A challenge to SHAC
NAVA | 24.12.2011 08:51 | SHAC
In a number of posts recently activists have highlighted the difference between the successes of campaigns like NAVA and the failure of SHAC to help animals.
In our view one of the major reasons for the failure of SHAC is because a select few now view SHAC as a way to fund their lifestyle and to live off the donations received.
In our view one of the major reasons for the failure of SHAC is because a select few now view SHAC as a way to fund their lifestyle and to live off the donations received.
Central to this failure is the funding of a house in Northern France for two 'semi-retired' SHAC activists one of whom is writing a book about the animal rights movement in the UK.
SHAC insiders unhappy about the facts of the house costs coming to light are consistently lying about it here and on other websites despite it being well known by a number of people.
NAVA therefore is issuing a challenge to SHAC. Confirm the details of the house, let us know the costs involved, declare who agreed the purchase and ongoing expenses and tell us when the commitment will end. If SHAC does not do that we will reveal what we know which so far is (i) the address of the house, (ii) the names of who is living there, (iii) the price paid for the house.
You have 24 hours
SHAC insiders unhappy about the facts of the house costs coming to light are consistently lying about it here and on other websites despite it being well known by a number of people.
NAVA therefore is issuing a challenge to SHAC. Confirm the details of the house, let us know the costs involved, declare who agreed the purchase and ongoing expenses and tell us when the commitment will end. If SHAC does not do that we will reveal what we know which so far is (i) the address of the house, (ii) the names of who is living there, (iii) the price paid for the house.
You have 24 hours
NAVA