Fortnum and Mason protesters found guilty
F&M145 | 17.11.2011 18:33 | Policing | Public sector cuts | Social Struggles | Birmingham
A group of 10 protesters who occupied Fortnum and Mason during the M26 demonstration have been found guilty of aggravated trespass. The sit-in organised by UK Uncut was held at the luxury food store on Piccadilly, in London, to highlight the store's tax avoidance. Charges of aggravated trespass against 109 others were dropped earlier in the year
The Defendants released the following statement:
The Defendants released the following statement:
Inside
Today, the 10 of us who were on trial have been found guilty of taking part in a protest.
A protest that was dubbed ‘sensible’ by the senior police officer at the scene.
We were standing up, or more accurately sitting down, against our government making harsh cuts to public services, whilst letting companies like Fortnum and Masons get away with dodging a total of tens of billions of pounds of tax every year.
Then we are put on trial, whilst it’s clear the real criminals are the tax dodgers, the politicians and the bankers who caused this financial crisis and who continue to profit.
We are supposed to have a democratic right to protest yet people like us, exercising that right and expressing our discontent feel the force of the law and receive harsh and disproportionate sentences.
We have been convicted of Aggravated Trespass, an example of a law created in the 1990′s as an attack on our rights to protest and which is used in situations like this one to turn protesting into a crime.
We will, of course, continue to fight this and will be appealing the judgement.
As the government’s cuts continue to destroy the economy and people’s lives we will not be put off by these attempts at humiliating and punishing us.
The defendants received ‘conditional discharges’ and fines, and a collective total of £10,000 debt towards ‘prosecution’s costs’.
You can donate to the campaign here
A protest that was dubbed ‘sensible’ by the senior police officer at the scene.
We were standing up, or more accurately sitting down, against our government making harsh cuts to public services, whilst letting companies like Fortnum and Masons get away with dodging a total of tens of billions of pounds of tax every year.
Then we are put on trial, whilst it’s clear the real criminals are the tax dodgers, the politicians and the bankers who caused this financial crisis and who continue to profit.
We are supposed to have a democratic right to protest yet people like us, exercising that right and expressing our discontent feel the force of the law and receive harsh and disproportionate sentences.
We have been convicted of Aggravated Trespass, an example of a law created in the 1990′s as an attack on our rights to protest and which is used in situations like this one to turn protesting into a crime.
We will, of course, continue to fight this and will be appealing the judgement.
As the government’s cuts continue to destroy the economy and people’s lives we will not be put off by these attempts at humiliating and punishing us.
The defendants received ‘conditional discharges’ and fines, and a collective total of £10,000 debt towards ‘prosecution’s costs’.
You can donate to the campaign here
F&M145
Comments
Hide the following 3 comments
English lesson
17.11.2011 19:22
However if you are not guilty, in other words you feel no remorse, you may well do it again. In that case it may well be necessary to instil into your mind; the fear of state violence, violence from the policy force and violence from the prison "service".
anarchist
get a grip
17.11.2011 22:50
Yes, like the Boston Strangler who attacked about 2,000 women or whatever it was. He probably didn't feel guilty or remorseful and so carried on doing it.
I think you are forgetting one very important reason that people are punished and imprisoned, its call protecting the public. In this case, business going about their lawful business. I could come and steal your iPhone and not have any guilt of remorse about it. Doesn't mean i shouldn't be punished.
If people are going to continue to commit crime on others who are going about their lawful business, then of course it is right that they are punished. Period.
anon
just because
18.11.2011 01:34
move
frill