FCUKBA: a month of immigration repression and resistance
No Borderer | 23.06.2012 00:41 | Afghanistan | Migration | Repression
CHARTER FLIGHTS
The next charter flight will be a mass deportation to Afghanistan at midnight on 26th June.
The following is a typical example of one of the young men being forcibly returned to the country: http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2012/06/496886.html. The transcript was taken while he was in detention two weeks ago; he is now in Afghanistan, scared, furious, and without a family or home to go to. 80% of people in Kabul live in squalid squatter camps, with the situation for internally displaced people particularly dire.
The following charter flights were known to have taken place over the past month, deporting around 60 people at a time:
Afghanistan:
11th June at 00.00 hrs
29th May at 00.00 hrs
Sri Lanka:
31st May 15.30hrs: 40 people taken off following blockade and injunction (see below).
Pakistan:
19th June: 70 people deported
FIGHTING BACK
*Deportees resist: Despite the heavy security involved in each deportation, there have been several reported cases of people successfully stopping their deportations on commercial flights over the past month, with some now out in the community again. All paid a heavy price for their resistance, acquiring injuries as a result.
*Sri Lanka flight blockade: On May 31st, family members, friends and other supporters spontaneously sat in front of one of the WH Tours coaches poised to transport Sri Lankan detainees to the airport for a charter flight to Colombo. This action gained the deportees an extra half hour, following which, 40 Tamils were taken off the flight when a last-minute injunction was obtained. The court acknowledged new evidence gathered by Human Rights Watch that asylum seekers were being tortured and raped after being deported back to Sri Lanka. The 36 others were reportedly sent back as scheduled.
More details here:
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2012/06/496689.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/jun/05/tamils-deported-sri-lanka-torture
*Darfuri hunger strike: 13 detainees from Darfur, Sudan, embarked on a hunger strike on the 24th May against their indefinite detention in Campsfield. In an attempt to break the strike, they were denied visits from supporters and dispersed to other detention centres, but received practical support from campaigners on the outside. The visits were denied by staff at Campsfield (Mitie) on the basis of "concerns regarding detainee welfare and the maintenance of safety and good order in the centre". Gradually, some of them were released and there are now four individuals who remain on hunger strike in London detention centres.
Background: http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2012/06/496624.html
*Anti-raids campaign: the anti-raids campaign, a new network against street-based immigration checks and raids, launched its bustcards for migrants in a public event on 2nd June. These resources, as well as a guide for supporters can be found here:
http://precariousworkersbrigade.tumblr.com/post/24320344426/anti-raids-campaign-solidarity-with-migrants-checked
The UKBA has also recently changed its guidance on immigration checks for the better:
SUMMARY: What everyone should know:
1) Immigration checks cannot be speculative: immigration officers and police must have reason to believe a person may be an immigration offender before stopping and questioning them
2) They cannot stop and question a person on the basis of race, in accordance with the Equality Act 2010
3) If you have been stopped you do *not* have to answer any questions or show ID
4) You can walk away
5) Immigration Officers must now follow a procedure before questioning:
- They must identify themselves & show a warrant card;
- They must explain the reason for the questioning
- They must advise the person that they are not obliged to answer any questions;
- They must advise person that they are not under arrest and are free to leave at any time (para 31.19.5 Chapter 31)
*If YOU are stopped*
You do not have to answer officers' questions and it is not in your interests to do so; answering questions about your identity and
immigration status allows them to gather evidence where they have none.
-It is recommended that you do not answer their questions
-You do not have to show ID
-If you feel confident with English, you can say: "I don't have to answer your questions".
-If you think that they stopped you just because of your race, you can
also say:
- "This is racist", or
- "This is not legal"
- Try to remain polite but confident
- It is recommended that you then leave if possible
This is *not* a guarantee that they will not arrest you or abuse their powers, but if they see that you know the law they may be more likely to abide by it.
*If YOU SEE SOMEONE being stopped*
If you see someone being stopped, and your immigration status does not put you at risk yourself, it is recommended that you:
- Immediately make the person aware that they do not have to answer questions & that they can leave
- Remind the officers of the law (above)
- Film the incident, where possible asking the person stopped if that's ok, or just filming the officers involved. This may be useful in making a claim in the event of an unlawful stop or arrest.
- Record the lapel numbers of the officers involved
- Make other members of the public aware of what's happening
- Get witnesses' contact details if the stop leads to an arrest or the person wants to pursue it afterwards
- Attempt to pass on a phone number to the individual if you think the stop will lead to arrest
- Try not to get aggressive or physically obstruct officers if you want to avoid being arrested for obstruction
If you want to be more prepared in advance for such a scenario, have a camera ready in your bag and your number already written on a card.
