Skip to content or view screen version

Libya: A Response to the Escalating Situation

Solar Flare | 08.03.2011 21:05 | Repression | Social Struggles | World

Update on actions in the UK - parliamentary group/ statement by the British Libyan Solidarity Campaign/ demos

Demonstrators outside the Libyan Embassy on 5 March
Demonstrators outside the Libyan Embassy on 5 March

Solidarity from the Iraqi community in London
Solidarity from the Iraqi community in London

Around 100 people joined a lively peaceful demonstration on 5 March
Around 100 people joined a lively peaceful demonstration on 5 March








Libya: A Response to the Escalating Situation

It has now been three weeks since the civil uprising in Libya began. Prompted by similar popular actions in other North African countries, the response has been most bloody in Libya, with Colonel Gaddafi vowing to “fight to the last man and woman”. Not one to be outdone in terms of brutality, Gaddafi’s response to peaceful protests has been typically violent, turning the military against the civilian population. The situation has now spiralled into almost all-out civil war. The UN has put the death toll at over 1000. The international community has been slow to react; just last week, Libya was a member of the UN Human Rights Council.

On 2 March, an emergency meeting was held in parliament, hosted by Gisela Stuart MP with the Henry Jackson Society[ http://www.henryjacksonsociety.org/stories.asp?id=1979&pageid=49], to set up the Committee for a Democratic Libya. The meeting was addressed by Lord Trimble and Khaeri Aboushagor, the UK representative of the Libyan League for Human Rights, and was attended by representatives of other Libyan community organisations in the UK. Speakers drew parallels with the situation in Iraq in 1991 and Bosnia in the mid-1990s. The options for a response from Britain and her allies, including military options, were discussed.

One of the Libyan organisations attending the meeting, the British Libyan Solidarity Campaign (BLSC) [www.blsc.org.uk] issued a six-point statement on 5 March calling on the international community to take action to protect the people of Libya. It calls for (1) an immediate UN-policed no-fly zone, (2) UN security for food and medical convoys, (3) strategic assistance including military intelligence and satellite imagery for the Opposition, (4) military supplies for the Opposition and an arms embargo on the Gaddafi regime, (5) UN forces on standby to react in the case of an act of war on the Libyan people and that (6) any UN military action should be withdrawn immediately on demand of the Libyan Opposition. [ http://blsc.org.uk/news/?p=78]

The statement starts by saying that “The Libyan people do not want war. They do not want invasion, but they do need protection”. This statement is not an invitation for foreign states to intervene in Libyan sovereignty or to invade; rather it is calling for a “measured and timed temporary response to deal with events on the ground and to defend the legitimate rights of the Libyan people”.

The situation on the ground is constantly escalating as is the violence. Most of the country is currently held by Opposition forces. While no organised opposition to the regime exists following 42 years under a totalitarian regime, a governing structure is starting to come together in the areas they hold, particularly following the resignation and defection of high-level diplomats and politicians under the Gaddafi regime. The Opposition, however, is largely untrained and unarmed. Over the last few days, fierce battles have raged in key towns, with government forces supported by an increasing number of air strikes and far superior weaponry. Government troops entering towns have been reported to have committed atrocities against local communities. There is much fear of aerial attacks by the Opposition forces in Benghazi and Zawiyah, who are calling for a no-fly zone.

Protests have been held in support of the Libyan people all over the UK over the past three weeks, with daily demonstrations outside the Libyan Embassy since 17 February. The pro-Gaddafi demonstrators, whose support had been paid for, have fizzled out and while the green flag of the current regime has returned outside the embassy after having been replaced by the older tricolour flag flown by the Opposition early into the protests, the protesters outside the embassy have made it very clear that while they ardently want the Gaddafi regime gone, they are not interested in seeing it replaced by foreign intervention or invasion.

© Aisha Maniar 2011

Aisha Maniar is a human rights activist and writer. The author is not representative of the British Libyan Solidarity Campaign. For more information, please visit www.blsc.org.uk or e-mail  blsc@hotmail.co.uk

Solar Flare

Comments

Hide 2 hidden comments or hide all comments

More actions

08.03.2011 21:17

Since 17 February, there have been daily demonstrations outside the Libyan Embassy in Knightsbridge, London (right outside Hyde Park Corner tube station). These demonstrations take place everyday at 2-6pm. Please join them if you can.

