Skip to content or view screen version

20yrs of depleted uranium dumped on MoD's doorstep

Campaign Against Depleted Uranium | 08.11.2011 12:20 | Anti-Nuclear | Anti-militarism | Iraq | World

LONDON: Campaigners have dumped 2.3 tonnes of imitation ‘depleted uranium (DU) dust’ on the MoD’s doorstep to remind them of their responsibility for contaminating areas of Iraq and Kuwait, during the 1991 and 2003 conflicts.

They are demanding the government take responsibility for contamination in the Gulf and cancel plans to extend the life of the UK’s last remaining DU round, CHARM3. The action is part of a global event marking the International Day of Action on Depleted Uranium, and the UN International Day for Preventing the Exploitation of the Environment in War and Armed Conflict.

Along with the DU dust, campaigners delivered a letter to the MoD, signed by eight organisations including the Campaign Against Depleted Uranium, Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, Pax Christi, and Campaign Against the Arms Trade, and award winning film-maker and journalist John Pilger. The letter condemns the use of DU, asks the MoD to publicly recognise the risks from DU weapons and calls for a stop to the CHARM3 extension programme.

CHARM3 is the last UK munition to contain the increasingly controversial DU. When DU munitions hit hard targets an uncontrolled release of DU dust occurs. If inhaled or ingested, this dust has the potential to cause cancer. In areas that DU has been used, most notably in Iraq, doctors have reported a substantial increase in the rates of cancers and birth defects within the population [2].

Aneaka Kellay, CADU campaigner said: "It is completely irresponsible for the MoD to use weapons that leave toxic remnants that put the health of civilians at risk, particularly given that these weapons would not be acceptable to use within the UK according to our own environmental protection regulations. I hope the new defence minister Philip Hammond sees sense and removes this toxic cold war relic from its arsenal."

DU is increasingly seen as a Cold War relic, which was developed out of fear of a Soviet tank invasion. International opposition to their use is continuing to grow. Campaigners argue that the Soviet threat is outdated and that radioactive and chemically toxic weapons are particularly inappropriate for contemporary humanitarian focused operations.

The propellant charge for the CHARM3 rounds will expire in 2013 and the MoD is developing a Life Extension Programme (LEP) [3] to enable their use beyond 2013. The MoD admits that DU weapons are not ‘safe’ but continue to incorrectly claim that DU poses no risk in order to justify its continued use. It is looking increasingly likely that DU munitions will be subject to an international ban and the UK has an opportunity to take a leading role in this process.

Concerned MP’s have submitted an Early Day Motion to parliament on the CHARM 3 renewal [4]. Internationally DU weapons have been condemned by four resolutions in the European Parliament, including a landslide resolution in 2008, which called for a moratorium on DU's use and efforts toward a global ban. DU weapons have been the focus of three resolutions in the United Nations General Assembly, and the subject of domestic bans in Costa Rica and Belgium.
Notes:

[1] To see a copy of the letter please see  http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3981379/DoA%20letter%20to%20MoD.pdf

[2] See A Question of Responsibility - the legacy of depleted uranium use in the Balkans, ICBUW report, September 2010. Available for download here:  http://www.bandepleteduranium.org/en/a/342.html

[3] To see a copy of the FOI request relating to the CHARM 3 round please contact 0161 273 8293 or send an email to  info@cadu.org.uk

[4] EDM 2318 Depleted Uranium Weapons Renewal  http://www.parliament.uk/edm/2010-12/2318

Campaign Against Depleted Uranium
- e-mail: info@cadu.org.uk
- Homepage: www.cadu.org.uk

Comments

Hide the following comment

The polluter is liable for the decontamination

09.11.2011 06:27


By te Basel Convention, the polluters - i.e. the Nato countries - are liable for the decontamination:

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basel_Convention

One single site in Montenegro took 5000 working days (20 working years) to decontaminate:

 http://www.bandepleteduranium.org/en/a/342.html

"By the way, the only way to remove the hazards of DU is to totally encase the ‘thing’ blown up and the surrounding topsoil. To wrap it up like a ‘huge hershey’s kiss’. Then you dig down 6 inches at least and remove the topsoil for roughly 1000 feet around."

 http://leftwingnutjob.wordpress.com/category/depleted-uranium/

In Libya, approximately 9000 "strike sorties" were flown.

So for a first approximation, if each sortie dropped one DU bomb, this would make 180000 working years.

If there are, say, 20 top decision makers, this would make 9000 years of work for each.

grapevine