Skip to content or view screen version

“This is it then, this is the end.”- A view of the NUS Demo 21/11/12

Annonymous 'Radical Writers Collective" | 29.11.2012 01:49 | Social Struggles | London

A a reflexive view from the streets during the NUS demo last week and some thoughts about the student movement as a whole.

We began walking over a deserted Westminster bridge, the rain pouring down
hard on us. In front of us, thousands of students were making their way
through the streets of Lambeth, a borough with high levels of
impoverishment, to demand “Educate, Employ, Empower” to I'm not quite sure
who.

In many ways, this moment really did feel like the end of the student
movement. Those in power sat smugly and safely behind the police fortress
that had been set up along Whitehall and Parliament Square. The NUS could
lie to anyone still listening that it had represented its members as well
as bolstering their own chances for power in the Labour party. The majority
of people seemed to have no problem with parading straight past Parliament
and onwards to Kennington Park, seduced perhaps by that promise of
employment. Damp and despairing it felt as though this had been some sort
of last chance and we'd lost it – nothing had happened (although we can
take some comfort from the egging of Liam Burns and chants of 'NUS shame on
you, where the fuck have you brought us to').

2 years before marching from A to B was simply not an option. Instead we
targeted those who wanted to see us denied free education (both free as in
no price and where learning is free from the dictates of the state and the
market) and indebted for the rest of our lives. Students stormed and
smashed the Tory HQ creating a spectacle that inspired and galvanised
students here and in Quebec. With the NUS condemning our actions, we went
on to show how much more effective we are outside these sorts of
organisations. Another demonstration saw the windows of other government
buildings smashed in and protestors get close to breaking through police
lines around parliament. These experiences, these acts of fuck you and the
destruction of power, were a kind of empowerment beyond the NUS' wildest
dreams.

The NUS' march was purposely designed to kill off the lessons and
experiences that we had gathered from these times – to kill off the student
movement – as we creeped around backstreets and into a south London park
encircled by railings in the 1800s to prevent unrest. But whilst the slogan
and route were organised around demobilisation they provoked an angry
response that asserted our need for action, autonomy, and anger.

The National Campaign Against Fees and Cuts counter march saw over 1,000
students (whilst the official march managed only a couple of thousand more)
gather at UCL with substantive demands and propositions illustrated by
banners proclaiming 'Smash the NUS', 'The Dead Bury the Dead – Never Work'
and '#Wrong to Work' and insurrectionary literature from the Imaginary
Party declaring 'Educate, Disempower, Destroy'. The march was for 'free
education' and for the freeing of society but also for the destruction of
the NUS which is a barrier to our practices and aims.

Plans for direct action were stopped by heavy policing (surely they don't
have the funds to keep this up?), with the NUS stewards relishing their new
found 'authority', and perhaps a lack of communication between ourselves.
Whilst energy had been high at the start, the longer we were funnelled down
the streets by the police, the wearier we grew. Our attempts to make a
break down the Strand rather than join the NUS march at Embankment were met
with lines of police and reinforcements arriving behind them. Our numbers
were simply not enough to overcome this total policing. And so we arrived
on the corner of Westminster bridge, Parliament square on our right blocked
by 2 barriers with lines of police and riot vans. We half-heartedly
discussed possible plans knowing they would come to nothing.

But there is still rage. Even though it did not manifest itself in
particularly obvious and compelling forms that day. We got to know each
others faces, or eyes, for those wearing masks. And that is the start of
something.

And perhaps we were looking in the wrong place for that rage at this
moment. Maybe the streets, blocked and lined with riot police, are not the
place to meet right now – although, of course, this is where the beauty is.
The other day I spoke with three women in the computer room of our Further
Education college about the introduction of fees for their courses that
will come in next year. This is where the rage is. They described their
anger at the government 'robbing' from them. They explained how they were
studying so that they could get a job to be an example to their children.
They were surviving on £30 a week.

*'I think education should be free – it shouldn't be like that [ever
increasing fees]'*

*'We don't know where we're going to stand with fees coming in, we've got
our kids to look after as well,'*

*'Don't try and rob from me to make yourself pppffff'*

*'It's ridiculous where money is – they let the rich off and f the poor,'*

*'they waste money on stupid sculptures, that new building, that point
thing, the Shard shit'*

*'You can't even have little treats, it is £30 a week on food. We can't go
out, we don't have a social life'.*

*'We're just surviving, just getting by, without this education now, where
am I going to be?'*

*'We're trying to help ourselves but we're just in debt.'*

*'I was watching This Morning and they were saying that if you live on less
than £400 a week you live below the poverty line. I'm poor but you're not
helping me,'*

*'They really categorised us now – we're poor. Categorise us, put us into a
little...'*

Listening to them, I did not even bother to mention the student demo. It
felt as if I would be somehow selling them out suggesting they come along
to something I had little hope in to start with. They were busy enough
looking after their children, studying, and surviving.

Clearly, then, this is not the end – there is a belief in free education
and the anger with which to obtain this and much more. NCAFC has called for
a National Day of Action on December 5th in all places of education.
Drawing as well from the Imaginary Party's literature, it is clear that the
struggle, having learnt from Quebec, should return to these places, where
we can listen to and organise with each other. Whilst never forgetting
Milbank.

