Skip to content or view screen version

The Future of Bristol & District Anti-Cuts Alliance

Nigel Varley | 02.07.2013 06:55 | Analysis | Public sector cuts

I am the Organising Secretary of the Bristol & District Anti-Cuts Alliance but am writing this in a personal capacity.

This is more or less the third anniversery of BADACA. The idea came from a meeting of reps from local branches of the NUT and spread to other unions and organisations. It is now time to review BADACA and Bristol NUT has just passed a resolution to that effect.

In many ways BADACA has been a success. For one thing it has kept going when anti-cuts groups in other towns have not. It has organised demos, lobbies and leafletting; it is taken seriously and provides a valuable information service to about 1500 people on the effect of the cuts and action against them locally. Recently, it has been active in the campaign against the bedroom tax, giving out thousands of leaflets and starting the beginnings of tenants' groups in parts of Bristol. I think we are the only organisation doing this consistently. I also think we can take some of the credit for Bristol City Council hesitancy on sticking the boot in on tenants who cannot pay as shown by the resolution passed at the last Council meeting. This resolution was by no means an outright victory but it was something.



However, all is not well. BADACA meets monthly but the meetings are getting smaller and smaller with the same crowd of predominently old men. It is a pity that so few go to meetings because the discussion is usually good - practical, informative and about what to do. I am 64. There is something wrong when someone as old as me has a prominent position in a campaigning organisation. BADACA has a Steering Committee supposedly made up of delegates from its 30-odd affiliated trade union branches and community groups but the delegates do not come so it is the same group as attends the Open Meetings and (more or less) the Organising Committee, which was supposed to organise things but has become an executive of men available during the day. Very few of BADACA's core activists genuinely represent a viable trade uinion or community organisation to whom they are answerable.

Then there are the trots. A weapon used against BADACA is that it is a "trot front" dominated by members of the Socialist Party and Socialist Workers Party. To a certain extent it is, but in their defense it is not their fault. They have not deliberately manouvered their way into control and, as they cancel each other out, they do not really have control. They have filled a vacuum because, at the end of the day, they are the ones prepared to do the work.

It cannot go on. There is no end to austerity; the cuts are getting worse; even if Mayor Ferguson wanted to, there is little he can do to protect Bristol from the Government's onslaught. Aside from the bedroom tax, the most pressing issue is the sell-off of the NHS. How many Bristolians know that if they call for an ambulance it will be provided by National Car Parks (possibly with a ticket machine inside it)? Weston-super-Mare Hospital is being flogged off and its A&E closed; billions are being drained from the service to private business, all backed up by a media campaign to destroy public confidence. It is no good waiting for the next Labour Government; there may not be one in 2015 and if there is, little will change. We must revive the anti-cuts campaign in Bristol which started so well three years ago with big meetings and demos of 2000 or more.

The question is, how? There are hundreds, nay thousands of Bristolians aganist the cuts. The problem is that hardly anyone will do anything. Over 300 people came to the People's Assembly a few weeks ago but few of them turned up to the bedroom tax demo a few days later. The People's Assembly may inspire more people into activity but what it will actually do in Bristol is not clear and neither is its relationship with BADACA.

To succeed, BADACA needs to go back to its representative base a large part of which is local trade union branches and workplaces. You may scoff at the unions but in the Bristol area we have a network of tens of thousands. The NUT can distribute material on the NHS to its 5000 local members and other unions can distribute stuff on what is happening to schools. The emphasis has to be on winning the arguments: cuts are not inevitable; we don't have to "make sacrifices"; public is good and private bad; it is the fault of greedy bankers, not immigrants and "scroungers". At the moment, we are losing. I believe that BADACA has to be much looser - a genuinely representative federation of different organisations and campaigns supporting each other. Imagine the effect if we could mobilise a 100 or more people to be in Broadmead every Saturday for two months, in local shopping centres, outside hospitals and health centres with imaginative and accessible material and stunts to explain the consequences of what is happening to the NHS.

BADACA has to give itself a kick up the backside and get back its old spirit but so does the Bristol left. Just because you are a "Friend" of an anti-cuts Facebook page or follow the right blogs doesn't mean you are actually doing anything. We need a discussion on where we are going and all contributions are welcome.