Although the pro-Gaddafi counter-demos died down quickly, there is reported to be a pro-Gaddafi taking place this Thursday, 10 March, at 1-6pm, so the Libyan community is asking people to join the regular demonstration to counter this action. With the rising death toll, tensions are high.

From the BLSC:
 http://blsc.org.uk/news/?p=88
"The people of Zawiya are facing a massacre. 50 tanks and 40 trucks carrying Gaddafi’s militia have entered Zawiya and are waging war on the unarmed civilians on the streets and in their homes. They have destroyed the Hospital and have shot women and children in their homes. We need action NOW! Call William Hague’s office immediately and demand action is taken to stop the massacre. Call 0207 2194611 and email  haguew@parliament.uk to demand an immediate no fly zone and appropriate action to be taken against the Ground Troops murdering the civilian population."

Solar flare


Britain

08.03.2011 21:38

Britain, america, nato,BBC and all thier little puppets here in the imperialist left., and overseas- fuck off out of libya and libyan affairs and stay out. You are unwanted by true libyan people. If you dont want war on your own doorstep, then stay out and stay away from libyan internal affairs. Libyan people themselvs will decide whats best for them.

A


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

above comment is pro-gaddaffi troll masquerading as anarchist

08.03.2011 21:54

no anarchist in his right mind would support NOT assisting Libya in getting rid of gaddafi.

all anarchists want gaddaffi gone now. implement the no fly zone!

gaddafi has to go.

Drake


Libya is not Egypt and all rebellions are not Revolutions!

08.03.2011 22:39

Revolutionaries must be vigilant observers and mindful of the components of revolution versus reform or simple rebellion. We must also never be quick to take sides or forget our history and the role and objectives of Imperialism over the interest of the Masses of the People. What we have seen in Egypt, Tunisia and Libya today is a reflection of the continued development of the class struggle in Africa.

That is exactly the intent of the imperialist powers in supporting these rebellions amongst the growing educated and working class population in Africa and the Middle East. The global imperialist economies rely on the material and human resources and potential capacity of Africa, the Middle East and the Americas and therefore the potential of the working class movements becoming socialist especially within Africa would topple the financial markets of america and europe and end the welfare that provides security and sustenance to israel!
Although the rebellions in North Africa namely, Egypt, and Tunisia and in the Middle East are making headway, and even have had partial success in removing imperialist puppets like Hosni Mubarak and the Tunisian president Ben Ali, which they should be congratulated for, it does not guarantee the dismantling of the feudal or neocolonialist regimes that continue to hold power.

No matter how much imperialist ideology and their mass media attempt to make everything appear to be about this individual head of state or that individual leader, the neo-colonial servants defending the illegitimate foreign interests of u.s. and european imperialism is much more extensive and elaborate than one person. The masses of workers, women, men and youth must continue to organize themselves into a force for permanent socialist reconstruction.

Once, Egypt stood as one of the most anti- imperialist nations in Africa. ‘In the early 1920s, industrialized areas in Africa like Egypt, South Africa, Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia had strong working class movements and this is where Africa’s first communist parties emerged. By 1962, it was estimated that Africa held at minimum 15 million industrial workers and these organized workers played a significant role in the liberation movements.’(Class Struggle in Africa, pg 64)

In Egypt, President Gamal Abdul Nasser represented in 1954, the aspirations of the Egyptian, African and the oppressed masses of the world. Through what was called Arab socialism, Nasser’s government seized farm land from the rich and redistributed the land amongst the people.

He also nationalized the banks and announced in 1956 the nationalizing of the Suez Canal. Zionist israel responded with a military attack against the Egyptian army but with diplomacy, Nasser was able to appeal to the UN and gained the support that demanded israel’s withdrawal But Israel did not back down and launched another military attack which was the beginnings of the six day war.

