Skip to content or view screen version

Supreme Court Ruling on Assange Extradition. Report from Solidarity Vigil

WISE Up for Bradley Manning | 31.05.2012 21:11 | Anti-militarism | Repression | Terror War | World

Yesterday, 30 May, the Supreme Court handed down its 5-2 majority verdict finding against Julian Assange in his appeal against extradition to Sweden. However, the verdict was far from straightforward and an unprecedented re-opening of the appeal now looks possible. The solidarity vigil at the court was organised by Veterans for Peace UK, London Catholic Worker and other supporters.














EXTRADITION APPEAL VERDICT

About a dozen of us had gathered outside the Supreme Court by 7.30am in preparation for what we expected to be the last stage, one way or the other, in Julian Assange’s fight against extradition to Sweden. We were not encouraged by the news that Hillary Clinton would be visiting Sweden hours after the verdict. This visit is the “first bilateral visit to Sweden by a US SecState for a very long time” according to Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt and was only announced after the Supreme Court date was publicly released last week. Draw your own conclusions.
 http://wlcentral.org/node/2623


30 ATTEND VIGIL

Over the course of the morning, the number of supporters swelled to around 30 but we were easily outnumbered by the press pack opposite (and a lot of cameras and bags just waiting to be decorated with the ‘Free Bradley Manning’ stickers someone had brought along). There was also a queue of supporters waiting to go inside the court to hear the verdict, but not crowds by any means – maybe people thought the outcome was a foregone conclusion or maybe they have just tired of the ongoing series of court dates. Unusually, there was not a single ‘Anonymous’ mask in evidence.

Today’s banners included Sue and Roland’s special ‘Queen’s Jubilee’ editions, altered to read ‘God Save Julian’ on the union flag. Photos of these have been widely used to illustrate reports on the verdict worldwide. Anthony arrived with a huge wooden placard he’d somehow managed to bring along on the bus, with ‘Free Assange’ on one side, ‘Free Bradley Manning’ on the other. Two guys turned up, made their sign there and then and donned gags before holding it up. Mirjam’s placard read ‘Don’t Shoot the Messenger’ in Swedish.


NO JULIAN

Julian’s legal team arrived early, followed by high profile supporters such as John Pilger and Vaughan Smith, but there was no sign of Julian and his mother Christine, who had flown to Britain to support her son. They were expected at 8.30, but had still not appeared 45 minutes later when we received a tweet from inside the court to say that the court had dismissed the appeal. First impressions were that Julian had lost and extradition was imminent.

It was later reported that Julian’s car had been held up in traffic.


5-2 AGAINST

At first, we had little information outside the court about the detail of the ruling, except that it was a 5-2 majority verdict, so at least two of the judges had not been persuaded to toe the party line.


STITCH UP!

More signs materialised at the vigil, including Lindi’s succinct ‘Stitch Up’ and Genny’s ‘UK Courts Kiss US Ass’ (which had a patch ready to turn ‘Kiss’ into ‘Kick’ in case the verdict went the other way – sadly not needed on this occasion).


MORE DETAILS ABOUT THE VERDICT

Gradually, details of the ruling filtered out: the matter appeared to have been decided on a discrepancy between French and English translations of the words ‘judicial authority’; the ruling was largely based on interpretation of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties; this was not part of the respondent’s case at appeal and Julian’s legal representatives had therefore not had the opportunity to make submissions on this point; the ruling referred to debates in Parliament prior to the introduction of the European Arrest Warrant and accepted that Parliament’s understanding of the wording ‘judicial authority’ was that it could only refer to a court or a judge.


14 DAY STAY OF EXTRADITION

In light of a confusing ruling that they had only had a very short time to study, Dinah Rose QC had now requested that the appellant’s legal team be given opportunity to make a case for the judgment to be reconsidered and the court had granted 14 days to present a case, during which time there can be no extradition.


PARLIAMENT MISLED OVER EAW

Julian’s solicitor Gareth Peirce emerged from the court to make a statement pointing out that all the judges agreed that Parliament had been misled when agreeing the EAW legislation:

“Parliament implemented the European Framework document on a basis that Members of Parliament did not understand to be the case. They were assured and Ministers assured them that the way in which we understand in this country ‘judicial authority’ to mean a court and a judge was what Parliament was enacting into law.”

Guardian video of John Pilger, Gareth Peirce and Julian Assange supporter Sue Gianstefani speaking about the ruling:
 http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/video/2012/may/30/julian-assange-supporters-lawyers-react-video


JOHN PILGER

John Pilger, Vaughan Davies and many others gave their immediate responses to the ruling to the assembled media. John Pilger had also given an interview to Truthout the night before the judgment, the full text of which can be read here:
 http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/9476-john-pilger-why-the-assange-case-is-important


CLOSING OF THE VIGIL

The vigil was continued until about 11am when the remaining supporters formed a circle and sang Dylan’s ‘I Shall Be Released’, led by Ross on guitar and gatecrashed by camera crews.