Nigel Varley
- Original article on IMC Bristol: http://bristol.indymedia.org/article/765721

Comments

Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments

Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Solutions to Financial Crisis

02.07.2013 10:40


Firstly, when people refer to a financial crisis they could refer to different economic problems.
•Recession – fall in output, negative economic growth and higher unemployment (e.g. Great depression of 1930s, Recession of 2008-09)

•Banking crisis – banks lose money, go bust. Fall in money supply.(e.g. Credit crisis of 2007-08. Bank failures during 1931 in US.)

•Government Fiscal Crisis. When government borrowing increases and markets fear it is not sustainable. Leads to higher bond yields and threat of government default. E.g. Greece bond crisis.

•Exchange Rate crisis – rapid fall in value of exchange rate.


Though given options, most likely is probably government fiscal crisis – government debt default. (European fiscal crisis)

Of course, often problems are related. In a recession, government borrowing tends to rise, an economic crisis can lead to a fiscal crisis. In the case of Ireland, the banking crisis got absorbed by the government leading to the fiscal crisis.

Four Options

1. Devalue

This means to reduce the value of your exchange rate. For example, in 1992, the UK was in the ERM. The value of the Pound was semi-fixed against the D-Mark (£1=3DM). But, in September 1992, the government left the ERM and allowed the value of the pound to fall. (see: ERM Crisis) Devaluing exchange rate makes exports cheaper which helps boost growth.

In the case of the Euro, one possibility is for Greece to leave the Euro and restore their own currency. This would lead to an effective fall in their exchange rates and help economy become more competitive.

After financial crisis Iceland devalued Krona by 35% in 2008. This helped Iceland


2. Inflate.

Inflate means to try and boost aggregate demand in the economy to create higher economic growth. For example, in a recession, the Central Bank could cut interest rates, print money or pursue quantitative easing. This leads to an increase in the money supply and can help to stimulate economic activity; it is also likely to cause inflation

This ‘loosening’ of monetary policy can help create higher spending; it may also led to higher inflation (higher prices). It may also be referred to as:
‘expansionary fiscal / monetary policy’ / fiscal stimulus, reflation, ‘kickstart the economy’.

Higher inflation also makes it easier for the government to pay back its debt. In fact inflating away your debt is seen as a kind of a partial default. The government finds it easier to pay back debt and bond holders lose out because their savings are worth less.

e.g. in 1920s, Weimar Germany printed money to pay war reparations leading to hyperinflation.



3. Default

Default refers to the decision by government to stop repaying part or all of its debt. This will make it difficult for government to borrow in the future, but it means they don’t have to aggressively cut spending to reduce borrowing.

When government borrowing as a % of GDP increases rapidly, it becomes quite difficult to control borrowing. In order to meet interest repayments, and reduce the debt burden, the government may be forced to pursue fiscal austerity (cut spending, increase taxes). However, cutting spending in a recession can make it worse. e.g. the attempts by Greece to cut spending have failed to reduce their budget deficit. The deficit continues to rise and it has created social instability; they are also likely to default anyway. A better option may have been for Greece to admit they were going to struggle to repay deb and default on their bonds earlier. It means investors in Greek bonds would lose some money. However, it gives Greece a chance to enable economic growth and in the long run this may be a better deal for bond holders. Rather than still default, but also have a longer period of economic decline.
•Default explained

Deflate

Deflate refers to policies to reduce inflation. It would involve
•‘Tight’ monetary policy – higher interest rates to reduce spending
•‘Tight’ fiscal policy – spending cuts, higher taxes. Tight fiscal policy also reduces the level of government borrowing.

Deflating the economy will tend to reduce growth and reduce the rate of inflation.

e.g. many countries in the Euro have been trying to solve their fiscal crisis by reducing government spending.

However, it is difficult to solve problem by relying on deflation alone. Deflating economy leads to a painful period of adjustment (lower unemployment lower growth)

Tejvan Pettinger


Good article

03.07.2013 07:45

And congratulations and thanks for clearly doing alot of excellent work

^^^^^


Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments