The Crossrail Bill in the House of Commons, London contains in one piece every facet of the state and its authoritarian plan against the people. No elected holder of public office including the patronaged members of the UK House of Lords has spoken out against the Crossrail Bill in the way that Bethnal Green and Bow MOP George Galloway has done. Top understand why that is it is important examine the evidence of the role played by today's 'Red Baroness' Helena Keeny and her likes.
© The Author / Khoodeelaar / CBRUK /LAWMEDIA 2006
Helena Kennedy, ‘QC’ [lawyer practising in the English courts] Baroness’ is being feted in the ‘mainstream media’ in the UK today heading an alleged revival of electoral democracy in the UK.
That movement is full of pitfalls and thorns sown by the likes of Helena Kennedy herself y are the bands of self-seeking opportunists who have contributed more significantly to the real discrediting whatever it is that they are now meaning by their use of the term democracy.
Helena has not said a word ever about the assault that is Crossrail.
She has behaved as if there has not been a rising popular discontents across the UK on issues like the local communities feeling disgusted with the abuse of powers that is being perpetrated by the decision-makers and legitimised by the careerist lawyers and spin doctors.
When the former
At every turn, the likes of Helena Kennedy
have materialised on one conveniently plausible ‘pro-democracy’ pro-caring’ ‘pro-fairness’
platform or another in the UK whence they then have sought and received the goodies that the corrupt holders of elected office have had to proffer by way of patronage [baroness] and reward [‘QC’].
In doing so Helena keeny and her likes have done the dirtiest of deeds for the corrupt state that could be imagined – they have denied the say to the people they have reinforced discrimination in away that the state and its more overtly discriminating andscuimiantrroy backers could not have done.
Helena Keeny is of the same moral level as Cherie Blair, ‘QC’ wife of Tony, anotehr’lawyer’.
Between them, they disagree, as Cherie is often reported to be disagreeing with Tony.
But at the end of the day, they all belong to the same club. To the same set of the servants of the corrupt state as their otehr, more overly identifed counterparst and rivals.
They do not mean to give ‘the people’ any more say than the case is today.
What Helen is doing now is creating or trying to create another facade, yet another ‘new’ tactic which they need to deploy at the people and to galvanise enough of the people whom they can then use to get their objective- which is to maintain the status quo with a new look while the same corrupt agenda is pursued only with less obvious signs that it is being pursued.
When Helena was pushing an alleged anti-Tory proganada front on behalf of the alleged ‘NEW LEADERSHIP’ of the Labour Party in 1996- a year before the replacement of Tory John Major by the New Labour Blair, she was making claims that she was indeed whiter than white when it came to
her applying the facility she possessed of making such claims without either meaning them or without possessing the intellectual integrity of knowing how outlandish ant she and her likes were to the utter majority of the people who have had no option but to treat the charade of eledctruirao democracy with the contempt that it deserves.
But Helena was behaving in as authoritarian a manner and style with as much disregard for the rules of ethics and morality that are paramount parts of genuinely democratic atmosphere and persona as she was competing just as doggedly as a Stalinist as she would have done had she been installed in office following a Stalinist coup in the UK
In the past 8 years of Blair at Number 10 Downing Street, the likes of Helena Kennedy?
have taken up almost all manner of state sponsored positions that are being maintained at public cost in the name of serving the people. The people in Britain have not been more disenfranchised than they are now. In the context of everything that the likes of Helena Keeny have been claiming to have done in their contribution to democratising Britain, this country, the society here has not been more undermined by such a perfect generation of Stalin’s’ disciples posing as saviours of democracy.
They are in the House of Lords
They are in the quangos
They are on local Councils.
They are on local funded 'voluntary' bodies
hey are running an entire industry in sleaeball-lobbying on every single subject under the sun that ahs any link with meg a fast buck at the xosne of the public,.
They are everywhere.
They are the newsmakers. They are news-reporters.
They are the news commentators
They share the loot
They scare the rest of us about the alleged costs of letting them lose the
There is nothing at all to say for Helena Kennedy’s stunt today
What the people need is less of the likes of Helena Kennedy, not more.
Because Helena does not know that communities exist in areas like Tower Hamlets. Unless she is given a red carpet reception staged in suitably ‘ethnic-parading’ location where the likes of Helena Kennedy are given ‘ethnic’ salutes for their 'valiant roles in saving the ethnics from themselves
That is why the entirety of Helenea’democracy’ champion have been silent about the CrossRail assault on the East End.
