Skip to content or view screen version

Weapons Inspection Update - EDO Brighton

Robert N Weatherley | 16.07.2012 15:35 | Smash EDO | Anti-militarism | Repression | Terror War | South Coast | World

Turned out nice again - despite pre-demo smears from the local rag and assortment of Tory wankers - Smash EDO succeeded in shutting down the arms factory for the day and a blockade and lock-on is still in place at Home Park Rd.

Banner outside EDO despite police cordon
Banner outside EDO despite police cordon


Smash EDO has outmanoeuvered Sussex Plod, and the Argus today with a well worked campaign of direct action against the Brighton arms company. Around 60 'weapons inspectors' marched up Lewes Road and got to EDO ITT at around 3pm. Sussex Plod had set up a metal barrier blockade at the top of the Home Park Rd to stop protestors getting to the factory. This backfired after two campaigners breached the barriers and scaled the narrow gap between the metal fence and infamous verge. Once outside the factory they avoided arrest and dropped an anti-arms industry banner over the fence right in front of the factory. There is currently a six people lock-on with the arm pipes disguised beneath cardboard missiles on the march. Nothing like the detective skills of the all-new police liaison officers, hey lads and lasses. Get down there now to support those locked on.

Robert N Weatherley
- e-mail: info@toryscumsmear.com
- Homepage: toryscumsmearmerchants.plc.uk

Comments

Hide 6 hidden comments or hide all comments

Well done all

16.07.2012 15:42

and for outwitting plod, fantastic work!

Solidarity

"outwitting plod"

16.07.2012 16:11

What by doing exactly what you said you were going to do, exactly when you said you would be doing it. How is that "outwitting" them ?

Bingo

Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

easy to defeat lockons

16.07.2012 17:04

1) Get Lorry
2) Padlock chain around lock-on protestors ankles and attach to back of landrover
3) Stand there and countdown 60 seconds to free themselves from lock-ons
4) After 60 seconds, drive lorry away

Ted

@Bingo

16.07.2012 19:22

From what I can tell from this short report, by turning what the police had expected to be a site invasion into a blockade... and using the police's own barriers as part of that.

anonymous

Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

What ?

17.07.2012 09:09

So you are saying that the total effect on EDO was zero because they had already given their staff the day off anyway because Smash EDO had spent weeks telling everybody when and what they would be doing, the only difference being that a factory invasion became a blockade that didn't blockade anybody or anything ?

Meanwhile the 10 year campaign against EDO has seen their profits rise, their sales increase, their staff levels go up and their market share increasing. Smash EDO is soon going to be rivalling SHAC as an example of a failed campaign that has been unable to learn from its past mistakes. Of course by pointing out the truth I assume the usual cries of "troll" will be made because that's now the rule here.

Bingo

Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

In fact

17.07.2012 10:44

In fact 'Bingo' what we will do is hide your comment because you are......

A troll

Have a nice day.

ftp

Den time

18.07.2012 11:09

So you are saying that the total effect on EDO was zero because they had already given their staff the day off anyway because Smash EDO had spent weeks telling everybody when and what they would be doing, the only difference being that a factory invasion became a blockade that didn't blockade anybody or anything ?

Meanwhile the 10 year campaign against EDO has seen their profits rise, their sales increase, their staff levels go up and their market share increasing. Smash EDO is soon going to be rivalling SHAC as an example of a failed campaign that has been unable to learn from its past mistakes. Of course by pointing out the truth I assume the usual cries of "troll" will be made because that's now the rule here.

ian

So, what to be done?

18.07.2012 12:32

No, Ian, I am not going to call you a troll. However, some of those facts are not true. For instance, the Fishersgate location was dropped by the company and 25% of the business at Home Farm road closed in 2007. However, that is not really the point. Obviously conditions would have changed since they were bought out by ITT (one of the biggest arms companies in the world).

Question is, if you are not a troll but someone who do share some anti militarist sentiments, how DO you fight something as powerful as global arms companies? I think new ideas would be welcome. In the meantime, I think persistent campaign is the best we have at this time when not that many activists take any actual action at all.

If, however, you are not interested in resisting the arms industry at all, which I suspect, then why should activists listen to you rather than getting on with whatever can be done?

T

"how DO you fight something as powerful as global arms companies?"

18.07.2012 14:55

By the same method that has been proven to be the only one that works - through the political process.

