, LORD TOM SAWYER, ex Chairman of Notting Hill Housing Trust, the ex Chairman of the LABOUR PARTY, who was appointed as Chairman by his good friend TONY BLAIR, LABOUR PARTY British Prime Minister. Who is now out of his depth in SLEAZE with a capital S or is it a capital C for CORRUPTION? - the jury is still out. The verdict will come in decisively and unequivocally on THURSDAY, 4 MAY 2006 at the date of the Local Elections.


LABOUR OUT - LABOUR OUT - LABOUR OUT


That is what most of the Tenants will say who do not like the Management of Notting Hill Housing Trust and the way the tenants have all been treated like imbeciles without a Brain.


We have news for you - LABOUR PARTY!


I voted before for the LABOUR PARTY - but never again.


I never realised it was the LABOUR PARTY that was setting me up as a FALL GUY as they did to PETER REDMAN.


LORD TOM SAWYER, senior member of the LABOUR PARTY should have taken the CAN but they got poor junior member of the LABOUR PARTY, PETER REDMAN and Chief Executive of Notting HIll Housing Trust to take the RAP.

PETER REDMAN received a secret unaccountable pay off from out of the unaccountable funds of Notting Hill Housing Trust!


COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE AT NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST

YES, there is a Complaints Procedure at Notting HIll Housing Trust.

It is Internal - It is not Trusted by tenants because it is acknowledged even by its own staff as not worthy of the title 'Complaints Procedure'.

A COMPLAINTS PROCEDURE is:
INDEPENDENT
CAN BE RELIED UPON
TRANSPARENT
TREATED IN GOOD FAITH
ACCOUNTABLE
RESPECTED
CONSULTATIVE
AIMS TO ELICIT THE AGREED FACTS
AIMS TO SEEK AN AGREED SOLUTION
SEEKS TO ACHIEVE A REASONABLE OUTCOME
OUTCOME IS UPHELD BY BOTH PARTIES

Everything about Notting Hill Housing Trust reeks of Sleaze, Deceit and Impropriety.

Further, the management of Notting Hill Housing Trust cannot be trusted.

Lies, Misrepresentations, Deceits and Dissembling - these are invariably relied upon by Notting Hill Housing Trust.

It is well known by many of the tenants that the 21 Charity Shops in the most expensive locations of London are a money laundering scam. Why would a Charitible Trust with some 4 Billion pounds [4,000,000,000] worth of property which is known for charging extortionate rents and using deceitful management practices of which PETER RACHMAN the notorious evil landlord of Notting Hill would have been proud. Indeed the present Notting Hill Housing Trust now has the support of the most senior members of the LABOUR PARTY to practice evil wicked deeds. One of which is to give priority to non indigenous citizens. Such citizens are allocated the most luxurious properties. There is no disrepair in those properties - they are not put in rent arrears. They are left alone and left in credit. The most damp properties that are in the greatest of disrepair are specifically allocated to indigenous citizens.

If they dare to complain in writing with legitimate complaints, such indigenous tenants are immediately placed in purported Rent Arrears with selected Statements of Account. More lies!

Yes, Mr Lindsey - I have a whole file of Statements of Account and letters to various Notting Hill Housing Trust tenants who have been falsely, deceifully and deliberately placed in Rent Arrears. The (underhand and deliberate) motive of Notting Hill Housing Trust management - to seek an Eviction. Actions as these contitute Harassment. There is a law that protects tenants from such unlawful actions as these - The Protection From Harassment Act 1997. [+ Protection From Eviction Act 1977 is also useful (it is there to protect tenants).]

Another (deceitful and deliberate) tactic Notting Hill Housing Trust (ab)use to great effect in a position of Abuse of Trust - the getting of tenants to sign two tenancies.


Deviously Clever.


One tenancy appears to give rights and does give rights.

Yet when Notting Hill Housing Trust want to change the goal-posts (the rules) [when it has learnt something new about the tenant - placed onto its expensive computer system without my knowledge and in breach of law, such as the unlawful use of my personal and private information - the breach of the right to: i) respect for my private and family life and ii) fredom of expression [Human Rights Act 1998, Schedule 1, Article 8 and Article 10].


NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST PLEASE NOTE:

ARTICLE 8
RIGHT TO RESPECT FOR PRIVATE AND FAMILY LIFE
Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.

Further Note:
It is unlawful for a landlord, including Notting Hill Housing Trust, to break into a tenants home.

It is unlawful for a landlord, including Notting Hill Housing Trust, to commit Criminal Damage to a tenants personal property.

It is unlawful for a landlord, including Notting Hill Housing Trust, to steal/misappropriate a tenants personal property.

It is unlawful for a landlord, including Notting Hill Housing Trust, to HARASS a tenant whilst in the 'demised' property.

All tenants are entilted to the (Implied) COVENANT of QUIET ENJOYMENT

It is unlawful for a solicitor to lie to promote a client, including a client as Notting Hill Housing Trust.

It is unlawful for a landlord, including Notting Hill Housing Trust to tamper with the mail of tenants.

It is unlawful for a landlord, including Notting Hill Housing Trust, to isolate the electricity of a tenant whist in occupation of the demised premises.

It is unlawful for a landlord, including Notting Hill Housing Trust, to allow a tenant to be placed in a property that is not safe for human habitation with darkened common parts.

It is unlawful for a landlord, including Notting Hill Housing Trust, to abdicate its responsibilities as a landlord.

If there are two tenancy contracts, the one tenancy with the greater rights is the tenancy contract that can be relied upon by the tenant. [If Notting Hill Housing Trust were to deviously seek an eviction, by proxy, by persuading a tenant to sign a tenancy agreement which gives the tenant less security for the same property - the tenancy for the same property with the greater security is the tenancy that will be upheld by any court. This can be enforced in the local County Court (depending on the location of the tenant's address). That is basic property law. The law has not been changed for the convenience of Notting Hill Housing Trust. Otherwise, all landlords would try the same underhand methods and get away with it. Just because a landlord might persuade a tenant to sign a second tenancy agreement in relation to the same property - this does not make the second agreement lawful - yet this evidence of the second tenancy - if the first tenancy agreement can be produced - an important inference can be drawn - this documentary evidence does go to the (devious) state of (corrupted?perverse?) mind of the (confrontational? hostile?) management (style) of Notting Hill Housing Trust! (as it is extremely difficult to terminate a secure tenancy - the management tend to set up HARASSMENT by PROXY to evict a tenant - if proved by the tenant - these constitute compelling grounds of HARASSMENT by the landlord against the tenant - particularly if the tenant is a vulnerable tenant)(Media involvement - Court involvement - Direct Action - Group Action all have their part to play - just as easily as the management are appointed - just as easily they are dismissed - for Gross Misconduct or for 'Falling on their Swords' - and what big Swords they want to have!!!)]


ARTICLE 9
FREEDOM OF THOUGHT, CONSCIENCE AND RELIGION
Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief and freedom, either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief, in worship, teaching, practice and observance.

ARTICLE 10
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION
Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.


Keith Henley expresses himself about NADINE SAAKWA, as do so many other tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust, who have had the misfortune to deal with her. She is very offhand and confrontational in manner. She is arrogant and devious.

Notting Hill Housing Trust has become a byword for Confrontation and Hostility. It appears to revel in Sleaze and the Chief Executive from Servite Houses seems to support Confrontation and Hostility by management against respected tenants who are now unable to present their numerous legitimate complaints to the flagship Housing Association (HA) - otherwise known as a Registered Social Landlord (RSL) that is controlled by those who now control the LABOUR PARTY - Mr BLAIR - Mr PRESCOTT (at ODPM which controls HOUSING and RSLs/HAs around the country - the way to get votes - HOUSING = VOTES = through GERRYMANDERING communities in every political constituency - placing housing in an area and placing non indigenous citizens who are likely to be grateful for this presention of largesse for no obvious reason - most of the local citizens who pay for the scheme, in the mistaken belief it is targeted for 'Key Workers' as nurses and policemen is a deceit perpetrated on the hard working taxpayers - are most are not understanding - most of the tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust are also not understanding of this devious scheme - otherwise seen as a scam once understood). There is LORD LEVY (the qualified accountant who has no intermediary and advised BLAIR to use 'LOANS (presented as Donations - indefinite gifts - not a payment of principal to be returned with a commercial rate of interest)' not DONATIONS so that the money from BENEFICIARIES of the LABOUR PARTY would be 'off the record' and UNACCOUNTABLE - like the taxpayers money that goes through ODPM and 'audited' through the unaccounable AUDIT COMMISSION (Executive overseeing) not through the NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE (Parliamentary overseeing) - through LORD SAWYER (ex Chairman of the LABOUR PARTY appointed as Chairman of Notting Hill Housing Trust by TONY BLAIR) - LABOUR LORD, LORD CLIVE SOLEY (ex Chairman of the LABOUR PARTY, PARLIAMENTARY LABOUR PARTY (PLP) - got the LABOUR PARTY MPs to vote for the WAR in IRAQ - he wrote that the UK Press should be strictly regulated in 'REGULATING THE PRESS' - he hated and hates RUPERT MURDOCH, he is the good friend of TONY BLAIR and even closer friend of LABOUR LORD, LORD TOM SAWYER)(Ironically he wanted to get rid of the House of Lords and was Chairman of its Select Committee to oversee its destruction!)
Their good LABOUR PARTY friend who was also previously a Councillor of Hammersmith is LABOUR PARTY member, NIC RAYNSFORD MP who was recently placed on the Board of Notting Hill Housing Trust. He has done no favours for the tenants. Just more of the same. Hostility and Confrontation from management. Unaccountability and Lack of Respect. Deceit and Impropriety. Deception and Lies.

Some 700 complaints were recorded against Notting Hill Housing Trust - only a proportion of the figures for the year were given - not the full year) what is the real figure! [As seen and presented for scrutiny in Hansard (the report of the House of Commons, in response to a Parliamentary Question from Greg Hands MP).]
Who provided THE FIGURES OF PURPORTED COMPLAINTS to Parliament?
- NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST of course (presented by LABOUR PARTY Housing Minister Phil Woolas LABOUR PARTY MP - a very good friend of the LABOUR PARTY Chairman of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST)

The STINK gets stronger as each day passes.

TONY BLAIR has very good reason to be ALARMED at yesterday's BLACK WEDNESDAY's revelations - but NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST Sleaze caps them all !!!
Independent?
Transparent?
Accountable?
Trusted by Tenants?
Respected?
you have to be joking!


The LABOUR PARTY have filled the Board of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST with members of the LABOUR PARTY.

I can understand why decent tenants live in fear that many are not prepared to put their name to a public record - to be attacked by the likes of LABOUR PARTY LORD, LORD SAWYER, LABOUR PARTY LORD, LORD SOLEY, LABOUR PARTY NIC RAYNSFORD, LABOUR PARTY MP and who are able to conveniently hide behind the protective screen of parliamentary 'accountability' - the ability to attack others whilst they hide behind their privileged position to attack vulnerable tenants. This LABOUR PARTY is far worse than
any other Political Party I have ever known.

Itis no coincidence that LORD SAWYER the ex Chairman of the LABOUR PARTY and ex Chairman of Notting Hill Housing Trust and LORD SOLEY as ex Chairman of the LABOUR PARTY, PARLIAMENTARY LABOUR PARTY (PLP) as a Notting Hill Housing Trust adviser is able to hide in the dark of the shadows.

The ex Chairman of Notting Hill Housing Trust made sure that his successor the Chairman of Notting Hill Housing Trust set up policies developed to discriminate against tenants - negative discrimination - in favour of the managing tenants - rather than managing the properties! From where did Mr GERARD LEMOS get his blueprints to condone active discrimination against tenants under the Housing management control system?
He studied History and applied the knowledge that Chairman Mao used in China in his tyrannical, unaccountable, non transparent DICTATORSHIP.

Look what Mr Lemos introduced as his discredited management policies into Notting Hill Housing Trust. As a result of the brewing scandal, as with the untimely departure of LABOUR PARTY LORD, LORD SAWYER with 45+ Trust properties that were misappropriated.

Mr GERARD LEMOS supported Non Communication and Confrontation by management against tenants. The new Chairman, LABOUR PARTY member, Alan Cole speaks about the "good seeds that the previous Chairman has sown". Clearly, he is adopting the same policies. These are being enforced by the Chief Executive of Notting Hill Housing Trust (Kate Davies) which she used with arrogance and hostility when Chief Executive at Servite Houses. Many tenants knew her when they were in one of the 14,000+ homes based in Merseyside, London or down on the south coast. In her post as Chief Executive there she was known for her arrogant, hostile and confrontational attitude to tenants. She did not repond to letters of legitimate complaint from respectable tenants.

Is it right for NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to brick up the access to a tenants windows to deny access to the tenants windows? [The Legal Right to Light.]

Is it right for NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to brick up the access to deny access to the tenants garden? [The Legal Right to an Easement.]

Is it right for NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to steal a tenants files that the tenant is using in a legal action against the landlord? [Burglary.][+ CRIMINAL DAMAGE]

Is it right for NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST to break into a tenants flat to try to unlawfully evict a tenant? [BREAK IN AND ENTRY.][+ CRIMINAL DAMAGE][Breach of the Covenant of Quiet Enjoyment.]

Yes, these and much more NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST has done in an effort to demonstrate that CONFRONTATION and HOSTILITY is the management style! The same style the Chairman appears to voluntarily accept and endorse.

The dog usually wags his tail - no, with Notting Hill Housing Trust, it appeared that the tail of the dog appeared to wag the dog? But on closer inspection and scrutiny it is pellucid and patent that the LABOUR PARTY truly controls the management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST.

That is why NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST appear to act without a care of the law...
- they ARE the LAW!
- they ARE the GOVERNMENT!

See what is going on - 'BLACK WEDNESDAY' 26 APRIL 2006 -
THE CHICKENS - WITH A CONTAGIOUS VIRUS - ARE COMING HOME TO ROOST!