It is not an accident.
When Ken Livingstone the careerist ‘leader’ of the Greater London Council [GLC] was claiming to be doing in the early 1980s what Helena is again showing her propensity to be doing in February 2006
Helena Kennedy, ‘QC’ [lawyer practising in the English courts] Baroness’ is being feted in the ‘mainstream media’ in the UK today heading an alleged revival of electoral democracy in the UK.
That movement is full of pitfalls and thorns sown by the likes of Helena Kennedy herself y are the bands of self-seeking opportunists who have contributed more significantly to the real discrediting whatever it is that they are now meaning by their use of the term democracy.
Helena has not said a word ever about the assault that is Crossrail.
She has behaved as if there has not been a rising popular discontents across the UK on issues like the local communities feeling disgusted with the abuse of powers that is being perpetrated by the decision-makers and legitimised by the careerist lawyers and spin doctors.
When the former
At every turn, the likes of Helena Kennedy
have materialised on one conveniently plausible ‘pro-democracy’ pro-caring’ ‘pro-fairness’
platform or another in the UK whence they then have sought and received the goodies that the corrupt holders of elected office have had to proffer by way of patronage [baroness] and reward [‘QC’].
In doing so Helena keeny and her likes have done the dirtiest of deeds for the corrupt state that could be imagined – they have denied the say to the people they have reinforced discrimination in away that the state and its more overtly discriminating andscuimiantrroy backers could not have done.
Helena Keeny is of the same moral level as Cherie Blair, ‘QC’ wife of Tony, anotehr’lawyer’.
Between them, they disagree, as Cherie is often reported to be disagreeing with Tony.
But at the end of the day, they all belong to the same club. To the same set of the servants of the corrupt state as their otehr, more overly identifed counterparst and rivals.
They do not mean to give ‘the people’ any more say than the case is today.
What Helen is doing now is creating or trying to create another facade, yet another ‘new’ tactic which they need to deploy at the people and to galvanise enough of the people whom they can then use to get their objective- which is to maintain the status quo with a new look while the same corrupt agenda is pursued only with less obvious signs that it is being pursued.
When Helena was pushing an alleged anti-Tory proganada front on behalf of the alleged ‘NEW LEADERSHIP’ of the Labour Party in 1996- a year before the replacement of Tory John Major by the New Labour Blair, she was making claims that she was indeed whiter than white when it came to
her applying the facility she possessed of making such claims without either meaning them or without possessing the intellectual integrity of knowing how outlandish ant she and her likes were to the utter majority of the people who have had no option but to treat the charade of eledctruirao democracy with the contempt that it deserves.
But Helena was behaving in as authoritarian a manner and style with as much disregard for the rules of ethics and morality that are paramount parts of genuinely democratic atmosphere and persona as she was competing just as doggedly as a Stalinist as she would have done had she been installed in office following a Stalinist coup in the UK
In the past 8 years of Blair at Number 10 Downing Street, the likes of Helena Kennedy?
have taken up almost all manner of state sponsored positions that are being maintained at public cost in the name of serving the people. The people in Britain have not been more disenfranchised than they are now. In the context of everything that the likes of Helena Keeny have been claiming to have done in their contribution to democratising Britain, this country, the society here has not been more undermined by such a perfect generation of Stalin’s’ disciples posing as saviours of democracy.
They are in the House of Lords
They are in the quangos
They are on local Councils.
They are on local funded 'voluntary' bodies
hey are running an entire industry in sleaeball-lobbying on every single subject under the sun that ahs any link with meg a fast buck at the xosne of the public,.
They are everywhere.
They are the newsmakers. They are news-reporters.
They are the news commentators
They share the loot
They scare the rest of us about the alleged costs of letting them lose the
There is nothing at all to say for Helena Kennedy’s stunt today
What the people need is less of the likes of Helena Kennedy, not more.
Because Helena does not know that communities exist in areas like Tower Hamlets. Unless she is given a red carpet reception staged in suitably ‘ethnic-parading’ location where the likes of Helena Kennedy are given ‘ethnic’ salutes for their 'valiant roles in saving the ethnics from themselves
That is why the entirety of Helenea’democracy’ champion have been silent about the CrossRail assault on the East End.
It is not an accident.
When Ken Livingstone the careerist ‘leader’ of the Greater London Council [GLC] was claiming to be doing in the early 1980s what Helena is again showing her propensity to be doing in February 2006
e-mail:
Homepage:
Comments
Display the following comment