shows what appears to be two bodies being carried from the platform..
r2r | 07.07.2005 11:01 | London
r2r
e-mail:
gringoben@indiemail.com
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Mayday 2007
No Borders Days of Action 06
M18 Anti War
Mayday 2006
Refugee Week 2006
SOCPA
Day of Action Against Migration Controls
DSEi 2005
ESF 2004
Server Seizure
May Day 2004
2003 Bush Visit
DSEi 2003
May Day 2003
No War Feb 15
Spaces
rampART
Bowl Court
56a Infoshop
LARC
Pogo Cafe
Groups/Projects
Offline/InfoUsurpa
No Borders
Rising Tide
Freedom Bookshop
Advisory Service For Squatters
RoR samba band
Space Hijackers
LDMG
Campaigns
Disarm DSEi
Food Not Bombs
London No2ID
Bikes Not Bombs
Climate Camp
Regular Events
Critical Mass
Anarchist Bookfair
Anarchist Forum
Comments
Hide the following 19 comments
Mainstream media reporting
07.07.2005 12:30
I would have thought a sensible reaction to this kind of event would be to keep an open mind, to look for clear evidence to find exactly who was responsible for the attack - after all, that is the only chance we have of preventing them doing it again, isn't it? Instead, within a couple of hours we have Tony Blair saying it is 'reasonably clear' it is a terrorist attack. After his speech, the commentator on Radio 4 had high praise for Blairs words, commending his calm, measured tones. He said that Blair would not say that it was a terrorist attack unless he had clear evidence. Where is this evidence? Of course Blair will say that it is a security matter, and the public should not be given the information. Why is this? For any other crime, we require evidence before we come to a conclusion.
And another commentator on BBC radio is saying that this has all the hallmarks of an Al-Qaeda attack. Again, it seems that this is sufficient 'evidence' to confirm that this is an Al-Qaeda attack - 'hallmarks'.
Of course the motive for this conclusion is unfortunately all too clear. A disgusting terrorist attack like this makes people scared. It becomes easier then for the government to strip away those pesky civil liberties that people have in this country. Anyone who dares criticise the government in any way can now be deemed a sympathiser with terrorists. And of course now the government can increase to even greater levels it's murderous foreign policies in Iraq and elsewhere, all under the guise of a 'war on terror'.
I don't think any of these comments will appear in the mainstream media, yet luckily more and more people are coming to realise that Blair's regime is now so desperate that he will resort to putting spin on attacks like this to boost his cause.
I understand with the chaos in London now that you must suspend your meeting. But please don't be deterred from standing up against this terrible regime we have in this country, and fighting for our cause.
Samuel Fernando
Samuel Fernando
too soon
07.07.2005 12:52
On another note, I just heard Bush's response, deceitful remarks from an dangerously ignorant and arrogant man. As a US citizen I can only express shame for our current leadership.
reader
by any other name
07.07.2005 13:06
Dragutin
what else is it?
07.07.2005 13:20
To be fair to both Blair and the media, they've been very reluctant to blame anyone without any evidence. The most I've heard on the BBC is that, "Jihad in Europe have claimed responsibility on a web site, but until this is confirmed we're still unsure" or words to that effect.
sarah
Terrorism? Yes. Responsibility? Not sure.
07.07.2005 13:25
Bryan J.V.
e-mail: infamousbutchery@yahoo.com
Chickens Coming Home to Roost - US-UK Foreign Policy Agenda Bites Home
07.07.2005 13:33
The claim by Blair that this is an attack on Western Civilization is a simplistic decoy to divert attention from the fact that these kinds of injustices have been perpetrated by US-UK forces most recently in Iraq and Afghanistan.
There would be no "attack on Western Civilization" if US-UK et al had not entered the fray with their foul agenda first and if instead they concentrated on aid, development and education instead of irresponsible corporate expansion via the arms trade. As with September 11, 2001, the chickens are coming home to roost.
My sympathies go out to all the innocent victims in this corruption of power.
D-Man
e-mail: space23@gmail.com
Misinformed
07.07.2005 14:04
You don't know that. Nobody knows what the motivations were- there is an isolated statement on a message board somewhere which says this, but it is nothing to base your opinions
Blair never said that this was an 'attack on western civilisation'. His exact words were:
"Whatever they do, it is our determination that they will never succeed in destroying what we hold dear in this country and in other civilised nations throughout the world."
...the implication being that anyone who undertakes such an attack (on civillian targets, specifically designed to cause terror) cannot consider themselves civilised. Do you disagree?
To draw parallels between these attacks and military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan is an ignorant and misinformed. Whatever is going on in Iraq and Afghanistan, it is of an entirely different nature to these attacks- in form and in intent.
Duncan Stuart
e-mail: bronzehedgehog@hotmail.com
Here comes the night of broken glass
07.07.2005 14:38
Please, don't be so naive. This will not be the last terrorist attack. The more illegal wars that are launched to catch??????????? ah yes, OBL, the mastermind, the devious syndicate, the cia asset.
Maybe if bush/blair went after OBL instead of saddam, there would be no explosions today. Maybe if Rove didn't out Valerie plame, she'd still be doing work in the middle east "protecting" you. But Noooooooo, valerie plame said those niger documents were fake and that wasn't good for the war on terror marketing plan.
How convenient as Judith miller goes to jail to "protect her source", a "website" claims al-qaeda did it.
Gee, do you think we might want to find those servers and put them out of business, after all, your talking about a website that posts responsibility. So I ask you, wouldn't it be smart to look into this website?
Of course not, then how would you know al-qaeda did it? Cui bono?(Who benefits)
Motive - Means - Opportunity
Motive: yes
Means: sketchy
Opportunity: No
How does "al-qaeda-europe" infiltrate and then subsequently coordinate a multiple explosive attack without anyone knowing. Including the intelligence agencies that have more money and resources then they know what to do with.
"We have been at a very high state of alert. Of course if there had been any kind of specific warnings we would have dealt with it," Blair said.
Certainly not al-qaeda, your talking about a rag-tag group that is suddenly an international criminal syndicate, one that the US trained, funded, and supported in the soviet-afghan war.
Show me the evidence, not a website that "claims" and I guess MORE security doesn't help given Blairs words above. If you cannot stop a terrorist attack when you are on a "very high state of alert"...
Your either incompetent, negligent, or complicit. As if anyone believes that bush or blair will make anyone safer with the list of lies that have led us to this point. Take a look at what happened today and ask yourself, is the war on terror working?
I am sensitive to the deaths, but I want answers, not "the war on terror II - the empire strikes back"....get a grip, shake the fear, and demand answers not revenge.
ect
oh the irony
07.07.2005 15:03
surely everybody knows the law an eye for an eye
mischief
Chickens Coming Home to Roost - Part II
07.07.2005 15:23
Your logic follows that either a Central Asian or Middle Eastern group perpetrated this act, which my hip-shot judgement tends to agree with. However, if that is the case, US-UK foreign policy is irrelevent. Sure our governments engage in activities that generally make these peoples less than happy with us, but simply put it is WHO WE ARE that so greatly enrages these people. If UK and US culture and influence were completely restricted to within the borders of those countries, Central Asian and Middle Eastern peoples of a particular group within a particular religous persuation would still hate us and want to harm us because the philosophies that we value and respect directly oppose and in some instances threaten the philosophies of said group.
Adrian
e-mail: almarti6527@gmail.com
Conspricacy to bomb London?
07.07.2005 15:27
As usual, the first reaction will be shock, outrgae, despair and anger...
Where do we look when things like this happen?
We look into ourselves to find understanding. When this is not forthcoming, and it's impossible to understand such events so early on, we rely on the media to inform us, often of the facts, and often of someone's opinions. That line is always a little blurred for me.
What strikes me as interesting is
1. the timing - directly on the start of the G8 summit, something imprinted on the conciousness of billions of people due to the efforts of Live 8.
What better distraction from the massive focus on the G8 from the masses (especially those in the UK) than such an act of violence in London.
I hope the G8 doesn't fade further away from primetime viewing, and the obvious US and G8 countries' involvement in systems/buisness/governments which generate, allow and actively support the state of poverty for so many, and become swallowed by a paranoid fear-mongering clamp down on "security" or a deferment or diffusion of the whole focus of G8 and the pressure the leaders should be under from the world watching.
I'm sure conspiracies and/or theories thereof, may come out slowly, and I don't wish to suggest any here...
2. WHy has no-one made it totally clear they are responsible?
The internet provides one possible truth, but if you really go to these lengths, why not more destruction, and a claim from someone to make their point/cause etc. heard?
Think about the motivations of an organised and potentially religion/ideal-driven terrorist group and in what circumstances this could provide them with any kind of platform to get any kind of point across. I'm sure "agenda"-wise, the UK Government will be able "swerve" certain agendas quicker towards completion.
Keep a close eye on how Blair et al respond to this attack. They have a great "reason" to "clamp down" on many of the aspects of life and freedoms we enjoy.
I hope this is conscise enough, there are so many aspects of this event.
What's important is that those affected/injured/bereaved realise they are supported and receive the love and good energy from all of us around the world.
Let us resolve to love the good things more, not hate those "unaccountable" and "mystery" terrorists more. They are everywhere, nowhere and humanity should focus on the positive qualities of human nature not seek to destroy the negative.
Robert Ham
"Strategy of Tension"?
07.07.2005 16:04
Those of you with any connection whatsoever to Arab, Muslim, South Asian, African, and Immigrant communities, stand by them now. If you know people who are caught up in the crackdown who need accompaniment on errands for protection from random vigilante attacks, translation, legal assistance, media support, or anything else, be ready to stand up for human rights wherever you are. Don't let the witch-hunts begin again.
the perspective of Italy
Revenge, punishment...two wrongs do not make a right.
07.07.2005 16:05
Rose
Inevitable
07.07.2005 16:06
Both British and American security services have said that the war on Iraq has made terrorist attacks more likely.
mark
Terrorists and motives
07.07.2005 16:37
Are religious extremists able plan such an act on forein ground? Extremists tend to be people who gets carriet out by their emotions, not this kind of people. For me it has more to do with ecconomic interests then religious nor ideologic. The people behind this had to have a strong motive and access to a large quanty of money, local people and qualified profetionals maybe even from the army. If it really is the Alqaeda behind this, I question their motives and allies, cause it only seems to help the interests of their enemies.
I bet that from now on:
Europe will be more active on the war against terror
Civilians from england and maybe from the rest of Europe will have lees liberty and rigth Due to safety (like the patriot act)
All muslims will be seen as terrorists (like comunists were some years ago)
Military suppliers will get richer
Iran will be invaded
so who has the attack helped?
sorry for my gramma
alan
alan
but who exactly ARE the terrorists??!!!
07.07.2005 17:29
the cold war has finished, there are no major threats from other countries, no world power that could conceievebly stand up to our 'allies' america.
we need a 'faceless' enemy, its the only thing that will keep people afraid.
squats
hmm...
07.07.2005 17:32
terrorists often cripple transport routes - IRA, Madrid... and as for commuters and not businesses - why did Al Qaeda sympathisers destroy a hotel in Bali then? i have no idea who did it, i'm not an expert in world espionage, terrorism and warfare - i get the feeling most people here aren't either.... It's all conjecture, and a lot of the layman's logic displayed here as to why there was some vast MI5 conspiracy doesn't actually tie in with how other attacks have panned out. I'll wait to see if we ever find out.....
sarah
something stinks!!
07.07.2005 17:59
- so now i am to believe they have sat back for over a year and watched while their country has been bombed to **** and they are now finally retaliating by blowing up a few measly underground trains and the top off a double decker bus !!???!!
sorry but i dont buy it
surely if they can organise such a massive operation to start the "terrorist war" they would have more up their sleeves than a few bombs in a tubetrain and a suicide bomber on a bus to back it up - it just doesnt ring true to me ...
The upside for the powers that be is that bush can now turn round and pat blair on the back for being justified all along and the public can praise the 2 of them even more for protecting us Undecided - the damage from todays bombings, (however sad as it is for those who have lost loved ones) is not enough to destroy our economy - but it has given them reason to carry on doing what the hell they like and IS the perfect excuse to slap a security state on us
something stinks if you ask me ......
i dont buy it...
London TERRORIST attack
09.07.2005 22:47
i have followed the news from the very start on various chanels and viewed other content on websites.
A friend of mine was at kings cross and is bloody lucky to be alive.
Everything that happened tallys up to how the al-queda work.
They have now discovered the bombings werent suicide bombers but were planted timed devices set to go off just 50 seconds after each other.The bombing on the bus is the odd one out which police believe the bomber couldnt get on a train for some reason and with the bomb in his bag needed to find a new target.
They have also discovered the bombs were not home made like they orginally thought
Three bombs went off almost simultaneously, within 50 seconds of each other. They were originally believed to have been set off over one hour.
:: The device on the bus was believed to have been carried in a bag.
:: Evidence indicates the bombs were triggered by timers.
:The bombs contained about 10lbs of explosives. This suggests they were not home-made, but had a commercial or military purpose
all linking to al-queda..
the second claim to the bombings was posted in the name of the Europe Division of the network's Abu Hafs al-Masri Brigades
"A group of mujahedeen from a division of the Abu Hafs al-Masri Brigades piled blow after blow on the infidel capital, the British capital, leaving dead and injured," said the statement.
This group also claimed to have carried out the madrid bombing,aswell as numerous others.
whic you can see here
http://www.specialoperations.com/Terrorism/Terrorist_Groups/Abu_Haf.htm
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/D2D48F79-B330-40E3-A17D-B4CDD01EE1A0.htm
http://www.indolink.com/displayArticleS.php?id=031104102802
What happened on thursday was terrorists and can be nothing else.
it was an act of terrorism,it killed,it injured and as i type right now its happening again not in london but now in birmingham,
birmingham city has now been evacuated due to intelligence received by the police,they have carried out on controlled explosion on a bus so far,and since then have evacuated more areas of the city,including,chinatown,broad street,corporation road,.
What happened on thursday isnt the end,its far from the end,and what can we do??absolutely nothing but sit here,watch,worry and hope our families and loved ones arent injured or killed by it.
hel