I AM ASKED THE QUESTION:

Have you a COMPLAINT?
NOTTING HOUSING TRUST -


NO, I DO NOT HAVE ONE COMPLAINT - I HAVE COUNTLESS COMPLAINTS AGAINST NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - AND THE LABOUR PARTY THAT HAS DECEIVED ME!

Do not allow Notting Hill Housing Trust from taking over whole estates across London. The councils who are regulated by government want to absolve themselves of responsibility for estate management so they hand over the estate management to Registered Social Landlords who are not accountable to anybody.

Lords Hansard
20 October 2005: Column 958

Lord Sawyer: My Lords, I too should like to thank the noble Baroness for initiating this debate. It is a serious, complex and worrying issue for us all. I therefore suppose that it is good to talk. Perhaps I too can declare an interest at the beginning of the debate. The only one I can think of is that I was once the treasurer of the Darlington council tenants' action committee.

We used to battle against the council, both Labour and Conservative. I do not know why they made me the treasurer— I had no money at the time. I think it was because they wanted someone young to carry the banner. The only people we disliked more than the council in those days were private landlords, whom we used to depict as greedy, grabbing and thieving rogues, and that was when we were being polite to them. But time has moved on. Modern times meant that the council which was once our saviour fell out of favour and the workers with more money wanted to be like the bosses and own their own homes—and why not?
Selling council houses was probably Maggie Thatcher's most successful policy, making tenants owners at the right price. The trouble was that she did not replace the stock that she sold with new stock for those coming into housing need. In many ways I feel quite depressed at present. I do not blame the Government for that in any way—I think that the pressures on every front are so intense that we are going backwards. Council provision is not very good where it does exist, and it does not exist in many places. Housing associations make some provision for those who cannot afford to buy, but that provision is declining: 7 million dwellings in 1981 and 5 million dwellings in 2003.

On a personal note, the big increase which quite annoys me is the development of small private landlords—"buy to let" or "how my generation exploits its own children" are the terms I use—and rent levels that my children cannot afford and make it impossible for them to save for a deposit to buy. Now we have self-invested pensions, to which the noble Baroness referred, where once again the wealthy will receive tax relief at the expense of the not so wealthy and give the market another spin towards the private landlords and the rich.
The Government are trying in any way they can to reverse some of those trends but it is difficult. However, by their own admission—an interesting statistic—only one-third of today's 10 year-olds will be able buy their own home if nothing is done about the right-to-buy, the supply and the affordability situation.

I know that the Government is doing their best. I was very interested in David Miliband's contribution this week about trying to get communities to take responsibility for buying and making provision for housing. I am also very interested in the initiatives which I have read about that John Prescott has been trying to take; to build houses that people can buy for £60,000 or £80,000. It would be immensely exciting for young people in my life and in my family if that were possible. I must keep on at the Government to make home ownership—this might not be everyone's priority, but it is certainly my top priority—a big campaign in the future. The matter I want to touch on in the next few minutes concerns whether to ask housing associations—we do not normally associate them with houses to buy—to become involved in such a campaign. I was the chairman of Notting Hill Housing Trust for five years. Our main focus was on the kind of things I have already talked about. Initially, we tried to overcome the legacy of notorious landlords such as Peter Rachman. Eventually, we got into our stride and provided 15,000 homes for rent in some of the most desirable parts of London. The noble Lord, Lord Whitty, referred to Notting Hill. The association built rented homes there where the opportunity for less well-off people to buy is almost non-existent.

However, much more needs to be done in that respect. Although Notting Hill Housing Trust and other housing associations should continue to build houses for homeless people to rent—that must be their core business—they ought to consider that when people come off benefits, get into work and become more socially and economically active, their aspirations, abilities and desires to buy start to grow. As their life chances improve, they want their housing situation to improve.

Just before I left Notting Hill Housing Trust a survey was carried out which revealed that two-thirds of our tenants would prefer to buy their own homes. You cannot go on ignoring that. You must face up to the fact that those tenants want to be like us; they want to buy. They do not want to rent. The noble Lord, Lord Best, referred to the report of Professor Wilcox published this week, which reveals another group of people who are stuck in housing need as a result of the slow pace of building. These are people who do not qualify for social housing—they have jobs and a reasonable income—but in many parts of the country they cannot afford to buy. What will happen to them? That was a question posed by the noble Lord. They will become increasingly disaffected. They will slide down the social scale and open up divisions in our society. They will see themselves as not being part of the "haves" but as being part of the "have-nots". We cannot afford to let that happen.

Over the years I have become increasingly convinced that if we are serious about reducing some of the big social issues such as child poverty, and increasing social mobility, we must help more working class people into appropriate forms of home ownership. In rented homes the poor get poorer and have precious few assets in their old age. Buying shares in their home—the one place they possibly could buy shares—or buying it outright will encourage them to save, build asset ownership and strengthen the commitment of families to their communities and homes. All the research shows that having an asset can make all the difference to poorer families, older people and people from disadvantaged backgrounds.
Notting Hill Housing Trust was one of the first organisations to pioneer shared ownership. That was an early attempt to make home ownership more affordable. That has been successful. We provided about 7,500 such dwellings. Other associations have taken that on. It is a growing area. However, it needs to grow more. Perhaps we could encourage tenants to buy shares in homes owned by housing associations to enable them to have a stake. They could start to build up assets, increasing wealth, choice and self-esteem by having such a stake in their homes. They could then perhaps free up social housing for those people who need it more.

I do not want to occupy all the time that I have been allocated. I knew what I wanted to say and I hope that I have said it fairly clearly. Home ownership is very popular in this country. Perhaps it should not be, but it is. That is how it is. In some European countries wealthy people are very happy to rent, but that is not the case here. Seventy per cent of people in this country own their own homes, but, interestingly, 80 per cent of households comprising a couple and two children own their own homes whereas 30 per cent of single parents own their own homes. That statistic tells a story. I do not want to go over the top but I sometimes get tired of armies of professional home owners lecturing tenants, or speaking on their behalf, about what they should want. We should listen to what tenants want. More often than not they will say that they want to be home owners too. We should take every measure that we can to try to help them become home owners.

Lord Sawyer

WOW some people on this site certainly know their facts - whoever knows all this stuff should be made Chairman of Notting Hill Housing Trust - and represent our interests!!!


Whoever it is seems to be highly knowledgeable about Politics and Law.


Whoever knows all this stuff should be appointed to the Board of Notting Hill Housing Trust.


The Board of Notting Hill Housing Trust certainly needs a good sorting out!


Thank you for the highly intelligent people who understand how Notting Hill Housing Trust works and to explain clearly the unbelievably close links that Notting Hill Housing Trust has established and cultivated with local government and central government - yet it should have been obvious, if they are all members of the Labour Party - that now makes absolute sense why various nasty, negative, confrontational things that have been sent to me in the post have all been organized and orchestrated through my landlords and I understand only too well that it is not a positive or helpful organization whatever image it may try to portray by its expensive public relations or media spin - all a perception - but the true reality is that it is a negative, hostile, unappealing and vile creature of the Labour Party, without a doubt hostile to the real members of the public.

My friends and I who are tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust will never vote for the Labour Party again.

We were thinking who to vote for.

Now we know - we certainly won't be voting Labour - we are not mugs - we see through the likes of:
Tony Blair,
John Prescott,
Charles Clarke,
Patricia Hewitt,
Tom Sawyer,
Clive Soley,
Michael Levy,
Gerard Lemos,
Alan Cole,
Kate Davies
and all the Labour Party members of the Board at Notting Hill Housing Trust!

Thank for explaining that the Audit Commission comes under the authority of the Office of Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM) who is responsible for Housing and the Audit Commision is not an independent inspector of Housing Associations [rather like the Housing Corporation that funds the Housing Associations that comes under the ODPM - also not independent] - but it is biased - so whilst Notting Hill Housing Trust might crow about receiving 24,000,000,000 [24 Billion - 24 thousand million] green lights - all glowing - as the endorsement is coming from their friends - like Mr Lemos who was placed in the Audit Commission by the Labour Party before he was appointed as Chairman of Notting Hill Housing Trust. It is nothing to crow about - as their friends in the Labour Party give them the glowing endorsement to a rotten landlord that should be driven out of town. It uses the commercial entity [Notting Hill Home Ownership Ltd.] when it wants to screw the tenants with extortionate rents (just like the slum landlord Peter Rachman of Notting Hill and Nicholas van Hoogenstraten did before them - but Notting HIll Housing Trust is worse - far worse - as it has the automatic support of the Government - Central Government and Local Government) - then it uses the charity [Notting Hill Housing Trust - the Charitable Trust with its 21 Charity shops] when it wants to seek sympathy and give the apearance it cares. It only cares about one thing - its survival. Yes, as John says, the whole system was set up to take us for a ride - a really big ride... off the cliffs to our destruction!

How could I not have realised all of this!

I knew there was something extremely crooked about Notting Hill Housing Trust, but I could not exactly put my finger on it. Now I know.

I am going to get in touch with Barry Lindsey to support him 100%.

It now becomes so very obvious why the management at Notting Hill Housing Trust are so confrontational and hostile to all of us!!!

I think the Labour Party Lord from 22 Inchmery Road, Catford who is behind all this orchestrated and selective abuse of good tenants through his Labour Party pals and cronies has a cheek.

How dare he, as the orchestrator of hostile confrontational tactics who not once answered - let alone acknowledged any of the letters from tenants whilst placed as the Labour Party Chairman in charge of Notting Hill Housing Trust. How dare he try to act as a holier than thou attitude. A Labour man speaking with a forked tongue if he uses the expression "honourable" - this is deceit and lies at its height - he clearly means dishonourable...

Is he also a Freemason - the right handshake to knife a few more tenants?

The British Council is certainly the hot bed of the discredited Labour Party - promoting British culture? - you have to be joking - it is the undermining of British culture - this is what the Blair project is and was all about.

I now see him as an old man, discredited, instead of supporting good tenants he stuck the knife deep into them - each and every one of them.

When an indictment for the New Labour Party - a corrupt coterie of sleazeballs.

I see the Labour Party as evil through his henchmen. His place is in the coffin of history.

He will follow the likes of the slum landlord, Peter Rachman of Notting Hill and Nicholas van Hoogenstraten.

Tom Sawyer is no Champion of anyone, as the Labour Party Chief Executive of Notting Hill Housing Trust tries to suggest - but of evil - he it was who orchestrated the discredited policies of Gerard Lemos of 7 Bisham Gardens, Highgate - directed against the good tenants - who got the secret payment out of Trust funds - he implemented the policies of confrontation and hostility. Rather than supporting - he attacked - he attacked - and he attacked again.

These are the dying days of the Labour Party...

The Labour Party is finished - RIP...

Thanks you fantastic people. Just what I wanted to read.
Nice work. Nice to know I'm not alone.
I knew my landlords are evil - but I can't believe they do what they do to so many other good tenants - did you say over 700 complaints - what is the real figure, now that I'd like to know!

And the Housing Associations get over £24,000,000,000,000 - wow - the figures are mind blowing! That would sure pay for a lot of properties...

That's why the Labour Lord, ex Chairman of the Labour Party and Chairman of Notting Hill Housing Trust, the one from Catford, and his friend, the ex Labour Party MP for Ealing, Acton and Shepherd's Bush wanted to deceive so many of us - didn't he bribe MPs to vote for the war in IRAQ?

By the way, that Labour Party Lord, the Sawyer man, might rapidly try to deceive me again through his poor researcher, but it won't wash - not this time.

I'm voting on Thursday, 4 May, but for once, not for the Labour Party

What Lord Tom Sawyer said in October 2005 at the House of Lords was true. He's right! I do want to own my own home. In fact I demand it unconditionally as an Assured tenant of Notting Hill Housing Trust. (As a Beneficiary of the Trusts of a Charity) There is no purpose for Notting Hill Housing Trust to exist or to manage tenancies for properties it has provided on an 'In perpetuity basis' because as a charity Notting Hill Housing Trust's duty is to give away these homes to all of their beneficiaries who have no home of their own. These houses must be given away to Assured Tenants on a freehold basis because the right to permanent housing is unconditional. It is then for the tenant, now the new owner of the property which was once owned by Notting Hill Housing Trust to manage his / her own housing and contractual affairs. How dare they claim to provide permanent housing to beneficiaries and then to interfere with people's lives by trying to manage these tenancies. Remember, a charity is there to give. Not give and then to take back. Notting Hill Housing Trust has a duty to give away their housing stock to all their Assured Tenants and walk away.

Notting Hill Housing Trust is controlled by the Labour Party
Just like Local Government is controlled by the Labour Party
Just like Central Government is controlled by the Labour Party
Just like elections are controlled by the Labour Party

STEVE MILLER (47) who came to the Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham in 1992 as deputy manager overseeing elections and the Electoral Register and has held his current job as Electoral Services Manager since 1999 and manages the election in Hammersmith & Fulham (of 119,295 residents) - you would have thought he would be ensuring he enfranchises citizens, not disenfranchises them!
With a staff of 700 you would think he would get things right?
Yet one man resident in the same building in the heart of the Borough for the past 14 years has been removed from the Electoral List - his "crime" to have made a complaint in writing against his landlords who are a creature of the Labour Party.
Isn't Steve Miller also a member of the Labour Party?
Clearly, a Conflict of Interest!

