olympic critical mass trial begins in london
rikki | 25.02.2013 12:51
the trial begins today of 9 cyclists who were among the 182 arrested on the opening night of the olympics after draconian public order conditions were applied against the customary critical mass cycle ride that takes place at the end of every month
click on pics for larger versions - free for credited non-commercial usage - all other rights reserved - contact author if unsure.
------
around 20 supporters showed up in the bitter cold outside the westminster magistrates court this morning for the opening day of the trial of the nine cyclists.
charges under section 12 of the public order act relate to wide-ranging conditions imposed by police that night that banned cyclists from travelling anywhere together north of the river thames.
arguments in court are likely to centre around whether the police had a reasonable cause to impose any conditions in the first place, then whether the conditions imposed were sufficiently proportionate and limited as necessary under the human rights act, then whether the accused were properly informed of those conditions, and finally whether the cyclists can be proven to have broken those conditions without lawful excuse.
it seems that the police are lying right from the start by claiming that the critical mass was suddenly overflowing with activists hell-bent on disrupting the olympic ceremony. they have a publicly-viewable page at http://content.met.police.uk/News/182-people-arrested-in-protest/1400010375724/1257246745756 which claims that the critical mass normally numbers around 100 cyclists, but that on this occasion 400-500 turned up.
i've been writing occasional reports and attending the rides for years, and can confirm that numbers only dwindle to around 100 in the cold winter months, with far greater numbers taking part during the summer, normally several hundred.
last friday, even with temperatures around zero, on the february ride there were 132, so the police claim is fanciful and probably a deliberate falsehood.
there's a report on the olympic mass at http://london.indymedia.org/articles/12612
i'm unable to report from the court as i may be called as a potential witness, but there may be updates on the CM9 wordpress site at http://justicecm9.wordpress.com/
the case is set to last 5-7 days.
the court is of course public and supporters are welcomed in the public gallery.
------
around 20 supporters showed up in the bitter cold outside the westminster magistrates court this morning for the opening day of the trial of the nine cyclists.
charges under section 12 of the public order act relate to wide-ranging conditions imposed by police that night that banned cyclists from travelling anywhere together north of the river thames.
arguments in court are likely to centre around whether the police had a reasonable cause to impose any conditions in the first place, then whether the conditions imposed were sufficiently proportionate and limited as necessary under the human rights act, then whether the accused were properly informed of those conditions, and finally whether the cyclists can be proven to have broken those conditions without lawful excuse.
it seems that the police are lying right from the start by claiming that the critical mass was suddenly overflowing with activists hell-bent on disrupting the olympic ceremony. they have a publicly-viewable page at http://content.met.police.uk/News/182-people-arrested-in-protest/1400010375724/1257246745756 which claims that the critical mass normally numbers around 100 cyclists, but that on this occasion 400-500 turned up.
i've been writing occasional reports and attending the rides for years, and can confirm that numbers only dwindle to around 100 in the cold winter months, with far greater numbers taking part during the summer, normally several hundred.
last friday, even with temperatures around zero, on the february ride there were 132, so the police claim is fanciful and probably a deliberate falsehood.
there's a report on the olympic mass at http://london.indymedia.org/articles/12612
i'm unable to report from the court as i may be called as a potential witness, but there may be updates on the CM9 wordpress site at http://justicecm9.wordpress.com/
the case is set to last 5-7 days.
the court is of course public and supporters are welcomed in the public gallery.
rikki
e-mail:
rikkiindymedia[At]gmail(d0t)com
Comments
Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments
doubled pics
25.02.2013 12:57
rikki
critical mass are morons!
25.02.2013 18:53
London Taxi Driver
apparently they think cycling is a crime?
25.02.2013 20:52
cycling isn't a crime - you are correct
so what exactly are your bleating about except some strawman argument?
