Skip to content or view screen version

10 questions the MPs did not ask Murdoch

Robin Beste (repost) | 20.07.2011 13:53 | Anti-militarism | Other Press | Terror War | Sheffield | World

As predicted the day before the Murdoch's were questioned by MPs, the difficult questions did not get asked.

When Rupert Murdoch appears before the parliamentary committee on 19 July 2011, here are ten questions the MPs certainly will not ask about the relationship he had with Tony Blair during the run up to the Iraq war, when Murdoch was, in the words of Blair's former press officer Lance Price, "the third most powerful figure in the Labour government", after Blair himself and Gordon Brown.

1 In 2002-3 all of your 127 newspapers around the world, with a combined circulation of 40 million a week, supported the Iraq war. We now know you were often in direct contact with the then prime minister Tony Blair, who you said at the time was "extraordinarily courageous and strong" and who had "shown great guts" in planning the war on Iraq. How much coordination was there between Downing Street and News International on the media presentation of what was widely regarded as an illegal war?

2 You said when interviewed in the run up to the war that Iraq's oil was central to the rationale for overthrowing Saddam Hussein: "The greatest thing to come out of this for the world economy...would be $20 a barrel for oil. That's bigger than any tax cut in any country." Tony Blair always insisted in public that Iraq's oil played no part in the decision to attack Iraq. To what extent did he agree with you in private that getting control of the world's second biggest oil reserves was at the heart of the war aims?

3 All of your newspapers used Tony Blair's "dodgy dossier" of September 2002 to try and generate a war fever with the bogus claim that -- in the words of The Sun headline -- "BRITS 45 MINUTES FROM DOOM". The hand of Alistair Campbell, Blair's press officer, is widely regarded as having been responsible for the dossier's fabrications. There was no coverage in the Sun or the rest of News International's outlets, when it was revealed that some of this dossier, which was supposed to present a cast iron case for attacking Iraq, was drawn from a 12-year old thesis, published on the internet by a PhD student. Was this because you and Blair made a pact that News International would be relentless in promoting the war, even if this meant using lies and distortion?

4 You spoke to Tony Blair by telephone on 11 March 2003, after the announcement by the then French prime minister Jacques Chirac that France would veto a second United Nations resolution sanctioning war against Iraq. Blair was banking on this resolution to help sell a war that was opposed by an overwhelming majority of the British public. The next day, the Sun wrote, "Like a cheap tart who puts price before principle, money before honour, Jacques Chirac struts the streets of shame. The French President's vow to veto the second resolution at the United Nations - whatever it says - puts him right in the gutter." To what extent did your conversation with Blair influence the co-ordinated attack on Chirac across all of your newspapers?

5 You spoke again with Blair on 13 March 2003. The next day, the Sun intensified its vitriolic abuse of Chirac: "Charlatan Jacques Chirac is basking in cheap applause for his 'Save Saddam' campaign - but his treachery will cost his people dear. This grandstanding egomaniac has inflicted irreparable damage on some of the most important yet fragile structures of international order." Did your conversation with Tony Blair reveal that the "grandstanding egomaniac" and "damage to the structures of international order" may have been more appropriately applied to him rather than to Chirac?

6 Your third phone call with Tony Blair within nine days took place on 19 March 2003, the day before the Iraq war started. What was it about the relationship you had with Tony Blair that made him feel it was appropriate to take a phone call from a newspaper proprietor just hours prior to the most momentous decision a prime minister can make: ordering the country's armed forces to war?

7 When the United Nations inspectors under Hans Blix could find no evidence of Iraq having weapons of mass destruction, the coverage in your newspapers bordered on hysteria -- "HE'S GOT 'EM. LET'S GET HIM" screamed the Sun headline. When it was later shown beyond dispute that the weapons of mass destruction in Iraq never existed, did you not feel that News International should have issued an apology for promoting a lie to justify an illegal war?

