Skip to content or view screen version

Sean Rigg - inquest verdict

copypaster | 01.08.2012 18:12 | Anti-racism

Summary: Schizophrenic but physically healthy black man died in custody at Brixton police station after excessive police restraint. Care trust failed to offer Rigg psychiatric evaluation, instead placing him in a hostel. Police failed to reply to emergency calls for 3 hours after Rigg started threatening staff at his hostel, then took him to a holding cell instead of hospital. Inquest jury - level of force "unsuitable". Rigg's family - "Sean died as a result of the wilful neglect of those who were meant to care for him". IPCC "inadequate and obstructive". Yet another black death in police custody without an officer being prosecuted.

Police used an unsuitable level of force before the death of a schizophrenic man in custody, an inquest jury has found. Karate expert Sean Rigg, 40, was held after a claim he had attacked passers-by in Balham, south London, in 2008. He died at Brixton police station. Southwark Coroner's Court heard he had not been taking his medication.

Returning a narrative verdict, jurors found police handling of the death had showed an "absence of leadership". Coroner Andrew Harris said: "The level of force used on Sean Rigg whilst he was restrained in the prone position at the Weir estate was unsuitable. In addition, there was an absence of leadership. This led to a failure to take appropriate control of the situation."

Mr Rigg, who had a history of problems with the law, had been diagnosed with schizophrenia as a 20-year-old. In May 2008 he was living at a hostel run by Penrose Housing Association in Fairmount Road, Brixton. Staff there called 999 just before 17:00 BST when he smashed up a gazebo and threatened staff with karate moves.

Over the next three hours the staff at Penrose made another four emergency calls to police, but help was not forthcoming. By 20:00, when they made their final call, he had left the hotel and was then reported to have attacked a young couple. Within 10 minutes of the report he was restrained by three police officers on the Weir Estate in Brixton.

Later that evening he collapsed at Brixton police station suffering from a heart arrhythmia, which was the medical cause of Mr Rigg's death. The court heard he had been physically fit before he died. The jury found police restrained Mr Rigg in the prone position for eight minutes while he was being arrested, a length of time that "more than minimally" contributed to his death. Jurors also found there was no evidence Mr Rigg had in fact been violent to the public.

The coroner continued: "Sean Rigg's health continued to decline during the journey in the cage of a police van back to the police station. Sean Rigg's mental health was already, and continued to be, very poor. As Sean Rigg was brought into the cage at Brixton police station he was extremely unwell and was not fully conscious."

He added: "It was reasonable to expect the police to recognise that there was cause for concern regarding Sean's mental and physical health."

South London and Maudsley NHS Trust (SLAM) was also criticised for failing to organise a mental health assessment for Mr Rigg before his death. Crisis plans in place to deal with him were found to be inadequate. The trust also failed to ensure Mr Rigg took his medication in the two months before his death. The jury found the absence of a mental health assessment "more than minimally contributed" to his death.

A spokeswoman for the trust said: "We apologise to the family of Mr Sean Rigg that he did not receive the standard of care he was entitled to expect from us. Having reviewed the care and treatment we provided to Mr Rigg, it is clear that different clinical decisions should have been taken in the days leading up to his tragic death. In particular, we accept a Mental Health Act assessment should have been undertaken when it became apparent that Mr Rigg was relapsing."

In a statement, Mr Rigg's family said: "The evidence we have heard has left us in no doubt that Sean died as a result of the wilful neglect of those who were meant to care for him and keep him safe. If the South London and Maudsley Trust had done their job properly and provided the care and help that Sean urgently needed, he would be alive today. If the police had not ignored repeated 999 calls from the hostel, and taken Sean to the hospital as they should have done, he would be alive today."

The family said they had been let down by the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) investigation which was "inadequate and obstructive from the start". They have also called for a public inquiry to establish "why the system in this country consistently fails to deliver justice to the many families whose loved ones have died in police custody".

"Until we have justice there will be no peace for us or the many other families we stand with," the statement added.

Both the Metropolitan Police and the IPCC have yet to comment.

copypaster

Comments

Hide the following 8 comments

Everyone

01.08.2012 20:00

to the streets?!

a person


more info

01.08.2012 21:09

It should be noted that he did threaten to attack and physically attack a number of people before he was arrested. The police has to detain him otherwise other innocent members of the public going about their business would have been hurt.

So the police did the right thing, the problem was with what happened afterwards.

Cho Cho


Kings n queens.

01.08.2012 21:42

"It should be noted that he did threaten to attack and physically attack a number of people before he was arrested. The police has to detain him otherwise other innocent members of the public going about their business would have been hurt."

