Skip to content or view screen version

Fukushima fuels wave of protests against UK’s 'nuclear renaissance'

Kick Nuclear | 17.03.2011 17:45 | Ecology | Energy Crisis | Health | Cambridge | World

17 March 2011

As the tragedy at Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in north-east Japan continues to unfold, campaign group Kick Nuclear is joining anti-nuclear activists from around the UK to plan a series of demonstrations and direct action events.

Spokeswoman Nancy Birch says:

"Over the last 60 years, the nuclear industry has proved time and again that it is incapable of controlling such a dangerous – and expensive – form of energy. The government is about to give the green light to new nuclear reactors at up to eight different sites around the UK coastline, and we are urging people to show their opposition before it’s too late."

* This Sunday, 20th March, Kick Nuclear will support a vigil organised by CND outside Downing Street, London, for the current and future victims of the unfolding disaster at Fukushima and north-east Japan, and to oppose new nuclear build in the UK.

* A national rally against new nuclear build will take place outside the gates of Sizewell nuclear power station in Suffolk, England on Saturday 23rd April.

* A weekend protest camp is to be held on the beach in front of the Sizewell plant from 22nd-25th April, organised by members of the Stop Nuclear Power Network. The camp will coincide with the 25th anniversary of the Chernobyl nuclear disaster.

* Direct action events are being organised by regional groups at various nuclear power plants around the UK. Campaigners in Somerset are gearing up to make Hinkley Point the new environmental front line of protest.

* Kick Nuclear is reinforcing its campaign for a national boycott of EDF Energy. The French state-owned energy giant is spearheading the push for new nuclear build in the UK, and elsewhere.

Nancy continues:

"Even prior to Fukushima, there have been at least four near-catastrophes at nuclear power plants around the world in the last 10 years, (1) and many other cases where radioactive waste has been allowed to leak into the UK’s water supplies and food chain (2).

"It may be unlikely that a high-level earthquake will affect the UK, but there are plenty of other risk factors. Floods, storm surges, acts of terrorism and human error can never be ruled out. Nuclear energy has no place in the twenty-first century."

Kick Nuclear is also calling for an independent inspection of the UK’s existing nuclear fleet. Fellow Kick Nuclear activist, Andreas Speck, says:

"Last December, nuclear reactors in the UK’s ageing fleet were granted lifetime extensions of between five and twenty years. The technology in these reactors is out of date and safety breaches are commonplace. The only way the public can be reassured is if the inspections are carried out by a completely independent panel of experts, and not the usual government suspects."

Kick Nuclear maintains that the public has been duped into thinking that new nuclear is necessary to combat climate change.

Andreas adds: "New nuclear power will offer too little, too late. There are many alternatives that do not carry such a high price in terms of safety and cost. The government must abandon its plans for a new generation of nuclear power stations."

ENDS

References:

(1) Since 2000, there have been near-disasters at nuclear reactors in Sweden(1), the Netherlands(2), Japan(3) and France(4).

1.  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forsmark_Nuclear_Power_Plant
2.  http://weblog.greenpeace.org/nuclear-reaction/2009/11/nuclear_secrets_netherlands_nu.html
3.  http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/features/earthquake-fire-and-nuclear-l/
4.  http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,564826,00.html

(2) Some recent accidents and incidents at nuclear sites in the UK:

April 2010: Sellafield nuclear processing facility exposed for dumping five bags of radioactive waste in a landfill site after a faulty scanner passed them as safe.

March 2010: Sizewell B shut down for seven months following failure of a pressuriser in the primary cooling circuit. In its report, the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate says that it is likely that other pressurisers pose a risk too, but still allowed Sizewell B to restart.

March 2010: nuclear power station operator, Magnox, fined £250,000 for allowing 14 years of radioactive leaks from a holding tank at Bradwell nuclear power station in Essex.

January 2007: cooling water from the spent fuel pond of Sizewell A leaked into the North Sea. This was only noticed by accident.

Further information can be found at:  http://www.boycottedf.org.uk
Press contact: Nancy Birch - 07506-006597

"I do not believe a single word that issues from the mouth of a single spokesperson for the nuclear industry." - Jonathon Porritt addressing a Stop Hinkley meeting May 2010.

Boycott EDF Energy - the main cheerleader for new nuclear power in the UK
 http://boycottedf.org.uk

Sizewell Camp, 22-25 April, 2011
 http://sizewellcamp.org.uk

Stop Nuclear Power Network
 http://stopnuclearpoweruk.net

Kick Nuclear
- e-mail: london [at] stopnuclearpoweruk.net
- Homepage: http://boycottedf.org.uk

Comments

Hide the following comment

Emergency Vigil for Japan-Cumbria

17.03.2011 20:01

Please join us in expressing our sympathy for those affected.

We will be urging the government to look at the Japanese lesson and
abandon plans for the burial of high level nuclear wastes in Cumbria and
new nuclear power stations in the UK.

We will meet at Kendal Market Place 10.30am this Saturday
- join us in an emergency vigil for Japan.

The Japanese power companies were warned that it would be dangerous to
build nuclear power stations on an earthquake fault line. In response,
the regulators and
power companies said all possible events had been taken into account,
that the design and safety systems of the plants assured safety even
in the event of earthquake and tsunami.

The same story is being played out in Cumbria. The Nuclear Decommissioning
Authority (Nirex) was warned by the conclusions of a public planning
inquiry in 1997 that West Cumbria was geologically unsuitable for
underground disposal of UK's 'legacy' nuclear waste. These findings have
not been overturned. Instead the NDA and regulators have given assurances
that they will engineer a solution to Cumbria's leaky geology
so that they can dump high level nuclear wastes deep underground.

The petition opposing the burial of high level nuclear wastes from the
worlds' spent fuel in Cumbria's leaky geology will be circulating following
Saturdays Vigil.


No High Level Nuke Dump in Cumbria
 http://northern-indymedia.org/system/file_upload/2011/02/11/74/no__geological__nuke_dump_in_lakes-_petition.jpg

anti-nuke