NOT-SO-SECRET US INDICTMENT

The US has issued a secret indictment for Julian that could be used to extradite him to the US from Britain or Sweden:  http://wikileaks.org/Stratfor-Emails-US-Has-Issued.html. He remains in extreme jeopardy from the US – which is intent on exacting revenge for WikiLeaks’ public truth-telling activities – whatever the final outcome of this case. Nevertheless, the longer it plays out, the harder it becomes for those conspiring against Julian to maintain their pretence of lawful process. Wake up, World!


OTHER VIGILS AND RALLIES AROUND THE WORLD

Other vigils timed to coincide with the verdict included Brisbane and Berlin, with demonstrations across Australia and around the world taking place on 31 May.

More photos from the Supreme Court:
 http://www.flickr.com/photos/79638220@N05/
 http://www.flickr.com/photos/vertigogen/sets/72157629972545676/
 http://www.demotix.com/news/1245010/julian-assange-loses-swedish-extradition-appeal-london

Photos from Berlin here:
 http://www.demotix.com/news/1245203/rally-free-bradley-manning-and-stop-extradition-julian-assange

WISE Up for Bradley Manning
- e-mail: wiseupforbm [at] yahoo.com
- Homepage: http://wiseupforbradleymanning.wordpress.com

Comments

Hide the following 6 comments

why?

31.05.2012 21:41

assange has admitted more than once doing exactly what he is accused of. only he doesn't call it rape. still, he has admitted that he did do what the women say he did.

they are/were wikileaks activists/workers - where is your solidarity with them?

b manning deserves every bit of our support, and then some.

wikileaks as a group is worth defending too. but assange? no way. no way at all.

breanna


i.e.

31.05.2012 22:32

consensual sex which did not please in some way or other.
we must all have been guilty of that at some time or other.

LOL


What Women Against Rape have to say about it

01.06.2012 03:36

This letter to the Guardian from late 2010 sums it up:

Many women in both Sweden and Britain will wonder at the unusual zeal with which Julian Assange is being pursued for rape allegations (Report, 8 December). Women in Sweden don't fare better than we do in Britain when it comes to rape. Though Sweden has the highest per capita number of reported rapes in Europe and these have quadrupled in the last 20 years, conviction rates have decreased. On 23 April 2010 Carina Hägg and Nalin Pekgul (respectively MP and chairwoman of Social Democratic Women in Sweden) wrote in the Göteborgs-Posten that "up to 90% of all reported rapes never get to court. In 2006 six people were convicted of rape though almost 4,000 people were reported". They endorsed Amnesty International's call for an independent inquiry to examine the rape cases that had been closed and the quality of the original investigations.

Assange, who it seems has no criminal convictions, was refused bail in England despite sureties of more than £120,000. Yet bail following rape allegations is routine. For two years we have been supporting a woman who suffered rape and domestic violence from a man previously convicted after attempting to murder an ex-partner and her children – he was granted bail while police investigated.

There is a long tradition of the use of rape and sexual assault for political agendas that have nothing to do with women's safety. In the south of the US, the lynching of black men was often justified on grounds that they had raped or even looked at a white woman. Women don't take kindly to our demand for safety being misused, while rape continues to be neglected at best or protected at worst.

Katrin Axelsson

Women Against Rape


Further reading:

John Pilger:
 http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/9476-john-pilger-why-the-assange-case-is-important

Interview with Glenn Greenwald:
 http://www.democracynow.org/2012/5/30/divided_british_court_upholds_extradition_of

no apologist


Petition for Julian Assange

01.06.2012 15:25

Here is a Change.org petition for action for Julian Assange if you are interested:

 http://www.change.org/petitions/australian-government-seek-assurance-that-julian-assange-will-not-be-extradited-to-the-usa

Suzy


except

02.06.2012 10:50

it was not consensual in any meaning of the word.

Women Against Rape are confusing occasions when a man has been wrongly accused, with this example where the man actually did exactly what he is accused of.

yes, i am sure the desire to prosecute assange is politically motivated, being aware of the state's usual attitude to rape (ignore/deny it) but that does not mean he should not be held to account for what he did - it means all men who rape should be held to account as he is being.

remember folks, assange is not wikileaks, and wikileaks is not assange.

stop defending men who rape!

breanna


If Sweden had the slightest interest in the allegations as stated...

02.06.2012 17:19

...the prosecutor would have taken the opportunity to question Julian Assange in Britain under standard procedures.

woman