Tony Blair’s hogging of the ‘headlines’ over the ridiculous ‘respect agenda’ today Tuesday 9 January 2006 is an indulgence that must be put into perspective. The Blairite behaviour of the controlling group on Tower Hamlets Council has been abysmally anti-democratic.
© CBRUK / KHOODEELAAR 2006
Tony Blair’s hogging of the ‘headlines’ over the ridiculous ‘respect agenda’ today Tuesday 9 January 2006 is an indulgence that must be put into perspective. The Blairite behaviour of the controlling group on Tower Hamlets Council has been abysmally anti-democratic. Unless Tower Hamlets council is democratized by the community in the borough, there may not be much left of the community AS WE KNOW IT. That community is coming under increasing sell outs and sell off attacks. And that is even before we examine the massive violations of the community that are planned under the Crossrail hole Bill. The role played so far by controlling factions on the local Tower Hamlets Council in the East End in bringing the Crossrail hole attack schema upon the Han bury Street, Princelet Street and upon the neighbouring streets has been the key determinant in giving the Crossrail-backing interest the ‘confidence’ that they can destroy the Brick Lane Area and yet face no tangible demand for accountability from the East End community.
Here is Part C of the KHOODEELAAR MANIFESTO 2006
Tuesday, January 10, 2006
khoodeelaar manifesto Part c Tuesday 10 jan 2006
PART C of the KHOODEELAAR MANIFESTO 2006
1. The Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will use the existing laws to establish the facts of the local Tower Hamlets council’s use of the legal powers to make grants and other funds available to ‘voluntary’ organisations in the community.
2. The Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will make sure that the holders of senior positions in the employment of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council (LBTH ). The LBTH Council do not follow the political orders or personal preferences of individual councilors or of controlling groups of co7ncillors if those orders or preferences are at variance with the interest of the local community and if those orders and preferences are also in conflict with the social, cultural educational, economic and environmental interest of the local community
3. The Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will publish the fullest legally available information on which groups in the local community in a given financial year was given what sum of money by the LBTH Council to achieve what objective and under what democratic and transparent criteria
4. The Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will publish the active links of all holders of elected positions in the Council with all known groups and gropy0ongs in the Borough so that the behaviour of the councilors can be democratically monitored by the community.
5. The Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will also publish the information on the councillors’ links with any senior employee of the council and with any other councilor so that the behaviour of the councilors can be democratically monitored by the community
PART D will appear later on this week
Tony Blair’s hogging of the ‘headlines’ over the ridiculous ‘respect agenda’ today Tuesday 9 January 2006 is an indulgence that must be put into perspective. The Blairite behaviour of the controlling group on Tower Hamlets Council has been abysmally anti-democratic. Unless Tower Hamlets council is democratized by the community in the borough, there may not be much left of the community AS WE KNOW IT. That community is coming under increasing sell outs and sell off attacks. And that is even before we examine the massive violations of the community that are planned under the Crossrail hole Bill. The role played so far by controlling factions on the local Tower Hamlets Council in the East End in bringing the Crossrail hole attack schema upon the Han bury Street, Princelet Street and upon the neighbouring streets has been the key determinant in giving the Crossrail-backing interest the ‘confidence’ that they can destroy the Brick Lane Area and yet face no tangible demand for accountability from the East End community.
Here is Part C of the KHOODEELAAR MANIFESTO 2006
Tuesday, January 10, 2006
khoodeelaar manifesto Part c Tuesday 10 jan 2006
PART C of the KHOODEELAAR MANIFESTO 2006
1. The Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will use the existing laws to establish the facts of the local Tower Hamlets council’s use of the legal powers to make grants and other funds available to ‘voluntary’ organisations in the community.
2. The Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will make sure that the holders of senior positions in the employment of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets Council (LBTH ). The LBTH Council do not follow the political orders or personal preferences of individual councilors or of controlling groups of co7ncillors if those orders or preferences are at variance with the interest of the local community and if those orders and preferences are also in conflict with the social, cultural educational, economic and environmental interest of the local community
3. The Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will publish the fullest legally available information on which groups in the local community in a given financial year was given what sum of money by the LBTH Council to achieve what objective and under what democratic and transparent criteria
4. The Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will publish the active links of all holders of elected positions in the Council with all known groups and gropy0ongs in the Borough so that the behaviour of the councilors can be democratically monitored by the community.
5. The Brick Lane London E1 Area campaign against the Crossrail hole Bill will also publish the information on the councillors’ links with any senior employee of the council and with any other councilor so that the behaviour of the councilors can be democratically monitored by the community
PART D will appear later on this week
Comments
Display the following 7 comments