8 You spoke to Tony Blair on January 29, 2004. This was the day after the Sun leaked extracts from the Hutton Report into the death of government scientist David Kelly, who had been hounded to suicide by Alistair Campbell and the Blair spin machine. Kelly had been revealed -- almost certainly by a leak from Blair's office -- as the source of the BBC report that said the case for war had been "sexed up" in the "dodgy dossier". The Hutton Report, since thoroughly discredited as a whitewash, said Blair and Campbell were -- in the Sun's words -- "completely cleared of criticism". No such fate for the chairman of the BBC Greg Dyke and chairman of the BBC governors Gavyn Davies, both of whom resigned, as Blair, Campbell and your newspapers took the opportunity to savage the BBC for broadcasting the "sexed up" claim. When you spoke to Tony Blair on 29 January, were you both gloating over a spin job well done through the leaking of the Hutton report to the Sun, arranged we must assume between Alistair Campbell and Rebekah Wade (now Brooks), who was then editor of the paper?

9 You are renowned for putting the interests and the profits of your media empire above all other considerations. What payoff did News International get from Tony Blair for the unqualified support it gave for his illegal war in Iraq?

10 Over one million people were killed in Iraq. Another four million were made refugees by the war. The country's infrastructure was so devastated that even today, electricity is rationed for many Iraqis, many still do not have access to clean drinking water or a functioning sewage system, and the health service, which was once the most advanced in the region, now struggles to provide a decent level of care. I79 British soldiers were killed and hundreds more suffered life changing injuries. As a direct result of the war, Britain suffered terrorist atrocities on 7 July 2005, in which 52 people were killed. Does your conscience ever regret the key part that you and your newspapers played in promoting an illegal war which has brought such death and destruction to the Iraqi people, unbearable bereavement to the families of British soldiers sent to kill and be killed for a lie, and increased insecurity, from the threat of terrorist attack, to the people of Britain?

Robin Beste (repost)
- Homepage: http://www.stopwar.org.uk/index.php/iraq/645-10-questions-the-mps-will-not-ask-rupert-murdoch

Comments

Hide the following comment

NUREMBURG TRIALS: Aggressive War is the Supreme International Crime on Earth.

21.07.2011 01:26

The U.S. Judge Jackson who wrote into International Law that the planning and doing of Aggressive War is the supreme international crime on the planet Earth, as it actuates all other crimes high, low, big and small. He furthers says that it is the supreme international crime whether Germany does it or the U.S.A. does it.

That is world international law to which Britain is signed on to through the unity and struggle of the British Eighth Army, and represents the very anti-fascist covenant that they fought so hard for throughout the Second World War. Ask the 11th question as such, Why did you betray your country, and the anti-fascist fighters of the Second World War by Lying about non-existent WMD, and abandon the anti-fascist side to pick up the discredited 'axis powers' military methods of propaganda such as promoting 1) Might is Right, 2 ) Unilateralism (against the general assembly and security council of the UN) 3) Pre-emptive strike.

Such actions of you news papers are tantamount to betraying the British Peoples anti-fascist practice in the majority. What could you possibly gain from such illgotten jingoism promoting unjust aggressive wars, and illegal violence? More pollution from the burning of looted oil? He should be held accountable for his crimes against the peace and perpetrating war crimes throughout the Iraq, Middle East region. The United Nations Charter, itself a product of the anti-fascist fighters, says that it is brought into being to make aggressive war just a long distant memory for the comming generations. The new way forward to be collective agree as democracy, to settle disputes between countries around the world.

Question 12 should be why did he not obey the United Nations Charter, and promote collective agreement to settle the disputes between paid up members of the United Nations? This surely is a Parliament that is far and way from all that the British Eighth Army fought for, including the Geneva Conventions of War, that says 1) targeting and bombing of civilians is a war crime, 2) or torturing and killing POW's is a war crime, 3) It is illegal for the foreign military occupation to make a regime change, 4) ) or collective punishment of the so-called 'Sand Niggers' as the jingoists call the Iraqis-- ie the People, who live in the region designated as the worlds' Holyland, while bombing their villages, towns, and cities into rubble, in case there is a militant amongst them.

These war crimes of the worlds' most worst sort, must be brought to justice, and the justice was written by the vast majority of the world through the anti-fascist covenants. Britain and its Parliament of the rich cannot forever get away with breaking the worlds international and national laws brought into being by the anti-fascist fighters during the second world war. NO PASARAN!!

Union Jack