" No lawful justification" for the death ofAzelle Rodney Death.
Just this! | 05.07.2013 13:33
A retired judge has investigated the Police killing of Azelle Rodney in 2005 and found that there was "no lawful justification" for shooting him repeatedly.
In what is by now the typical whitewash by Police and IPCC, the previous findings held that they were in the clear over the shooting. Once more, their lies and cover up have been exposed.
In what is by now the typical whitewash by Police and IPCC, the previous findings held that they were in the clear over the shooting. Once more, their lies and cover up have been exposed.
The conclusion of the investigation and report by retired judge, Sir Chrsitopher Holland, can be read here: 
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk-news/2013/jul/05/azelle-rodney-death-metropolitan-police
The Police have been found to be lying and engaging in shoot to kill tactics once more.
The UK can be considered to be a Police state, where they kill people in cold blood and cover it up.
To make matters worse, the Met Police refuse to apologise to Rodney's family. The oficer who murdered Rodney refuses to accept the judge's findings.
They still don't get it. A prosecution is being discussed but who thinks either Azelle Rodney, or his family, will achieve justice?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk-news/2013/jul/05/azelle-rodney-death-metropolitan-police The Police have been found to be lying and engaging in shoot to kill tactics once more.
The UK can be considered to be a Police state, where they kill people in cold blood and cover it up.
To make matters worse, the Met Police refuse to apologise to Rodney's family. The oficer who murdered Rodney refuses to accept the judge's findings.
They still don't get it. A prosecution is being discussed but who thinks either Azelle Rodney, or his family, will achieve justice?
Just this!
Comments
Hide the following comment
Download the report
06.07.2013 12:41
For once a judge has done a good job. He has got to the truth, despite the numerous attempts by the police and government to cover up by falsely claiming that an enquiry could not be held in public.
I think the judge has got some of his conclusions wrong, but they are minor ones which do not affect the main thrust of the report. The police and government will be mixing up extra whitewash to try and cover this.
A N Other