Skip to content or view screen version

No Military on Our Streets

Against the 2012 games | 07.04.2012 12:39 | Anti-militarism | Public sector cuts | Repression

Anti-Militarism - Anti-Olympic - Anti-Cuts Flyer PDF

 http://325.nostate.net/?p=4702

In the last couple of years, the ‘Help for Heroes’ army PR campaign has tried to make us love Britain’s military forces. We have been told they are ‘our boys’, ‘our troops’. We have been encouraged to think of them as our friends, and our comrades. They are not. An army needs an enemy to be an army. They are an occupying force fighting the enemies of the bankers, the politicians, and the new social order. The people are this enemy. And so ‘our boys’ are our enemy. War abroad, repression at home. This summer, and already, a military state will be rolled out on the streets of Britain for the security of the Olympic games, as the Tories and Security Services continue their unrelenting demolition of people’s freedom and means of survival. The Army is being trained to quell future riots and widespread social unrest which is inevitable as we struggle to live in intolerable conditions. The people have been at the receiving end of intense propaganda via the ‘Help for Heroes’ campaign for years now, in order to make us accept the occupation which is coming and the role of the Army in breaking the back of any industrial action or strike which has the possibility to create any rupture of the ‘Queen’s Peace’.

The Olympics is the excuse to put the Army on the streets, arm massive numbers of police and create a surveillance state which will not end when the gold medals are given out. The Army will never be withdrawn from their role of social control after the Olympics, nor will the cops give up their murderous role. Britain is now a modern fascist State. Just like Italy, where the army is in occupation in city and town squares, public transport hubs and urban streets – all to defend the State and the capitalist system against the people. This is happening just as soon in Greece, with the emergence of a new Junta – which is the only way that ‘democracy’ can stop the people taking what they want and need using the methods of self-organisation – self-organisation for their own survival against the capitalist austerity. Austerity is not for the rich and included, it’s for the poorest and most vulnerable sections of the population. The economic crisis and the rise in food and fuel prices will not just go away, the entire modern industrial-technological system is based on consuming vast amounts of natural resources which are now running out. This is a problem which cannot be solved by strike-breaking armies and by turning societies into open prisons under the gaze of millions of surveillance cameras.

Those who join the world’s armies are not heroes. They are, by definition, mercenaries – invading, occupying, murdering and terrorising in return for a pay-check. There is nothing heroic about this. Heroes do something extraordinary and spontaneous for no reward, monetary or otherwise. All soldiers – whilst they agree to murder and dominate on behalf of the oppressors – are mercenaries.

The only heroic thing that armies have done in history is to defend each other against danger in the theatre of war, to refuse the senseless orders of their political masters, to refuse to occupy their own or another’s country, to refuse to act as scabs against striking workers, and to refuse to carry arms or use force against their own people. Only when the troops understand that they are pawns in a game played only for the benefit of the rich and which is hurting the freedom of their family, friends and society at large, only when the troops turn their guns on our masters, will they be considered heroes. It has happened many times in history, and it can happen here.

Revolution – Now and Always

Against the 2012 games
- Homepage: http://325.nostate.net/library/no-military-on-our-streets.pdf

Comments

Hide the following 11 comments

PDF

07.04.2012 12:47

repost


Heroic cowardice.

07.04.2012 15:06

"Who do you think defeated Facism ?

Who do you think ensured the UK was safe from Stalinist totalitarianism ?

Who do you think help liberate Kuwait ?

Who do you think assisted the Lybian uprising to get rid of the dictator Ghaddafi ?"


You are trading on history. None of these things in any way mitigate the fact that UK forces are now acting as occupiers.

Just because you get it right in one time, does not automatically mean that your actions are correct at all times.

To go through the examples you give, giving each a measure of strength in terms of the good they achieved I would say:

Strong
Moderately strong
Moderate
Weak

Its a downward trend!

So what comes next in this sorry journey to illegitimacy? And when it arrives will you still try to defend it?

