Very reasonable proposals have been put fowered to allow people who don’t won’t to be filmed to have there wishes respected. The organising process seams unable to engage with this issue.
undercurrents | 31.03.2004 16:13 | European Social Forum | Free Spaces | Social Struggles | Birmingham | London
undercurrents
e-mail:
hamish@riseup.net
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Mayday 2007
No Borders Days of Action 06
M18 Anti War
Mayday 2006
Refugee Week 2006
SOCPA
Day of Action Against Migration Controls
DSEi 2005
ESF 2004
Server Seizure
May Day 2004
2003 Bush Visit
DSEi 2003
May Day 2003
No War Feb 15
Spaces
rampART
Bowl Court
56a Infoshop
LARC
Pogo Cafe
Groups/Projects
Offline/InfoUsurpa
No Borders
Rising Tide
Freedom Bookshop
Advisory Service For Squatters
RoR samba band
Space Hijackers
LDMG
Campaigns
Disarm DSEi
Food Not Bombs
London No2ID
Bikes Not Bombs
Climate Camp
Regular Events
Critical Mass
Anarchist Bookfair
Anarchist Forum
Comments
Hide the following 8 comments
Trying the video agen...
02.04.2004 10:09
hamish
Get to the Truth
04.04.2004 22:04
I was at the meeting. It had nothing to do with democracy or alleged infringement of consenus democracy.
It all had to do with you playing around with your video camera as a little child with new toy. And you have had that video for a very long time.
When the majority in the room said that they did not want the meeting to be recorded by you, you still went ahead and tried to video. Even your friends disowned your antics and find you embrassing. And I am one of them. I have on so many occasions defended you. No more.
And you claimed that you would be recording the truth. We are not all naive as to think that your editing wouldn't play any part in how you want your video to play on the net.
So stop it otherwise mummy and Daddy will have to take your toy away.
Honest Hoz
Honest Hoz
you can tell its the SWP
07.04.2004 19:27
The resulting bad tempered outcome later was a direct result of not dealing with the issue on the agenda as agreed with the chairs at the previous meeting and the beginning of this one.
The ESF is an open process - this is agreed by everyone involved thus filming, sound recording and photography, allowing for individuals preferences, is clearly allowed.
There is a problem that a minority of people do not want to be filmed and unless they are taking part in some key function in the process such as chairing or facilitating this preferences should of course be respected.
The very sensible solution is to have part of the room that is never filmed… then we have openness and respect for diversity of opinion. The minority who do not want to be filmed then clearly make themselves known and their views are respected.
The idea of closing the meeting to video, photo and audio recording is simply incompatible with the principals of the ESF. No argument on this one.
hamish Campbell
e-mail: hamish@riseup.net
Homepage: http://www.undercurrents.org
No No No No
08.04.2004 15:33
It is not about videoing or recording the ESF process. The majority, yes the majority, and yes the majority again, do not want you, yes you, to use your toy on them.
There is no discussion. What the majority, in fact nearly everyone, in Birmingham, said they did not want you to film. Your antics have permanently violated their trust in you.
Hamish, you are a nice individual. Fun and childish games are alright in the playground and in the common. But not in the ESF process. In fact you antics are stopping other media (not mainstream) but Indymedia from playing a role. There were people there from Brazil who wanted to record the event. But your behaviour mean't that they did not want to be associated with the event.
Repeat we, and repeat again I am your friend, I find what you are doing an embrassment.
So please put your toy away and play a constructive role in the ESF process, if you want to. And if you want to, it means giving up your toy and letting us, those who want to record the event do so. You are stopping the majority.
If you want to win your trust again with us, it means changing your behaviour. Once you do that then, may be, people might want to discuss the ESF process with you. And it is going to take a lot of trust building.
Honest Hoz
Which "majority"?
08.04.2004 17:26
Is it some random heckler, or is it just one more example of SWP/GLA/union secrecy and lack of transparency in action?
Individuals like me interested in participating in the ESF can mail Hamish to discuss this, but I can't mail "Honest Hoz".
Leftist bureaucrats have been stopping the majority from participating from day one in the London ESF and earlier. If they want to win our trust again, it means changing their behaviour. Once they do that then, maybe, people might want to take notice of the ESF process. And it is going to take a lot of trust building.
Until then, it will remain a pointless talking shop for an irrelevant minority.
spanner
e-mail: spanner719@hotmail.com
Re Hamish
12.04.2004 18:47
-
Sad and mad at the ESF
27.04.2004 12:38
What is consensus, what are the principals of the WSF...
Best to think about these things (:
hamish Campbell
e-mail: hamish@riseup.net
here is the video agen (:
07.05.2004 16:25
- video/mp4 1.5M
hamish Campbell
e-mail: hamish@riseup.net