Mark Kennedy, James Bond, and the Secret State.
M | 17.01.2013 13:18 | Policing | Repression
"The High Court has today granted an application by the Metropolitan Police for a secret hearing over the claims brought against them under the Human Rights Act, arising from undercover officers engaging in intimate long term relationships with women whilst undercover."
The Investigatory Powers Tribunal meets in secret, takes selected evidence in secret, and publishes only a yes/no in its findings, with no access to the Tribunal by the complainants, no right to know the secret evidence provided by Kennedy and his mates, and no right of appeal.
http://policespiesoutoflives.org.uk/?p=363
http://www.ipt-uk.com/
All Power to The Secret State!
http://policespiesoutoflives.org.uk/?p=363
http://www.ipt-uk.com/
All Power to The Secret State!
M
Comments
Hide the following 12 comments
bond
17.01.2013 13:20
anon
Are you kidding?
17.01.2013 14:21
fiction neutraliser
mark ain't bond
17.01.2013 14:40
.
Solidarity
17.01.2013 14:54
Rob ex RTS
Austin Powers Perhaps?
17.01.2013 15:51
The Spy Who Shagged Me!?
Klamber
On Her Majesty's Secret Service
17.01.2013 16:18
Brooke Bond
point taken
17.01.2013 16:24
HARP
The desperation of the police is good - it shows they are afraid of the truth
17.01.2013 22:24
These tactics may or may not be appropriate against "hardened criminals" planning to carry out "major crimes". They are completely outrageous when used against political campaigners whose views the police and others in the establishment dislike. The police are desperate to keep their political activities out of the public eye, but thanks to the efforts of many they have not fully succeeded.
The official's ruling, relying on a fictional character who in real life would probably have died of STDs long ago, would be comical if it was not such a serious matter. Why on earth did the official make himself a laughing stock by mentioning the fictional Mr Bond? I have read his paper and am none the wiser.
In this case the glass is half full. The secret court, which has never found against officials, is not the end of accountability. At the moment it will still be possible to discuss many of the facts in open court eventually. As with the Drax train trial the pontification of officials is not always as clear cut as they implym so it may be possible to introduce things in open court as in the Drax train case. The police's next tactic will be to try and get Ken Clarke's secret courts in before this case comes to a real court and then divert it there. We must watch out for that.
Emotional and sexual abuse of political campaigners by the state is wrong. Officials need to be held to account for doing wrong.
A N Other
police lie, and lie, and lie
17.01.2013 23:01
jak
Love and Solidarity
18.01.2013 08:29
Gulliver
Justice
18.01.2013 19:52
nm
strategy
19.01.2013 00:19
For court room strategy, how about getting a couple of MP's to just say the opposite, that NO, they had not expected cops to be having five year relationships, having children, or getting innocent activists into the bed at all.
Might that help the women's case? Don' know what else could help except their taking to the streets, going public with the whole story and shaming the cops, and building a mass movement that demands justice in the streets.
j