Sacha Baron Cohen - Satirist or Stereotypist?
Dr Strangelove | 10.05.2012 18:30
So does Sacha Baron Cohen fancy himself the heir to Charlie Chaplin with his new film The Dictator? The political agenda of Cohen’s larger than life creations has never seemed more transparent.
So does Sacha Baron Cohen fancy himself the heir to Charlie Chaplin with his new film The Dictator? The political agenda of Cohen’s larger than life creations has never seemed more transparent . “General Aladeen”? Must have taken all of 20 seconds to think of that name. But I suppose people in Iowa will get ‘Aladeen’ more than ‘Seenbad’.
I’ve no idea what the film’s like. I’ve just seen the hysterical pre-release marketing featuring Cohen in a general’s uniform and jihadist-style beard. A neat conflation of Arab Spring bogeyman and Islamic extremist, with that frisson of Hitler for those with a knowledge of Chaplin’s “The Great Dictator”. And today a cover ad feature in Metro to cheer up the sleepy-eyed commuters with hilarious music hall style Middle-Eastern names.
Perhaps it’s too po-faced to go into the propaganda value of such a creation, and recall that the conflation of Middle East bogeyman, Islamic extremism and reference to Hitler is the stock rallying cry for whatever war in the region we are expected to support. As a piece of agit-prop it looks fairly spectacular, lampooning a recurring hate figure in the west ever since Muslims replaced Communists as the bad guys, and with the value of being re-usable for whatever new movements emerge from the period of upheaval in the region. Cohen has built a huge audience in countries that bomb Muslims, and a lot of that audience don’t feel the need to think too deeply about why the conflicts happen, happy to take the cue of a few ridiculous catchphrases, fake beards and whatever “mankini” moment the film is bound to throw up.
But it would be naive to underestimate Cohen’s work, both for its ability to strike a chord with a massive audience and also for the satire to work simultaneously in a variety of directions. Like I say I haven’t seen the film and have no intention of doing so, but perhaps there are more levels to it than the ones I’ve identified. I don’t know perhaps there is a comatose Israeli character with a long history of massacres behind him, General Gabriel Moron? Or a selection of oily (oily!) arms dealers with premises in various European capitals falling over themselves to supply the dictator, along with western sports promoters, architects, financiers and the like. Or an ex-British prime minister dedicated to palm-greasing any likely looking figure in the region.
I’ve no idea what the film’s like. I’ve just seen the hysterical pre-release marketing featuring Cohen in a general’s uniform and jihadist-style beard. A neat conflation of Arab Spring bogeyman and Islamic extremist, with that frisson of Hitler for those with a knowledge of Chaplin’s “The Great Dictator”. And today a cover ad feature in Metro to cheer up the sleepy-eyed commuters with hilarious music hall style Middle-Eastern names.
Perhaps it’s too po-faced to go into the propaganda value of such a creation, and recall that the conflation of Middle East bogeyman, Islamic extremism and reference to Hitler is the stock rallying cry for whatever war in the region we are expected to support. As a piece of agit-prop it looks fairly spectacular, lampooning a recurring hate figure in the west ever since Muslims replaced Communists as the bad guys, and with the value of being re-usable for whatever new movements emerge from the period of upheaval in the region. Cohen has built a huge audience in countries that bomb Muslims, and a lot of that audience don’t feel the need to think too deeply about why the conflicts happen, happy to take the cue of a few ridiculous catchphrases, fake beards and whatever “mankini” moment the film is bound to throw up.
But it would be naive to underestimate Cohen’s work, both for its ability to strike a chord with a massive audience and also for the satire to work simultaneously in a variety of directions. Like I say I haven’t seen the film and have no intention of doing so, but perhaps there are more levels to it than the ones I’ve identified. I don’t know perhaps there is a comatose Israeli character with a long history of massacres behind him, General Gabriel Moron? Or a selection of oily (oily!) arms dealers with premises in various European capitals falling over themselves to supply the dictator, along with western sports promoters, architects, financiers and the like. Or an ex-British prime minister dedicated to palm-greasing any likely looking figure in the region.
Dr Strangelove
Comments
Hide the following 5 comments
fine line
11.05.2012 16:48
Really though I don't like rulers whoever they are or whatever they are like, so I don't really care if they are stereotyped ;-)
I'm looking forward to seeing it (downloaded for free of course; it is immoral to pay to see films) - his other films were a good laugh.
Now I'm against Zionism and the oppression of Palestine, and the point really is whether this film is pro-Zionist anti-Arabic propaganda (given Baron-Cohen's cultural background). I guess I won't know until I see it. I'd like to hope he is more intelligent than that - it does sound like it satirises both sides fairly well.
anon
Idiot
12.05.2012 10:19
"Like I say I haven’t seen the film and have no intention of doing so,"
I don't really need to expand, you said it all in those two quotes. Perhaps you should keep your two misguided pennies to yourself, or at least actually look more into what your talking about.
I have no intention of watching american pie: reunion, so i'm not posting up my half-baked prescient analysis of it as if it was 'news'.
anon
@anon idiot
12.05.2012 18:04
“The Dictator” explicitly satirises an Arab dictator and plays with imagery associated with Islamic radicalism. Combating these threats has been the pronounced purpose of wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya and is central to the current political manoeuvring towards Iran and Arab Spring movements across the region. The film and its marketing are part of opinion forming and reinforcement at a time when war morale is at a low ebb in this country.
Experiencing the film and where it’s coming from politically can be done through being exposed to billboard images, newspaper articles, you tube clips and downloads, opinions of people around you or possibly even paying to see it at the cinema.
This is what I am talking about if you couldn’t work that out from the original post.
Dr Strangelove
bread
13.05.2012 12:10
In your opinion
maker
"A [loud] self avowed zionist" - citation, please?
13.05.2012 13:10
he spent a year at a kibbutz in Israel as a child, but:
According to Baron Cohen, "I wouldn't say I am a religious Jew. I am proud of my Jewish identity and there are certain things I do and customs I keep." He tries to keep kosher and attends synagogue about twice a year.
anon