Skip to content or view screen version

UK's newest gas power station shut down and occupied

No Dash for Gas | 29.10.2012 12:50 | Climate Chaos | Energy Crisis | Public sector cuts | Sheffield

Early Monday morning around 30 activists shut down West Burton power station before climbing the chimneys to set up camp and occupy the flues in order to prevent it being switched on again. This action is to highlight the senselessness of a dash for gas in light of climate change and fuel poverty.

Up the chimney
Up the chimney

Less gas more wind
Less gas more wind


(reposted from www.nodashforgas.org.uk)

The occupation fires the starting gun on a huge nationwide battle over Britain’s energy future, with activists determined to stop government plans for a new dash for gas. They are calling instead for a high-tech carbon-free electricity system.

The night-time incursion was launched at 2am when the raiders got through the security fence. Under cover of darkness fifteen of them crossed the expanse to the chimneys then split into two groups and began the 300ft climb to the top. They are now building barricades to defend their positions. They have enough supplies with them to last at least a week and say they’re in it for the long haul.

The plant was shut down shortly after the campaigners began the ascent. A further team remained on the ground to liaise with the plant’s managers. Before launching the protest they engaged in extensive consultation with an expert engineer and each underwent intensive safety training.

West Burton power station in Nottinghamshire is being targeted because it’s one of the first in a new generation of highly polluting gas plants planned for the UK. The Coalition Government recently announced it intends to give the green light to as many as 20 new gas plants – a move that would crash Britain’s carbon targets, contribute to the climate crisis and push up bills.

Anneka Kelly is one of the activists occupying the chimney. Speaking on a mobile phone she said:

“Energy bills are going through the roof, people are getting flooded out of their homes, we’re seeing droughts across the world but the energy companies are making a killing. We’re here because we want an electricity system that doesn’t cause our world to warm and our bills to rise ever higher. Gas is expensive and highly polluting, but if the Government gets its way we’ll be reliant on it for decades. Instead we should be investing in clean high-tech renewables that slash pollution and in the long run will cost a lot less.”

Contrary to claims by ministers and the industry, gas is a dirty fuel that poses an unacceptable threat to the environment. It’s also expensive - official figures from Ofgem show that the average UK energy bill rose £150 last year, with £100 of that due to rising wholesale gas prices. Only last week EDF raised their prices, following most of the other major companies and plunging even more people into fuel poverty. Meanwhile high-tech renewable systems are rapidly coming down in price, meaning that soon they will be cheaper, while communities across the country are turning their back on the Big Six energy companies in favour of cooperative community energy schemes.

Ewa Jasiewicz is on top of one of the chimneys. She said:

“A new dash for gas will leave the UK utterly reliant on this dirty expensive fuel for decades to come. Our energy system is being run by a cartel of corporations that has this government in its pocket. As long as we have an economic system driven by profit, we will have an energy system that ignores the needs of those suffering most from climate change and rising energy bills. With a quarter of the UK’s outdated energy infrastructure needing to be replaced, we have a once-in-a-generation opportunity to invest in renewables that could generate hundreds of thousands of jobs, radically cut emissions of carbon dioxide and stabilise energy bills. Clean green technology is already powering thousands of homes across the UK, and enjoys overwhelming public support.”

ENDS

Notes to editors:

· West Burton gas power station is a 1,300MW Combined Cycle Gas Turbine (CCGT) plant, currently under construction in Nottinghamshire.

· It is comprised of three turbine houses and chimneys, labelled Units 1, 2 and 3. Unit 2 is complete and is operating at almost full capacity. Units 1 and 3 are further behind, with Unit 1 closer to completion than 3.

· When complete, the new CCGT plant will emit approximately 4.5 million tonnes CO2 per year when operating at full capacity. This is more than the annual emissions of Paraguay.[i]

· The Government's independent climate advisers, the Committee on Climate Change, have called for our electricity system to be almost entirely carbon free by 2030.[ii] They have defined this as meaning that our electricity system should produce no more than 50g of CO2 for every kilowatt hour of electricity generated, by 2030.

· The Chair of the Committee on Climate Change, John Gummer, recently wrote to the Energy and Climate Change Secretary, Ed Davey, to warn that George Osborne's plans for a new generation of gas power could be illegal: “extensive use of unabated gas-fired capacity… in 2030 and beyond would be incompatible with meeting legislated carbon budgets.”[iii]

· Energy and Climate Change Secretary, Ed Davey, has called for 20GW of gas power stations to be built by 2030, approximately 20 new power stations. [iv]

· He has also guaranteed that gas power stations that already have planning consent can, if built, continue emitting CO2 unabated until 2045, i.e. their full life-span, by exempting them from emissions regulations.[v] There is currently 13GW of gas that has either recently been completed, is in construction, or has been granted planning consent.[vi]

· Lord Turner, in his former role as Chair of the Committee on Climate Change, wrote to the Energy Secretary to warn this would lead to “the risk that there will be too much gas-fired generation instead of low carbon investment” and that the policy could take emissions "beyond the limits implied by carbon budgets."[vii]

· Figures from Ofgem show that in 2011 the average UK energy bill rose by £150, with £100 of this due to the rising cost of gas. [viii]

· Last week, EDF hiked their energy prices by 10.8%, the highest of any of the big six energy companies so far this winter.

