Gloom | 28.10.2003 09:13 | Indymedia | London | World
Gloom
Birmingham
Cambridge
Liverpool
London
Oxford
Sheffield
South Coast
Wales
World
Other UK IMCs
Bristol/South West
London
Northern Indymedia
Scotland
Afghanistan
Analysis
Animal Liberation
Anti-Nuclear
Anti-militarism
Anti-racism
Bio-technology
Climate Chaos
Culture
Ecology
Education
Energy Crisis
Fracking
Free Spaces
Gender
Globalisation
Health
History
Indymedia
Iraq
Migration
Ocean Defence
Other Press
Palestine
Policing
Public sector cuts
Repression
Social Struggles
Technology
Terror War
Workers' Movements
Zapatista
Mayday 2007
No Borders Days of Action 06
M18 Anti War
Mayday 2006
Refugee Week 2006
SOCPA
Day of Action Against Migration Controls
DSEi 2005
ESF 2004
Server Seizure
May Day 2004
2003 Bush Visit
DSEi 2003
May Day 2003
No War Feb 15
Spaces
rampART
Bowl Court
56a Infoshop
LARC
Pogo Cafe
Groups/Projects
Offline/InfoUsurpa
No Borders
Rising Tide
Freedom Bookshop
Advisory Service For Squatters
RoR samba band
Space Hijackers
LDMG
Campaigns
Disarm DSEi
Food Not Bombs
London No2ID
Bikes Not Bombs
Climate Camp
Regular Events
Critical Mass
Anarchist Bookfair
Anarchist Forum
Comments
Hide the following 6 comments
Fed up too
28.10.2003 09:34
There are romours (read the mailing list archives) that a multiple wire system may be introduced so that non news items go on a seperate wire. But the collectives have also talked about geting rid of the guideline that currently says that non-news items should no be here.
I for one have seriously considered giving up with indymedia, the newswire is a joke.
jj
The moderators
28.10.2003 10:49
Liberal housing policies, social policies, immigration policies ..... now liberal newswire policy!!
Boo
multiple newswires, communication, ideology
28.10.2003 12:34
Multiple newswires is one solution. The problem is, by splitting and rigidly defining 'news' and 'opinion' as separate discourse, we would only be replicating the ideology of the mainstream media, which is exactly what we don't want. In my opinion, even a split into 'news' and 'analysis' would be dangerous for similiar reasons.
I think it really takes discipline from users and clearly defined guidlines to solve this problem. It seems to be felt that the 'non-news' element of the guidlines needs *rewording* (not removing); but its a thorny problem. I think a 'forum' wire in addition to the 'news'wire would be cool, a simple solution.
Just reporting on the meeting anyway. My advice to this thread would be, don't leave if you're pissed off, get involved. Remember, we're supposed to be 'being, not hating, the media'.
As things stands, the process list is the right place for this discussion, amongst other channels of communication.
stinkbomb
Homepage: http://wwwtbns.net/keele
hmm
28.10.2003 17:10
maybe
disagree
30.10.2003 17:31
But getting rid of the non-news guideline sounds worrying. Also the new analysis topic could do with some explanation. Analysis could mean pretty much any old rant and like you say there are hundreds of forums. Maybe get rid of that as a topic?
Sunshine
Another priceless example!
11.11.2003 22:29
How priceless!
F.S.