I am strongly opposed to the global arms trade but I don't believe in pointless 'actions' that achieve nothing as they suck enthusiasm out of people and always result in failure (I refer you again to SHAC ). Smash EDO has been active for ten years and has achieved zero in real terms and at the cost of people who now think that their work was a waste of time.

Compare this with other campaigns where the focus was on changing the law.

MAG - 40% worldwide reduction in landmines, near total worldwide ban on production. No "actions" total focus on political campaigning.

Anti-Slavery Australia - three years of political influencing that resulted in the The Queen v Tang court case and eliminated slavery in Australia within the Chinese community.

ian

Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Facts

18.07.2012 15:33

"For instance, the Fishersgate location was dropped by the company and 25% of the business at Home Farm road closed in 2007"


Yes because they consolidated the operation into the main site, increased the staff by 200 people and upped their production.

factgiver

SHAC

18.07.2012 19:51

The SHAC campaign has not been a failure, due to concerted continual pressure from activists many companies have severed all links with Huntingdon and this has made it harder and more expensive for it to continue in the death trade.Not a single bank will touch them and i think its still correct in saying that the company has no bank account and all payments have to be authorised and countersigned by the bank of england. The companies profits have gone down and costs considerably up and with out the propping up of the government it surely would not exist. Failure, i think not.

the evil monkey king.
mail e-mail: cakeden@yahoo.co.uk

To Ian

18.07.2012 21:59

Thanks for responding and glad you have other ways to campaign. I don't think that everyone who have been involved in the campaign think it has been a waste of time -some might and that would have indicated that it was not their ideal way of working. They have probably gone on to find something that suits them better. Diversity of tactics is fine. As far as I'm aware Smash EDO have close contacts with groups who work on lobbying etc, such as CAAT and drone organisations so, just like in, for instance, the BDS movement, action, research and other campaigning is closely connected. Personally I find the information that comes out in court cases as result of direct action invaluable for research also: it it info you would hardly ever get hold of otherwise. Don't see why it would have to be one or the other - I do both.

Eight years of campaigning is only a long time if you expected a quick fix at the start I think.

T

And of course

18.07.2012 22:09

I am sure that not everyone on this site would agree that the only way to work would be through the current political process... This political system is the one which sent Tories across the world promoting arm sales in the wake of the various Arab uprisings. Disheartening process to work within for many anti arms trade campaigners!

campaigner

Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

"Failure, i think not."

19.07.2012 10:48

For our well meaning monkey friend above.

SHAC failed as a campaign because it did not achieve its sole aim - the closure of HLS, yes their costs have risen and yes they have different suppliers to the ones they used to have (you will note not no suppliers, just different ones), sure their banking is the Bank of England but none of that matters when one compares it to the primary cat among the pigeons, the place is still open, it is still doing animal research and it is as far from closing as it was when SHAC began. This is where there are parallels with Smash EDO, the campaign to close EDO/MBM began ten years ago, there have been protests, actions, publicity and the rest and the result is ? EDO is open, trading, expanding and profitable. The campaign failed to gain local support among the majority of the community (just like SHAC) the demos are seen as an inconvenience by locals (just like SHAC).

The will not be an end to the global arms trade until arms sales are banned by legislation (see the comment about land mines above, a success for political campaigning not "actions"). This also applies to animal experimentation, it will not end until there is a legal ban.

I of course understand that spending time will politicians and the organs of state is an anathema to the average activist but I would ask them to question why they are doing what they are doing - is it to illicit change or to have the "feel good" factor of being on an action.

In the words of Mark Thomas,

"There is a great rush to being involved with an action but unfortunately most do no more than make people feel as though they have done something. Only politicians, as distasteful as that may be, are able to change laws. "

Does other things

Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Banking

19.07.2012 11:00

It was stated above that,

"i think its still correct in saying that the company has no bank account and all payments have to be authorised and countersigned by the bank of england"




This was true for about a year however we now know that HLS has bank accounts in the UK, USA and Jersey and Cayman Islands. The identity of those bankers is protected using legislation that was originally designed to thwart stalkers ! Several SHAC people are working hard however to establish who they are so that pressure can be applied.

We never give up - we always win

SHAC supporter
- Homepage: www.shac.net

Working with the State

19.07.2012 13:34

I would sooner every campaign I had ever worked with failed then to compromise my principles by connecting with the State apparatus or its foot soldiers.

Our beliefs, our principles, our solidarity is our strength.

Anarchist

Hide 6 hidden comments or hide all comments