Why Tanya and @OccupyLSX need to cut ties with Oasis.
@freethepeeps | 10.12.2011 17:25 | Occupy Everywhere | Education | Public sector cuts
I think that what a lot of the discussions that Occupy have brought up is the fact the dots are not necessarily being joined. There was a big banner outside Occupy London and it said “Capitalism is Crisis” and essentially I think that when I first started Occupy I didn’t look at it as, I looked at it as “Capitalism is IN Crisis” and the more I’ve learnt on this journey of being with Occupy, and the more research I’ve done, and the more I’ve talked to people, and discovered and read about what is going on with our economy, with the global economy, with the financial crisis, with the political instability in Europe, I mean, effectively there isn’t a day when you can’t open the paper and find something that really does directly link to capitalism being completely and utterly in crisis. One of the things that capitalism can’t do, is it can’t add value to our lives. You can’t buy your childrens joy. You can’t buy anything that gives you quality in life. And the idea that capitalism can just continue and continue and continue is just to simply, it is utterly the most unsustainable system that could ever have been created, because it relies on continual growth.
Tanya Paton – InterFaith coordinator at #OccupyLSX speaking at Ethical Capitalism? debate jointly organised by #OccupyLSX and Oasis.
Sadly, it seems that Tanya has many more dots to join however, as asset-stripping Oasis, her partner for the event is also heavily involved in Academies, which, along with Free Schools, are one of the prime vehicles for the commodification of schools in this country. Such commodifcation being part of a trend recently described thus by Ursula Huws:
Now one of the trends that had actually been going on, rather unnoticed for at least the last 15 years or so, was that one of the biggest fields of expansion for multinational companies has actually been the public sector. The commodification of public services isn't a primitive accumulation in the sense that we know it, of generating new commodities out of areas of life that were previously outside the money economy, like domestic labour or the body, it is actually a commodification of the collective assets of the working class. Because what the welfare state is, if you like, is what workers over the last century managed to claw back from capital. It's their share of surplus value that was re-appropriated by our parents and our grandparents, very heroically actually – not making short-term economistic demands, but demanding things for the whole working class. This is now what's being expropriated. And so for these TNCs, the financial crisis was kind of like Christmas - this wonderful opportunity for forcing governments to commodify huge new swathes of the public sector, to create a new field of accumulation of capital in the name of cutting public budgets to balance the books.
The Oasis empire, run by Baptist minister Steve Chalke MBE has acquired a number of Academies including twelve secondary schools and two primary schools. Steve Chalke has said of his plans for the schools, “we will end up with a church which is also a school…a school that is also a church…” But management style has not been particularly caring to date, and it cannot be said that his academies have been great examples of the ‘ethical capitalism’ that was the subject under discussion.
Recently pupils at Salford’s Oasis MediaCityUK Academy were involved in a near riot after Oasis announced plans to make almost a quarter of teachers redundant, and teachers are now currently involved in strike action. According to Year 10 protestors:
"The head teacher blamed everyone else but himself – he said the ones before had overspent and left him to deal with it, that there were too many teachers and not enough pupils…But the school's spent money on all these ridiculous things like two whiteboards that cost five grand each and are never used.
"There's also a radio station that cost around £8,000 that's not used…There's Apple laptops that have been there for three years and never been used - they've got all this high tech equipment and no teachers!" they added "And now they're moving to a school that's three times as big as this one and no pupils to go in it. It's getting ridiculous."
For Oasis this was the second ‘near riot’ in their short history, with a head teacher resigning after another pupil protest over school management which resulted in five pupils being permanently excluded and 25 Year 11 students suspended.
Another feather in the Oasis ‘ethical capitalism’ cap is its partnership with homophobe Brian Souter. owner of Stagecoach and worth an estimated $328m or more.
Recently Rupert Murdoch caused concern when he described the US educational system as a $500Bn market and Michael Gove who worked for Murdoch, reported a number of meetings with Murdoch "most of which have been about education".
Even the Tories might not be able to manage to persuade Britons that we should hand over working class assets directly to the likes of Murdoch, and thus ‘charitable’ organisations such as Oasis and the Church of England, have been prominent in the acquisition of schools, along with CarpetRight tycoon Lord Harris.
However, it isn’t difficult to see how the likes of Murdoch and Serco are likely to move in and hoover up any Academy that experiences financial problems, in order to exploit education for profit in the future. After all ruthless acquisitions are what they do best.
Once people became aware that a link was being built with Oasis, representations were made to try and stop it happening. As Steve Chalke said at the meeting, it was only through Tanya's persistence that the meeting did happen. What is strange then, is that Tanya is also quoted as saying:
‘Occupy is amorphous, Everyone is included in the 99 per cent. I have no doubt that the system has no way of sustaining itself. I say to the one per cent watch out, we are not prepared to pay for your crisis.’
Whilst Tanya has made it clear that she believes that the Occupy movement is a " a mechanism by which to open a dialogue with the people who have caused the crisis as much as with the governments who have avoided actually finding any solution themselves", Occupiers who attended the meeting in the name of the 99% chose not to confront Oasis with a critique of its own unethical and harmful behaviour.
In the dying gasps of neoliberalism, the multinationals are now expanding themselves through taking control of the last of the working class assets. Once they control them, we can be sure that they will not give them back. We end up paying for them, because the state will be forced to bail them out if they fail. For them it is a win-win situation. For us the opposite. And it seems Tanya is determined to press ahead with partnering those who enable that process, even when presented with the reasons not to. It seems she is in a state of confusion. Consensus means listening to, and addressing concerns, (even if they are only presented after a decision has been made because more information comes to light).
Tanya is building a name for herself in her Occupy London role, and the Occupy movement must be wary of those who begin to act outside of consensus. It must also be wary of creating specialised roles which put individuals into a position where they begin to enjoy their five minutes of fame. So too should it be wary of organisations like Oasis who try to deflect the harm they are doing by building such links, and helping themselves to some of the media limelight created by Occupy, in the process.
At Wednesday nights meeting Steve Chalke announced plans for further colloboration between Oasis and Occupy London. Tanya needs to start joining the dots quickly, and to ensure that she does not allow Oasis to whitewash its reputation by exploiting the Occupy movement for its own benefit. Oasis is happy to get into bed with the one percent and is quite probably a small step away from handing over our schools to some of the very corporations that have got Occupiers onto the streets. At the least, any future interaction involving Occupy and Oasis must ensure that it reveals the full ugly story about what it is that Oasis stands for.
Academies on the Newswire;
Liverpool school strikes over academy plans | Teachers protest over St Edward’s Academy plans | Oppose Orimiston Academy! | Anti-City Academy Teachers Take To The Trees | Academies Talk hosted at Impington VC, Cambridge
Other links:
Schools: Not Open For Business [PDF] | The battle against privatisation | The Anti Academies Alliance | The threat of schools’ privatisation | Nov 9: Defend education fight privatisation
@freethepeeps
Comments
Hide the following 7 comments
In Response
10.12.2011 23:16
Tanya
e-mail: jimimyhero@hotmail.co.uk
Dialogue
11.12.2011 00:06
Muhammad
5 minutes of fame
11.12.2011 00:30
Its fine to talk to the asset strippers, but not even challenging them on that, or their poor record of pupil and staff relations, seems like an exercise in navel gazing to me.
If your talks change the system from the inside then great.
I suspect something a little more forceful is needed though.
I won't be the only one jeering Steve Chalke MBE* when he launches his initiative on the steps of St. Pauls
*Man Breaking Education?
@freethepeeps
Custard Pie for Rev Chalke - Tanya let's talk....
11.12.2011 09:33
Remind us why Steve Chalke said the talk wouldn't have happened without YOUR persistence.
I listened to the whole love-in and whilst the song was quite sweet, I don't think it achieved anything more than a boost for Chalkies ego.
What do you think it achieved?
@freethepeeps
Working with people we don't agree with
11.12.2011 16:12
I saw something very different on the student march on November the 9th. On earlier marches students that I had seen looked a little nervous about taking to the streets. How things have changed! They have connected with each other, student communities coming together and having fun. "You're sexy, you're cute, take off your riot suit" being chanted with humour and importantly with confidence to aggressive police. The students have little money or until recently political power, but I can see communities building, gaining strength, and beginning to realise that in standing together for a fairer society they and we can see change.
Students and me, Occupy and me, Oasis and me, Occupy and Oasis. We will all have things that we can agree on and campaign on (whether together or separately) and things we disagree on. We can find where we differ and if we are so minded refuse to work together, and having effectively divided ourselves, our challenges are less effective. Or we can choose to keep focussed on our common goals, reforming our society to work for the many and not the few. We can forge alliances with groups and people with whom we have differences, but critically, where we agree common goals. If we can work with others then this movement will keep growing, and growing and growing, and we can keep challenging effectively. First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.
Roger
Roger
11.12.2011 17:23
If those that went to the meeting in the name of #OccupyLSX had at least acknowledged that there is no small irony in the debating of the obvious oxymoron "Ethical Capitalism" with a host whose staff are striking because he wants to sack them and take some of them back for less cash, then I wouldn't have written the article.
We can dilute the message till it is meaningless but that won't necessarily make it more inclusive, because people WILL walk away in disgust. Some people want REAL change.
"Or we can choose to keep focussed on our common goals, reforming our society to work for the many and not the few."
Presumably you mean changing our society then, because capitalism has never worked for the many. There are those who just want it to go back to how it was when credit was being thrown at consumers in the west (and never mind what is happening in the continents where people are literally starving to pay for it) and it seems that they don't quite get what the 99% is yet. Should we just pretend that its westerners only?
"If we can work with others then this movement will keep growing, and growing and growing, and we can keep challenging effectively."
And once again here is the point - acting in the name of the 99% NO EFFECTIVE CHALLENGE WAS OFFERED at that meeting.
As for the Holy Man with the British Empire gong shouldn't he have been saving the jobs of the teachers and education of the pupils he dragged out of the public sector instead of pretending he gives a damn?
@freethepeeps
whats for dinner?
15.12.2011 13:07
vegetarian is better, vegan is even betterer.... but then it could argued that vegan is not enough, we all need to eat raw..... but then thats not enough so lets all be mother fucking breatharians.....
rachel