Party says teacher is a 'valuable resource'.
A drama teacher as a laeading local theatre is an active volunteer of the hard right wing BNP, the Express can reveal.
(J.Holden & P.Reilly report).
The Astor Theatre's drama co-ordinator Emma Chamberlain, 30, is the 'glamourous new face' of the the BNP's online television service BNPtv, which broadcast the organizations political views.
Miss CVhamberlain is described by the extemeists party as a 'very welcome recruit, to the cause.
When confronted by the DE, Miss Chamberlain claimed her work for BNPtv was 'a big mistake' and offered tio resign from the Astor. But she claimed her political affiliation had no bearing on the thetre or her teaching.
Dover MP Gywnnn Prosser (Lab) descibed the BNP as an 'evil, right wing, fascist organization" He added "If my child were in that class, I would take them out immediately".
Comments
Hide the following 13 comments
Contact Aster Theatre about their bad influences....
15.04.2006 15:20
Jon Johnson, Chairman
Astor Theatre Arts Centre
Stanhope Road
Deal
Kent CT14 6AB
Tel: 01304 368 481 / 01304 381 134
Email: admin@astortheatre.co.uk, friends@astortheatre.co.uk, balcony@astortheatre.co.uk
Web: www.astortheatre.co.uk
Why not contact the 'business friends' of the Astor about just who is being employed here. Check out http://www.astor.freewebspace.com/custom.html for a full list.
The loverly Emma is name checked at http://www.astor.freewebspace.com/custom2.html
Love
The Autonomous AntiFa Collective
malarky
e-mail: autoantifa@whitehouse.gov
What would BLAIR want you to do?
15.04.2006 16:04
the BNP, like the National Front before it, is a state run party, used across our recent political history for various purposes. Today, the New Reich uses THEIR BNP to hit sites like this in an act of pure distraction.
You see, Blair makes it as hard as possible to protest the genocide that he and his party followers are responsible for. In order to placate the glowing anger of certain activists, he provides the BNP to be a whipping boy. Those activists, after participating in a good dose of "anger therapy" via 'action' against the BNP, feel 'sated' and far less concerned about their inability to effectively act against Blair.
It is simple psychology, so simple in fact that such behaviour mechanisms have been well documented throughout most of Human history.
Ask yourself a question. Do you enjoy being identified as a 'hot-head', and thus easily manipulated by Blair and his agents? Do you enjoy being a person willing to take 'action' against racists, and yet exist in a world where YOUR tax pounds pay REAL RACIST MURDERERS to slaughter ever increasing numbers of non-white humans across the world in your name? Do you act to 'salve your conscience' or to actually make a real difference?
As Blair makes the final plans for the GENOCIDE of tens of millions of Iranians, he has maxed his distraction against the BNP in election campaigns across the country. His calculation is simple. This is the best chance to shore up a collapsing vote, and deflect attention from his past and future CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY. Many, after the election, will foolishly think that Blair has failed. However, the results, while low enough for 'Labour' to allow Blair to continue OPERATION FALSE-HOPE (you know, the Blair gone by Xmas crap), will be high enough overall to allow the claim that the UK still has a representitive democracy.
RESPECT, of course, will once again magically stand in a tiny proportion of the seats to ensure no possibility of a dangerous outcome. It does not take a genius to understand why RESPECT never makes any attempt to stand in the majority of seats (or, indeed, all of them). In the UK, ONLY a national party can make a national difference. BLAIR'S GREATEST CONCERN WITH HIS MANAGEMENT OF THE ANTI-WAR MOVEMENT HAS BEEN TO ENSURE THAT NO NATIONAL ANTI-WAR PARTY STOOD IN ALL THE SEATS AT A LOCAL OR GENERAL ELECTION.
-A vote for the Liberals is a vote for Blair and his Iran War.
-A vote for the Conservatives is a vote for Blair and his Iran War
-A vote for Labour is a vote for Blair and His Iran War.
-A vote for the State managed Greens, BNP, or Respect is a wasted vote, and thus a vote for Blair.
-NOT VOTING is a vote for rejecting the current system, and demanding that it is replaced with a TRUE democratic system that can never again fall under State control (and thus the control of one man).
Once we could afford wishful thinking about our so-called democracy. Blair has changed all that. Today, most radical left-wing politics fails because Blair and his agents invite activists to waste their time attacking muslims, Iran and the BNP, rather than attacking Blair. Everyone else, while growing increasingly sickened by Blair, also grow increasingly resigned to a system where Blair can never be defeated.
As a dictator in a supposed democracy, Blair MUST be able to say to people, THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN, AND ***I*** AM THEIR ELECTED LEADER. He CANNOT say this if too many people remain silent. Thus, BNP stories, and others, will be used to chase as many reluctant people to the polls as possible.
Oh, and for those of you that would choose to misunderstand my position, let me say I am completely against monolithic political parties, and would LOVE a system where voting for smaller parties could make a difference. But I will not allow my desires to become wishful thinking, and thus I will NEVER attempt to convince myself that any aspect of our broken and rotten system can be salvaged, and used for good. If one good thing comes out of the era of Blair (and it won't), it will be the realisation that to save our civilisation, it MUST be evolved to rid it of all obvious vunerabilities.
twilight
Who's next?
15.04.2006 17:11
Smelly Scrote
Nutter alert
15.04.2006 18:20
Goetterdaemmerung
Now then tomorrow you
15.04.2006 19:44
info
e-mail: info@no.com
fleas
15.04.2006 20:28
This is OUR country now, the fash LOST !!!
wise monkey
her website is...
16.04.2006 15:13
antifash
Twilight - eh?
16.04.2006 16:36
Please feel free to enlighten me on how the "powers that be" will recognise my refusal to vote as being a protest, rather than the usual explanation of being a "Sun" reader who won't vote because I'm ignorant of the issues?
Jurg
LABOURS HYPOCRISY
17.04.2006 09:26
Blair's war in Yugolsavia - 50,000 + including attacks on tv stations and public transport.
Blair's sanctions against Iraq = 500,000+, mostly kids
Blair's colonial war in Iraq = 100,000, and growing everyday
Blair's support for Suharto's Indoneisan Genocide -he just couldn't bear to those hawk fighters staying at home. Approx 500,000 +
Blair's support for tobacco exports to Asia - 2 - 7 million
Blair's support for WTO policies, structural adjustment etc. 1,000,000 + ( a modest estimate)
There's much more, but it's hard to put a precise figure on the numbers killed by neo-liberal polices backed by Blair and others.
Well, I suppose it's nice for the Labour Party that they've finally found a group of people that might be slightly more repulsive than they are: it used to be the Tories, but now even that claim has lost its credibility. So Piers Corbyn and others can still pretend a conscience, and pick up a hundred grand a year. Trebles all round at Millbank Towers!
OZZY
Free Speech For Nazis?
17.04.2006 23:29
Red N Black
don't vote - organise!
18.04.2006 20:33
they don't give a shit either way - though what worries them is a loss of 'legitimacy' from falling turnout. the closer parties get to power the more alike they become as they accomodate themselves to the needs of capital accumulation, sorry 'economic reality'. Its not about *protest* i.e. appealing to the rulers to be nicer but about *refusing* to consent to be ruled. They'll misrepresent non-votes just like they misrepresent votes - representatives are always misrepresentative unless they're mandated and recallable. Basically, in times of mass struggles like anti-Iraq war demos we are stronger if the governement of the day has a lower proportion of the popular vote - cops/soldiers are more likely to refuse orders/join us etc. So don't vote - organise!
an (A)
Scary Posters !!!
26.04.2006 13:29
Luvpump
and so!
03.05.2006 11:18
If fascists' behaviour is trying to take away space from others to exist as they wish, then it should not be a question of allowing them free speech to prevent others free speech; instead we have to prevent them preventing others, so that all can live how they want (so long as it doesn't impact negatively on others lives).
whatever