If you want to refer to their guidance when speaking to Immigration Officers, everything can be found in Chapter 31 UKBA Operational Enforcement Manual: http://tinyurl.com/7b7s9yn
*Stop Deportations to Afghanistan: public meeting. From 7.00-8.30pm on Monday 25th June, NCADC will be hosting the first meeting of its kind to strategise on campaigning against the mass deportations to Afghanistan. Come along to NCADC at Praxis Community Projects, Pott Street, Bethnal Green, London, E2 0EF & please try to confirm your attendance by emailing lisa@ncadc.org.uk.
The next charter flight will be a mass deportation to Afghanistan at midnight on 26th June.
The following is a typical example of one of the young men being forcibly returned to the country: http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2012/06/496886.html. The transcript was taken while he was in detention two weeks ago; he is now in Afghanistan, scared, furious, and without a family or home to go to. 80% of people in Kabul live in squalid squatter camps, with the situation for internally displaced people particularly dire.
The following charter flights were known to have taken place over the past month, deporting around 60 people at a time:
Afghanistan:
11th June at 00.00 hrs
29th May at 00.00 hrs
Sri Lanka:
31st May 15.30hrs: 40 people taken off following blockade and injunction (see below).
Pakistan:
19th June: 70 people deported
FIGHTING BACK
*Deportees resist: Despite the heavy security involved in each deportation, there have been several reported cases of people successfully stopping their deportations on commercial flights over the past month, with some now out in the community again. All paid a heavy price for their resistance, acquiring injuries as a result.
*Sri Lanka flight blockade: On May 31st, family members, friends and other supporters spontaneously sat in front of one of the WH Tours coaches poised to transport Sri Lankan detainees to the airport for a charter flight to Colombo. This action gained the deportees an extra half hour, following which, 40 Tamils were taken off the flight when a last-minute injunction was obtained. The court acknowledged new evidence gathered by Human Rights Watch that asylum seekers were being tortured and raped after being deported back to Sri Lanka. The 36 others were reportedly sent back as scheduled.
More details here:
http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2012/06/496689.html
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/jun/05/tamils-deported-sri-lanka-torture
*Darfuri hunger strike: 13 detainees from Darfur, Sudan, embarked on a hunger strike on the 24th May against their indefinite detention in Campsfield. In an attempt to break the strike, they were denied visits from supporters and dispersed to other detention centres, but received practical support from campaigners on the outside. The visits were denied by staff at Campsfield (Mitie) on the basis of "concerns regarding detainee welfare and the maintenance of safety and good order in the centre". Gradually, some of them were released and there are now four individuals who remain on hunger strike in London detention centres.
Background: http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2012/06/496624.html
*Anti-raids campaign: the anti-raids campaign, a new network against street-based immigration checks and raids, launched its bustcards for migrants in a public event on 2nd June. These resources, as well as a guide for supporters can be found here:
http://precariousworkersbrigade.tumblr.com/post/24320344426/anti-raids-campaign-solidarity-with-migrants-checked
The UKBA has also recently changed its guidance on immigration checks for the better:
SUMMARY: What everyone should know:
1) Immigration checks cannot be speculative: immigration officers and police must have reason to believe a person may be an immigration offender before stopping and questioning them
2) They cannot stop and question a person on the basis of race, in accordance with the Equality Act 2010
3) If you have been stopped you do *not* have to answer any questions or show ID
4) You can walk away
5) Immigration Officers must now follow a procedure before questioning:
- They must identify themselves & show a warrant card;
- They must explain the reason for the questioning
- They must advise the person that they are not obliged to answer any questions;
- They must advise person that they are not under arrest and are free to leave at any time (para 31.19.5 Chapter 31)
*If YOU are stopped*
You do not have to answer officers' questions and it is not in your interests to do so; answering questions about your identity and
immigration status allows them to gather evidence where they have none.
-It is recommended that you do not answer their questions
-You do not have to show ID
-If you feel confident with English, you can say: "I don't have to answer your questions".
-If you think that they stopped you just because of your race, you can
also say:
- "This is racist", or
- "This is not legal"
- Try to remain polite but confident
- It is recommended that you then leave if possible
This is *not* a guarantee that they will not arrest you or abuse their powers, but if they see that you know the law they may be more likely to abide by it.