21st century
trolls at work
25.02.2013 22:56
perhaps they were posted either by the lying cops who are trying to construct a post-arrest justification with their palpable nonsense about critical mass being infiltrated by activists bent on olympic destruction, or by sleazy gareth furby from london local bbc who turned up at court this morning with his piece already written, having received footage and his instructions from said cops.
rikki
My words are not your words. Use your own words if you want to speak
25.02.2013 23:24
wow - that broadsides your theories out of the water doesn't it. ha!
Perhaps you are a paid bike industry informer who is here to post stupid anti-car comments
Perhaps you just don't like cars because of an accident as a young child and therefore you are subconsciously now hating cars and that doesn't really have anything to do with liking bikes, but rather just fits in with the lets-all-hate-cars rhetoric?
21st century
Cabbie comment
26.02.2013 10:59
anon
Confused
26.02.2013 12:26
It just seems a really bizzare lifestyle choice. The world has moved on and some bike riders haven't.
Warm and dry car driver
Enough said
26.02.2013 16:19
Well that's reason enough to support Critical Masses isn't it?
FUCK CARS
Guess it
Cars are real
26.02.2013 17:52
Well, my mate would be dead if it wasn't for cars. His dad rushed him to hospital with anaphylactic shock.... in a car! No cars = dead person. You lose
What about transporting food? How is that going to work without lorries?
What about ambulances? Can't be done with bikes?
Remember, we don't all live in Tower hamlets you know
soviet built
cars
27.02.2013 00:53
we need to move to far more local production and transport of food.
meanwhile, the idea that everyone is entitled to burn oil to get around in private transport will be looked back on as archaic in the future. simple pooled car schemes and properly funded fast and efficient public transport can be the only solution to the the problems of diminishing energy resources, as well as the seriously increasing pollution in london and other cities.
cyclists can sometimes be a bit childish, and a bit holier than though, but don't let that distract you from the simple common-sense that the current and ever increasing level of private transport is wholly unsustainable.
the bizarre notion that cyclists don't have jobs is just one example of how lacking in common sense some 'bike-haters' are - there's simply no evidence for this belief!
yes, many bicyclists are to some extent 'car haters', for a variety of sensible reasons including pollution, potholes, recklessness, speed, climate change, and traffic jams, none of which cyclists are constantly responsible for.
sane person
right to reply
27.02.2013 16:29
How many bycles will you need to ship 500 tonnes of turnips from somerset? Do you think we can sustain the numbers of human being we currently have with out shipping food?
Maybe you would like to explain to 70% of londoners who live in multiple occupany buildings that they will not be able to eat as they cant grow food on the land they dont have, cant grown much in a window box.
properly funded fast and efficient public transport
So what does public transport run on. the trains and busses of this country churn out far more Co2 and micro particulants than all the cars.
cyclists can sometimes be a bit childish, and a bit holier than though but don't let that distract you from the simple common-sense that the current and ever increasing level of private transport is wholly unsustainable.
In london the number of private cars on the road is low, its the cabs, buses, coaches, works vans and delivery vans that make up the majority of road traffic
yes, many bicyclists are to some extent 'car haters', for a variety of sensible reasons including
pollution, - weve covered that true facts
potholes, - cars are normally too light to create the realy big potholes and road damage that you see, trucks, buses and heavy goods does it well though
recklessness, - like rideing on the pavement, going through red lights, pedestrian crossings (with people on them) and lane changeing without observation....yeah thats cars isnt it
speed, - average speed in central london is 23 miles per hour
climate change, - odly all the cars in the world produce less greenhouse emisions than all the cows and power stations (that produce electricity for the public transport)
traffic jams, - funny, the conguestion charge (now £10) still hasnt made all the cars go away...maybe they need to make that journey
none of which cyclists are constantly responsible for - your human, your liable.
Maybe what we need is for a few more folk to have taken physics and chemistry instead of the humanities and invent cleaner fuels, better public trasit systems and ways to transport electricity with out loss.
still that takes effort and wont get you laid at uni
anon by right
Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments