My experience of Atos.
just one person | 08.03.2013 17:47
I went to one of the Atos centers in the northwest of England where i had an appointment with a Mr Paul O'Neill (note he has no title of Dr before his name).
The Atos representatives attitude was strange to say the least and quite aggressive,he proceeded to be very judgmental to my replies when he asked his questions and voiced his own opinion about my disabilities in a negative way.
After the interview i found out that i no longer qualified for any form of sickness benefit and since then i have had to use payday loan companies and my life has spiraled out of control.
I later found out that the Atos rep Mr Paul O'Neill had lied on his assessment he had made of the interview.
What a B@stard this man truly is.
Just one person.
The Atos representatives attitude was strange to say the least and quite aggressive,he proceeded to be very judgmental to my replies when he asked his questions and voiced his own opinion about my disabilities in a negative way.
After the interview i found out that i no longer qualified for any form of sickness benefit and since then i have had to use payday loan companies and my life has spiraled out of control.
I later found out that the Atos rep Mr Paul O'Neill had lied on his assessment he had made of the interview.
What a B@stard this man truly is.
Just one person.
just one person
Comments
Hide the following 5 comments
find out
08.03.2013 18:34
make him pay
appeal!
08.03.2013 19:04
anon
80% fail
08.03.2013 21:49
john
other side of fence
09.03.2013 17:24
He managed to put a full weeks work in at an office
Mario
Mario votes Tory
10.03.2013 10:38
Each case is different, and the controversy about Atos is that their methods are deeply flawed. This is why GPs en masse have condemned the WCA and the testing by Atos. These are REAL doctors, with genuine credentials and experience who are saying, alongside disability rights groups, investigative journalists, MPs who've raised the issue in Parliament, and huge numbers of genuinely ill disabled people who've been screwed by it, that the WCA is not fit for purpose.
All disabled people want is an objective test, that addresses their difficulties - rather than trying to circumnavigate them as Atos do - by qualified professionals who are not constrained by the quotas and targets we all know exist between Atos and the DWP.
For those that are genuinely too ill to work a progressive ethical society will ensure they don't end up begging in the gutter. If you want to live in a society that leaves sick people to struggle just to survive on the streets, Mario, then that shows just how messed up your moral compass is.
For those disabled people who can work there needs to be the right jobs that are accessible for them. Finding those is easier said than done. Your colleague is one of the lucky ones in that respect.
I've been through the Atos assessment, and yes the report contained lies that conflicted with the 'interview'. The assessor avoided my illness as much as possible. The test is skewed to omit your disability and it makes ludicrous extrapolations that have absolutely no clinical or logical basis. In that sense it not only isn't objective or rigorous it is dangerous. The WCA has and continues to cost lives and worsen existing conditions. It casts people who have no realistic hope of getting or being able to maintain employment onto Jobseekers, which is an exercise in futility and stretches the finite resources of the Jobcentre even further. The private companies given contracts to find work for these people are inevitably failing and the only real winners out of this mess as far as I can see are the Atos shareholders who are reaping the profits.
It's easy to be a Tory troll. Here goes: Blah blah my taxes... blah blah hard workers vs scroungers... blah blah could work if they wanted to... blah blah they live in mansions and have massive lcd TVs... blah blah they're on the fiddle
Stop peddling the myths of the spin doctors and blaming the disadvantaged for your discontent.
Bowser