a debate hosted by the Alliance for Workers' Liberty
7.30pm, Wednesday 19th November
University of London Union, Malet Street
(nearest tubes: Euston, Goodge Street, Russell Square)
Speakers: Chris Hickey (AWL); Iain McKay (Freedom newspaper and Anarchist FAQ website)
All welcome!
For more details 07796 690 874 - office@workersliberty.org - www.workersliberty.org
Comments
Hide the following 4 comments
oooh...
06.11.2003 12:10
I hope the AWL have better arguments than the SWP in their annual (but not this year...) Anarchism + Marxism talk at Marxism, where they just make up what "anarchism" is and lie about it!
blacknred
AWL
06.11.2003 12:21
They print some pretty loopy stuff about Israel/Palestine, but at least you know where you stand with them. Unlike SWP etc.
random
in what way?
06.11.2003 13:15
The main differences are over policy, in that WL defend Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state whereas SWP call for a single secular state in all of Israel/Palestine. This reflects deeper disagreements over the nature of imperialism, Islam etc.
ageing hack
this is why
07.11.2003 13:02
1) You need to clarify what you mean by "defend Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state". The AWL doesn't support the ethnically exclusivist features of Israel (immigration laws etc) - we want it to be a legally and to the greatest extent possible practically a state of its citizens, as we want every state to be. But we do support the right of the Israeli-Jewish national entity to self-determination, up to and including the right to exist as an independent state. "Two nations - two states" means two democratic, secular states side-by-side; this is what we advocate as a campaigning demand to unite Jewish and Arab workers in Palestine.
2) Yes, the AWL has a "centralist" structure, meaning that decision are taken by responsible committees (and in the last instance our conference, which all members can and are encouraged to attend) and then carried out. But where the SWP's centralism is based on an unelected bureaucracy which stifles minority views, prevents debate and ultimately cannot be held accountable or removed, ours is a democratic centralism (if you like) with both institutional arrangements and a political culture conducive to debate, minority rights and accountability.
Might seem like an unimportant difference to some anarchists, but there you go!
Ruthy
Ruth Cashman
Homepage: http://www.workersliberty.org