· Recent polling by YouGov found that 55% of people want more windfarms, compared to just 17% who want more gas power stations. [ix]

· An ICM poll found that more than two-thirds of people would rather have a wind turbine than a shale gas well near their home. [x]

· The Offshore Wind Valuation Group found that harnessing just 29% of the practical offshore renewable resource by 2050 would generate the electricity equivalent of 1 billion barrels of oil annually, matching North Sea oil and gas production and making Britain a net electricity exporter. [xi]

[i]  http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/datablog/2012/jun/21/world-carbon-emissions-league-table-country

[ii]  http://www.theccc.org.uk/pdf/7980-TSO%20Book%20Chap%205.pdf and  http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/cc7ad3ee-fd8d-11e1-8e36-00144feabdc0.html#axzz27O6cJ1io

[iii]  http://hmccc.s3.amazonaws.com/EMR%20letter%20-%20September%2012.pdf

[iv]  http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/sep/28/gas-fired-power-stations-uk?INTCMP=SRCH

[v]  http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/news/pn12_025/pn12_025.aspx

[vi]  http://www.decc.gov.uk/assets/decc/11/meeting-energy-demand/energy-security/3425-statutory-security-of-supply-report-2011.pdf

[vii]  http://downloads.theccc.org.uk.s3.amazonaws.com/Letters/EdwardDaveyMP_Letter270312.pdf

[viii]  http://www.ofgem.gov.uk/Markets/RetMkts/rmr/smr/Documents1/SMR%20update%2028-03-12.pdf

[ix]  http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/may/30/germany-renewable-energy-revolution

[x]  http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/oct/23/wind-shale-gas-icm-poll

[xi]  http://offshorevaluation.org/downloads/offshore_valuation_full.pdf

No Dash for Gas
- e-mail: nodashforgas@gmail.com
- Homepage: www.nodashforgas.org.uk

Comments

Hide the following 7 comments

relevant article?

29.10.2012 18:47

Some interesting articles in this post, but I didn't see anything like this one, it seems quite relevant to this topic though:
 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1350811/In-China-true-cost-Britains-clean-green-wind-power-experiment-Pollution-disastrous-scale.html#ixzz1DgkTO7Gr

anon


I hope your going to reimburse the 200 workers sent home because of this...

30.10.2012 00:04

Well?


Do you care that during the duration of your little protest 200 workers have been sent home and so will nto be earning pay to support theirselves and their families?

Hope somebody from your organisation is going to contact said workers and reimburse their losses.

I'm all for activism but NOT when ordinary working-class people suffer the consequences of said activism. It does nothing at all but turn people against you. I'm sure your hearts are in the right place but this was an ill-thought out protest done by uneducated people with no common sense.

I just hope you have the decency to make things right with the ordinary, working-class people missing out on pay thanks to your actions.

Manchester Man


Great action!

30.10.2012 00:48

All those poor working class people forced to have a day off on full pay, it must be terrible for their families! Some of them probably just had to go fishing:) No employees will have lost a penny from this action, and all the cops will be on overtime! The only people who will have lost any wages will be those taking part in the action. We should respect the integrity of those who work so diligently without pay above those who are "just dong their job" for money.

anarchsit


Climate change lay offs.

30.10.2012 09:34

Thousands are already suffering the loss of entire livelihoods because of excessive CO2 emissions.
Even from a selfish, localist, or nationalist perspective, many more people are being denied jobs in green energy sectors because 'government' insists on facilitating polluters and their voting shareholders.

Think of the jobs created and the skills developed while building and maintaining offshore wind and tidal power.

air


To Manchester Man

30.10.2012 16:46

If people's contracts are so weak that they are not paid in these circumstances then they need to join or join a better trade union.

While you are talking about compensation perhaps you can answer me this. Who is going to compensate electricity bill payers for the extra costs of this dash for gas compared to the lower costs of expanding renewables? Or aren't you concerned about cost increases faced by billpayers?

 http://www.green-alliance.org.uk/grea_p.aspx?id=5857 and  http://www.e3g.org/about/news-articles/press-release-dash-for-gas-risks-high-costs-for-industry-and-consumers/ explain the risks.

A N Other


sorry but this is obvious

30.10.2012 23:18

If renewables were cheaper then I'm sure the shareholders would be banging at the door to get them built. These people arn't stupid - they are in business. If wind farms were cheaper than gas, then they would build them to line their pockets more.

I think they know what is cheaper much more than a bunch of armchair activists telling them what business solution is cheaper. Renewables are not cheaper. Building offshore wind farms is an absolute nightmare in expense and danger. At to that the sub stations, and underwater cabling and all the on going maintenance in a high wind environment, it all adds up to quite a lot of deaths due to accidents too (cheap the stats).

not for me


Obviously surfacial.

31.10.2012 09:25

Major shareholders with vested interests are unlikely to undermine their own investments.
Costs to consumers for using gas, then paying suddenly for renewables will be higher, irrespective of shareholder 'sensibilities'.
Costs to victims of climate chaos should not be ignored nor relished.
Their will be plenty of volunteers for the dangerous conditions of battling through elements, more honour, and fewer deaths than the tens and tens of thousands being marked up to carbon wars.

Lets have a well trained force of intelligent civil engineers, instead of ... the obvious trouble makers.

lid lifter