There were no western hero's in Iraq, and even fewer in Afghanistan. The 'Help for Hero's' campaign is just an attempt to squeeze funding from the private public at a time when the general public won't tolerate it from public spending.

This won't change any time soon...the best the military can hope for is a better political environment so they don't get embroiled in this nonsense again.

The military have their career soldiers, in exactly the same way that politics has its career politicians. They are all just treading the boards and trying to make vocations based on the values and ideals of the past.

Colonel Harry Blimp.


Question...

08.04.2012 13:57

Are you against fund raising and support campaigns for soldiers who have been injured in wars (such as losing limbs) or are you one of the "Fuck em they are all evil occupying colonist bastards so if they get their legs blown off good"?

Dan Factor
mail e-mail: danfactoruk@yahoo.co.uk


@dan

08.04.2012 15:06

There is a massive difference between glorifying the actions of solidiers and offering help and support to those who have been injured or to the families of those who have been killed.

Those who lose their lives or limbs are generally working class people with good intentions sent on (at best) futile missions. While the anti-war movement as a whole has recently been too nervous of offending people to say it, I have no such qualms - the soldiers who have been killed in Iraq & Afghanistan died for nothing.

We should definitely look after people fucked up by political wars, but we shouldn't stiffle debate by insisting that they are all heroes and that their sacrifice was meaningful.

a


Ok

08.04.2012 15:57

Thanks for clearing that up. I'm against war and all occupations but feel uncomfortable with calling soldiers mercenaries or something like that. I certainly don't think it helps the cause against war and plays into the hands of the pro war imperialists who will use it to slander those who oppose them and their wars as hating soldiers etc. I think instead of responding to displays of militarism like this we should use it to point out how these soldiers are being sent to die and be maimed in unjust pointless wars!

Dan


but they are mercenary SCUM!

08.04.2012 18:34

The soldiers in the britshit army are mercenaries. What else can you call them? - they participate in colonial wars of aggression in return for a shitty payment. They are not fighting in defence of the people of this country. They fight, torture, terrorise, murder and rape to maintain the hegemony and interests of the western elite. These soldiers are being sent to die in pointless wars, but they know it when they sign up. They know full well what they are getting into, and i will not shed a single tear for them.

3rdWorld


scum terrorists

08.04.2012 21:23

> The soldiers in the britshit army are mercenaries. What else can you call them? - they participate in colonial wars of aggression in return for a shitty payment. They are not fighting in defence of the people of this country. They fight, torture, terrorise, murder and rape to maintain the hegemony and interests of the western elite. These soldiers are being sent to die in pointless wars, but they know it when they sign up. They know full well what they are getting into, and i will not shed a single tear for them.

Bullshit. Thats a fucking lie followed by another set of lies. Fuck off - you lot started it.

Mr Angry


Calm down

08.04.2012 22:45

Ok ok calm the fuck down

Dan Factor


Really?

16.04.2012 12:49

I plan on joining and consider myself fairly progressive, not particularly keen on the prevailing neo-liberal agenda or the GWOT at all. I don't buy the whole "heroes one and all" schtick and from what I gather neither do most of the army. It's mawkish tabloid bollocks. Bollocks on the scale of saying that the military are some kind of malignant oppressors in the UK. A lot of them serving and former (like my old man) would see Blair or now Cameron swinging from a scaffold rather than Saddam. However one serves the elected government when you take the oath. This isn't Syria, they wouldn't brass up a crowd of protesters if there was majority popular demand for the end of the government.

hbomb


@ Mr Angry

16.04.2012 12:56

Tell me ONE instance where a British soldier has raped anyone in Iraq or Afghanistan. Unnecessary (broad definition I know) killings are also fortunately rare, that poor Baha Musa guy is a tragic exception and it was huge news. Poor misunderstood darlings from sink estates do shit like that on the regular and they haven't been shot at all day first.

hbomb