Skip to content or view screen version

Ding Dong! Thatcherism and sexism are alive

Systemic Disorder | 24.04.2013 17:10 | Culture | Gender

Margaret Thatcher is part of a system, not an individual deus ex machina, no matter how personally ambitious.

I have a deep ambivalence over the playing of the song “Ding Dong The Witch Is Dead” to commemorate the death of Margaret Thatcher. I can well understand the desire to rebel against orders by the British right-wing establishment that everyone must celebrate the prime minister’s “accomplishments,” but the exercise in this form is nonetheless deeply sexist.

Surely there are plenty of political epithets to be hurled at her memory that reference the disastrous policies of her reign. Ronald Reagan was just as awful, but he wasn’t denounced as a witch at his death, was he? Clearly, few of those who took part in the campaign to have the song played on the BBC’s music-chart program stopped to think about the sexism inherent in branding a woman a “witch.” Yes, even when we are talking about someone as horrid as Margaret Thatcher.

What does her gender have to do with her policies? And can it truly be said sexism is a thing of the past because a woman became head of the government of one of the world’s most powerful countries? No more than it could be said that racism is a thing of the past in the United States because Barack Obama is president.

Prime Minister Thatcher imposed misery on millions of Britons; her defenders’ demands that no ill be spoken of her rightly deserves contempt. What mercy did she show to working people? But although the prime minister was powerful and notoriously impervious to opposition, women as a group do not possess privileges.

To continue reading, please go to  http://wp.me/p2cpPS-5b

Systemic Disorder
- Homepage: http://systemicdisorder.wordpress.com/

Comments

Hide the following 5 comments

Wicca

24.04.2013 17:21

I'd love to see you tell a pagan witch how she is a self-loathing female for calling herself a witch.

Oliver Irwell


She were a fucking witch

24.04.2013 17:42

It's got nowt to do with gender no and people didn't hate her for that, they hated her coz she was a fucking witch!

Northern A


thatcher is a cunt.

25.04.2013 11:52

thatcher was a racist, homophobic, transphobic scumbag all of whoms actions fed into the development of neoliberalism (which can only be described as ultra patriarchal)

so i don't really care if its sexist that someone calls her a witch.

she should burn in hell with all the other patriarchs and matriarchs.

fuck archy.

David


Sexist, really?

27.04.2013 11:10

It's only sexist if you insist on interpreting language on the most superficial level, rather than taking the time to understand what people actually mean - and even then that'd still only be RELEVANT if you consider that issue to be more important than all the other issues that pertain to the legacy of destruction left by Thatcherism?

The naivete of this post is amply demonstrated by the question "what does her gender have to do with her policies?" Answer... obviously... ALOT (Thatcher over-compensated for gender inequality by, to put it simply, "beating" the male politicians at what she perceived to be their own game, ie - authoritarianism)

There's a tedious strand of finger-wagging that surfaces from time-to-time on Indymedia, probably all originating from the same author, and what all that genius-level tut-tutting achieves is not for instance political or moral insight, not for instance to unite the radical community in common cause with all the other victims of Thatcherism, but to insult the intelligence of other activists and to effectively communicate the message the that some radicals are sanctimonious berks, who are more interested in finding fault with fellow activists that they are in actually reaching-out to engage with popular culture

Kino


The objections

27.04.2013 11:15

Anyone who chooses to call themselves Systemic Disorder is clearly not thinking from the point of view of trying to convince people in the broader community that their ideas might have something to contribute (seriously, enough already with the 1980s style anarcho-crust imagery), but anyway the article is virtually irrelevant, to any issue other than its disruptive effect on radicalism, since it was posted far too late

Pen