Skip to content or view screen version

Hidden Article

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Robert Green Trial: Documents Reveal Scottish Gove

anon@indymedia.org (Belinda) | 23.01.2012 00:55 | London

  Levy & McRae, not Angiolini privately. Note that Simpson & Marwick took instruction from the Scottish Government via



 

Who was it that ordered the arrest of Robert Green for walking down a street in Aberdeen to meet people to distribute leaflets for his election campaign? Answer: Elish Angiolini, previous Lord Advocate. Why would the Lord Advocate want to arrest a man for running an election campaign highlighting the injustice of the Hollie Greig story? Why did she use the Crown Office when it was Sheriff Buchanan who ordered and the interdict? Who gained?

How can Robert defend himself when he was denied the evidence to do so?

Is this not a breach of trust, abuse of power, abuse of process and abuse of position (e.g. fraud act 2006 and the right to a fair trial)? Why, who gains?

?

Read full document and article here:

http://holliedemandsjustice.org/content/who-really-issued-the-interdict-on-robert-green/#comment-262


anon@indymedia.org (Belinda)
- Original article on IMC London: http://london.indymedia.org/articles/11519