Although Egypt suffered a significant military loss, he gained world wide respect and the masses demanded he not resign and he remained president for another 18yrs. Egypt’s membership in the Casablanca group with Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana, Sekou Toure of Guinea, and Modibo Keita of Mali put them in the forefront of the struggle for One Unified Socialist Africa. President Nasser died of a heart attack September 28, 1970 and was hailed as one of the most well respected socialist and anti imperialist leaders Africa has ever had.

But since the death of President Nasser, the global imperialist led by america and israel has been relentless in pushing its plans for geo political domination of that region, which includes the long standing colonization of Palestine for israeli interest and allowing the Suez Canal to become the waterway for imperialist war maneuvers and the imperialist military gateway to impose its will against Africa and the Middle East as demonstrated in Somalia, Sudan, Iran, Iraq and Afghanistan.

On the other hand, Libya has been for many years staunchly anti imperialist since its revolutionary coup in 1969 when Col. Gadhafi and the cadre of the People’s Republic created the present state of Libya bringing the Jamahiriya (“State of the Masses”) to power.

Where Egypt had exploited its working class and failed to develop the country or provide resources to its people, making only its elite including military leaders rich with billions of dollars in aid paid by the imperialist, revolutionary Libya at its birth in 1969 had nationalized its oil and used it in the development of the country.

The Libyan people benefited from the wealth of its nation the provision of public education, medical care, housing and full participation in all aspects of Libyan life. Libya is Africa’s leading anti imperialist force and she supported many of the movements throughout Africa and the world. Libya has been on course towards a socialist state through the Jamahiriya.

Egypt continued to exploit its masses deterring any collective formation of opposition outside of its unions. It treated its Nubian and peasant populations like a slave force while making rich the military and police force which along with the chosen tribal or clan leaders, they became the petit bourgeois class that defended the imperialist and zionist interest.

Committed like its flag to make green its economy and the neglected Sahara desert, Libya worked towards the technological development of the country and its people benefited. The real battle for Libya has been against its global imperialist enemies who have gone to no lengths to plant agents and conspirators to overturn the revolution of the People.

We know the zionist and their imperialist partners continue to plot and conspire to control both the politics and economics of North Africa and the Middle East. Is there any doubt why Benghazi was chosen as the base of revolt since the Libyan oil industry is controlled from that region?

Libya like the rest of Africa must protect its resources and its people must defend it even with their lives! We must be watchful of imperialist tactics as their machinations for domination of Africa has never changed!

The All African People’s Revolutionary Party maintained a strong relationship with Libya over the last 30 years and we continue to stand firmly in support of the Libyan people and the revolution of the Jamahiriya.

Due to Libya’s revolutionary stand in support of African and indigenous people’s struggles and its position against imperialist aggression, it was the AAPRP who partnered with other committed Pan Africanist, nationalist and progressive organizations like the Nation of Islam and the American Indian Movement to break the ban against travel to Libya from1985-1990. Libya has been an active partner in building relationships with all justice loving indigenous peoples supporting our strategies for liberation, unity and solidarity.

Libya has hosted tens of hundreds of worldwide conferences and programs to build international solidarity for Pan indigenous struggles for liberation in its 40 years. Leaders from Africa, Central and South America such as Daniel Ortega, Fidel Castro, Evo Morales and Hugo Chavez have all given their revolutionary support and concern for the people of Libya and President Gadhafi.

And for her anti-imperialist and pro-socialist stance, she paid a heavy price. Enduring economic and political embargos and isolation, the Libyan people persevered and continued to build their nation and support other revolutionary forces.

On April 15, 1986 under the american imperialist administration of ronald reagan, Libya was bombed in what they termed operation el dorado canyon which was alleged to be in response to Libyan agents bombing a german disco. Of course this was another subterfuge to initiate a military response with the proud African nation.

This terrorist attack occurred while dignitaries including President Rawlings of Ghana were visiting. Imperialist bombs killed the young daughter of President Gadhafi’s and injured many others.

This was done without provocation and without apology!

Although over the last few years, Libya has through its own defense, taken a more conservative position to avoid out right military invasion from the west, she continued to support Africa’s liberation and Unity and the worldwide struggle for socialist development.