Yes. And Ian Tomlinson was goading the police at the G20 and acting in a menacing manner. He was clearly a threat to not only the police but demonstrators and innocent passers by...so they had to push him over. Even when the police went to his aid afterwards, they were bombarded with bottles, bricks, slabs of concrete and goodness knows what else.

If that guy with the video camera hadn't been there...Tomlinson would no doubt have had a gun too!!!

Prophet of the truth.


1 track

02.08.2012 07:10

This is a different incident! Ian Tomlinson wasn't there? Doh! Read the article more carefully next time :)

chi cho


Worth noting the record

02.08.2012 07:52

"Jurors also found there was no evidence Mr Rigg had in fact been violent to the public. "

Just saying.

reader


the police did the right thing ...

02.08.2012 16:45

"It should be noted that he did threaten to attack and physically attack a number of people before he was arrested. The police has to detain him otherwise other innocent members of the public going about their business would have been hurt.

So the police did the right thing, the problem was with what happened afterwards."

The police didn't turn up for 3 hours, needlessly escalating the situation. They should have taken him to a hospital, where he could have received proper clued-up treatment, but instead took him to a cop shop where he died. En route they restrained in a way so as to cause a physically healthy 40 year old man to suffer a fatal heart arrhythmia. I don't see how you can say the cops did the right thing and the problem came afterwards - the cops had a duty of care for him from the moment they picked him up (healthy but distressed) to the moment he died. Afterwards meaning what ... after he died?!! Or maybe after they arrested him ... when he was still in their custody and the chose to restrain him the way they did.

That being said, it didn't help that the guy was in a hostel due to the failings of the care organisation. Proper trained experienced carers would have been more capable of coping when the cops ignored the situation. But at least they've admitted they failed - it'll be a cold day in hell before the cops follow suit.

 http://www.irr.org.uk/news/black-deaths-in-custody/
 http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~justice/Deaths.htm

n


the fully story

02.08.2012 21:39

> "Jurors also found there was no evidence Mr Rigg had in fact been violent to the public. "
That's not true! :(

>> Afterwards meaning what ... after he died?!! Or maybe after they arrested him ... when he was still in their custody and the chose to restrain him the way they did.

After he was arrested. The guy (who apparently was a karate expert) was running around smashing things and attacking people at random. So the police HAD to do something. They have a duty of care for the innocent public who were at risk. Thats their job.

The restraining is an issue. But, hey - have you ever tried to restrain a karate expert who has gone completely nuts? Its one thing say "should do this / should do that" but if you are the guy at the sharp end you do the best you can. Personally, i'd be out of my depth against a karate expert, so would probably have to use methods that weren't ideal.

>> That being said, it didn't help that the guy was in a hostel due to the failings of the care organisation. Proper trained experienced carers would have been more capable of coping when the cops ignored the situation. But at least they've admitted they failed - it'll be a cold day in hell before the cops follow suit.

Well, at the end of the day, someone has to pay for all this care, supervision etc etc. Its not an open chequebook (thats the reality of the world sweetheart). And even if it was - nothing's perfect. Nothing will have a 100% record..... ever. If you think that is achievable then you are in cloud cookoo land. I know you want perfection - idealist.

There are obviously many faults. But the fault also lies with the victim who didn't do himself favours by not taking his medication which apparently "he hated". Sure - everyone hates their medication. But he obviously knew (20 years?) that if he didn't take it, he would be a danger to others. It happened many times before. His negligence in failing to take this medication was no mystery to him. So he is the starting point of all this. His actions led to this issue. There are plenty of people who hate their medication. Eg. Diabetics... if they don't take it then they are going to get in a spot of dangerous trouble too.


cho chi


Listen to it!

09.08.2012 12:13

"There are obviously many faults. But the fault also lies with the victim who didn't do himself favours by not taking his medication which apparently "he hated". Sure -everyone hates their medication. But he obviously knew (20 years?) that if he didn't take it, he would be a danger to others."

Listen to yourself you law loving bigot!

The man was on medication for mental health problems so his judgement was impaired. How the fuck would he know the consequences of taking...or not taking his medication.

Always the same story with the clown who posts to this newswire defending the state and its crimes. Blame the victim for his death and do it by asking people to put there own amateur asses in the place of the police.

Of course if it were you this man and everybody else who would come into contact with you would die or experience serious injury because you have no fucking idea what you are doing. The police are just as thick as you are but they are trained to do there job in order to protect the public. Thats the only thing that separates the police from the idiocy that is you.

Rigg died because the police officers he came into contact with switched their training off and dealt with him as you the clown would. They saw only a black troublemaker. Those officers no more saw Riggs mental health than Harwood saw Tomlinson's profession.

Thats the truth of it.

Now fuck off back to preschool were you belong and do stop infecting this newswire with your brain dead stupidity.

You're a fucking imbecile and no mistake.

PC Shitforbrains