Correction: before I said that the article remains on the Guardian website, which is not strictly true because while the url of the article is still live, it is thankfully not retrievable from website now.

Complain to the Guardian about removing the article completely, by telephone: 0207239 9558 (ask to speak to the Reports Editor Dave Batty).

The Telegraph has an article headed with the claim that Tesco was petrol-bombed, but doesn't mention it in the article itself.

Just checked (at 11:21am), and the Guardian website still says:

"The crowd dug up cobbles from the road surface to throw at the police and a nearby branch of Tesco Metro, which opened last week, was petrol-bombed."

The proper journalists must all be on holiday.

The Guardian article is copyrighted as a Press Association work of fiction - ha - if they can't get the basics right they will soon be a laughing stock

Also, it's a tesco _express_ not a metro. Shoddy journalism, though I suppose it's harder to tell since the sign was 'removed' by local residents on Thursday night :-).

Can you spell "Innocent until proved guilty"?

You may scoff but this is going to make hard if not impossible for the accused to get a fair trial. Speaking of which, where are the accused? Banged up on remand? If you are reading this SUE THEIR ASSES. The press in particular have to be taught a lesson - we cannot have trial by newspaper.

You may have a problem suing them. If they said 'John Smith threw a petrol bomb' then John Smith can sue. If they said 'A petrol bomb was thrown' then John Smith cannot sue.

paper just copy& pasted this from press associationw who likely got disinfo from right wing authoritarians-murdoch. Maybe a local councillor could sue on behalf of stokes cross?

Definetely worth writing to the press complaints commission please  http://pcc.org.uk/
02078310022 on bank hols at mo,back tomorrow + get your MPs to pull fingers out if they arent,people like Norman Baker& Tony Benn& zac goldsmith can be useful. Areas like St pauls shouldnt take the full brunt of cuts etc+ have to defend everyone, they need more support from residents in areas like montpellier. Tesco are trying to set up a monopoly for its owners, we should use ombudsmen,mps& all measures we have got.

Bristol is being played or has been infiltrated by agent provocatuers who likely planted cocktails if some were found, strategy of tensions have been used many times before to infiltrate diffuse & detain radicals, notably in Italy. Maybe this is why comments from my IP address to Bristol IMC have been blocked?, best not to be too paranoid. Either way if police use this situ to try & crack down hard on activists many people will take to the streets& make peaceful disruption + the law will be used back on them,

so dont panic C@ptain Mainwaring,dont panic, really dont,many people really are Vpissed off& eager for positive democratic& economic change

There was more "trouble" at Stokes Croft last night. The Guardian report
(  http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/apr/29/bristol-protest-police-injured-tesco ) repeats the PA fiction about the Tesco store being petrol-bombed.