9-11 truth activists deliver letter to Guardian newspaper
Mockingbird | 24.11.2013 18:39 | Terror War
Inspired by the ReThink9-11 campaign which has put a massive billboard opposite the New York Times HQ, 9-11 Truth activists in London decided to deliver a letter of their own to the UK's own liberal voice, the Guardian newspaper.
Banner
On 22 November, a group of 9-11 truth activists delivered a letter to the Guardian questioning their coverage of the attacks of 9-11 2001.
The Guardian has achieved a reputation as an outlet for Whistleblowers, and has been praised (and condemned) for bringing information provided by Chelsea (Bradley) Manning and Edward Snowden to public attention.
However when security service insiders and expert witnesses blow the whistle on the official 9-11 story, their testimony is either downplayed or ignored. One example is Sibel Edmonds, former FBI translator who described the cover-up as follows,
‘What occurred with the 911 related investigation – be it the FBI, or the Department of Defense, or the Department of State, or the CIA or the Pentagon – they choose to basically publicize the deal at the hijacker level – and completely went about covering up certain entities that they had DIRECT evidence, DOCUMENTED evidence of the support networks – be it the financial support networks, or communications, or obtaining visas – they have not touched those individuals. Those individuals are still roaming free! Today!’
The activists also handed out flyers to Guardian staff and answered questions about our campaign. This activity was carried out in support of the ReThink9-11 campaign which sent a letter to the NYT this month challenging their coverage of 9-11.
More information on their campaign is at the link below
http://rethink911.org/news/open-letter-to-the-new-york-times/
The corporate media have betrayed the public by assisting the US government in promoting the findings of a sham inquiry (the 9-11 Commission) which was denounced even by its chairman as ‘set up to fail’. The official story of the 9-11 attacks, which is largely based on the findings of this enquiry, is a totally unsuitable foundation on which to base a foreign policy and domestic security agenda.
The Jimmy Savile scandal showed that a single act of bravery by a media professional can destroy a conspiracy of silence. We call on media professionals to start asking questions about the 9-11 attacks. They could start by asking how office fires in a fire-proofed, steel-frame skyscraper (building 7) managed to achieve this…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mamvq7LWqRU&feature=youtu.be
The Guardian has achieved a reputation as an outlet for Whistleblowers, and has been praised (and condemned) for bringing information provided by Chelsea (Bradley) Manning and Edward Snowden to public attention.
However when security service insiders and expert witnesses blow the whistle on the official 9-11 story, their testimony is either downplayed or ignored. One example is Sibel Edmonds, former FBI translator who described the cover-up as follows,
‘What occurred with the 911 related investigation – be it the FBI, or the Department of Defense, or the Department of State, or the CIA or the Pentagon – they choose to basically publicize the deal at the hijacker level – and completely went about covering up certain entities that they had DIRECT evidence, DOCUMENTED evidence of the support networks – be it the financial support networks, or communications, or obtaining visas – they have not touched those individuals. Those individuals are still roaming free! Today!’
The activists also handed out flyers to Guardian staff and answered questions about our campaign. This activity was carried out in support of the ReThink9-11 campaign which sent a letter to the NYT this month challenging their coverage of 9-11.
More information on their campaign is at the link below
http://rethink911.org/news/open-letter-to-the-new-york-times/ The corporate media have betrayed the public by assisting the US government in promoting the findings of a sham inquiry (the 9-11 Commission) which was denounced even by its chairman as ‘set up to fail’. The official story of the 9-11 attacks, which is largely based on the findings of this enquiry, is a totally unsuitable foundation on which to base a foreign policy and domestic security agenda.
The Jimmy Savile scandal showed that a single act of bravery by a media professional can destroy a conspiracy of silence. We call on media professionals to start asking questions about the 9-11 attacks. They could start by asking how office fires in a fire-proofed, steel-frame skyscraper (building 7) managed to achieve this…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mamvq7LWqRU&feature=youtu.be
Mockingbird
Comments
Hide the following 7 comments
Every 9/11 conspiracy theory was thoroughly debunked years ago!
25.11.2013 11:54
9/11 was NOT an inside job!
Every so called "Fact" about 9/11 has been debunked a long time ago!
25.11.2013 14:40
9/11 was NOT an inside job!
Vested Interests
25.11.2013 15:49
Anyone with half a brain knows there is something awfully suspect about 911.
The JFK assassination and MLK junior assassinations were also shrouded in mystery and misinformation. More recently we have the 2008 global financial meltdown that saw the banks, financial institutions and their shareholders being bailed out with trillions of dollars of taxpayers money. Then the general public in America and Europe are told that it was all their fault and now have to suffer austerity measures.
There seems to be common denominators in all these tragedies and scandals. The rich and powerful prosper and the people lose more freedoms, civil rights and slide further into hunger, homelessness and poverty everyday. We seem to be heading for some sort of neo-feudalism.
Perhaps that's why certain groups panic when they see people asking serious questions and are no longer prepared to swallow the public relations swill. These self-interested groups who often claim charitable motives are about to be exposed.
Archie
Debunked ?
25.11.2013 17:18
" In all the history of high-rise fires, not one has ever had its steel columns which hold lateral load sheared off by a 767. In all the history of high-rise fires, not one has ever been a building which had its vertical load bearing columns in its core removed by an airliner."
Had the lateral/vertical load bearing columns been removed by a crashing airliner, the building (or at least the floors above) would have collapsed immediately, hours afterwards.
"In all the history of high-rise fires, not one has ever been without some fire fighters fighting the fires."
Many high rise buildings have burned for days without collapsing see this one for instance :
If you want to read what architects and engineers are saying about the physics of 911, then read the Architects and Engineers for 911 Truth site at :
Concerning building 7, this page :
"In all the history of high-rise fires, not one has ever been without some fire fighters fighting the fires."
whereas this page :
"There were four engines and at least three trucks." designated for building 7 and "But they had a hoseline operating."
So your debunking site is debunking itself! I'd look for more consistent evidence, if I were you.
I could go on, but I feel people should do their own research and I have far better things to research at the minute.
Apache
ffs get over yourselves
26.11.2013 08:48
And yet, there's no controversy about the facts surrounding the subsequent wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. America and Britain went on to murder upwards of 2million Iraqis after 9/11.
Why don't you start making some noise about that?
ffs
Look to the future not the past
26.11.2013 19:47
anonymous
More dumb trolling on the 9-11 issue
05.12.2013 14:54
We live in the "Post 9-11 World" without understanding the creation myth of that World you're acting in a vacuum of ignorance.
"Why don't you start making some noise about that?"
Why do you assume that I/they don't?
N