They expose themself as a pro nuke monger. Hellbent on radioactive pollution for the next 50'000 generations to come, do they not realise?
 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-13887579

the editor's picks were:

60.
Jamie B
6 Hours ago

Glad to see the government's holding it's nerve of this issue. It would be very easy to get spooked by what was, when all's said and done, a very unusual situation in Japan, and the environmental repercussions of increasing our dependence on fossil fuels and inefficient 'renewables' could be severe.

58.
mirachsghost
6 Hours ago

I hav no problem with the generating of nuclear power, but not enough attention is given to the disposal of nuclear waste ad its costs!

These disposal costs are expensive and shoud be included in the running costs.

54.
Stratospheric
6 Hours ago

The Pandora's box was opened a long time ago and nuclear accidents observe no international boundaries. Saying no to nuclear will not protect the UK from say a French accident. At least developing nuclear keeps us at the forefront of cutting edge high value technology and is the only really viable way of controlling greenhouse emissions in a critical timeframe.

52.
snedger
6 Hours ago

I appreciate that there aren't many viable options but in the wake of the ongoing and seemingly endless horror in Japan I just think that they must find alternatives. Somehow forcing people to be less wasteful must go some way to avoiding building more of these monsters.

The disasters are few and far between but as Japan is seeing, when it goes wrong it is an unarrestable catastrophe.

50.
Testing_Times
6 Hours ago

This is a mix of good and bad news.Good in the sense of energy security,bad if left to speculators to finance it as that means the 'end user',as in the consumer,end up paying extortionate prices for energy generated.Modern reactors and safety regulations make this a safe form of electricity generation,I'm all in favour.

ooo

So, Agents or stupid people?

no mention of the fukushima 'guinea pig' schools
 http://enenews.com/parts-of-school-playground-declared-off-limits-after-25-microsievertshr-detected-200-km-se-of-fukushima-children-and-staff-must-wear-hats-and-gargle-regularlyhttp://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/tsunamiupdate01.html
 http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/06/radiation-in-japan-children-as-subjects.html
no mention of reactor 4 in danger of going critical and recent nuclear discharges
 http://enenews.com/4-spent-fuel-pool-only-8-degrees-boiling-point
 http://news.lucaswhitefieldhixson.com/2011/06/critical-event-occuring-at-reactor-4.html
no mention of radioactive Jet Stream
 http://enenews.com/radioactive-substances-rose-5-km-air-march-14-15-carried-jet-stream-europe
no mention of U.S. Nebraska nuclear power station being flooded and the rise in airborne radioactivity
 http://news.lucaswhitefieldhixson.com/

so its over to IAEA news and...
 http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/tsunamiupdate01.html
...Oh, it stopped reporting Fukushima 2nd June.

G, well who'd have guessed?
In order to give the anti-nuke lobby a response, I would like to put forward a response.
Responsibility has to be put, firmly, at the top of the agenda.
Octo3, to be or not to be, at Hinkley. Be Ready!

Scope for further action, to bring down the machine, will be addressed.