Skip to content or view screen version

Packed meeting calls for a halt to Whittington sell off

Islington Hands Off Our Public Services | 14.02.2013 17:58 | Health | Public sector cuts | London

Mass meeting rejects Whittington Hospital, Islington, board plan to raise money by selling up around one third of its property and business.

Packed meeting rejected Whittington Hospital board claims
Packed meeting rejected Whittington Hospital board claims


• No sell off demo planned for 16 March
• Campaigners to picket 17 February hospital board meeting

Whittington Hospital’s proposed property sell off could lead to a private health business replacing it, a former health minister has warned.

Camden MP and Labour’s ex-health secretary, Frank Dobson, speculated during the meeting on 12 February that a US health business could buy up part of the Whittington.

He was speaking at the Defend Whittington Hospital Coalition’s a 500-strong meeting at Archway Methodist Church called to oppose a shock plan to sell up to one third of the hospital’s land and buildings.

Frank Dobson said: “Who is going to buy the land? The land’s been designated for use for health facilities. We will get a private, American health company who will buy it and then build a hospital."

He also said: “The Whittington is the safest hospital in England. This might have something to do with the fact that it has a high number of staff to its patients. Yet, in seeking to qualify for foundation status, it is reducing its staff to the national norm.”

Tottenham MP David Lammy passionately warned that a few years in the future with a smaller, less viable Whittington, arguments could be made that it should be merged with another hospital.

Islington MP Jeremy Corbyn told the meeting he examined the pages and pages of proposals. He warned that bed numbers would be cut by half to 177 and staff could be reduced by between 300 and 500.

He confirmed that planning regulations designated the hospital land for use for health services only but he also reflected fears that the land could be used for luxury flats.

Hospital board chairman Joe Liddane admitted to the meeting that they botched their communications and pledged to hold meetings with the public to explain all.

He claimed that public health would be improved through spending sell off proceeds on maternity services and an increase in care in the community made better by medical advances.

He was backed by board members at the meeting and one GP, from the audience, who pleaded that managers were doing their best to keep the hospital in the NHS.

But most speakers from local associations and hospital campaigns in London rejected the proposal. Islington MP, Emily Thornberry and council leader, Catherine West, stressed that the local community loved the Whittington.

Speakers from the Save Lewisham Hospital, the Camden’s defend health services campaign and local author and political commentator Owen Jones, called for mass demos, occupation and strike action. Coalition chair, Shirley Franklyn attacked the lack of consultation fo the decision and called for a picket of the next hospital board meeting due for 17 February.

The meeting overwhelming supported a call to the managers to halt the sell off and backed a planned protest march on 16 March.

Islington Hands Off Our Public Services
- e-mail: secretary@ihoops.org.uk
- Homepage: www.ihoops.org.uk

Comments

Hide the following comment

PFI timebomb

16.02.2013 12:48

I think that PFI is a timebomb planted to blow up the NHS and hand over hospitals to the private sector. PFI is giving the private sector lots of money to build public buildings that the state could do a lot cheaper. It's bankrupted hospitals and is probably behind the Mid-Staffs disaster. Invented by the City of London, it was endorsed by New Labour. The PFI chickens are now coming home to roost.

interesting letter

Hospital’s debt bill – Camden New Journal, Letters, 22/07/2011
 http://www.camdennewjournal.com/letters/2011/jul/hospital’s-debt-bill
IN 2002, Whittington Hospital signed a Private Finance Initiative (PFI) contract. It cost around £30million. Using borrowed money, the hospital settled for an impressively spacious modern development of the somewhat rundown, busy and popular hospital. The price tag was not on show.

PFI funding has long been controversial because of its high cost.

How dire the Whittington’s present financial situation is I do not know. But a stark reminder of a major continuation of its financial problems was recently disclosed in the hospital’s response to a question asked by a member of Islington Pensioners? Forum. Using the Freedom of Information Act 2000 he elicited the information that the annual interest payment on its PFI debt for the financial year 2010-2011 was the staggering sum of £2,228,000.

Could not this money have been better used in patients? interests? What NHS assets may it now be obliged to sell?
My conclusion: reject any PFI borrowing ?solutions? as appallingly wasteful and benefiting shareholders at taxpayers? expense.

ANGELA SINCLAIR-LOUTIT
Highbury Hill, N5

Published: 22 July, 2011

Simon Hinds
mail e-mail: simongah@blueyonder.co.uk
- Homepage: http://simongah.wordpress.com/