I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST AREN'T BROUGHT TO BOOK - MAYBE BECAUSE IF IT IS THE LABOUR PARTY - WE DESPERATELY NEED A CHANGE OF GOVERNMENT - THEN WE WILL SORT IT OUT OURSELVES

SOME OF THE COMMENTS BY THEIR MANAGEMENT ARE REALLY NASTY

THEY MAKE OUT THE GREAT GUYS ARE THE BAD GUYS

WE NEED A CHANGE OF GOVERNMENT - TO A RESPONSIBLE ONE - NO MORE SLEAZE - NO MORE ADULTERY - NO MORE

WHO SAID: "MORALITY IS... ABOUT RIGHT AND WRONG... WE HAVE HAD ENOUGH LIES. ENOUGH SLEAZE." [THE UPSTANDING AND HONOURABLE JOHN PRESCOTT (DPM)(ex Ship's Steward on P&O Ferries - e.g. 'Spirit of Free Enterprise'?) - No mention of the loose Ms Tracey Temple (born on an RAF Hospital ship anchored in the Yemeni port of Aden - is that the connection? Is that the attraction?) his Diary Secretary - who left her husband (David Bolden married to her in 1995 said: "she will stop at nothing to get what she wants" - poor man still suffers from Depression, living on Disability Benefit in Brentwood, after she went off with another man - a man with power - the ultimate aphrodisiac - no matter how ugly a man might be?) to cavort with her employer - to the disgust of Mr Prescott's wife - Pauline and son, John, whilst they were in Hull.]

WHO VOWED TO LEAD A GOVERNMENT: "PURER THAN PURE" [TONY, TAKE A BOW!] SAID BY LABOUR PARTY TONY BLIAR OR IS IT TONY BLAIR AFTER WINNING THE GENERAL ELECTION IN 1997.

AS JUSTIN SAYS - STOP PLAYING CHARITY AND POVERTY AND JUST GIVE US OUR
PROPERTY - SO SIMPLE TO DO - IF YOU BELIEVE IN CHARITY - CHARITY BEGINS AT HOME - I THINK WE NEED TO SORT OUT OUR INTERESTS

IF YOU WANT TO GIVE MONEY TO THE THIRD WORLD - SORT US OUT FIRST !!!

GOOD FOR YOU JASON - WE WILL HAVE TO GET IN TOUCH...


IF THAT'S OK

40 Years of Housing

Notting Hill Housing Group (NHHG) is a London based housing association that offers choice of housing to people in London, particularly those who have no choice now.
NHHG was established in 1963 in response to the poor housing conditions in North Kensington. Led by Reverend Bruce Kenrick, a group of volunteers organised a national fundraising campaign, the results of which enabled them to buy the Trust’s first houses.
From the outset the Group has had a reputation as a pioneer in the social housing sector, leading the way forward in innovative housing solutions and tackling difficult issues head on.
NHHG’s volunteer Programme was set up in 1995 to provide emotional and practical support to some of the vulnerable people that we house. The volunteer team recruits individual volunteers and large corporate teams to undertake a number of activities to improve the lives of our vulnerable tenants.

Volunteer opportunities include working in our numerous charity shops, clearing gardens or painting rooms for tenants who are unable to do this for themselves, working in our donated Furniture Store and befriending residents who have become isolated and lonely. Volunteers are also involved in a variety of activities such as offering drama support to disaffected youths, providing clerical support and cooking breakfasts for our sheltered schemes.
In addition, NHHG encourages its employees to volunteer and has a small paired reading scheme with a local primary school. NHHG departments are also given the opportunity to undertake a decorating or gardening project as part of a teambuilding away day. Employee volunteering is endorsed from the top with the Executive Directors Team annually taking part in a day of volunteering.

Employee Volunteering

NHHG is involved in employee volunteering in two ways: it offers employee volunteering to its staff and it offers opportunities for employee volunteering to external organisations.
Reading Scheme:

Once a week 17 staff from NHHG give up their lunchtime to spend 30 minutes working with Year 5 (9-10 year old) children at a local primary school in Shepherds Bush to assist them with their reading. The scheme was introduced to enable staff at the Group to increase their awareness of the local community, to give something back to the community and encourage more communication across the organisation. The head teacher at the school has identified that the scheme “contributes to raising attainment in oracy and literacy and increases pupils’ access across the curriculum”. The head teacher also noted an increase in pupils’ confidence, and staff from the Group found it challenging and hugely rewarding.

Team Building Projects:
Throughout the year NHHG works with large organisations to provide teambuilding opportunities. NHHG provides opportunities for teams to improve their teamwork skills outside of the office.

Projects can include redesigning and establishing low maintenance long-term solutions to derelict gardens, large scale decorating projects and offering excursions for isolated tenants, possibly with mental health issues.

NHHG has worked with a number of large companies including media companies, large investment banks, government teams and universities. NHHG staff are also offered the opportunity to engage in one of the Group’s decorating or gardening projects as part of a company away day.

Benefits for NHHG include:
• Opportunities to offer excursions to isolated tenants with mental health problems
• Opportunities to complete projects which would otherwise not be done
• Opportunities to make a real difference to a housebound vulnerable customer
• Opportunities to establish long term solutions to derelict gardens
• Enhanced profile amongst our customers and within the local community
• Better knowledge of the needs of our customers
• Opportunities to create partnerships and introduce companies to the organisation

Benefits for the Company include:
• Team building opportunity
• Enables business to give something back to the community
• Enables business to get in touch with their customers and find out more about them
• Build their reputation
• Positive PR
• Skill development
• Improve communication across the organisation
• Improve social/community awareness

The projects enable NHHG to make a huge difference to the lives of vulnerable people and, as a result, the Group places enormous value on the assistance it gets from its partnerships with companies and other organisations.

Contact Information

Jo Simpson
Volunteers’ Manager
Notting Hill Housing Trust
Grove House
27 Hammersmith Grove
London
W6 0JL
Tel: 020 8357 4866
Email: volunteer@nhhg.org.uk
Website:www.nottinghillonline.com/Supporters

Mission possible...

Kate Davies, Group Chief Executive, Notting Hill Housing Group, Interviewed by Lucy Glynn, a young Notting Hill Housing Group colleague

Kate Davies is currently Chief Executive of Notting Hill Housing Trust, and previously Director of Housing in Brighton and Hove. She has been active in the CIH in both the south east and London. In her spare time she is a volunteer call taker for Parentline Plus, and sits on the Independent Advisory Group on Teenage Pregnancy.

Kate Davies was 36 with three young children when she came into housing. Thirteen years later she is Chief Executive of Notting Hill Housing Trust and so, to many of her younger colleagues, her progress has been inspirational. And so first of all, Lucy Glynn wanted to know how it all happened...

Kate sees her career development in very practical terms. She mentioned how she recently read an interview with a ballet dancer who commented that young people aren't prepared to put in the sweat and grind these days. Kate realised that progressing at work was likely to mean a lot of effort and often giving up her evenings. She feels that absolutely anyone can get to the top but, as with the ballet dancer, it requires hard work and commitment.

Lucy: "What ambitions do you have left to achieve?"

Kate: "I have lots of ambitions but they don't include running a housing association that's bigger than Notting Hill. As an association, we've had two amber traffic lights and so my aim is for us to be a three star association. I have big ambitions for the team."
And what about her sense of personal identity and individuality? Kate told the story of how her mum gave her a book on how to 'Dress for success' - the grey suit and white shirt type. She quickly realised it wasn't good advice. Kate's individuality is important to her. "It's what we love about people, so don't try to blend in. We should celebrate our differences." She admits that her lack of power dressing has meant she's been given the coats in meetings once or twice but it really doesn't bother her.

Customer care is obviously a big issue for housing associations but Lucy want sot know if Kate really cares? As Kate rightly points out, "Tenants can tell us where the shoe pinches." And so she feels that the customer is always right in that they do know better about their own situation. "We have to ask people who live there. Everyone has a right to be listened to and treated nicely. I feel huge empathy for our tenants - many at Notting Hill are poor single mums with hard lives."

Lucy: "What makes good management?"

Kate: "Management is a good way for people to progress in their career and make a bigger impact, and potentially more money. But it's scary because it brings with it responsibilities - other people's futures and achievements are in your hands to a certain extent. It's also about accountability and taking responsibility."
"In terms of management style, I think it's important to be negotiating but, at the end of the day, you're in charge. It's fun but it also requires courage. My greatest weakness is that I can be too direct and blunt. It doesn't make me easy to live with!"

Lucy: "What motivates you?"

Kate: "I'm motivated by money and social purpose. I earn good money and have good prospects but, at the end of the day, I need to make a difference. I'm lucky to do a job with a social purpose - it gives me a sense of achievement. Of course, sometimes I wonder 'Why should I get out of bed?' Well there's the fear of gravity of course (which I try and counter with the gym)! In fact I think fear is the biggest motivator but it's 'not cool' to talk about it."
"But while I might have a fear of gravity, I do believe in a healthy body and healthy mind. I think a lot of issues could be minimised by healthier lifestyles. As a country we spend too much time treating symptoms."

Lucy went on the ask about Kate's values.

Kate: "I'd say that I am always trying to look for the best in people. When I was little I took part in a children's talent competition at the local cinema and was humiliated for a cheap laugh. I soon learnt that treating people with contempt is one of the worse things to do. So my motto is to treat people with respect - everyone works better with encouragement."
"I have three children and two step children. Luckily, in the housing world, most people understand about the work/life balance. Of course, parenthood is a bit of a guilt trap anyway - whatever we do is wrong. And how they turn out is down to us. What I have learnt, to help with my work/life balance is to 'not sweat the small stuff' - personal safety and listening might be essential but I'm less worried about shiny shoes and perfect hems!"

Lucy: "And your greatest achievements?"

Kate: "I'd say that I am proudest about developing the interface with the Notting Hill board and senior management team. If that works well then everything works. For me, a bad housing association is one that gets complacent and sluggish. A good one is modest and ready to listen to criticism!"

Another important change occurred in 1980, when the Government of the day launched its ‘Hostels Initiative'. Access to major capital funding became available to projects working with Housing Associations. The, then, West London Cyrenians joined forces with Notting Hill Housing Trust in a major rehabilitation programme designed to renovate existing houses to high physical standards. All the buildings were transferred to Notting Hill Housing Trust by the Local Authorities and were finally fully renovated by 1987.

Between 1981 and 1983 discussions about the possibility of replacing volunteers with salaried staff took place. After extensive and time consuming consultations, the Council of Management decided that a co-ordinator should be appointed to oversee the process. This appointment took place in January 1984 after which a planning and integration sub-group was formed to ensure that consultation continued and that the aims and objectives of the change were clearly set out and agreed. Different ideas about the best way to operate had to be reconciled and then tailored to resource limitations. Following a recruitment process, a full complement of paid workers was finally in place in March 1986 working as a collective responsible to the Council of Management.

The benefits of employing skilled and experienced staff was visible in terms of improved standard of service delivery, active and informed participation in policy development and a raised profile for the organisation externally. However, it was recognised that there were some areas that were difficult, principally decision making, accountability and communication. The ever active Council of Management continued to monitor and evaluate the situation and in the spring of 1989 decided a staffing structure involving a team of almost 20 workers was unwieldy and inefficient as a collective and the organisation should develop into a hierarchy. Following extensive consultation again, the new staffing structure of a relatively flat hierarchy was introduced over the next two years. The early nineties saw a short period of consolidation and then a programme of planned and sustainable growth. During this period the name changed again this time from West London Cyrenians to London Cyrenians Housing Limited, to reflect more accurately the field of work engaged in and London-wide networking. Developments during the nineties are well documented in Annual Reports. Suffice to say that there are now 29 projects in management, a home by the sea for our service users, transport to get them there and over 300 service users. LCH became a Charitable Registered Social Landlord in March 2004 and came full circle in its relationship with Notting Hill Housing Trust when a number of properties were leased back into LCH management.

A new model of service provision has been developed which provides self contained studio flats on one locality base. This has given many people, who have often not had choice the opportunity to enjoy privacy, respect and dignity, responding to their pleas for a place with their own space as a base from which to grow and eventually move-on.

The staffing structure has been developed to be lean in the centre to enable the service to be a value for money one which targets funds to the front line. LCH are an imaginative and innovative organisation, even to their staff management arrangements – unusually a job-share arrangement exists for two posts Director and Deputy Director – making a joint Directorate, each with separate areas of lead responsibility and who report jointly to the Chair and the Management Committee. This arrangement provides peer support as well as minimising the isolation often experienced by individual post holders.

At LCH there is creativity and thoughtfulness, innovation and care and an organisation that has the capacity to develop and grow to meet the needs of the ever growing numbers of people who need housing with care and support

Institutional discrimination and harassment still exists at Notting Hill Housing Trust. Poor housing, severe disrepair and overcrowding is inalienably linked to poor health.
We will assemble, gather evidence and bring all these people at Notting Hill Housing Trust who are responsible for these crimes to account through the British courts and then through the European Courts of Justice. 'Managing beneficiaries tenancies' directly, or by proxy through ALMO (Arms Length Management) breaches Human Rights and will no longer be an attractive option for Registered Social Landlords to engage in.

NOTTING HILL HOUSING LIMITED
INDUSTRIAL AND PROVIDENT SOCIETIES ACT 1965

NOTICE OF CANCELLATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 16 OF THE ACT


57959\0625

Publication Date: Wednesday, 19 April 2006


Notice Code: 2802


Industrial and Provident Societies

NOTTING HILL HOUSING LIMITED

INDUSTRIAL AND PROVIDENT SOCIETIES ACT 1965

NOTICE OF CANCELLATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 16 OF THE ACT

Notice is hereby given that the Authority has, pursuant to the above-mentioned section, this day cancelled the registration of Notting Hill Housing Limited (Register No 29988 R), the registered office of which is at Grove House, 27 Hammersmith Grove, London W6 OJL at its request. The society ceases to enjoy the privileges of a registered society, but without prejudice to any liability incurred by the society, which may be enforced against it as if such cancellation had not taken place.

Financial Services Authority, 25 The North Colonnade, Canary Wharf, London E14 5HS.

10 April 2006.

(1003)

How dare management of NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST lie and deceive through Kate Davies and her PA, Lucy Glynn, who interviewed her.

KATE DAVIES should go back to SERVITE HOUSES.

KATE DAVIES is a liar.

She never answered my legitimate complaints nor did she even acknowledge all the letters I took the time to write about.

She should give her 200,000+ salary to those peoople who deserve it rather than acting in an arrogant, confrontational and hostile way to me and all the tenants like me who are deliberately placed in purported rent arrears for writing a legitmate complaint to her about the severe disrepair of my damp Notting Hill Housing Trust flat.

Were it not for Kate Davies, I would be enjoying life - yet I am obliged to exist in a climate of frustration and hopelessness, despair and depression.

Many of my friends who are tenants of Notting Hill Housing Trust would do serious damage to her if they were to see her sneering face patronise their street in her 4 x4 four wheel drivegas guzzler turn up in their poor neighbourhoods.

She acts like Marie Antoinette before her execution.

Is that the Labour Party member who is Chief Executive of Notting Hill Housing Trust, Kate Davies, I hear screaming out to her Labour luvvies(?): "Let them eat cake..." I hear her say...


It is time for Kate Davies, the Chief Executive to go and to go quickly.


She has done far too much damage at Notting Hill Housing Trust.


Too much suffering she has caused.


All tenants say, enough is enough.


Kate Davies must go or Notting Hill Housing Trust must be closed down - for good.

KATE DAVIES must go as Chief Executive, as she does not respond to legitimate complaints by tenants nor does she even bother to acknowledge them.

She should go back to SERVITE HOUSES from where she came.

She is ARROGANT, DICTATORIAL, PATRONISING, DECEITFUL and she LIES to the media sayin she likes communication.

The patronising arrogant woman would not know whhat the word means.

She is nasty and theepitome of evil.

Go KateDavies to here you came from.

You are certainly not worth 200,000 a year [not including your expenses.]

THE LABOUR PARTY
THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT
CONTROLS
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST

NEW LABOUR - IS SINKING - IN SLEAZE
9 DAYS OF HEADLINES - 9 YEARS SINKING IN SLEAZE SINCE 1997 - 9 LIVES ARE UP!
LABOUR PARTY - PRIME MINISTER - BLAIR - B.LIAR - HAS SUNK
WAR IN IRAQ GOES ON
LABOUR PARTY CLIVE SOLEY SUPPORTED IT - AS CHAIRMAN LABOUR PARTY PLP
LABOUR PARTY LORD TOM SAWYER SUPPORTED IT - AS CHAIRMAN LABOUR PARTY
LABOUR PARTY MP's VOTED FOR THE WAR
LABOUR PARTY VOTED FOR THE KILLING OF INNOCENTS
LABOUIR PARTY VOTED FOR THE USE OF URANIUM WEAPONS ON CHILDREN
COSTING BILLIONS - MEANING THE CLOSE DOWN OF HOSPITALS
COSTING BILLIONS - MEANING THE CLOSE DOWN OF SCHOOLS
COSTING BILLIONS - MEANING MORE STEALTH TAXES
COSTING BILLIONS - MEANING MORE COUNCIL TAX

DR DAVID KELLY KNEW THERE WERE NO WMD - DID B.LIAR ORDER HIS KILLING?

LABOUR PARTY CABINET IS PEOPLED WITH:
DYSFUNCTIONAL DISASTERS THAT ARE INCOMPETENT, INEFFECTIVE AND USELESS MUPPETS AND PUPPETS! [NOT UNLIKE: NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST?]
LABOUR PARTY - PRIME MINISTER HAS SUNK IN SLEAZE OF HIS OWN MAKING

SENSIBLE WISE VOTERS WILL PUNISH BLAIR [B.LIAR] AND LABOUR PARTY
BAD POLICY - BAD MANAGEMENT - BAD JUDGMENT
[LIKE: NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST]
HOW DARE THE LABOUR PARTY DENY GOOD TENANTS THEIR VOTES THEN CAMPAIGN IN HAMMERSMITH AND SHEPHERD'S BUSH

MAJOR ISSUES OF CRIME - ENVIRONMENT - NHS - IMMIGRATION - SECURITY
LOSS OF ACCOUNTABLE PUBLIC SECTOR JOBS FOR LOCAL PEOPLE - TO
UNACCOUNTABLE PRIVATE SECTOR JOBS FOR OUTSIDE LABOUR

THIS IS WHAT THE LABOUR PARTY IS DOING - WE MUST SEND THE RIGHT MESSAGE

DAMAGING REVELATIONS + SORDID AFFAIRS [ADULTERY] OF MINISTERS RESPONSIBLE FOR ENCOURAGING ECONOMIC MIGRANTS THROUGH THE GUISE OF "POLITICAL ASYLUM" AND THE HOUSING OF "KEY WORKERS" OF POLICEMEN AND NURSES. THE REALITY WAS TO GIVE PRIORITY TO NON INDIGENOUS CITIZENS WHERE THE PRIME MINISTER HOUSES THEM THROUGH THE DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER'S DEPARTMENT AND USES HOUSING ASSOCIATIONS LIKE -
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST -
THE FLAGSHIP HOUSING ASSOCIATION [REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORD]
AND DIRECTS NEGATIVE DISCRIMINATION POLICY TO OTHER HOUSING ASSOCIATIONS AGAINST THE INTERESTS OF INDIGENOUS CITIZENS!

HOW WICKED! - HOW TREACHEROUS! - HOW DISCRIMINATORY!

IS NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST A BIG MONEY LAUNDERING HOUSING GERRYMANDERING LABOUR PARTY SCAM?

THAT IS WHAT MORE AND MORE TENANTS ARE SCREAMING - WITH GOOD REASON!

THE CHAIRMAN BEFORE THE PREVIOUS CHAIRMAN WAS LABOUR [LORD TOM SAWYER]
THE PREVIOUS CHAIRMAN WAS LABOUR [GERARD LEMOS - THE GAY GENTLEMAN]
THE CHAIRMAN IS LABOUR PARTY
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE IS LABOUR
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ARE LABOUR
THE POLICIES ARE THOSE OF LABOUR GERARD LEMOS INTRODUCED BY LORD TOM SAWYER - EX CHAIRMAN OF THE LABOUR PARTY (WHAT ABOUT THE 45+ PROPERTIES THAT WERE MISAPPROPRIATED/STOLEN FROM NHHT - NO PROSECUTION BY THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS - THE LABOUR PARTY CHIEF EXECUTIVE RECEIVED A SECRET PAY OFF FROM LORD TOM SAWYER OUT OF NHHT FUNDS - WAS NOT THE LABOUR PARTY MEMBER, DPP APPOINTED ON THE RECOMMENDATION OF CHERIE BLAIR TO TONY BLAIR - HER HUSBAND - AS THE DPP WAS HER EX BOSS AT MATRIX CHAMBERS, GRAYS INN?)[WHAT ABOUT THE LABOUR PARTY LORD CHANCELLOR, CHARLES FALCONER - TONY BLAIR'S EX FLAT MATE?
CRONYISM PAR EXCELLENCE!!!]
CHARLES CLARKE - HOME SECRETARY - WAS A COMMUNIST - DYSFUNCTIONAL
HAS HE NOT DECEIVED THE BRITISH PUBLIC?
IS HE A TRAITOR?
HE HAS MADE US ELECTORS VULNERABLE DELIBERATELY REL:EASING 1,023 FOREIGN CRIMINALS TO KILL OUR GOOD POLICEMEN THAT PROTECT US!
HOW DARE HE DECEIVE US!
HOW DARE HE BE A TRAITOR TO US!
HOW DARE HE PERVERT THE COURSE OF JUSTICE!

IS NOT THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (DPP)[HEAD OF THE CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE (CPS)] THE EX EMPLOYER OF CHERIE BLAIR, THE LAWYER OF MATRIX CHAMBERS, GRAYS INN, NOT RECOMMENDED BY HER TO HER HUSBAND, THE LABOUR PARTY PRIME MINISTER?

LAW HAS BEEN TOTALLY COMPROMISED BY MR BLAIR AND BY HIS POLITICAL APPOINTMENTS.

THIS MEANS THAT ANY PROSECUTION BY THE POLICE OR BY LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES CANNOT SUCCEED!

WHAT ABOUT THE EX FLAT MATE OF TONY BLAIR WHO WAS APPOINTED BY TONY BLAIR AS LORD CHANCELLOR [CHARLES FALCONER] IN CHARGE OF LAW IN THE UK?

WHAT OF LORD LEVY (LORD CASHPOINT) THE QUALIFIED ACCOUNTANT (UNOFFICIAL TREASURER OF THE LABOUR PARTY) YET JACK DROMEY THE HUSBAND OF LABNOUR PARTY ELECTIONS MINISTER HARRIET HARMAN [WHO ONLY SEEMS TO BE INTERESTED IN THE NON INDIGENOUS VOTE] THE LABOUR MP FOR PECKHAM AND CAMBERWELL HAS BEEN COMPROMISED BY MICHAEL LEVY AND HIS INSIDE KNOWLEDGE OF THE CORRUPT CABINET?

WILL THIS NOT BE THE WORST LABOUR PARTY SHOWING IN 40 YEARS?

IN THE MEANTIME:
THE SLEAZE
THE CORRUPTION
THE HARASSMENT
THE ABUSE OF GOOD RESPECTABLE TENANTS
CONTINUE AT NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
THE DISCREDITED LABOUR PARTY CREATURE THAT IS NOT THERE TO SUPPORT THE INDIGENOUS CITIZEN!

NOTTING HILL HOSING TRUST IS A PROXY OF TONY BLAIR AND THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT AS THEIR NOMINEES AS CHAIRMAN
THE RIGHT SENIOR MANAGEMENT WHO ARE CONFRONTATIONAL ARE SUPPORTED
HOW WICKED!
HOW VILE!
HOW EVIL!

SHAM ON THEM!

SHAME ON THE LABOUR PARTY!

ONLY IF YOU ENSURE THE FALL AND COMPLETE ROUT OF THE LABOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT

HOUSING AT
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
WILL BECOME
TRANSPARENT
ACCOUNTABLE
end of CONFRONTATION and HOSTILE and ARROGANT tactics of
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
management!


SHOULD TONY BLAIR GET HIS OWN 30 MILLION POUND (BOEING 737) JET
AND 2 HELICOPTERS - SUPPORTED BY THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT's OWN COST CUTTER SIR PETER GERSHON - ANOTHER LABOUR PARTY CRONY?


IS THAT HOW YOU WANT LABOUR PARTY TO SPEND YOUR TAX?

OR

DO YOU WANT MORE MONEY SPENT ON A CRUEL WAR - BASED ON A B.LIAR LIE?

WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION - AS WE ALL KNOW - NEVER DID EXIST

WHY?


BECAUSE THE UK & USA HAD PREVIOUSLY SUPPLIED ALL WEAPONS TO IRAQ!

I READ ABOUT SENDING THIS KATE DAVIES BACK TO SERVITE HOUSES ...IT WOULD NOT MATTER AS THE GUY WE HAVE NOW...MATTHEW FOX.. IS HER CLONE!
WHEN KATE DAVIES LIED SO BAD... EVEN THE HOUSING OMBUDSMAN FOUND SERVITE HOUSES TO BE IN BREECH OF THIER OWN TENANCY AGREEMENT,THAT WAS IN JULY/AUGUST 2004.

KATE DAVIES THEN ALL OF A SUDDEN LEFT SERVITES ONLY TO BECOME CHIEF EXECUTUIVE AGAIN FOR ANOTHER HOUSING TRUST- NOTTING HILL.

ALL THESE TRUSTS ARE THE SAME AND THEY ALL MOVE AROUND IN CIRCLES.. IF... AND THAT IS A BIG 'IF' A COMPLAINT IS UP HELD!

SINCE THE HOUSING OMBUDSMAN FOUND IM MY FAVOUR AGAINST SERVITE HOUSES LIVING IN THERE HOVEL HAS BECOME EVEN HAS BECOME EVEN WORSE, TAHN BEFORE..... AND I NER' THOUGHT THAT WOULD BE POSSIBLE.

KATE DAVIES IS A BARE FACED LIAR AND I HAVE IT IN A LETTER FROM HER, WHEN SHE WAS CHIEF EXECUTIVE AT SERVITE HOUSING UNTIL LATE 2004. THIS IS MAINLY WHY THE HOUSING OMBUDSMAN FOUND SERVITE HOUSES TO BE IN BREECH.
BUT MATTHEW FOX THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE WE HAVE NOW IS JUST AS BAD ....THEY MUST HAVE TO TRAIN EVIL PEOPLE FOR THESE JOBS!

THIS IS MY REAL NAME AND MY REAL EMAIL ADDRESS..NAME AND SHAME THEM ALL...

SINCERELY,
SUSAN DENIM ( SDENI@AOL.COM)

25 Apr 2006 : Column 530


The scheme is half private, half social and is heavily funded by the Housing Corporation, but unfortunately the economics of the scheme do not work for local people. The private housing is extremely expensive. I have some recent property supplements in which homes in Imperial Wharf are advertised at £1.75 million, £1.35 million and so on. Few people can afford that. The social housing was funded by the Housing Corporation under delegated powers that may or may not have been proper. Even local Labour councillors condemn the poor construction and small size of that housing.

The biggest criticism of all, which should be of great interest to the Housing Corporation, stems from the price of the 15 per cent. of the units that are shared ownership, pitched at key workers. Those cost between £320,000 and £410,000 and the scheme is reckoned to be Britain's most expensive so-called affordable housing scheme funded by the Housing Corporation. In rent and mortgage, a typical couple appear to be paying £1,005 a year to live there. In a six-storey block, perhaps—

Mr. Deputy Speaker: Order. The more I hear on this subject from the hon. Gentleman, the more I think it would be appropriate for an Adjournment debate, but certainly not for the debate on the Second Reading of the Bill. He is going far too wide in presenting his arguments.

Mr. Hands: Thank you for that guidance, Mr. Deputy Speaker. I was going to list the litany of complaints from Mallard house residents, many of whom are taking legal action.

Mr. Deputy Speaker: Order. The hon. Gentleman should not argue with the ruling from the Chair; he should accept the guidance.