*If YOU SEE SOMEONE being stopped*
If you see someone being stopped, and your immigration status does not put you at risk yourself, it is recommended that you:
- Immediately make the person aware that they do not have to answer questions & that they can leave
- Remind the officers of the law (above)
- Film the incident, where possible asking the person stopped if that's ok, or just filming the officers involved. This may be useful in making a claim in the event of an unlawful stop or arrest.
- Record the lapel numbers of the officers involved
- Make other members of the public aware of what's happening
- Get witnesses' contact details if the stop leads to an arrest or the person wants to pursue it afterwards
- Attempt to pass on a phone number to the individual if you think the stop will lead to arrest
- Try not to get aggressive or physically obstruct officers if you want to avoid being arrested for obstruction
If you want to be more prepared in advance for such a scenario, have a camera ready in your bag and your number already written on a card.
If you want to refer to their guidance when speaking to Immigration Officers, everything can be found in Chapter 31 UKBA Operational Enforcement Manual: http://tinyurl.com/7b7s9yn
*Stop Deportations to Afghanistan: public meeting. From 7.00-8.30pm on Monday 25th June, NCADC will be hosting the first meeting of its kind to strategise on campaigning against the mass deportations to Afghanistan. Come along to NCADC at Praxis Community Projects, Pott Street, Bethnal Green, London, E2 0EF & please try to confirm your attendance by emailing lisa@ncadc.org.uk.
No Borderer
Comments
Hide 13 hidden comments or hide all comments
Most people support tighter immigration controls
23.06.2012 15:00
The 99%
@ 99%
23.06.2012 16:16
@
99%????
23.06.2012 17:02
Mrs X
Haha
23.06.2012 17:03
The 99%
dropp dead now
23.06.2012 17:26
Mrs X
@ '99%'
23.06.2012 17:39
@
the 99% win every time
23.06.2012 18:05
This is my say in the matter. My voice will be heard as a citizen and tax payer of this country.
another worker bee in the 99%
99 against 1
23.06.2012 18:16
Strawman argument based on utter bullshit and lies.
> You are not only unintelligent brainwashed racist idiot but also complicit in murder you fucking nazi.
lol! No one is complicit in any murders you idiot. Your lies are designed to try emotional blackmail people into opening the doors. No one is that naive. What about that journalist who was gang raped in the jungle camp eh? Is that the kind of people we want in this country - the answer is a resounding no.
keep that door shut
Silly hypocrites
23.06.2012 18:39
I imagine you'd soon withdraw your support for open door policies were you to be held accountable for the undesirables who would flock here.
The 99%
eh
23.06.2012 21:32
..and just take your anti-migrant prejudices elsewhere. If you'd ever got to know any migrants, sans papiers or asylum seekers you'd realise you're talking bullshit.
a
Yawn.......
23.06.2012 21:41
Its pretty easy to look up..... heres just one of many.
Unable to find any polls that counteract this.
http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/5676
"For immigration, almost all opinion polling suggests the public are broadly hostile towards immigration and, generally speaking, would support tighter restrictions upon it."
Where is your evidence that the majority of people support lighter immigration?
Links will do.
Concerned Citizen
If racists could think they would not be racists
24.06.2012 14:04
I do not know what opinion polls you read but I am sure you are proud to work, pay taxes, and support the criminal UK government and UKBA and your ignorance is such that you don't know anything except how to repeat government propaganda like a brainwashed parrot and that is probably what you are paid to do. Sure you never heard of the imperialistic past and present of your beloved kingdom, you are proud to be a royal subject and never heard of 1.000.000 people murdered in Iraq, or murdered in Afghanistan by the coalition forces, or starved in Africa and Asia by the agents of imperialistic exploitation and mostly people come here because you have destroyed their countries, they come to try and save their lives, to explain things in a slightly simplified manner, but if you are able to read maybe you can find out yourself, so why don't buy yourself a brain and stop buying the Daily Mail.
C
you are clueless
24.06.2012 16:12
Immigration control has nothing to do with racism... idiot.
It if did - then we wouldn't have different races of people in the country.... but we do
Immigration control is to do with nationality and citizenship.... idiot
Suggest you learn to read and buy a brain before posting stupid comments that contain inaccuracies.
who's the fool
they are illegal
24.06.2012 17:24
No it doesn't! That's total bullshit and you know it
I think you need to stop reading whatever bollox you are reading
anon
you are not the 99%
25.06.2012 12:08
A - 99%
Hide 13 hidden comments or hide all comments