N.B.
As we publish this post we are hearing news that
UCL has staged a sit in (with the possibility of it turning into an
occupation) over UCL management's involvement in the social cleansing of
Carpenters Estate. Elsewhere across London university campuses this
evening, there is a protest of cleaners and student supporters outside
University of London's Senate House for sick pay, holidays, and pensions.
Earlier on in the day, UCL academics lobbied the 'UCL council' against
reforms to Statue 18 which would give management powers to *fire at will*.
Now those words uttered as we crossed the bridge seem so laughable.


'Anonymous'- Radical writers collective

Annonymous 'Radical Writers Collective"
- Homepage: www.thesituationlondon.wordpress.com

Comments

Hide the following 13 comments

Absolute rubbish it was a resounding success

29.11.2012 10:33

Despite very bad weather we got over ten thousand out onto the streets and for almost an hour thousands of people stood on Westminster Bridge Road just yards from Parliament shouting at the top of their voices so that the MPs inside heard us and knew we had not gone away. Thousands then made their way to Kennington Park but due to heavy rain most decided to leave before getting to that far, but then we can't control the weather. Anyway it was inspiring to see dozens of people invade the stage at the final rally as sell out NUS leaders got shouted down.

student


it's only

29.11.2012 15:03

...over if the students don't take any of the lessons learnt from the student movement into their future lives after education....


farseekill


Hour in rain shouting

29.11.2012 16:52

" for almost an hour thousands of people stood on Westminster Bridge Road just yards from Parliament shouting at the top of their voices so that the MPs inside heard us and knew we had not gone away"

This has always been a wonderfully useful and practical way to get MP's to continue doing what they do - rule the country, make laws and ignore any protests even if they are one million people outside. Shutting down all the FE colleges, schools and universities for a few months with sustained and open occupations might make some kind of difference than expecting MPs to listen and be moved by demos outside the Dunghouse. That the NUS will never back such a grassroots action is the reason to push them to one side and get on with organising occupations, sit-ins, our own demos etc. Quebec students were way ahead of the game and much can be learned from their struggles unless we want to shout to our MP's ad inf!

Bore


Bollocks article

29.11.2012 23:35

To say that "We began walking over a deserted Westminster bridge... thousands of students" puts this article in perspective - the reason the bridge was "deserted" was because the THOUSANDS of students the NUS successfully mobilised had by that stage left, after blockading one side of Parliament for hours (I'm not aware of any demo that ever blockaded every side of Parliament btw)

Likewise the National Campaign Against Fees & Cuts march was NOT a "counter march". As NCAFC stated on their website they disagreed with the NUS about the route, but they were marching to JOIN the NUS march, not to oppose it. Likewise several of the signatories who've supported the NCAFC call-out for Dec 5th are in fact MEMBERS OF NUS NATIONAL EXECUTIVE......

 http://anticuts.com/2012/11/21/see-you-again-on-dec5-free-education-living-grants-abolish-the-debt/

The article makes a few valid points but those lies reveal it as overall just blatant shit-stirring, trolled-up by people who are offering nothing by way of any practical alternative. If any commentator was really trying to bolster-up the student movement they'd be using their time and energy to promote the forthcoming action on Dec 5th and not using the same time and energy to demoralise student activists

London Road


Make sure you're in the Strand on Dec 5th !!!!!!!!!!!!!

29.11.2012 23:50

Sure anyone can always make valid criticisms of any and all political campaigns and groups, but the reason Indymedia is being used by trolls to post up divisive and defeatist comments about student protests is because those trolls want to take an admittedly weakened anti-cuts movement and kill it off completely

Make sure you're in the Strand on Dec 5th

Leo


@Leo and London Road

30.11.2012 02:17

I don't think this article is trolling or self defeating, i think it is being critical of the demonstration and of the general failings of the student movement (of which there have been many). Reading the article in full you see that it is arguing for greater action and for more self organisation, not just attacking what exists now; but guys come on we have to be critical of our actions or we will never learn/make them better. Lets face it the inspiring student movement of two years ago has very much faded and is not strong or useful anymore- thats not to say give up thats to say rethink, and oppinion that i think this article is also getting at.

None


@ None

30.11.2012 13:52

"Reading the article in full you see that it is arguing for greater action and for more self organisation, not just attacking what exists now" - the issue being that this "Radical Writers Collective" (?!) is "arguing for" rather than ACTUALLY DOING

You can post on Indymedia "arguing for" anything you want, for your entire life, but at this stage in the austerity programme what we (meaning ordinary people like myself) want to hear is details of what actions people are organising and when and where those actions are taking place so, we can get involved and show our support

Every moment that someone spends criticising someone who did bother to do something is a moment that could have been spent working on the logistics of organising an alternative. In terms of how best to use our time, it's much better to see a 10,000 strong NUS demo as a foundation for building on and as a springboard for moving forward than it is to selectively focus on the demo's shortcoming as an opportunity to demoralise the huge numbers of idealistic and politicised young people who bothered to take part in it

