Additions
Because you're not very bright
15.10.2015 10:26
You wanted to know:
" so why does IMC still keep blocking reports of it and editing posts so they just have links to an old Northern Indymedia story ? "
Firstly, it isn't an " old Northern Indymedia story", it is a set of guidelines developed by Northern as explained in the first sentence of the article:
"This is a set of guidelines for exposing infiltrators within groups, and in particular by using resources such as Indymedia to do so."
The guidelines were developed partly because they envisaged sick individuals like you:
"unsubstantiated allegations are highly damaging to the individuals and serve to manufacture dissent more than anything else. Indymedia needs to avoid becoming a source of scurrilous rumour and disinformation."
They therefore conclude by stating that:
"* Allegations that are vague, anonymous or do not have adequate supporting evidence shall be
removed."
And that is precisely what has happened here, your vague, anonymous accusations without any adequate supporting evidence have been removed"
You claim: "The activists involved followed the guidelines,"
But in fact you have not followed them at all:
In order to follow the guidelines the following would need to happen:
"For a story exposing someone as an informer, infiltrator or grass to be accepted by the
IMC collective, the story has to be
* Accredited by a known and established group." (Not done - a made up group inside your fantasy filled head does not qualify)
"* Include public points of contact who are prepared to actively communicate with queries
relating to the exposure." (This would involve giving contact details for a an individual - obviously that would mean giving up anonymity and being accountable for spreading these ridiculous lies, and you are too much of a coward to be accountable for your disgusting behaviour)
"* Release the evidence used to substantiate the claim, where possible. Note, this should
preferably include screenshots / scans of documents rather than just text." (claiming that they are on Urban 75 when they are not isn't enough - a story on an Urban 75 forum wouldn't in any case meet the requirement that a known and established group be accredited - but it would mean someone having to give a valid email address and have their IP monitored)
Now if the story was true, you would be personally responsible for failing anyone who might be at risk, by not fulfilling the above. As the guidelines explain:
"The reasons for this is to
* Allow for independent verification of the group and how it came to the decision so that
others can have confidence in the story and are able to take appropriate action if necessary."
Hoping that someone might see your filthy fantasies and act on them in the short space of time before they are, in accordance with the guidelines, REMOVED simply doesn't cut the mustard.
Now why don't you stop being such a waste of space and go do something to make the world a better place?
" so why does IMC still keep blocking reports of it and editing posts so they just have links to an old Northern Indymedia story ? "
Firstly, it isn't an " old Northern Indymedia story", it is a set of guidelines developed by Northern as explained in the first sentence of the article:
"This is a set of guidelines for exposing infiltrators within groups, and in particular by using resources such as Indymedia to do so."
The guidelines were developed partly because they envisaged sick individuals like you:
"unsubstantiated allegations are highly damaging to the individuals and serve to manufacture dissent more than anything else. Indymedia needs to avoid becoming a source of scurrilous rumour and disinformation."
They therefore conclude by stating that:
"* Allegations that are vague, anonymous or do not have adequate supporting evidence shall be
removed."
And that is precisely what has happened here, your vague, anonymous accusations without any adequate supporting evidence have been removed"
You claim: "The activists involved followed the guidelines,"
But in fact you have not followed them at all:
In order to follow the guidelines the following would need to happen:
"For a story exposing someone as an informer, infiltrator or grass to be accepted by the
IMC collective, the story has to be
* Accredited by a known and established group." (Not done - a made up group inside your fantasy filled head does not qualify)
"* Include public points of contact who are prepared to actively communicate with queries
relating to the exposure." (This would involve giving contact details for a an individual - obviously that would mean giving up anonymity and being accountable for spreading these ridiculous lies, and you are too much of a coward to be accountable for your disgusting behaviour)
"* Release the evidence used to substantiate the claim, where possible. Note, this should
preferably include screenshots / scans of documents rather than just text." (claiming that they are on Urban 75 when they are not isn't enough - a story on an Urban 75 forum wouldn't in any case meet the requirement that a known and established group be accredited - but it would mean someone having to give a valid email address and have their IP monitored)
Now if the story was true, you would be personally responsible for failing anyone who might be at risk, by not fulfilling the above. As the guidelines explain:
"The reasons for this is to
* Allow for independent verification of the group and how it came to the decision so that
others can have confidence in the story and are able to take appropriate action if necessary."
Hoping that someone might see your filthy fantasies and act on them in the short space of time before they are, in accordance with the guidelines, REMOVED simply doesn't cut the mustard.
Now why don't you stop being such a waste of space and go do something to make the world a better place?
IMCista