Mr. Hands: The debate on this Bill is being watched closely in Hammersmith and Fulham. Notting Hill Housing Group is one of the biggest recipients of funds under delegated powers from the Housing Corporation. About two years ago, I issued an appeal in our local papers for tenants who had suffered under the group and was amazed by the response. I received e-mails from people complaining about how the group had treated them, and the examples included walls that had fallen down not being repaired and other failings.

The Bill allows powers to be delegated within the Housing Corporation, which could set an unwelcome precedent for some of the housing associations that are administered by and were regulated by the Housing Corporation. It will be difficult to tell housing associations that they cannot have those sweeping delegated powers if the Housing Corporation is allowed them. Residents of estates such as the Chambon, Solon Housing's estate on the river on Carnwath road and Orbit's development at Gwyn close would not like to see increased delegated powers.

Notting Hill Housing Group has a famous history and an exemplary mission, namely to provide low-cost housing in areas of west London with expensive property prices and high private sector rents. It provides more than 11,000 affordable homes, more than 4,000 of which are in Hammersmith and Fulham, and it is taking a keen interest in our debate today.

25 Apr 2006 : Column 531



Nothing prepared me for the public response to the appeal that I put out a couple of years ago. I am currently dealing with a number of Notting Hill Housing Group tenants who are experiencing significant problems and who are watching this debate closely to see whether the delegated powers will have an impact on them. For example, Collette Murray must share her bedroom with her son aged nine, because they cannot use their sitting room owing to the antisocial behaviour of the tenant below. Mrs. Jacobs of Shepherd's Bush road had had her floorboards up for eight years, until I inspected her property.

I want to own my own home. and don't want it managed by some organisation who is making big money left, right and centre. I demand to live in something I can call my own and it is my right. To hell with notting hill. What Notting Hill Housing does is daylight robbery. They get millions from the Housing corporation and still want to profit on the expense of the tenants suffering. Please can you all go and demonstrate against notting hill. See all your MPs, tell them how you suffer and bring evidence to support it. Notting Hill Housing has invested 40 years at discrediting and belittling the people who live in their properties. They really need to be closed down once and for all. Enough is enough.

Mr Smith said a key issue distorted and exploited by the BNP was housing. "Social housing is a huge issue across London and a huge issue here and we simply have to address it. There are huge social issues we have to deal with and housing is the main one. That is what the BNP are tapping into."

Anyone is better than Labour. The mass exodus of foreign nationals encouraged to come to Britain to settle under Labour's immigration and asylum policies + Housing, welfare and NHS.
Whilst the Somalian and other, Asylum seekers get quality housing, the indiginenous people in Britain have been treated like second class shit and emasculated by the political correctness. Political correctness has finished and labour has finished. Inequity and political discrimination against English people must stop. Cultural divisions have been engineered in Britain. No one can force anyone to live in a multicultural society. Housing priority must be given to the indigenous people of 'Britain' FIRST. Not to anyone else. Notting Hill Housing and the issue of Housing needs to to be shut.

THE GOVERNMENT - ITS AGENTS
LABOUR PARTY - (LABOUR PARTY) NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST


THE FACTS SO FAR.


THE PEOPLE - THE FACTS - THE POLITICS - THE LAW - THE MEDIA - THE CONTROL - THE INTELLIGENCE
BUT THE INTELLIGENCE IS NOT AS SECURE AS MANY THINK...

OTHERS KNOW ALL THE PEOPLE - THE FACTS - THE POLITICS - THE LAW - THE MEDIA - THE CONTROL - THE INTELLIGENCE - AND MORE!!!

ON THE DEATH OF THE VERY HIGHLY RESPECTED JOHN SMITH IN 1994, IMMEDIATELY AFTER HIS FUNERAL SERVICE HELD AT WESTMINISTER ABBEY, DERRY IRVINE [THE LABOUR PARTY SHADOW LORD CHANCELLOR] WHEN CROSSING PARLIAMENT SQUARE, BUMPED INTO PETER MANDELSON [(A MAN THAT MOST GOOD DECENT AND RESPECTABLE PEOPLE WOULD NOT TRUST - SHARING THE SAME, SOME MIGHT ARGUE, PERVERSE PECCADILLOS AS PETER MANDELSON & REINALDO DA SILVA, NOT UNLIKE GERARD LEMOS & PAUL CRANE OF POND SQUARE, HIGHGATE) - PETER MANDELSON WAS HEAD OF COMMUNICATIONS OF THE LABOUR PARTY] & DERRY IRVINE ARGUED TO PETER MANDELSON THAT "TONY (B.LIAR)" [HIS EX PUPIL BARRISTER, EX ST JOHN'S COLLEGE, OXFORD & LINCOLN'S INN (ONE OF THE FOUR INNS OF COURT - A LAWYER HAS TO JOIN AN INN OF COURT IN ORDER TO STUDY LAW FOR THE BAR EXAMS - THE SAME INN THAT MRS THATCHER & CHERIE BOOTH & CERTAIN NAMELESS OTHERS JOINED)] WOULD BE THE NEXT LEADER OF THE LABOUR PARTY.
THIS "SECRET SCHEME" WAS PUT IN PLACE & THE PLAN WAS MATERIALISED INTO FACT. [1994-1997]


THE DEVIOUS DECEIT WAS EXECUTED WITH THE INTENTION TO FAVOUR ONE SPECIFIC CANDIDATE IN ORDER TO DELIBERATELY EXCLUDE SOME GOOD PEOPLE: GORDON BROWN,
ROBIN COOK,
DONALD DEWAR (POOR DONALD - HOW HE WAS BETRAYED & CUCKOLDED (BY YOU KNOW WHOM WHO WENT OFF WITH HIS WIFE) - DONALD WAS A SOLICITOR BUT THE OTHER, WHO ACTED AS IF HE WAS CARDINAL WOLSEY, WAS ONE OF THE MOST POWERFUL BARRISTERS IN THE COUNTRY - HE WENT OUT IN DISCREDIT - AS THE PUBLIC DID NOT SUPPORT HIM AS A LABOUR CANDIDATE MP, HE USED HIS PROXY - TONY B.LIAR, TO ACT ON HIS BEHALF - DEVIOUSLY CLEVER - THIS VILE TACTIC WAS USED BY THE LABOUR LORD:

LORD TOM SAWYER OF 22 INCHMERY ROAD, CATFORD (EX CHAIRMAN OF THE LABOUR PARTY) WITH LABOUR MEMBER GERARD LEMOS OF 7 BISHAM GARDENS, HIGHGATE HIS SUCCESSOR AND PUPPET (APPOINTED ON HIS RECOMMENDATION AS THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT RACE ADVISER - WHO SET UP NEGATIVE DISCRIMINATION RACE POLICIES & THESE DISCREDITED LABOUR PARTY POLICIES WERE INTRODUCED INTO THE FLAGSHIP RESISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORD/HOUSING ASSOCIATION [TO BE ADOPTED BY ALL OTHER RSLs/HAs]:

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - THE FLAGSHIP REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORD ('RSL') OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE FLAGSHP HOUSING ASSOCIATION ('HA')
WHEN HE WAS APPOINTED AS CHAIRMAN OF
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
(BY THE LABOUR PARTY) HE HAD ALSO BEEN APPOINTED AS COMMISSIONER OF THE AUDIT COMMISSION, AND COMMISSIONER OF THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, BANKING COMMISSION AND MORTGAGE COMMISSION, AS RECOMMMENDED BY TOM SAWYER TO TONY BLAIR FOR HIS APPOINTMENT TO MANY SENIOR POSTS, INCLUDING DEPUTY CHAIRMAN OF THE BRITISH COUNCIL, DEPUTY TO LABOUR LORD NEIL KINNOCK) HIS FRIENDSHIP WITH LORD TOM SAWYER GOES BACK SOME 10 YEARS BEFORE 2004 - AS GOOD LABOUR PARTY FRIENDS.

LABOUR LORD TOM SAWYER WAS AN EXTREMELY GOOD FRIEND OF LABOUR MP, LATER LABOUR LORD:
LORD CLIVE SOLEY (AN EX PROBATION OFFICER AND EX LABOUR PARTY COUNCILLOR) OF 24 BIRCH GROVE, EALING COMMON (EX CHAIRMAN OF THE MOST POWERFUL LABOUR PARTY PARLIAMENTARY LABOUR PARTY (PLP) WHO ORDERED ALL THE LABOUR PARTY MPs TO VOTE FOR AN UNLAWFUL WAR IN IRAQ - IF NOT, EVERY ONE OF THEM WERE INFORMED BLUNTLY THEY WOULD 'LOSE THE WHIP' - MEANING THEY WOULD BE SACKED AS A LABOUR PARTY MP AND NOT CONSIDERED FOR PROMOTION TO THE FRONT BENCH OR TO CABINET) WAS IT NOT HIM WHO NOMINATED EX COUNCILLOR & EX LEADER OF EX LABOUR PARTY HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM COUNCIL ANDREW SLAUGHTER - ANOTHER LABOUR PARTY EX BARRISTER).

MANY OF THE MOST POWERFUL LABOUR PARTY MEMBERS DECEIVED, DUPED AND BETRAYED THEIR CONSTITUENTS - TOGETHER WITH BETRAYING VERY GOOD AND RESPECTABLE PEOPLE LIKE DONALD DEWAR, ROBIN COOK, MO MOWLAM, MAGARET BECKETT ET AL. AT THE ALTAR OF POLITICAL EXPEDIENCY.

WHEN THERE WAS A CHOICE TO SUPPORT GOOD CONSTITUENTS WITHIN THEIR CONSTITUENCIES, THE LABOUR PARTY MP WICKEDLY UNDERMINED THE GOOD CONSTITUENTS AND ATTACKED THE CONSTITUENTS WITH VENOM & SPITE.

SPECIFIC LABOUR PARTY MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT DECEITFULLY ACTED IN LEAGUE WITH LABOUR PARTY NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST MANAGEMENT.

GOOD RESPECTABLE PEOPLE WHO WERE ORIGINALLY LABOUR PARTY SUPPORTERS WERE NOT SUPPORTED BY THEIR LABOUR PARTY REPRESENTATIVES.

THE LABOUR PARTY REPRESENTATIVES DECEITFULLY TURNED ON THEIR GOOD CONSTITUENTS AND ATTACKED THEM WITH VENOM.
THE WAY OF THE BULLY
THE WAY OF THE COWARD
THE WAY OF NOTTING HILL HOME OWNERSHIP LIMITED
THE WAY OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
THE WAY OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING
THE WAY OF THE CHAIRMAN OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
THE WAY OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
THE WAY OF THE DIRECTORS OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
THE WAY OF THE TRUSTEES OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST

ATTACK THE WEAK
ATTACK THE VULNERABLE
ATTACK THE DISPOSSESSED
ATTACK THE INARTICULATE
ATTACK THE ILLITERATE
ATTACK THOSE WHO ARE NOT LEARNED IN LAW
ATTACK THOSE WHO ARE NOT AWARE OF THEIR RIGHTS
ATTACK THOSE WHO ARE NOT AWARE TO SEEK EFFECTIVE REDRESS

HOW WICKED
HOW VILE
HOW DECEITFUL
HOW UNDERHAND
HOW DUPLICITOUS
HOW TREACHEROUS
NOT A SCRAP OF DECENCY
NOT A SCRAP OF GOOD MORALS
NOT A SCRAP OF GOOD FAITH
NOW ALL IN TERMINAL DECLINE!


WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND...


THE GOOD TRIUMPHED ON THURSDAY 4 MAY 2006


WHEN THE GOOD CONSTITUENTS OF 32 LONDON BOROUGHS OF GREATER LONDON WENT TO THE POLLS TO REGISTER THEIR FEEDBACK ON THE STATE OF THE NATION - GREATE LONDON AND THE REST OF THE COUNTRY REGISTERED ITS FURY.

THEY WERE FURIOUS
THEY WERE ANGRY
THEY WERE LIVID
THEY WERE NOT USED TO BEING LIED TO
THEY WERE NOT USED TO BEING DECEIVED
THEY WERE NOT USED TO BEING CONFRONTED
THEY WERE NOT USED TO BEING HARASSED
THEY WERE NOT USED TO BEING TRUSTED WITH ILLIGALLITY
THEY WERE NOT USED TO BEING TREATED WITH HOSTILITY
THEY WERE NOT USED TO BEING TREATED AS A SECOND CLASS OR AS A THIRD CLASS CITIZEN
THEY WERE NOT USED TO TREACHERY
THEY WERE NOT USED TO THEIR LANDLORD BEING A CREATURE OF THE LABOUR PARTY
THEY WERE NOT USED TO THE CHAIRMAN OF THE LANDLORDS BEING A MEMBER OF THE LABOUR PARTY
THEY WERE NOT USED TO THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE LANDLORDS BEING A MEMBER OF THE LABOUR PARTY
THEY WERE NOT USED TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL BEING A MEMBER OF THE LABOUR PARTY
THEY WERE NOT USED TO THE TRUSTEES OF THE LANDLORDS ALL BEING A MEMBER OF THE LABOUR PARTY


NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST:
IT IS A CREATURE OF THE LABOUR PARTY


HIGH PRIORITY IN HOUSING TO NON INDIGENOUS CITIZENS
LOW PRIORITY IN HOUSING TO INDIGENOUS CITIZENS


NON INDIGENOUS CITIZENS: PALATIAL PROPERTIES IN PRIME PLACES
INDIGENOUS CITIZENS: DEPRESSING DAMP SLUM IN DESPICABLE DISREPAIR


1. AFTER THE SECRET NATIONAL LABOUR PARTY SCHEME WAS DELIVERED
IN 1997;
TOM SAWYER AS LABOUR PARTY CHAIRMAN SENT OFF TWO OFFICIAL LETTERS:
i) HE OFFICIALLY CONGRATULATED TONY B.LIAR [AS WINNING THE GENERAL ELECTION - THIS MEANT PATRONAGE AND LARGESSE A PLENTY]
ii) HE OFFICIALLY WROTE TO (THE NOW LABOUR LORD) MICHAEL ABRAHAM LEVY
THE UNOFFICIAL TREASURER OF THE LABOUR PARTY NEC - UNDERMINING JACK DROMEY (NUMBER 3 IN THE OFFICIAL NEC HIERARCHY) (HUSBAND OF LABOUR PARTY ELECTIONS MINISTER HARRIET HARMAN - LABOUR PARTY MP FOR CAMBERWELL & PECKHAM - HOME OF GLAZER DELMAR SOLICITORS - WHERE COUNCILLOR DAME SALLY POWELL HAD PREVIOUSLY WORKED AS A SOLICITOR - AS LABOUR PARTY CABINET MEMBER OF REGENERATION OF HAMMESMITH & FULHAM & LIVING AT 30 COVERDALE ROAD, SHEPHERD'S BUSH - SHE IT WAS WHO INTRODUCED 24 HOUR ALCOHOLIC DRINKING LAWS, [WAS SHE NOT FOUND SLUMPED AT THE STEERING WHEEL IN HER CAR, MASSIVELY OVER THE DRINK OR DRUGS DRIVE LIMIT, DRUNK IN HER CAR IN HARLEY STREET AND WAS SHE NOT GIVEN A CUSTODIAL SENTENCE BUT A FINE?] ONE OF TWO LABOUR PARTY COUNCILLOR MEMBERS OF THE POWERFUL LABOUR PARTY NEC - SHE WAS PUT IN CHARGE OF THE ASTRONOMICAL REGENERATION BUDGET).

2. IN 1998 TOM SAWYER WAS APPOINTED BY TONY B.LIAR AS A LABOUR PARTY LORD

3. IMMEDIATELY THEREAFTER IN 1998, TONY B.LIAR NOMINATED LORD TOM SAWYER AS CHAIRMAN OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST

WHO WAS TOM SAWYER?
HE WAS EX HEAD OF THE NATIONAL UNON OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ['NUPE']NUPE/UNISON UNION - SUPPOSEDLY REPRESENTING, AMONGST OTHERS, CENTRAL GOVENMENT & LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
HE WAS EX CHAIRMAN OF THE LABOUR PARTY
IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT 45+ PROPERTIES OF THE NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST WERE MISAPPROPRIATED [CASH FOR TRUST PROPERTIES - I HAVE EVIDENCE THAT SOME NHHT MANAGEMENT GIVE TRUST PROPERTIES FOR CASH IN BREACH OF TRUST - AT THE RIGHT PRICE] PETER REDMAN THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE WAS OBLIGED TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE MANY UNACCOUNTABLE PROPERTIES THAT WERE DISCOVERED BEING MISAPPROPRIATED [READ STOLEN] AND A SECRET PAY OFF WAS PAID BY LORD TOM SAWYER OUT OF TRUST FUNDS
SOON THERERAFTER IN 2004, LORD TOM SAWYER HURRIEDLY DEPARTED.
HE WAS VERY, VERY, FORTUNATE HE WAS NOT PROSECUTED.

HOLD ON - WHO DECIDES ON PROSECUTIONS IN THIS COUNTRY?
OH, IT IS OUR OLD LABOUR PARTY FRIEND - WAS HE NOT PROSECUTED FOR POSSESSION OF CANNABIS ONCE UPON A TIME IN HIS LAW STUDENT DAYS? - WELL WE ALL HAVE FAULTS!

THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECECUTIONS (DPP) IS HEAD OF THE CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE (CPS) - WHO IS NONE OTHER THAN KEN MACDONALD - THE EX HEAD TENANT OF MATRIX CHAMBERS - THE HEAD OF THE LAW OFFICES WHERE CHERIE BLAIR WORKS - THE WIFE OF THE LABOUR PARTY PRIME MINISTER.
ON CHERIE BLAIR [CHERIE BOOTH'S] RECOMMENDATION KEN MACDONLD WAS APPOINTED BY TONY BLAIR AS DPP!

MIGHT THIS HAVE MADE A DIFFERENCE?

WHAT DO YOU THINK - EXERCISING YOUR WISE INTELLECT & JUDGMENT!

I SEE...

SO THAT'S HOW IT WORKS.

WHO IS HEAD OF THE LAW FUNCTION IN THIS COUNTRY?
WH APPOINTS THE JUDGES?
WHO PROMOTES THE JUDGES?
WHO DISMISSES THE JUDGES?
WHO APPOINTS THE MAGISTRATES?
WHO DISMISSES THE MAGISTRATES?
WHO SITS AS HEAD OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS [JUDICIARY]?
WHO SITS AS HEAD OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS [LEGISLATURE]?
WHO SITS AS HEAD OF THE EXECUTIVE/CABINET?
WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR STAFFING OF THE COURTS?
WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INTRODUCING MAJOR/MINOR LEGISLATION?
WELL IT WAS DERRY IRVINE - THE LORD CHANCELLOR [TONY B.LIAR's EX PUPIL MASTER]
AFTER THA BLAZING ROW...
IT IS NOW [LABOUR LORD] LORD CHARLES FALCONER [EX FLAT MATE OF TONY B.LIAR][ANTHONY CHARLES LYNTON (ACL) BLAIR - HE HAS A BROTHER, WILLIAM BLAIR, WHO IS A PRACTISING BARRISTER - A RESPECTABLE AND HONOURABLE MAN]
WAS NOT CHERIE BLAIR/CHERIE BOOTH APPOINTED AS A JUDGE...
I WONDER WHO APPOINTED HER?
WAS IT NOT A LABOUR PARTY MEMBER... [SEE ABOVE!]

4. IN 2004, GERARD LEMOS [THE PUPPET OF LORD TOM SAWYER] WAS APPOINTED AT THE AGM. HE INTRODUCED THE NEGATIVE CONFRONTATIONAL COMMUNIST POLICIES THAT APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN LIFTED FROM CHAIRMAN MAO'S LITTLE RED BOOK. HE CLEARLY HAD A STRONG LEANING TO COMMUNIST CHINA.


THE LOCAL ELECTIONS HAVE SIGNALLED OUR POSITION
VERY LOUD
AND
VERY CLEAR!!!

YET...


THE DOOR IS OPEN...


AS IT ALWAYS WAS...


HOW WILL THE LABOUR PARTY AND THEIR AGENTS, SUCH AS AT NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, NOW ACT?


WILL THEY SEE THE WRITING ON THE WALL?


WILL THEY LISTEN?


WILL THEY COMMUNICATE?


WILL THEY AVOID CONFRONTATION?


WILL THEY ACT AS MANAGING PROPERTIES NOT MANAGING PEOPLE?


WILL THEY NO LONGER CONFRONT GOOD RESPECTABLE TENANTS?


WILL THEY NO LONGER HARASS GOOD RESPECTABLE TENANTS?


WILL THEY ABANDON THE CRIMINAL TACTICS THEY HAVE EMPLOYED (OF WHICH THERE IS OVERWHELMING & UNBELIEVABLE PROOF)?


WILL THEY ABANDON THE: SAWYER, REDMAN, LEMOS, DAVIES, COLE, LABOUR PARTY POLICIES OF NEGATIVE DISCRIMINIATION AGAINST GOOD RESPECTABLE TENANTS?


24 BILLION POUNDS [24,000,000,000 POUNDS] IS A VAST AMOUNT OF TAXPAYERS MONEY TO BE UNACCOUNTABLE - AVAILABLE TO THE EXECUTIVE TO DISBURSE AS NECESSARY TO - IN THE MAIN - NON INDIGENOUS CITIZENS?


THE HOUSING CORPORATION IS UNACCOUNTABLE TO PARLIAMENT BUT ACCOUNTABLE TO THE EXECUTIVE [LACK OF TRANSPARENCY - LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY - LACK OF CONSULTATION]


THE AUDIT COMMISSION IS UNACCOUNTABLE TO PARLIAMENT BUT ACCOUNTABLE TO THE EXECUTIVE [LACK OF TRANSPARENCY - LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY - LACK OF CONSULTATION]


THE BRITISH COUNCIL IS HEADED UP AS A CRONY COUNCIL [LACK OF TRANSPARENCY - LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY - LACK OF CONSULTATION]


NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST IS IN RECEIPT OF UNACCOUNTABLE TAXPAYERS MONEY [LACK OF TRANSPARENCY - LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY - LACK OF CONSULTATION]


THE EXECUTIVE [OF THE LABOUR PARTY] AGUE THAT RSLs PROVIDE HOMES FOR 'KEY WORKERS' (LIKE POLICEMEN & NURSES).


THE TRUTH IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT.

1. RSLs/HAs PROVIDE HOMES FOR NON INDIGENOUS CITIZENS FIRST -
2. DAMP HOVELS IN MASSIVE DISEPAIR TO INDIGENOUS CITIZENS LAST -


WILL THIS DISCREDITED POLICY CONTINUE AGAINST ITS OWN CITIZENS?


IT BETTER NOT... OR LABOUR WILL WITNESS A SIMILAR RESULT AT THE NEXT GENERAL ELECTION ...


WE DO NOT THREATEN - WE PROMISE!


HOUSING POLICY COMES UNDER THE OFFICE OF DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER (ODPM) AS DOES THE UNACCOUNTABLE HOUSING CORPORATION (WHICH PROVIDES UNACCOUNTABLE TAXPAYERS MONEY) - AS DOES THE AUDIT COMMISSION (WHICH IS UNACCOUNTABLE AND INSPECTS THE RSLs/HAs SO IT GIVES THE RSLs/HAs EXCELLENT RATINGS - UNLIMITED TAXPAYERS MONEY GOES INTO RSL/HA HOUSING (FOR VOTES) - GERYMANDERING IN ORDER TO TRY TO GET AS MANY VOTES IN MARGINAL CONSTITUENCIES OR IN CONSERVATIVE BOROUGHS OR WARDS).

BECAUSE JOHN PRESCOTT [THE EX BRITISH SHIPPING COMPANY, P&O, STEWARD WHOSE DUTY IT WAS TO SERVE THE OFFICERS ON THE P&O FERRIES IN THE MERCHANT NAVY - P&O HAS RECENTLY BEEN SOLD OFF TO THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES - DUE TO, AMONGST OTHER THINGS, THE WRECKING TACTICS OF INDIVIDUALS LACKING FORESIGHT LIKE THE NON-COMMUNICATIVE CONFRONTATIONAL JOHN PRESCOTT - HIS BOOK: 'NOT WANTED ON VOYAGE' - WHO KNOWS ABOUT THE ULTRA SECRET SCHEME FOR GERRYMANDERING THE VOTE.
SO TONY B.LIAR WILL NOT WANT TO SACK 'TWO JAGS(SHAGS)' PRESCOTT.
WHO BREACHED THE CABINET CODE?


COMMUNIST CHARLES CLARKE [HOME SECETARY - IN CHARGE OF MI5 - SECURITY SERVICE] HAS GONE - AS HE HAD TO GO - AS WAS ROBUSTLY ARGUED ON THIS SITE BY VARIOUS CONTRIBUTORS.

PATRICIA HEWITT HAS GONE - IN CHARGE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & THE NHS - AS WAS ROBUSTLY ARGUED ON THIS SITE.


CHARLES CLARKE HAS GONE - LIKE PETER REDMAN [LABOUR PARTY MEMBER CHIEF EXECUTIVE] IN DISCREDIT

HE HAS GONE LIKE LORD TOM SAWYER [LABOUR PARTY MEMBER CHAIRMAN] IN DISCREDIT

HE HAS GONE LIKE GERARD LEMOS [LABOUR PARTY MEMBER CHAIRMAN] IN DISCREDIT [HE HAS RUN AWAY TO COMMUNIST CHINA - WITHOUT WAITING FOR THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING TO GIVE HIS REASONS TO THE MEMBERS (THE ONE POUND SHAREHOLDERS CAREFULLY SELECTED BY THE CHAIRMAN - WHAT A DISCREDITED SHAM OF A LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY - THIS IS UNKNOWN IN BRITISH CORPORATE AND/OR BRITISH TRUST ACCOUNTABILITY HISTORY) AND THEN TO TENDER HIS RESIGNATION (IN DISGRACE)

KATE DAVIES [LABOUR PARTY MEMBER CHIEF EXECUTIVE] NEEDS TO GO

ALAN COLE [LABOUR PARTY MEMBER CHAIRMAN] NEEDS TO GO


ALAN COLE HAS NOT SUPPORTED THE GOOD RESPECTABLE TENANTS


KATE DAVIES HAS AT NO TIME SUPPORTED THE GOOD RESPECTABLE TENANTS OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - JUST USED CRIMINAL TACTICS AGAINST THEM - AS SHE APPEARS TO WANT THE MANAGEMENT OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST TO ACT AS A LATTER DAY PETER RACHMAN - THE VILE, EVIL, DECEITFUL SLUM LANDLORD OF NOTTING HILL - WHERE NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST STARTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVIL MAN - WITH THE EXCELLENT GOOD INTENTIONS OF REVEREND PETER KENRICK (THE ANGLICAN PRIEST) & WINNIFRED ATTWELL (THE WEALTHY & VERY GOOD INTENTIONED SINGER) WHO PUT MONEY IN TRUST IN ORDER TO ADDRESS THE DESPICABLE DAMP HOUSING THAT WAS IN MASSIVE DISREPAIR THAT GAVE RISE TO ADVERSE HEALTH PROBLEMS THAT GOOD RESPECTABLE TENANTS WERE OBLIGED TO BEAR AND OBLIGED TO LIVE IN.


BUT NOW THERE ARE RIGHTS - LEGAL RIGHTS - HUMAN RIGHTS - REMEDIES - THAT WILL DEAL WITH SUCH BETRAYERS OF GOOD RESPECTABLE PEOPLE.


ENOUGH IS ENOUGH AND NO MORE.


A POWERFUL SIGNAL WAS SENT OUT ON THURSDAY 4 MAY 2006.


NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST IS RATHER LIKE AN 'ALMO' - AN ARMS LENGTH MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION ('ALMO') ACTING AS A PROXY FOR THE OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER ('ODPM') - DESCRIBED IN AUTHORITATIVE REPORTS AS A GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT FULL OF DISCRIMINATION & BULLYING & BEING RUN LIKE A PANTOMIME HORSE!


WILL NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST LISTEN BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE...


1. DISMISS ALAN COLE: "THE 'GOOD' (THESE WERE EVIL) SEEDS GERARD LEMOS HAS SOWN..."
2. DISMISS KATE DAVIES : "THE 'GOOD' (THESE WERE EVIL) SEEDS GERARD LEMOS HAS SOWN..."


NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST IS NOW "ON NOTICE"...


HOW WILL IT REACT...

THE GOVERNMENT - ITS AGENTS
LABOUR PARTY - (LABOUR PARTY) NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST


THE FACTS SO FAR.


THE PEOPLE - THE FACTS - THE POLITICS - THE LAW - THE MEDIA - THE CONTROL - THE INTELLIGENCE
BUT THE INTELLIGENCE IS NOT AS SECURE AS MANY THINK...

OTHERS KNOW ALL THE PEOPLE - THE FACTS - THE POLITICS - THE LAW - THE MEDIA - THE CONTROL - THE INTELLIGENCE - AND MORE!!!

ON THE DEATH OF THE VERY HIGHLY RESPECTED JOHN SMITH IN 1994, IMMEDIATELY AFTER HIS FUNERAL SERVICE HELD AT WESTMINISTER ABBEY, DERRY IRVINE [THE LABOUR PARTY SHADOW LORD CHANCELLOR] WHEN CROSSING PARLIAMENT SQUARE, BUMPED INTO PETER MANDELSON [(A MAN THAT MOST GOOD DECENT AND RESPECTABLE PEOPLE WOULD NOT TRUST - SHARING THE SAME, SOME MIGHT ARGUE, PERVERSE PECCADILLOS AS PETER MANDELSON & REINALDO DA SILVA, NOT UNLIKE GERARD LEMOS & PAUL CRANE OF POND SQUARE, HIGHGATE) - PETER MANDELSON WAS HEAD OF COMMUNICATIONS OF THE LABOUR PARTY] & DERRY IRVINE ARGUED TO PETER MANDELSON THAT "TONY (B.LIAR)" [HIS EX PUPIL BARRISTER, EX ST JOHN'S COLLEGE, OXFORD & LINCOLN'S INN (ONE OF THE FOUR INNS OF COURT - A LAWYER HAS TO JOIN AN INN OF COURT IN ORDER TO STUDY LAW FOR THE BAR EXAMS - THE SAME INN THAT MRS THATCHER & CHERIE BOOTH & CERTAIN NAMELESS OTHERS JOINED)] WOULD BE THE NEXT LEADER OF THE LABOUR PARTY.
THIS "SECRET SCHEME" WAS PUT IN PLACE & THE PLAN WAS MATERIALISED INTO FACT. [1994-1997]


THE DEVIOUS DECEIT WAS EXECUTED WITH THE INTENTION TO FAVOUR ONE SPECIFIC CANDIDATE IN ORDER TO DELIBERATELY EXCLUDE SOME GOOD PEOPLE: GORDON BROWN,
ROBIN COOK,
DONALD DEWAR (POOR DONALD - HOW HE WAS BETRAYED & CUCKOLDED (BY YOU KNOW WHOM WHO WENT OFF WITH HIS WIFE) - DONALD WAS A SOLICITOR BUT THE OTHER, WHO ACTED AS IF HE WAS CARDINAL WOLSEY, WAS ONE OF THE MOST POWERFUL BARRISTERS IN THE COUNTRY - HE WENT OUT IN DISCREDIT - AS THE PUBLIC DID NOT SUPPORT HIM AS A LABOUR CANDIDATE MP, HE USED HIS PROXY - TONY B.LIAR, TO ACT ON HIS BEHALF - DEVIOUSLY CLEVER - THIS VILE TACTIC WAS USED BY THE LABOUR LORD:

LORD TOM SAWYER OF 22 INCHMERY ROAD, CATFORD (EX CHAIRMAN OF THE LABOUR PARTY) WITH LABOUR MEMBER GERARD LEMOS OF 7 BISHAM GARDENS, HIGHGATE HIS SUCCESSOR AND PUPPET (APPOINTED ON HIS RECOMMENDATION AS THE LABOUR GOVERNMENT RACE ADVISER - WHO SET UP NEGATIVE DISCRIMINATION RACE POLICIES & THESE DISCREDITED LABOUR PARTY POLICIES WERE INTRODUCED INTO THE FLAGSHIP RESISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORD/HOUSING ASSOCIATION [TO BE ADOPTED BY ALL OTHER RSLs/HAs]:

NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - THE FLAGSHIP REGISTERED SOCIAL LANDLORD ('RSL') OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE FLAGSHP HOUSING ASSOCIATION ('HA')
WHEN HE WAS APPOINTED AS CHAIRMAN OF
NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
(BY THE LABOUR PARTY) HE HAD ALSO BEEN APPOINTED AS COMMISSIONER OF THE AUDIT COMMISSION, AND COMMISSIONER OF THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION, BANKING COMMISSION AND MORTGAGE COMMISSION, AS RECOMMMENDED BY TOM SAWYER TO TONY BLAIR FOR HIS APPOINTMENT TO MANY SENIOR POSTS, INCLUDING DEPUTY CHAIRMAN OF THE BRITISH COUNCIL, DEPUTY TO LABOUR LORD NEIL KINNOCK) HIS FRIENDSHIP WITH LORD TOM SAWYER GOES BACK SOME 10 YEARS BEFORE 2004 - AS GOOD LABOUR PARTY FRIENDS.

LABOUR LORD TOM SAWYER WAS AN EXTREMELY GOOD FRIEND OF LABOUR MP, LATER LABOUR LORD:
LORD CLIVE SOLEY (AN EX PROBATION OFFICER AND EX LABOUR PARTY COUNCILLOR) OF 24 BIRCH GROVE, EALING COMMON (EX CHAIRMAN OF THE MOST POWERFUL LABOUR PARTY PARLIAMENTARY LABOUR PARTY (PLP) WHO ORDERED ALL THE LABOUR PARTY MPs TO VOTE FOR AN UNLAWFUL WAR IN IRAQ - IF NOT, EVERY ONE OF THEM WERE INFORMED BLUNTLY THEY WOULD 'LOSE THE WHIP' - MEANING THEY WOULD BE SACKED AS A LABOUR PARTY MP AND NOT CONSIDERED FOR PROMOTION TO THE FRONT BENCH OR TO CABINET) WAS IT NOT HIM WHO NOMINATED EX COUNCILLOR & EX LEADER OF EX LABOUR PARTY HAMMERSMITH & FULHAM COUNCIL ANDREW SLAUGHTER - ANOTHER LABOUR PARTY EX BARRISTER).

MANY OF THE MOST POWERFUL LABOUR PARTY MEMBERS DECEIVED, DUPED AND BETRAYED THEIR CONSTITUENTS - TOGETHER WITH BETRAYING VERY GOOD AND RESPECTABLE PEOPLE LIKE DONALD DEWAR, ROBIN COOK, MO MOWLAM, MAGARET BECKETT ET AL. AT THE ALTAR OF POLITICAL EXPEDIENCY.

WHEN THERE WAS A CHOICE TO SUPPORT GOOD CONSTITUENTS WITHIN THEIR CONSTITUENCIES, THE LABOUR PARTY MP WICKEDLY UNDERMINED THE GOOD CONSTITUENTS AND ATTACKED THE CONSTITUENTS WITH VENOM & SPITE.

SPECIFIC LABOUR PARTY MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT DECEITFULLY ACTED IN LEAGUE WITH LABOUR PARTY NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST MANAGEMENT.

GOOD RESPECTABLE PEOPLE WHO WERE ORIGINALLY LABOUR PARTY SUPPORTERS WERE NOT SUPPORTED BY THEIR LABOUR PARTY REPRESENTATIVES.

THE LABOUR PARTY REPRESENTATIVES DECEITFULLY TURNED ON THEIR GOOD CONSTITUENTS AND ATTACKED THEM WITH VENOM.
THE WAY OF THE BULLY
THE WAY OF THE COWARD
THE WAY OF NOTTING HILL HOME OWNERSHIP LIMITED
THE WAY OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
THE WAY OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING
THE WAY OF THE CHAIRMAN OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
THE WAY OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
THE WAY OF THE DIRECTORS OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST
THE WAY OF THE TRUSTEES OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST

ATTACK THE WEAK
ATTACK THE VULNERABLE
ATTACK THE DISPOSSESSED
ATTACK THE INARTICULATE
ATTACK THE ILLITERATE
ATTACK THOSE WHO ARE NOT LEARNED IN LAW
ATTACK THOSE WHO ARE NOT AWARE OF THEIR RIGHTS
ATTACK THOSE WHO ARE NOT AWARE TO SEEK EFFECTIVE REDRESS

HOW WICKED
HOW VILE
HOW DECEITFUL
HOW UNDERHAND
HOW DUPLICITOUS
HOW TREACHEROUS
NOT A SCRAP OF DECENCY
NOT A SCRAP OF GOOD MORALS
NOT A SCRAP OF GOOD FAITH
NOW ALL IN TERMINAL DECLINE!


WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND...


THE GOOD TRIUMPHED ON THURSDAY 4 MAY 2006


WHEN THE GOOD CONSTITUENTS OF 32 LONDON BOROUGHS OF GREATER LONDON WENT TO THE POLLS TO REGISTER THEIR FEEDBACK ON THE STATE OF THE NATION - GREATE LONDON AND THE REST OF THE COUNTRY REGISTERED ITS FURY.

THEY WERE FURIOUS
THEY WERE ANGRY
THEY WERE LIVID
THEY WERE NOT USED TO BEING LIED TO
THEY WERE NOT USED TO BEING DECEIVED
THEY WERE NOT USED TO BEING CONFRONTED
THEY WERE NOT USED TO BEING HARASSED
THEY WERE NOT USED TO BEING TRUSTED WITH ILLIGALLITY
THEY WERE NOT USED TO BEING TREATED WITH HOSTILITY
THEY WERE NOT USED TO BEING TREATED AS A SECOND CLASS OR AS A THIRD CLASS CITIZEN
THEY WERE NOT USED TO TREACHERY
THEY WERE NOT USED TO THEIR LANDLORD BEING A CREATURE OF THE LABOUR PARTY
THEY WERE NOT USED TO THE CHAIRMAN OF THE LANDLORDS BEING A MEMBER OF THE LABOUR PARTY
THEY WERE NOT USED TO THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OF THE LANDLORDS BEING A MEMBER OF THE LABOUR PARTY
THEY WERE NOT USED TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ALL BEING A MEMBER OF THE LABOUR PARTY
THEY WERE NOT USED TO THE TRUSTEES OF THE LANDLORDS ALL BEING A MEMBER OF THE LABOUR PARTY


NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST:
IT IS A CREATURE OF THE LABOUR PARTY


HIGH PRIORITY IN HOUSING TO NON INDIGENOUS CITIZENS
LOW PRIORITY IN HOUSING TO INDIGENOUS CITIZENS


NON INDIGENOUS CITIZENS: PALATIAL PROPERTIES IN PRIME PLACES
INDIGENOUS CITIZENS: DEPRESSING DAMP SLUM IN DESPICABLE DISREPAIR


1. AFTER THE SECRET NATIONAL LABOUR PARTY SCHEME WAS DELIVERED
IN 1997;
TOM SAWYER AS LABOUR PARTY CHAIRMAN SENT OFF TWO OFFICIAL LETTERS:
i) HE OFFICIALLY CONGRATULATED TONY B.LIAR [AS WINNING THE GENERAL ELECTION - THIS MEANT PATRONAGE AND LARGESSE A PLENTY]
ii) HE OFFICIALLY WROTE TO (THE NOW LABOUR LORD) MICHAEL ABRAHAM LEVY
THE UNOFFICIAL TREASURER OF THE LABOUR PARTY NEC - UNDERMINING JACK DROMEY (NUMBER 3 IN THE OFFICIAL NEC HIERARCHY) (HUSBAND OF LABOUR PARTY ELECTIONS MINISTER HARRIET HARMAN - LABOUR PARTY MP FOR CAMBERWELL & PECKHAM - HOME OF GLAZER DELMAR SOLICITORS - WHERE COUNCILLOR DAME SALLY POWELL HAD PREVIOUSLY WORKED AS A SOLICITOR - AS LABOUR PARTY CABINET MEMBER OF REGENERATION OF HAMMESMITH & FULHAM & LIVING AT 30 COVERDALE ROAD, SHEPHERD'S BUSH - SHE IT WAS WHO INTRODUCED 24 HOUR ALCOHOLIC DRINKING LAWS, [WAS SHE NOT FOUND SLUMPED AT THE STEERING WHEEL IN HER CAR, MASSIVELY OVER THE DRINK OR DRUGS DRIVE LIMIT, DRUNK IN HER CAR IN HARLEY STREET AND WAS SHE NOT GIVEN A CUSTODIAL SENTENCE BUT A FINE?] ONE OF TWO LABOUR PARTY COUNCILLOR MEMBERS OF THE POWERFUL LABOUR PARTY NEC - SHE WAS PUT IN CHARGE OF THE ASTRONOMICAL REGENERATION BUDGET).

