Skip to content or view screen version

Day of action against adidas

monkey_wrench | 03.12.2012 12:37 | Globalisation | Social Struggles | Workers' Movements | Birmingham

On Saturday 1 December, people across Britain took part in a day of action against adidas. With actions at every major adidas store in the country.

Adidas have refused to pay their former workers in Indonesia $1.8 million in legally-owed redundancy pay. Other brands using the factory have agreed to pay their share of the $3.4m the workers are owed.

This action took place at the adidas store in Birmingham with the University of Birmingham's People & Planet society joined by concerned members of the public.

At one point the over zealous security assaulted one of the protesters by punching him in the face and later ripped up one of the protesters banners who at the time were protesting on the high street outside the shop and not inside on shop property.

Why won’t adidas pay? They are happy to pay their $157m to sponsor the Olympics, but won’t pay 1% of that to avoid the destitution of those that made them their profits.

In May 2012 50,000 people signed a petition calling on adidas to pay up. They refused.

In November 2012 the University of Washington, cut contracts with adidas over the issue, adding to $10s of millions of contract cuts since the campaign began. Adidas are still refusing to pay up.

Other actions took place in London, Manchester, Liverpool and Bridgend/Cardiff

 http://vimeo.com/54740440

monkey_wrench

Comments

Hide 2 hidden comments or hide all comments

Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Details Removed

03.12.2012 12:50

Some parts of this comment contradict the Editorial Guidelines and as such it has been removed.

For details of why contact the Moderation List via email.

Concerns about editorial guidelines or queries about moderation are dealt with on the imc-uk-moderation list. These issues are not dealt with through the newswire, and newswire posts on these topics will be hidden.

IMC


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Details Removed

03.12.2012 14:36

Some parts of this comment contradict the Editorial Guidelines and as such it has been removed.

For details of why contact the Moderation List via email.

Concerns about editorial guidelines or queries about moderation are dealt with on the imc-uk-moderation list. These issues are not dealt with through the newswire, and newswire posts on these topics will be hidden.

IMC


Hide 2 hidden comments or hide all comments