Skip to content or view screen version

7 March - Freedom of Speech is on trial Westminster Magistrates

Ian Puddick | 25.02.2011 19:39 | Repression | Terror War

Kroll, Guy Carpenter ltd, City Police Counter Terrorism Directorate used to silence plumber Ian Puddick for exposing corruption at board level at the worlds largest reinsurance company.

After exposing financial fraud at board level at the worlds largest reinsurance company, Ian Puddick received a telephone call from Benedict Hamilton the MD of Kroll, Ben told Ian that they had deep deep pockets and that they would fuck him like he had never been fucked before.
Ians home, office and his company accountants office were then raided by City of London Counter Terrorism Directorate after 4 months of surveillance by up to 20 officers, it was called 'operation bohan'.
All computers, mobile phones, sat nav's, digital cameras, laptops etc were confiscated from all locations and sent to the high tech crimes laboratory for forensic analysis.

The reinsurance company then investigated the board members expenses, at the end of the internal investigation, the board member mr xxxxxxx resigned after 30 years employment.
(the board member cannot be named as DC Sarah Mayo City of London Counter Terrorism & Major Crimes Directorate said it could damage his professional reputation)

The police operation, operation bohan is est to have cost in excess of £1m. All freedom of information requests have been declined by city of London police on the grounds of national security and not in the public interest.

No charges were brought against Ian Puddick.

Outraged, Ian Puddick created www.police expenses.co.uk and www.ianpuddick.co.uk which contains a new video about the break in to Ians home & the theft of all his court defence paper work and the bug hidden in his home.

Ian Puddick now faces a criminal charge relating to his website
FREEDOM OF SPEECH IS ON TRIAL

City police have sent undercover detectives to Hyde park speakers corner on a Sunday to listen to him talk about this very very unusual case. Ian has been rearrested and questioned over speaking in public about this case.

"if I had been exposing fraud about the milkman at my local dairy, would my home and office have been raided by the the counter terrorism directorate" - Ian Puddick

Ian Puddick
- e-mail: leakbustersnet@gmail.com
- Homepage: http://www.police expenses.co.uk

Comments

Hide the following 3 comments

questions

26.02.2011 01:03

1. This post doesn't make that much sense.

2. The website linked to doesn't work.

3. If you can provide useful and readable information I would be very interested in attending the trial - if it does actually constitute 'freedom of speech on trial'.

Paul


Update on joint operation between city police & KROLL

26.02.2011 09:34

My first video about city of London police 'operation bohan' & KROLL 'operation marten' a joint operation can be viewed at www.police expenses.co.uk - it's the full uncensored video

My second video about the surveillance operation, me being followed by KROLL and then the break in to my home to steal my court documents and place a hidden bug www.ianpudick.co.uk

City of London police have said in a recorded police interview that if you say write or publish anything , even if it is 100% true, if it upsets or causes offence then a criminal offence as been committed and they have a statutory duty to prosecute
IP

Ian puddick
mail e-mail: Leakbustersnet@gmail.com
- Homepage: http://www.police expenses.co.uk


er yes

28.02.2011 08:03

City of London police have said in a recorded police interview that if you say write or publish anything , even if it is 100% true, if it upsets or causes offence then a criminal offence as been committed and they have a statutory duty to prosecute

er yes, it is true, has been for about 60 years.

it is the offensive nature of the comment that is the key, not the truth of it.

Its like saying, most uni graduates who took politics, media and social politics will be unemployed and wasted thier time as they are pointeless corses. the message is correct but there is offence taken by some, therefor it requires investigation to determine if the message was INTENDED to cause offence.

anon by right