2. IN 1998 TOM SAWYER WAS APPOINTED BY TONY B.LIAR AS A LABOUR PARTY LORD

3. IMMEDIATELY THEREAFTER IN 1998, TONY B.LIAR NOMINATED LORD TOM SAWYER AS CHAIRMAN OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST

WHO WAS TOM SAWYER?
HE WAS EX HEAD OF THE NATIONAL UNON OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEES ['NUPE']NUPE/UNISON UNION - SUPPOSEDLY REPRESENTING, AMONGST OTHERS, CENTRAL GOVENMENT & LOCAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
HE WAS EX CHAIRMAN OF THE LABOUR PARTY
IT WAS DISCOVERED THAT 45+ PROPERTIES OF THE NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST WERE MISAPPROPRIATED [CASH FOR TRUST PROPERTIES - I HAVE EVIDENCE THAT SOME NHHT MANAGEMENT GIVE TRUST PROPERTIES FOR CASH IN BREACH OF TRUST - AT THE RIGHT PRICE] PETER REDMAN THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE WAS OBLIGED TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE MANY UNACCOUNTABLE PROPERTIES THAT WERE DISCOVERED BEING MISAPPROPRIATED [READ STOLEN] AND A SECRET PAY OFF WAS PAID BY LORD TOM SAWYER OUT OF TRUST FUNDS
SOON THERERAFTER IN 2004, LORD TOM SAWYER HURRIEDLY DEPARTED.
HE WAS VERY, VERY, FORTUNATE HE WAS NOT PROSECUTED.

HOLD ON - WHO DECIDES ON PROSECUTIONS IN THIS COUNTRY?
OH, IT IS OUR OLD LABOUR PARTY FRIEND - WAS HE NOT PROSECUTED FOR POSSESSION OF CANNABIS ONCE UPON A TIME IN HIS LAW STUDENT DAYS? - WELL WE ALL HAVE FAULTS!

THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECECUTIONS (DPP) IS HEAD OF THE CROWN PROSECUTION SERVICE (CPS) - WHO IS NONE OTHER THAN KEN MACDONALD - THE EX HEAD TENANT OF MATRIX CHAMBERS - THE HEAD OF THE LAW OFFICES WHERE CHERIE BLAIR WORKS - THE WIFE OF THE LABOUR PARTY PRIME MINISTER.
ON CHERIE BLAIR [CHERIE BOOTH'S] RECOMMENDATION KEN MACDONLD WAS APPOINTED BY TONY BLAIR AS DPP!

MIGHT THIS HAVE MADE A DIFFERENCE?

WHAT DO YOU THINK - EXERCISING YOUR WISE INTELLECT & JUDGMENT!

I SEE...

SO THAT'S HOW IT WORKS.

WHO IS HEAD OF THE LAW FUNCTION IN THIS COUNTRY?
WH APPOINTS THE JUDGES?
WHO PROMOTES THE JUDGES?
WHO DISMISSES THE JUDGES?
WHO APPOINTS THE MAGISTRATES?
WHO DISMISSES THE MAGISTRATES?
WHO SITS AS HEAD OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS [JUDICIARY]?
WHO SITS AS HEAD OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS [LEGISLATURE]?
WHO SITS AS HEAD OF THE EXECUTIVE/CABINET?
WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR STAFFING OF THE COURTS?
WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INTRODUCING MAJOR/MINOR LEGISLATION?
WELL IT WAS DERRY IRVINE - THE LORD CHANCELLOR [TONY B.LIAR's EX PUPIL MASTER]
AFTER THA BLAZING ROW...
IT IS NOW [LABOUR LORD] LORD CHARLES FALCONER [EX FLAT MATE OF TONY B.LIAR][ANTHONY CHARLES LYNTON (ACL) BLAIR - HE HAS A BROTHER, WILLIAM BLAIR, WHO IS A PRACTISING BARRISTER - A RESPECTABLE AND HONOURABLE MAN]
WAS NOT CHERIE BLAIR/CHERIE BOOTH APPOINTED AS A JUDGE...
I WONDER WHO APPOINTED HER?
WAS IT NOT A LABOUR PARTY MEMBER... [SEE ABOVE!]

4. IN 2004, GERARD LEMOS [THE PUPPET OF LORD TOM SAWYER] WAS APPOINTED AT THE AGM. HE INTRODUCED THE NEGATIVE CONFRONTATIONAL COMMUNIST POLICIES THAT APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN LIFTED FROM CHAIRMAN MAO'S LITTLE RED BOOK. HE CLEARLY HAD A STRONG LEANING TO COMMUNIST CHINA.


THE LOCAL ELECTIONS HAVE SIGNALLED OUR POSITION
VERY LOUD
AND
VERY CLEAR!!!

YET...


THE DOOR IS OPEN...


AS IT ALWAYS WAS...


HOW WILL THE LABOUR PARTY AND THEIR AGENTS, SUCH AS AT NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST, NOW ACT?


WILL THEY SEE THE WRITING ON THE WALL?


WILL THEY LISTEN?


WILL THEY COMMUNICATE?


WILL THEY AVOID CONFRONTATION?


WILL THEY ACT AS MANAGING PROPERTIES NOT MANAGING PEOPLE?


WILL THEY NO LONGER CONFRONT GOOD RESPECTABLE TENANTS?


WILL THEY NO LONGER HARASS GOOD RESPECTABLE TENANTS?


WILL THEY ABANDON THE CRIMINAL TACTICS THEY HAVE EMPLOYED (OF WHICH THERE IS OVERWHELMING & UNBELIEVABLE PROOF)?


WILL THEY ABANDON THE: SAWYER, REDMAN, LEMOS, DAVIES, COLE, LABOUR PARTY POLICIES OF NEGATIVE DISCRIMINIATION AGAINST GOOD RESPECTABLE TENANTS?


24 BILLION POUNDS [24,000,000,000 POUNDS] IS A VAST AMOUNT OF TAXPAYERS MONEY TO BE UNACCOUNTABLE - AVAILABLE TO THE EXECUTIVE TO DISBURSE AS NECESSARY TO - IN THE MAIN - NON INDIGENOUS CITIZENS?


THE HOUSING CORPORATION IS UNACCOUNTABLE TO PARLIAMENT BUT ACCOUNTABLE TO THE EXECUTIVE [LACK OF TRANSPARENCY - LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY - LACK OF CONSULTATION]


THE AUDIT COMMISSION IS UNACCOUNTABLE TO PARLIAMENT BUT ACCOUNTABLE TO THE EXECUTIVE [LACK OF TRANSPARENCY - LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY - LACK OF CONSULTATION]


THE BRITISH COUNCIL IS HEADED UP AS A CRONY COUNCIL [LACK OF TRANSPARENCY - LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY - LACK OF CONSULTATION]


NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST IS IN RECEIPT OF UNACCOUNTABLE TAXPAYERS MONEY [LACK OF TRANSPARENCY - LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY - LACK OF CONSULTATION]


THE EXECUTIVE [OF THE LABOUR PARTY] AGUE THAT RSLs PROVIDE HOMES FOR 'KEY WORKERS' (LIKE POLICEMEN & NURSES).


THE TRUTH IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT.

1. RSLs/HAs PROVIDE HOMES FOR NON INDIGENOUS CITIZENS FIRST -
2. DAMP HOVELS IN MASSIVE DISEPAIR TO INDIGENOUS CITIZENS LAST -


WILL THIS DISCREDITED POLICY CONTINUE AGAINST ITS OWN CITIZENS?


IT BETTER NOT... OR LABOUR WILL WITNESS A SIMILAR RESULT AT THE NEXT GENERAL ELECTION ...


WE DO NOT THREATEN - WE PROMISE!


HOUSING POLICY COMES UNDER THE OFFICE OF DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER (ODPM) AS DOES THE UNACCOUNTABLE HOUSING CORPORATION (WHICH PROVIDES UNACCOUNTABLE TAXPAYERS MONEY) - AS DOES THE AUDIT COMMISSION (WHICH IS UNACCOUNTABLE AND INSPECTS THE RSLs/HAs SO IT GIVES THE RSLs/HAs EXCELLENT RATINGS - UNLIMITED TAXPAYERS MONEY GOES INTO RSL/HA HOUSING (FOR VOTES) - GERYMANDERING IN ORDER TO TRY TO GET AS MANY VOTES IN MARGINAL CONSTITUENCIES OR IN CONSERVATIVE BOROUGHS OR WARDS).

BECAUSE JOHN PRESCOTT [THE EX BRITISH SHIPPING COMPANY, P&O, STEWARD WHOSE DUTY IT WAS TO SERVE THE OFFICERS ON THE P&O FERRIES IN THE MERCHANT NAVY - P&O HAS RECENTLY BEEN SOLD OFF TO THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES - DUE TO, AMONGST OTHER THINGS, THE WRECKING TACTICS OF INDIVIDUALS LACKING FORESIGHT LIKE THE NON-COMMUNICATIVE CONFRONTATIONAL JOHN PRESCOTT - HIS BOOK: 'NOT WANTED ON VOYAGE' - WHO KNOWS ABOUT THE ULTRA SECRET SCHEME FOR GERRYMANDERING THE VOTE.
SO TONY B.LIAR WILL NOT WANT TO SACK 'TWO JAGS(SHAGS)' PRESCOTT.
WHO BREACHED THE CABINET CODE?


COMMUNIST CHARLES CLARKE [HOME SECETARY - IN CHARGE OF MI5 - SECURITY SERVICE] HAS GONE - AS HE HAD TO GO - AS WAS ROBUSTLY ARGUED ON THIS SITE BY VARIOUS CONTRIBUTORS.

PATRICIA HEWITT HAS GONE - IN CHARGE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & THE NHS - AS WAS ROBUSTLY ARGUED ON THIS SITE.


CHARLES CLARKE HAS GONE - LIKE PETER REDMAN [LABOUR PARTY MEMBER CHIEF EXECUTIVE] IN DISCREDIT

HE HAS GONE LIKE LORD TOM SAWYER [LABOUR PARTY MEMBER CHAIRMAN] IN DISCREDIT

HE HAS GONE LIKE GERARD LEMOS [LABOUR PARTY MEMBER CHAIRMAN] IN DISCREDIT [HE HAS RUN AWAY TO COMMUNIST CHINA - WITHOUT WAITING FOR THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING TO GIVE HIS REASONS TO THE MEMBERS (THE ONE POUND SHAREHOLDERS CAREFULLY SELECTED BY THE CHAIRMAN - WHAT A DISCREDITED SHAM OF A LACK OF ACCOUNTABILITY - THIS IS UNKNOWN IN BRITISH CORPORATE AND/OR BRITISH TRUST ACCOUNTABILITY HISTORY) AND THEN TO TENDER HIS RESIGNATION (IN DISGRACE)

KATE DAVIES [LABOUR PARTY MEMBER CHIEF EXECUTIVE] NEEDS TO GO

ALAN COLE [LABOUR PARTY MEMBER CHAIRMAN] NEEDS TO GO


ALAN COLE HAS NOT SUPPORTED THE GOOD RESPECTABLE TENANTS


KATE DAVIES HAS AT NO TIME SUPPORTED THE GOOD RESPECTABLE TENANTS OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST - JUST USED CRIMINAL TACTICS AGAINST THEM - AS SHE APPEARS TO WANT THE MANAGEMENT OF NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST TO ACT AS A LATTER DAY PETER RACHMAN - THE VILE, EVIL, DECEITFUL SLUM LANDLORD OF NOTTING HILL - WHERE NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST STARTED AS A RESULT OF THIS EVIL MAN - WITH THE EXCELLENT GOOD INTENTIONS OF REVEREND PETER KENRICK (THE ANGLICAN PRIEST) & WINNIFRED ATTWELL (THE WEALTHY & VERY GOOD INTENTIONED SINGER) WHO PUT MONEY IN TRUST IN ORDER TO ADDRESS THE DESPICABLE DAMP HOUSING THAT WAS IN MASSIVE DISREPAIR THAT GAVE RISE TO ADVERSE HEALTH PROBLEMS THAT GOOD RESPECTABLE TENANTS WERE OBLIGED TO BEAR AND OBLIGED TO LIVE IN.


BUT NOW THERE ARE RIGHTS - LEGAL RIGHTS - HUMAN RIGHTS - REMEDIES - THAT WILL DEAL WITH SUCH BETRAYERS OF GOOD RESPECTABLE PEOPLE.


ENOUGH IS ENOUGH AND NO MORE.


A POWERFUL SIGNAL WAS SENT OUT ON THURSDAY 4 MAY 2006.


NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST IS RATHER LIKE AN 'ALMO' - AN ARMS LENGTH MANAGEMENT ORGANISATION ('ALMO') ACTING AS A PROXY FOR THE OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER ('ODPM') - DESCRIBED IN AUTHORITATIVE REPORTS AS A GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT FULL OF DISCRIMINATION & BULLYING & BEING RUN LIKE A PANTOMIME HORSE!


WILL NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST LISTEN BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE...


1. DISMISS ALAN COLE: "THE 'GOOD' (THESE WERE EVIL) SEEDS GERARD LEMOS HAS SOWN..."
2. DISMISS KATE DAVIES : "THE 'GOOD' (THESE WERE EVIL) SEEDS GERARD LEMOS HAS SOWN..."


NOTTING HILL HOUSING TRUST IS NOW "ON NOTICE"...


HOW WILL IT REACT...

Oh John, you say so many wise wise words as you are clearly a wise and educated man but those at Notting Hill Housing Trust are uneducated fools and losers so they do not listen.


Come 3 MAY 2007 the LABOUR PARTY and all those at Notting Hill Housing Trust will find out the hard hard way. Why? Because they never ever had the sense to listen to you. They thought that to confront you was the only way. But it is the way of the bully. What fools!!!


The LABOUR PARTY will be wiped out - they will lose the elections and BLAIR will be OUT.


It will be MELTDOWN.


If only they had the sense to seek your advice. But they think they are Gods.


You will have the last laugh John - be brave - be patient!

cyrenian care using criminal activity at 352 to 354 goldhawk road to filter income gained at that address from onsite drug dealing daily caught on camera on site into the the finances of the charity. Company cars used with the purchase of a charity number where the payment come from income obtained from drug deALING ON SITE IS MONEY LAUNDERING. The group cyrenian support and cyrenian care along with the land lord look ahead that has entered into a share enterprise recently with nothing hill housing trust is a criminal enterprise UI wiil attach the files