It was President Gadhafi who took up the mantle held by President Kwame Nkrumah to call for the United States of Africa. He has been the key advocate for a united Africa and restructuring of the African Union.

The Libyan people have been on the right side of the struggle for truth, justice, socialist ideals and the People’s Revolution and therefore she has always been a target for imperialist aggression.

If we believe in the Socialist revolution and the components of dialectical change, we know that the people of Libya who have survived embargos and bans, who have been bombed and ridiculed in the world wide imperialist press, who have built their nation brick by brick and with the green book as their guide, committed to revolutionary ideological and political ideals, will not wash away that history for western democracy.

They will address the contradictions within their nation and bring forward the Socialist revolution. Political positions against the masses in Tunisia and Egypt and other issues related to Africa’s move towards liberation and unity may cause question of Libya’s leadership but one does not throw out the baby with the bath water.

The people are the foundation of all revolutions and therefore, we must stand with the People to bring forth the Mass revolution required to guarantee their existence.

In President Nkrumah’s ‘Class Struggle in Africa’, he reminds us, “the basis of revolution is created when the organic structure and conditions in a given society have aroused the mass consent (or discontent) and mass desire for positive action to change or transform that society. Socialist revolution is impossible without the use of force. Revolutionary violence is a fundamental law in revolutionary struggles. “

The journey for Socialism is not a clear or easy and it comes at a high cost. The enemy will not surrender unless forced and it requires the organization, unity and determination of the masses of the people to bring the enemies of the people to their knees.

What we are witnessing today will require more than a rebellion. It will require a mass based and well organized long term Revolution. Libyans must be aware that their independence and liberty is not secure especially under a pro-western style democracy and must resist any capitulation to change their politics.

Only they can learn that lesson and we believe they are experienced enough to know who their enemies are. They must also know that until the rest of Africa is liberated, united and socialist, no territory in Africa is secure.

Our duty is to support the masses and encourage their full participation in the Libyan and African revolution. We must also protest any move towards sanctions against Libya and demand the imperialist stay out of Africa.

Absolutely no military invasion!

This is what distinguishes revolution from rebellion in Africa, a commitment to rid the continent of all forms of imperialism (settler-colonialism, neo-colonialism and zionism); to liberate Africa’s resources for development of its empowered people under a unified government that moves to protect the people from nation/class/gender oppression.

We of the All African People’s Revolutionary Party call upon all Pan African, progressive, socialist and pro-human organizations and individuals to voice their opposition to any military intervention.

Organize mass demonstrations. Send press releases and let the world know that we will not stand by quietly while the imperialist/zionist forces orchestrate a military invasion or sanctions against Libya under any circumstances least of all under the guise of democracy!

We stand with the people of Libyan Jamahiriya to take full responsibility for the defense of their revolution. At the same time, we must be vigilant and keep a watchful eye on the continued goings on in Tunisia and Egypt as imperialist forces in the west also try to use this media frenzy over Libya while working to reconsolidate neo-colonial control over those other areas of Africa.

Hands off Africa! No military intervention, no economic or political sanctions against the Libyan nation! Africa must be free, united and socialist. We stand Ready for Revolution!

gar
- Homepage: http://garizo.blogspot.com/2011/03/libya-is-not-egypt-and-all-rebellions.html


Beware!

09.03.2011 10:32

The British Libyan Solidarity Campaign (BLSC) was set up at a meeting in the house of commons chaired by north of Ireland loyalist David Trimble. Would you trust him to make peace and bring democracy to any country? Or would you expect he'd be calling for imperialist occupation, just as he does in his own country.

anti-imperialist


If read correctly...