Let's face it, if 10,000 people had showed up for an Anarchist demo, no matter how bad it was, people would be crowing about it on Indymedia for years

Lee O


To the people who made This March is **** Banner

30.11.2012 14:15

Just when you thought people had run out of sophisticated political analyses
Just when you thought people had run out of sophisticated political analyses

This really takes the prize for possibly the stupidest political banner ever. The point being that these pillocks weren't responding to a situation they found on the demo, they decided the march was bad in advance, made their banner in advance, got their masks ready in advance, came along with the expectation the march was going to be bad, and then, through their actions, helped ensure it was bad - or at least make sure it satisfied their own criteria for declaring it to have been a failure

Looking forward to them getting thousands of people out on the streets

People like this are politely requested NOT to attend future demos, it's obvious from recent tests that autonomous "networks" contribute neglible numbers to demonstrations anyway, so the actual numbers you bring won't be missed

Scooby


Speak for yourself, mate.

30.11.2012 15:26

"You can post on Indymedia "arguing for" anything you want, for your entire life, but at this stage in the austerity programme what we (meaning ordinary people like myself) want to hear is details of what actions people are organising" - this is utterly dishonest bollocks. Speak for yourself, don't try and present yourself as the voice of the Great British Public when you're just an anonymous poster on an obscure activist website with a dwindling readership. Maybe what you want to hear is just details of actions with no criticis, but what we (meaning ordinary people like myself) want to hear is some kind of intelligent discussion of our successes and failures so we can work out what's working and what isn't, and what 99.9% of the population want is not on indymedia, which we can tell from the fact that barely anyone uses it. This attempt to shut down all criticism of ineffective liberal protest is bollocks - people do become disillusioned with useless liberal protests over time anyway, no matter what happens, just because they don't work. Comparing October's TUC demo to the one last March illustrates that point. Providing a critique is one way to maximise the possibility that they might move on to something better, rather than just giving up.
Oh, and that "This march is shit" banner is legendary. By your own standards, no-one is ever allowed to say anything that's not nauseatingly positive, so you're a hypocrite if you criticise it.

A


"This march is shit"

30.11.2012 18:32

"... so lets stand around at it, rather than use our free time productively or for enjoyment"

What a bunch of losers. If you thought it was shit, then don't go to it.
I think football is shit.... hence I don't go to football games. I use my time doing stuff I like!
lol! Dumbasses

Reminds me of the cartoon where a monkey keeps pulling a switch and each time they do, a big mallet hits them on the head. Yet the monkey keeps pulling the switch!
You can't help people who can't help themselves.

knows what im talking about


Banner is Shit

01.12.2012 00:06

Have to agree, that's one of the all time worst attempts at writing searing rad critique that fails. Is kind of like sub-sub-all those Californian University 'demand nothing' occupation slogans from 2 or 3 years back except lacking any political subtlety or verve. As a response to the dog-end politics of the NUS and the great march to nowhere important, it probably sounded great in the making. In the doing. Hmmmm.

Those puppies don't look like they are capable of taking much revenge they so dearly desire. What kind of revenge do you think they want and why is that ALL they want? Why don't they take it instead of moaning?

hey even got dressed up in the manner of those in Quebec supporting CLASSE with all that red and all. The woman in the middle is so badly masked up - bowlcut fringe and a black beret and half her face showing. At least her shit-talking comrades had a reasonable stab at it.

More relics for the museum of radical stances. More evidence of the failure of radicals to recognise what might be a truly radical stance and action right now in these dismal times and choose instead for the red mask rad banner photo op. Def not one to show their kids though!

Monkey with Hammer


Response to "A"

03.12.2012 23:55

To talk about what we "meaning ordinary people like myself" want to hear IS to "speak for yourself" ("yourself" meaning me, in this context, obviously) - not even the first sentence of your argument makes sense; and by my own standards, anyone and everyone IS "allowed to say anything that's not nauseatingly positive" as you yourself have proven.... what you're not free to do is to talk shit and escape criticism!

The most important point is however that critics of the NUS march have been repeatedly asked to show what alternatives and improvements they can actually DELIVER, and, as this debate has rumbled on across several posts, not one critic of the NUS has (so far) found the ability to actually answer the fucking question

Yes criticism of the NUS march is valid, but no more so than criticism of anything else - all that criticism proves is that everyone's capable of forming an opinion

Your points will only become RELEVANT when you can prove you can definitely come up with something better

Scoobz


NUS demo in Kennington? NCAFC demo in Russell Square?

04.12.2012 00:27

One question asked in previous threads was whether the idiots who stormed a police line as the NCAFC feeder march passed the SOAS complex on the edge of Russell Square, trying to take the demo away from the general public and trying to get demonstrators nicked and injured for no benefit and no reason, were the same people who stormed the stage in Kennington? The reason no-one answered is coz the answer's obvious

They've seized on obvious NUS shortcomings as retroactive justification for blowing their pants in Kennington, but the real measure of their strategic nous was the shambolic and irresponsible way this bunch of overgrown teenagers conspired to endanger their fellow marchers march hours earlier

Seriously, as regards future demos, FUCK OFF if you know what's good for you

Rustle