Skip to content or view screen version

small but loud protest and direct action at india house - report & pics

rikki | 06.12.2012 18:39 | Ecology | London

london activists, 'foil vedanta', helped organise the protest this afternoon outside the indian high commission in aldwych, london. they were there in solidarity with thousands of indians protesting outside their supreme court while waiting to hear a decision on a controversial mining application in eastern india.

main banner
main banner

noisy protest
noisy protest

CBI admonishment
CBI admonishment

hands off
hands off

the special delivery
the special delivery

no ID fleece
no ID fleece

indian commission illegal dumping?
indian commission illegal dumping?


click on photo for larger - free for credited non-commercial radical use. all other rights reserved. contact author if in doubt.
------
the london protest was small, but colourful and noisy, with a selection of great banners, a megaphone, and despite the cold conditions, high-spirited. although there was a fenced 'protest pen' laid out near the visitor's entrance, there were no police present. occasionally, embassy staff came out and took photos of everyone involved.

news came in from india that many thousands had joined the protest there, and soon we heard that the final decision had been delayed again until january 11th.

at around 3pm, some 'workmen' turned up and swiftly deposited bags of rubble in the doorway while staff hurriedly tried to keep them out and push the door closed. the 'workmen' walked away and soon blended in with passers-by. activists then planted their banners in the heap.

a few minutes later, armed diplomatic police turned up, followed by regular cops, including a whole van-full. clearly a quiet afternoon for the cops as soon their numbers equalled that of the protestors who they then ushered into the pen.

a 'green and black cross' legal observer pointed out to a senior officer that some of the police were wearing fleeces that obscured their ID numbers. after some discussion, they were ordered to take off their fleeces.

after the protest ended, with no arrests or details taken, embassy staff swept the hallway, and moved the pile of earth to a nearby tree. i trust they will be arranging proper disposal rather than illegally dumping it on a london street, but the track record of the indian government and its close ties with the head of vedanta may suggest otherwise.

vedanta are trying to push through a huge mega-mine construction on sacred land in the nyamgiri hills where the local dongria kondh tribes have traditionally worshipped, foraged, hunted and gathered. the indigenous tribes are accomplished horticulturalists, and, known as the 'protectors of the streams', they subsist self-sufficiently in the forests and hills of the orissa area.

they have fought off vedanta's mining interests successfully for many years through the courts, with direct action, and by protesting, but the lure of the mountain's rich seams of bauxite have driven the company back for a final attempt in the supreme court, and much depends on the decision which now looks to have been postponed until the new year.

for more info on the issue, or if you want to join their campaign, see the www.foilvedanta.org website

rikki
- e-mail: rikkiindymedia[At]gmail(d0t)com

Comments

Hide 6 hidden comments or hide all comments

Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Who cleared up all the crap afterwards

06.12.2012 21:29

I hope you cleared that stuff up after you finished protesting.


Protesting = legal and fine

Leaving shit everywhere afterwards is not protesting. It is illegal. That is why the police and there and arrest you.

ok


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Response to OK

06.12.2012 22:40

If "leaving shit everywhere afterwards... is illegal" and "that is why the police and there and arrest you" (sic) the police would have arrested somebody?!

And to put your bullshit in perspective, in 2010 the Vedanta subsidiary Sterlite Industries received a tax demand from the Indian government worth nearly $60 million and were charged were numerous tax offences, and Vedanta's unsafe working practices have killed dozens of workers

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vedanta_Resources#Criticism

Ty


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

response

06.12.2012 23:27

Extract >> after the protest ended, with no arrests or details taken, embassy staff swept the hallway, and moved the pile of earth to a nearby tree. i trust they will be arranging proper disposal rather than illegally dumping it on a london street, but the track record of the indian government and its close ties with the head of vedanta may suggest otherwise.

The author said it was illegal dumping on the street. The protesters dumped it on the street, the embassy merely moved it as it was obstructing an exit. They have to do this because the main entrance would be considered a fire exit. Their duty of care to the people inside is to ensure that all fire exits are unobstructed. So, to add to the illegal dumping on the street, the protestors always blocked a fire escape thus putting people's lives at risk which is also illegal. Yet, the author seems to manage to blame the embassy who had nothing to do with the big pile of dirt!

ok


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

dumping

07.12.2012 00:23

i don't normally respond to trolls and won't be drawn into further argument but consider this possibility:

the protestors had "lawful excuse" - look it up!

the embassy didn't.

rikki


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

THe protestors didn't have lawful excuse

07.12.2012 00:33

1. There was nothing that needed protecting that was in "immediate" danger
2. The criminal acts (illegal dumping, blocking fire exit, false imprisonment) clearly wasn't going to protect anything from immediate danger. This can be proven as nothing was in danger, and nothing has been saved from danger by this act.

simples


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

trolls who are even more fascistic than the cops

07.12.2012 07:13

who'd have thunk it?

hurrah


direct action?

07.12.2012 15:26

nice banner
but could we stop misusing, and so devaluing, the term "direct action"
this was clearly a protest to/at a government
whatever the pros and cons of that, it's very far from taking action to have a direct effect yourself

coolio


Hide 6 hidden comments or hide all comments