09.03.2011 16:15

By way of clarification, the British Libyan Solidarity Campaign was set up years ago and has been campaigning against the regime in Libya and this country's ties to it for years. The meeting in parliament would have gone ahead anyway with or without the attendance of any Libyan(s) organisation(s). Check out the link to the Henry Jackson Society to see exactly what kind of meeting it was and the scope (oh dear!)... and no, David Trimble is not in a position to talk "peace" for or on behalf of anyone, or many of the other speakers.
Self-determination of the Libyan people is a matter for the Libyan people, a point made quite clearly above.
Peace

Solar Flare


Correction

11.03.2011 00:06

I should have said 'Committee for a Democratic Libya' in previous post, not British Libya Solidarity Campaign. The BLSC has been around a long time, while the other thing is new. However, the point about Trimble (who should not be trusted further than he can be thrown, and who should be thrown far!) etc stands. This is not a progressive committee - it is a bunch of cheerleaders for imperialist intervention.

anti-imperialist


libyan rebels in bed with pro-empire forces

11.03.2011 09:09

@anti-imperialist the british-libya-solidarity-campign is also in bed with trimble:  http://blsc.org.uk/news/?p=40

@


Hidden Comment

This posting has been hidden because it breaches the Indymedia UK (IMC UK) Editorial Guidelines.

IMC UK is an interactive site offering inclusive participation. All postings to the open publishing newswire are the responsibility of the individual authors and not of IMC UK. Although IMC UK volunteers attempt to ensure accuracy of the newswire, they take no responsibility legal or otherwise for the contents of the open publishing site. Mention of external web sites or services is for information purposes only and constitutes neither an endorsement nor a recommendation.

Hands off Libya: victory to Gaddafi!

14.03.2011 08:23

Hands off Libya: victory to Gaddafi
Issued by: CPGB-ML
Issued on: 11 March 2011

The CPGB-ML calls for support for the Libyan government in its fight to crush attempts to take control of Libyan oil out of the hands of the Libyan people.

We must resist attempts by foreign powers, especially western imperialists, who, in the interests of gaining control over its oil resources, want to Balkanise Libya, or to turn it into a client state and a base for attacking the democratic movements now surging in the rest of the Arab world and Africa.

Attempts by the imperialist media to portray the Libyan government in the same light as those of the puppet dictators in Tunisia, Egypt and Bahrain are totally fraudulent, as are attempts to depict the opponents of the Libyan regime as rising up in the interests of freedom alongside the peoples of those Arab countries that are clients of western imperialism.

To compare Libya with Tunisia, Egypt or Bahrain is to compare chalk with cheese. To start with, Libya has a standard of living comparable to Britain's - one of the highest in Africa. Not bad for a country that in 1951 was officially the poorest in the world.

Yes, Libya has acquired oil wealth since then, but this does not lead automatically to a high standard of living for the population: one has only to look at Nigeria or Equatorial Guinea, where the exploitation of oil resources has led to a dramatic fall in general living standards.

Gains of the revolution

Under the Gaddafi regime in Libya, women have gained full legal equality with men. Everybody has enough food on the table and every Libyan is provided with decent rent-free housing, has free access to good quality health care and to education services. This is hardly the situation in those countries of the Arab world that meet with imperialist approval!

James Petras has very well explained the imperialist oppression to which these countries are subjected, which leads directly to the dire poverty of most of the population and the intense frustration of the middle class:

"... most of the Arab economies where the revolts are taking place are based on 'rents' from oil, gas, minerals and tourism, which provide most of the export earnings and state revenues. These economic sectors are, in effect, export enclaves employing a tiny fraction of the labour force ... [they] do not have links to a diversified productive domestic economy: oil is exported and finished manufactured goods as well as financial and high tech services are all imported and controlled by foreign multinationals and ex-pats linked to the ruling class ...

"Rent-based income may generate great wealth, especially as energy prices soar, but the funds accrue to a class of ‘rentiers’ who have no vocation or inclination for deepening and extending the process of economic development and innovation ...

"Beyond pillaging the public treasury, the ruling clan-class promotes 'free trade', ie, importing cheap finished products, thus undermining any indigenous domestic start-ups in the 'productive' manufacturing, agricultural or technical sector." ('Roots of the Arab revolts and premature celebrations', axisoflogic.com, 3 March 2011)

In such countries, the ruling class that facilitates the imperialist pillage of its country enjoys luxury beyond all dreams, while the poor have nothing but their religion to console them. This simply is not the situation in Libya, where the oil wealth has been used to provide a high standard of living for the people.

Opponents of the regime

Why then are we now witnessing civil war in Libya?

Gaddafi's regime is far from acceptable to all Libyans, notwithstanding the fact that it is not at all an economic failure. It has to be remembered that Gaddafi has been leading his country out of feudalism into the modern world, and the vested interests of the old regime don't much like this.

Feudal tribal chiefs do not like to see their power ebbing away. Their religious ideologues do not like to see a society arising that rejects their medievalist tenets, such as women's inferiority and a predilection for cruel and unusual punishments for crimes - dating from the times when nomadic societies had no resources to develop more humane methods of dealing with offenders.

And of course, since as yet the world has never known a society that is capable of providing to all its members everything that they need, there will always be people who are disgruntled enough to be mobilised - against their own interests - by reactionaries making all kinds of empty promises in their endeavour to overturn progressive regimes. In Libya today, unemployment is a problem, even if hunger is not.

Oil and imperialism

Most of the country's problems are centred in the east, around Benghazi - the area, incidentally, which is the centre of Libya's oil industry. This region is in the part of the country called Cyrenaica, home to the Senoussi clan to which King Idriss, the puppet of British imperialism who was overthrown by Gaddafi's coup, belonged.

It is obvious that clan loyalties that no longer have any relevance in the modern world have been conjured up by reactionaries hoping to recapture their lost glory, no doubt with appeals to the most medieval of religious traditions.

Western imperialism, outraged by Libya's nationalisation of its oil under Gaddafi, and by Gaddafi's unfailing support for anti-imperialist causes (South Africa, Palestine, Ireland etc), has also always opposed the Gaddafi regime, and will certainly have been making contacts among disaffected sections of the Libyan population, waiting for happier days when enough forces could be mustered for overthrow of the Libyan government from within.

Defence of the revolution

In these circumstances, it should be obvious that for the Gaddafi regime to survive at all and to continue implementing its progressive programme, it had to resort to repression of its most dangerous enemies.

We are in no position to say whether or not that repression was taken too far since we have no evidence either way, but to fail to suppress dangerous enemies of the revolution - and to take timely measures firmly to discourage ordinary people from being seduced by their weasel words - would certainly amount to betraying the revolution and the people.

Friends of Libya have, in recent years, been alarmed at the concessions Gaddafi felt constrained to make to the outrageous demands of western imperialism in order to break the vice of sanctions that was beginning to destroy the social gains that had been so painstakingly built up.

We have not been happy that Libya should have accepted responsibility for the Lockerbie affair, although the evidence is perfectly clear that this had nothing to do with Libya. We are even less happy that Libya gave up its right to develop an independent nuclear industry.

However, whatever concessions Libya has made with a gun pointed at its head, it has still not descended to the level of a client state in the way that Egypt and Tunisia had, or Saudi Arabia, Bahrain or Yemen.

In order to ensure Gaddafi's defeat, western imperialism has already begun imposing economic sanctions that include freezing Libyan assets abroad. Now it is seriously considering military intervention, initially in the form of imposing no fly-zones over Libya's sovereign territory - a clear act of war.

SAS officers have been intercepted trying to provide military support to insurgents, while the French imperialist government has already leapt in to 'recognise' the council formed in the east of Libya, led by former minister Mustafa Jalil, which is fighting for the government's overthrow.

Some people and organisations, such as Stop the War, have been bamboozled by the non-stop and ubiquitous Goebbelsian propaganda that has spewed forth from the imperialist media ever since Gaddafi's regime was put in place into believing that he is some kind of a monster who must be overthrown at all costs. In view of his record in defending the interests of the Libyan people, such an approach is absurd.

Stop the War, dominated as it is by organisations that devote themselves to spreading illusions in social democracy (ie, futile hopes that solutions for the working class and oppressed people are to be found within capitalism), still finds itself cheerleading for Gaddafi's opponents: their only reason for opposing imperialist military intervention is that it may be harmful to the cause of imperialism's local agents in Libya!

Down with social-democratic treachery; down with imperialism!

VICTORY TO THE LIBYAN REVOLUTION; VICTORY TO GADDAFI!

HANDS OFF LIBYA

cpgb-ml


Hide 2 hidden comments or hide all comments