Skip to content or view screen version

The cycle injuries TFL ignored

BikesAlive at london.com (bikes alive) | 17.03.2012 14:55 | London

New research shows cyclists' injuries which TFL decided to ignore



Research by Levenes Solicitors, who specialise in cycling safety, shows that in the Kings Cross one-way system - where Bikes Alive have been holding regular demonstrations - there were numerous injuries to cyclists at the same time as Transport for London (TfL) was telling traffic engineers to ignore bikes when redesigning junctions there.

As already disclosed (see press release from BikesAlive on 7 March 2012), transport consultants Buchanan were told by TfL - during the period 2005-2009 - to ignore cyclists when analysing plans for Kings Cross (see  http://kingscrossenvironment.com/2012/03/05/buchananreport ); yet we now know that on just the stretches of road at Kings Cross where campaigners have been enforcing traffic go-slows (amounting to no more than half a mile in all), there were 25 incidents between 2005 and 2010 where cyclists were injured seriously enough to end up in official statistics (see  http://blog.cycleinjury.co.uk/2012/03/kings-cross-go-slow-25-cyclist-injuries.html ).

And, of course, there would have been countless others which didn't make it into any official figures; and there were more cyclists' injuries, and a death, at the same site in 2011, for which official figures are not yet available.

Report toned down

Furthermore, local Kings Cross activists have discovered that when traffic consultants did try to include cycle-friendly suggestions, they were watered down between the draft report and the final report (see  http://kingscrossenvironment.com/2012/03/07/did-tfl-weaken-pro-cycling-recommendations-for-killer-kings-cross-junction-as-long-ago-as-2007 ), because of TfL's prioritising of motorised traffic.

Bikes Alive campaigner Albert Beale commented: "Any one of these three revelations would be enough to justify cyclists taking direct action to defend ourselves from the traffic dangers at Kings Cross. The combination of them all makes us even more determined to continue with our enforced traffic calming - until TfL does an about-turn and makes the roads at Kings Cross safe for cyclists, pedestrians and other vulnerable road users. This must inevitably mean restricting the speed and volume of motor vehicles through Kings Cross - which is the exact opposite of current TfL policy."

NOTES

For further analysis of these revelations, and other Bikes Alive news, see  http://bikesalive.wordpress.com.

BikesAlive at london.com (bikes alive)
- Original article on IMC London: http://london.indymedia.org/articles/11896

Comments

Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments

Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Face facts

17.03.2012 15:48

Lets be honest a bike is a big city makes as much sense as a horse. It's a form of transport from the past and it is motor vehicles that must be planned for.
To an extent getting injured must be expected if you mix cars, lorries and bikes.

Weekend cyclist


Hide 1 hidden comment or hide all comments