Skip to content or view screen version

abuse sussex police helped to cover up

rasta | 15.10.2012 15:22 | History | Liverpool | South Coast

historical abuse

i am putting out a teaser at some point in time i will tell mor... about ten years ago i brought or rather attempted to bring a case of historical child abuse into the courts..part of the process was to report these crimes against myself and thousands of other children to sussex police..i was reluctant to do so as i wos u nder no illusion that police could ever be trusted..but i did so..sussex police sent 1 female plod ocifer to visit me at my addresse..i outlined the crimes against children commited against myself and thousands of others..i wos told they would get back to me..and they did..o they did..and wen they did sussex police told me it wos too long ago son..20 years past now since your brutal abuse as a 14 year old child held in holes with no light under the ground ect ect.. so thats wot the corrupt sussex pigs said to me..na sorry it dant matter..we too bizy beating down on peace protesters up edo to bother with that now son...next day i open the argus pus rag to read that same police are to investigate a local historical child abuse case dating back 30 years plus??? c my point forming yet? bad boy..so now apparently the police are investigating jimmy the perve saville cases dating bak to the 1950s..c my point coming together yet??? bad girl...so wot do u rekon?? some abuse matters to the pigs if they cant cover it up anymor..hence jim saville...some dusnt if they dont like you and they can cover it up...o and allso theres a lot mor i wil tell soon...i intend to try and tell it to sussex and the entire country...no justice no peace fuk the police...never giv up never giv in.....a survivor...

rasta

Comments

Hide 2 hidden comments or hide all comments

rasta

15.10.2012 16:52

if there was ever a time to get your own story out there, this is it.

x


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Can be involved

15.10.2012 17:03

I once knew somebody who said that Jimmy Savile looked at him kind of funny, just thinking about this now is traumatic for me however I am prepared to sell my story to the Murdoch papers if that helps the poor little kiddies.

Bandwagon jumper


Why are you...

15.10.2012 18:27

...writing in that patois syntax? It's making me cringe. And what do you mean about these other thousands of victims? Can you be more specific?

Rudeboy


rude boy

15.10.2012 23:22

your standardised lingo is no better and your arrogance is far more cringeworthy

b


The Paedophile Police.

16.10.2012 10:05

Rasta, the reason why Plod didn't take any action etc is due to the fact that in the UK today and in the past, the Police are involved in paedophilia.

 http://www.deliberation.info/the-paedophilia-problem-in-british-police/

 http://www.rebeccatelevision.com/categories/tribunal

Try a Google search on Paedophile+Police+ Freemasons

Kermit


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

no

19.10.2012 14:05

just because its on the internet does not mean its fact.

ie. you are only posting these posts to draw away attention from the fact, that I can proove by the fact that I think it, that you are involved in child prostitution.

see its on the internet now, dosnt have to be fact now that I have said it it MUST be true and anyone who says differently is covering it up, cos' your a freemason.

if your only proofe is the internet, and its cooroberation is a simelar site then your "facts" are nonsence

anon by right


Hide 2 hidden comments or hide all comments