#TakeVAT lands at Heathrow
Dorothy Perkins | 12.02.2011 13:08 | Public sector cuts
#TakeVAT activists met up at Green Park before heading off for Heathrow's Terminal 3 on the Picadilly Line. Fun and games followed, with press being told that they can't film and protestors being told that they would be arrested for aggravated tresspass if they didn't leave the teminal.
Dorothy Perkins
Homepage:
http://london.indymedia.org/tumbles/promoted
Comments
Hide the following 15 comments
Question ?
12.02.2011 15:57
So is there no VAT on airline tickets?
Sorry I don't know because I don't take airlines, there not safe!
(and bad for the environment)
anon
Is this a joke?
12.02.2011 16:36
If you are VAT registered, then you have to add 20% to the price of any goods or services you sell. Every quarter, you then give this money to the government. Basically, the companies are "tax-collectors" on behalf of the government.
Companies who deal in VAT-exempt services such as flights or cakes simply don't charge the customer VAT in the first place! They arn't dodging anything, its the customer who isn't paying the tax, not the business.
Of course, you seem to also forget that customers pay airport taxes and huge taxes on fights already (they just arnt called VAT). The last flights i had over half the cost was just tax.
anon
Spot on
12.02.2011 17:43
And if he forced those of us who have bought items from the Channel islands, this avoiding VAT, to pay an extra 20%, they would also congratulate him.
Paul
Make air travel VAT exempt
12.02.2011 19:29
This stops the airlines reclaiming their input tax, whilst not adding any output tax which would simply be reclaimed by businesses
tax_trickery
its doable
12.02.2011 20:55
This stops the airlines reclaiming their input tax, whilst not adding any output tax which would simply be reclaimed by businesse
The businesses would just pass the extra costs onto the consumers....
One solution would be to make them pay normal VAT, but reduce flight tax by an equivilent amount. That way, they'd be paying their VAT (keeping the protestors happy) but the overall tax amounts would equate to the same amount (keeping the consumers happy).
Win-win situation
ed
Spin
12.02.2011 21:00
not richard murphy
And so?
12.02.2011 21:17
Paul
Ok, I've got it now!
12.02.2011 21:24
But if you charged VAT on airline tickets which are already heavily taxed, you'd be taxing tax!
What ever next? Charge VAT on road fuel? The people would never stand for it.
anon
zero rated
12.02.2011 21:49
not richard murphy
tax is tax whatever the name
12.02.2011 22:41
It seems most people with two brain cells realise that if the airlines costs were raised by having to pay their vat on supplies, then it would get passed straight to the ticket holders.
So thats what these protestors really want - to tax the ordinary customer more. Completely pointless as they would just reduce ADP if the airlines struggled to survive due to loss in sales.
Can anyone actually make sense of this protest?
mollycock
Moreover...
13.02.2011 06:46
Is that really what TakeVAT wants?
Paul
It's a sneaky anti aviation protest
13.02.2011 15:10
Sneaky
I don't think airline tickets are taxed by the government
13.02.2011 20:56
Certainly aviation fuel is zero-taxed, unlike car fuel and fuel for heating your home. So poor pensioners are taxed for the fuel they use but rich execs flying round the world aren't.
Apparently the original reason for this is that in the early days of flying, the League of Nations (the precursor to the United Nations) wanted to encourage international travel so that cultures to learn about each other more and discourage outbreaks of war in the future.
anon
doubtful
13.02.2011 21:45
I doubt it. But when i last flew to Canada, it was specifically outlined on the quote the amount of tax. I can't remember how much be it was over half. I doubt they'd get away with lying be stating things were tax when they weren't.
The funny thing was, there was a checkbox on the order page saying "would you like to offset your carbon usage against a tree planting scheme?". It was already ticked and cost £40.
I just unticked it and got the price £40 cheaper!! It says a lot about how many people must leave it ticked...... who knows where that money goes. If you are so bothered, then better giving the £40 to something where you know what is being done with the money.
>> Certainly aviation fuel is zero-taxed, unlike car fuel and fuel for heating your home. So poor pensioners are taxed for the fuel they use but rich execs flying round the world aren't.
Correction: We "ALL" get taxed on fuel. The poor pensioners get a winter fuel allowance to offset this.
>> Apparently the original reason for this is that in the early days of flying, the League of Nations (the precursor to the United Nations) wanted to encourage international travel so that cultures to learn about each other more and discourage outbreaks of war in the future.
Well i guess that didn't turn out as planned! multi-culturalism at its best.
anon
there is Air Passenger Duty but I think that is it
14.02.2011 22:58
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_Passenger_Duty
It is a per-person excise tax for leaving the country and increases depending how far you are flying.
anon