the police were notable by their absence. on every other occasion when any sort of group has gathered in the square, either community support officers or police have come to investigate and see if any crime was being committed under the controversial section 132 of the law.
on several of the sunday afternoon picnics (which will be continuing at one o clock every sunday in the new year) police decided that they 'believed' a demonstration was going on, and arrested participants or threatened arrest.
when cindy sheehan, the american peace activist, came to visit brian haw recently, police used the law to threaten supporters who were clearly not demonstrating, but this then triggered a demonstration and procession up to the gates of downing street where a noisy protest continued without arrests.
with recent media interest and coverage of this ridiculous law, it seems that decisions about arrests are based on the likelihood of adverse media coverage. once they realised who cindy sheehan was, they clearly backed down despite having given ultimatums and stern warnings. tonight's carol gathering would likewise have gained huge media interest had there been any arrests, and so the police were clearly ordered to ignore the event.
a small group of community support officers lurked under an archway across the road junction, and police walked in front of parliament, studiously avoiding even looking at what was going on (although one officer broke rank and had a sneaky gander). meanwhile, brian made his speech to a hundred or more supporters, a megaphone was briefly used, and fliers for sunday picnics were handed out, all in flagrant breach of the law.
but don't think for one moment that the police have decided not to enforce this terrible law. they just pick softer, less media-attractive targets. yesterday a lone protester, margaret tucker, was taken away by police for standing near parliament with a banner stating 'i am not the serious organised criminal'.
maya evans was found guilty under the law recently and given a 12 month conditional discharge and ordered to pay £100 costs. more than twenty others have been charged under the law, and the first of these cases will be heard on the 9th and the 18th of january in the new year. maya will be appealing her conviction and looks likely to go straight to the high court with this battle. as long as the police continue to act so arbitrarily in enforcement, the law looks shakier and shakier in court. the battle is on. the challenges keep coming. there is much confidence that this draconian legislation will be made unworkable and eventually overturned.
www.peopleincommon.org welcomes any ideas for imaginative challenges to this law, and they hold an open picnic every sunday afternoon in parliament square to discuss and act upon ideas to undermine this legislation.
other information can be found at:
www.parliament-square.org.uk
www.j-n-v.org.uk
Comments
Hide the following 4 comments
To the Countryside Alliance
22.12.2005 13:22
Many of us on the left disagree with what you say - but many would nonetheless fight relentlessly for your right to say it. Free speech covers your right to protest the ban on foxhunting wherever and whenever you want to.
I, and many others I know on the left, were appalled that one of your members was arrested for wearing a T-shirt saying "Bollocks to Blair". If there is one sentiment that can unite the Anti-War movement and the Countryside Alliance, it has to be this one! Free speech is the last remaining line of defence, and it's bigger than our differences.
Would you be prepared to start a dialogue?
Boadicea
Unity
22.12.2005 17:30
Rachel
Left and right are meaningless here...
22.12.2005 19:05
e.g. The US govt/military were on the side of the famous Socialist Saddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq war.
I've thought for some time that the countryside alliance and the antriwar movement have a common cause (freedom to protest) - and they should work together.
Copernicus
heling put the C**t back in countryside
22.12.2005 20:37
be under no illusions about the CA. Their agenda is based purley around the mass slaughter of a variety of innocent animals. Anyone who has ever been on a sab will attest to the fact that these bastards have NO CONCEPT of peoples freedom to protest. Sabs get beaten week in week out, and two are dead because of CA supporters intolerance to views other than their own. Siding with them is one of the stupidest ideas i have ever heard. They are enemies of the animals, of free speech and actions, and hence, enemies of ours! Whats next, siding with RESPECT!!!!!!!!!!!
(A) Sab
a Sab