Demonstration against US Climate Treaty Wrecker
Phil Thornhill | 08.12.2011 12:51
At the risk of exhausting people we are holding this final demo at the end of the Talks to show that we feel the (largely) negative outcome of the talks matters, that we are angry about it and that we are continuing the fight…….
This Friday (9th December) evening 4.45 to 7.00 pm
Outside the US embassy, Grosvenor Square
This Friday (9th December) evening 4.45 to 7.00 pm
Outside the US embassy, Grosvenor Square
Barely noticed by much of the media the Climate talks in Durban, South Africa are, entirely predictably and as expected, heading for near-total failure, as the one legally binding treaty on climate we have, or have ever had, runs out.
Contrary to the low media profile this failure is one of awesomely vast significance – already to many of the world’s poorest but ultimately to the whole global community. Not only that but this is not happening as a blameless ‘act of God’, it’s a failure caused by people, and by some people more than others.
We’re targeting the US because they are part of the rich developed world with high per capita emissions and high historical responsibility. Out of the developed nations they are outstanding as never having even signed up to (let alone fulfilled their obligations under) the world’s only emissions reductions treaty - the Kyoto Protocol – and are busy leading the charge to kill it dead right now. They are leading the resistance to any treaty with binding targets within a timeframe which might allow it to do any good. Certainly Canada and Japan are not far behind the USA and targeting the USA does not mean others are blameless, but it is a statement about where the biggest responsibility lies.
We will raise our giant 8 x 4 metre banner condemning the Koch Brothers and their “dirty money” outside the embassy as a way of suggesting who within the US we hold most responsible (the extreme right and their corporate funders) …but Obama has made no strong stand on climate, despite his election rhetoric, and nor has the US kept out of the way in the UN negotiations to allow others to make progress (which the US might join in with later…).
For US responsibility see for instance (as a very small sample)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kumi-naidoo/obama-get-your-climate-th_b_1131456.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joss-garman/obama-climate-change_b_1127748.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/joss-garman-obama-could-save-the-talks-with-a-single-call-to-cop17-6272111.html
Finally….. look how much things have changed (not) since the CCC started in 2001 attacking the US for trying to destroy the Kyoto treaty
See http://www.campaigncc.org/node/322 and http://www.campaigncc.org/node/326
Its largely because developed countries (certainly the US, Canada....) have failed to show commitment in making a real start on emission cuts under Kyoto that developing countries are now so distrustful and unwilling to commit themselves to binding cuts under a broader treaty now.
Contrary to the low media profile this failure is one of awesomely vast significance – already to many of the world’s poorest but ultimately to the whole global community. Not only that but this is not happening as a blameless ‘act of God’, it’s a failure caused by people, and by some people more than others.
We’re targeting the US because they are part of the rich developed world with high per capita emissions and high historical responsibility. Out of the developed nations they are outstanding as never having even signed up to (let alone fulfilled their obligations under) the world’s only emissions reductions treaty - the Kyoto Protocol – and are busy leading the charge to kill it dead right now. They are leading the resistance to any treaty with binding targets within a timeframe which might allow it to do any good. Certainly Canada and Japan are not far behind the USA and targeting the USA does not mean others are blameless, but it is a statement about where the biggest responsibility lies.
We will raise our giant 8 x 4 metre banner condemning the Koch Brothers and their “dirty money” outside the embassy as a way of suggesting who within the US we hold most responsible (the extreme right and their corporate funders) …but Obama has made no strong stand on climate, despite his election rhetoric, and nor has the US kept out of the way in the UN negotiations to allow others to make progress (which the US might join in with later…).
For US responsibility see for instance (as a very small sample)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kumi-naidoo/obama-get-your-climate-th_b_1131456.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joss-garman/obama-climate-change_b_1127748.html
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/joss-garman-obama-could-save-the-talks-with-a-single-call-to-cop17-6272111.html
Finally….. look how much things have changed (not) since the CCC started in 2001 attacking the US for trying to destroy the Kyoto treaty
See http://www.campaigncc.org/node/322 and http://www.campaigncc.org/node/326
Its largely because developed countries (certainly the US, Canada....) have failed to show commitment in making a real start on emission cuts under Kyoto that developing countries are now so distrustful and unwilling to commit themselves to binding cuts under a broader treaty now.
Phil Thornhill
e-mail:
fiona@campaigncc.org
Homepage:
http://www.campaigncc.org
Comments
Display the following comment